Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Correct me if I'm wrong:
1) According to OTC Reporting Standards: https://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/reporting-standards ...
2) and being that NWBO is listed with the SEC: https://sec.report/Ticker/NWBO ...
3) NWBO (OTCQB) is under the following reporting requirements:
A Company's Obligations on the OTCQX, OTCQB and Pink Market:
- Financial Reporting - Many companies are not subject to SEC registration requirements, and therefore, do not make regular filings of financial information and other corporate events with the SEC. Companies are not required to provide financial information to OTC Markets Group; however in order for investors to make informed trading decisions, many companies elect to provide disclosure. For a detailed explanation of SEC registration and reporting requirements and the exemptions available from those requirements, please see the SEC's Small Business Question and Answer Page.
- Corporate Actions - SEC Rule 10b-17 requires all OTCQX, OTCQB and Pink companies to provide timely notice to FINRA of certain corporate actions, including dividends, stock splits, reverse splits, name changes, mergers, acquisitions, dissolutions, bankruptcies or liquidations, at least 10 days prior to the record date. Companies who fail to report such corporate actions in the required time may be subject to fines up to $5,000. For more information, see FINRA's Notice to Member 10-38. For further details, contact FINRA's Operations Department at 866-776-0800
I find NOWHERE in the SEC 8k filing instructions (https://www.sec.gov/files/form8-k.pdf) or requirements (listed below) any requirement for a company to publish data, such as negative TLD data, within 4 business days (of being unblinded / made known of the data)
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/243.100
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/243.101
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/243.102
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/243.103
The only information I find is related to Corporate Actions (actions they themselves have undertaken), and time requirements for OTC stocks, but nothing about information they have come upon, such as information about the results of their clinical trials, whether positive or negative.
If anyone has information / sources to support otherwise, I would really like to read this ... Does anyone find anything different?
I'm also in in the .30s ... but making that the point of a post just serves to boost one's own ego and is a waste of users' time reading and clicking through imo ...
Not sure what bragging accomplishes here ...
Great video someone posted on ST.
This is an LA Stories documentary on Dr Linda Liau, one of the primary brain doctors working with NWBOs DCVAX-L vaccine for Glioblastoma patients. The video is a bit long, but the first 5 mins show the vaccine in vials (without ever mentioning the name of it or NWBO, since its only about Liau). They position the vaccine as her secret weapon... and she is very humble not to take full credit for it, but also not talk about the company behind it, which would be illegal until top line data is announced.
I have a really good feeling that the TLD is going to be awesome
https://spectrumnews1.com/ca/la-west/la-stories/2019/04/08/la-stories--renowned-brain-surgeon-dr--linda-liau#
Because of penny stock scams ... ST didnt want to be involved in the legal battles. They ended OTC support in 2016 after many lawsuit attempts by ST users. For some reason, they are allowing it again. Maybe they updated their T&Cs to indemnify themselves or something. Either way, OTC is back. But not sure of foreign traded OTC life RLFTF
All OTC stocks added back to stocktwits (supposedly)
OTC stocks back on stocktwits.
I live in Zurich - not closed this week.
Supply and demand ... the supply is in the BILLIONS
No chance. RLF is partnered already. And NeuroRx will merge with a NYSE company in the next 3-6 months.
Its not an OTC stock in the sense most people think. Roche AG is a MAJOR Swiss BP traded on the SIX (Swiss Exchange) ... to sell their stock in the US, is has to be listed as a foreign traded OTC. Its like that with RLF (Relief Therapeutics) as well, traded US OTC as RLFTF.
SURVEY - What's' the likelihood (% chance) that the stock price does NOT go above $2.50 again? and Why do you think that?
(for example: if bad or unimpressive TLD results, and/or an unimpressive reaction to TLD results)
.. there IS a % Chance that this doesn't play out like we hope - I'd like to gauge what odds everyone here is playing / expecting ...
Penguin, JB is right - there is a plan for Inhaled Aviptadil(1) and very likely in a portable inhaler form as well for cases of "moderate" covid(2) - like what Elon Musk likely has right now(3)
Moderate to Severe cases is what they mention. Moderate Covid likely does not have you in in-patient treatment, but at home (like Musk and others) with self-use treatment materials (like an inhaler).
Severe cases, esp. with respiratory failure, will indeed have you in in-patient therapy with locally administered inhaled treatments in a fix inhaler (as opposed to a portable one)
So I believe that those purporting the high likelihood of an Inhaler for Aviptadil are right on in their assessment / expectations.
1 - https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fda-grants-inhaled-use-ind-for-rlf-100-aviptadil-to-treat-patients-with-moderate-and-severe-covid-19-aiming-to-prevent-progression-to-respiratory-failure-301107288.html
2 - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04360096
3 - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54948005
The "sell" should have happened longer ago than that .. .and make money with that money in the meantime, and then find a better re-entry here. People dont seem to know how / why / when to take losses and move on...
Seems a lot of people here do not understand that strategy and how to make their money work for them, instead of holding onto losses for literally years when they could be making money for years, day after day after day.
Dear LearningCurve: Why should anyone be banned for being of the opinion that people should take their losses and move on, if all they can do is populate our boards with complaints and cannot handle the situation they are in? ... IMO, Its very good advice to people who cannot handle losing money ... holding onto losses forever is how bad traders become bag holders forever, not knowing anything about risk- and money management and setting loss limits and moving on and/or finding a better entry.
The general amount of ignorance on this board disappoints me.
The board was a lot better 2-3 months ago, before all of these ignorant, self-entitled newbies showed up and blasted this board with useless junk, making it no better than any other board on this site. This board was one of the few well structured boards with great posts all the time - now my time is wasted having to sift through worthless message after worthless message.
I miss the intelligent, well thought out research posts by brilliant long-term investors here - and the really great DISCUSSION that followed and supported that.
Why do the admins / moderators here not block all of the off-topic nonsense here? And ban people who blast this board with multitudes of useless messages.
If they aren't happy in this stock, why don't they sell their positions, man up and take their losses, and leave????? Why make this board their own personal Cry-Baby Room?
Re: Lending Shares:
"Where are Short Sellers Borrowing Stock From?
To borrow a stock, you need someone to lend it. Brokerage firms fill this role. With limited exceptions, short sellers are borrowing from brokerage firms. Does that mean that your brokerage firm is lending out your securities to another party who is actively hoping to drive down the price of the stock? The answer: it might be.
To be clear, your brokerage firm cannot lend out your stocks without your permission. However, you may have signed a customer agreement that explicitly allows your broker to lend out your securities. This clause is often tucked deep within the customer agreement, and few investors pay much attention to it. In many cases, investors who have a margin account with their brokerage firm will be asked to sign a hypothecation agreement. This agreement generally gives the brokerage firm the right to lend shares of securities that you own."
Source: https://www.sonnlaw.com/faq/can-my-broker-lend-my-shares/
KZ: Thanks! Very interesting. So it looks like Kevin Duffy did a short 7-month stint at NWBio and went back to Merck just as Covid broke out severely in the US in March.
Indeed it is interesting to read into, but I would read into that very differently than thinking he went back to Merck to take NWBO with him - Instead, I would read into his bio via the Timeline of it all, seeing the important element being "when" he went back to Merck (March) and what was going on in the world / USA at that time (COVID breakout), in which he case he probably decided to take up the opportunity to be the Medical Science Research Director around research primarily related to Covid. I wouldn't have assumed it would be around GBM and taking NWBO with him to Merck for a BO. That logic is just wishing thinking born of dollar signs in investors' eyes, imo.
How did the MERCK rumour start?
What's the justification for so many people pushing RUMOURS like this? IMO, it just sets so many people up for disappointment when something less happens, and does all investors a huge disservice.
What are your thoughts?
They already publicised that information. It will be added on 30. November.
It was only a couple million shares. Someone could have decided they wanted their money now instead of waiting until after the new year. I live in Switzerland. There are many private investors here with millions and tens of millions of shares bought in the pennies. Nothing to worry about in my opinion unless you see tens of millions being dropped over and over and over. Otherwise, its probably one holder liquidating some funds, which they probably do on a normal / monthly basis.
Well said, GG, well said! #AviptadilStopsCovid
FAQ: "When can we expect to receive a response from the FDA to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application filed at the end of September?
The FDA does not have a specific timeline by which it must respond to an EUA application and so, unfortunately, we are not able to provide further clarity on the timing of an agency response. With this in mind, a response could come before or after top-line data are released from our Phase 2b/3 trial in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Top-line data are currently expected in January 2021.
Comparisons between RLF-100™ and company products recently granted EUA cannot be drawn. For one, there is no way to determine when a company filed an EUA application unless a company discloses this information, which is not common practice. We did so to provide the utmost of transparency to our investors and stakeholders. It is important to note that the receipt of an EUA by any other company would not exclude RLF-100™ from being granted EUA as well. RLF-100™ in its current trial is used as a therapeutic for the most critical patients. To our knowledge, there is no other drug currently available on the market or in late-stage clinical development that specifically focuses on this patient population."
https://relieftherapeutics.com/investor-relations
IF that were so true, then I would expect people here to be on OTHER PUBLIC forums talking about the drug, not the INVESTOR forums. - Otherwise, its like religious believers on a church's website (oh wait, the "public" in your words), pushing for political campaigns. Its the wrong venue ... should be done elsewhere by groups with a different motivation - this is "INVESTOR" hub ... get it?
Go push that stuff on Facebook groups and YouTube videos or somewhere else where the discussed publicly, but when its pushed by investors, the FDA knows that stuff and it plays AGAINST what investors really want. No-one wants to feel forced to accept something by investors ... thats like a hostile takeover attempt by people after financial gains, which EVERYONE here is .. again, this is INVESTOR hub ... not "Social Butterflies Forum"
Whoever said lives shouldn't be saved? Re-read my message instead of reading the message your mind wants to read. The point was about where the pressure is coming from and investors going over Javitts head (claiming saving lives, but really impatiently hoping to increase their bank accounts). I said let the public (instead of investors) makes this push, separate from the INVESTOR BOARDS who are obviously motivated by PROFIT, not goodwill towards man. It would be like churches pushing for political campaigns on their church websites, which isn't supposed to happen. See the hypocrisy and inappropriateness yet? Or still blinded by greed (and justifying in your head as if its only about saving lives)?
Sad to see this stuff being pushed so hard by investors who want to profit financially ... this stuff should be driven by public demand - not investors. It sends the wrong message pushing stuff this way on these forums. I am heavily invested in this stock, but regardless, I don't support efforts like this. It leaves the wrong taste in the mouth of the FDA and others when they hear the company's name or the product name, associated with investors trying to force them to approve things. Very sad to see this ... let things take their natural course...
Dr. Javitt is deeply connected with the FDA. He is doing all of the right things to set this up for approval. Just because impatient investors are not getting their money quick enough, doesn't mean that we need to break the chain of command and try to force things to move at our speed. I really really disagree with this selfish mentality. This is an experimental drug. The FDA "is" aware of it. Forcing their hand with investor-led petitions isn't the right way, and I highly doubt Dr. Javitt would support those efforts publicly.
Halberd Corp. CEO Interviewed on Money TV
This guy has his sh!t together. I'm loaded here looking forward to the progress on their nasal spray. I'd take a nasal spray prevention over an injected vaccine any day! And I think many others would too!
YouTube (Audio interview):
25 million share BUY at 09:42:42 at $0.0265 ... wow!
Bloomberg Radio (Drew Armstrong, guest) is talking right now about the importance of Therapeutics, despite having vaccines on the market .... https://www.bloomberg.com/audio
So you are ready to take the vaccine, Squidy? ... I doubt most people at all would want to take the vaccine. There is very little trust in such a speedy vaccine, which is why multi-dose sprays and symptom reducing therapeutics are in very high demand by investors right now. SMART investors know this ... so, I would be careful who are calling "Junior" around here ... less you expose your own short comings as well ...
its NEW! if you download the PDF, it says it was first published yesterday, on 09 Nov. 2020 as 10.1137/jito-2020-SITC2020.0878 (you have to read the vertical text on the right hand margin)
or click on Article Info tab and look under Publication History section:
Citation
Bosch M, Liau L, Ashkan K 787 Phase III clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cells in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 2020;8:doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.0787
Publication history
First published November 9, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 09, 2020
Did I read correctly that the SNO presentation is canceled????
Not true, at all! -
Current Makert Cap of all shares (1,422,593,000) @ $0.0025 = $3.5m .... they are authorising 43% more money than needed at current prices to buy back up to 70% of their shares ...
this is going to create some huge price jumps if shareholders SET THEIR ASKS VERY HIGH
PR: 70% Buyback - "SACRAMENTO, CA , Oct. 28, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- via NewMediaWire -- Today BrewBilt Manufacturing Inc. (the “Company”) (OTCPINK: BBRW), announced that the company management, legal team and auditing team have agreed to increase the share buyback from $1.5M to $5M , while its revenues continue to expand.
Jef Lewis , CEO, stated, “I am sensitive to the shareholders who want information on our share buyback program. The share buyback is in progress, and we will be increasing the buyback up to $5M through 12/31/2021 in order to repurchase more than 70% of our float. This buyback in conjunction with expanding revenue will assure a more concrete equity floor for our shareholders. This week BrewBilt received $1.2M in new customer orders for brewery equipment and an order for cannabis equipment. There is a spike in orders relative to COVID customers who have decided to move forward with their business expansion into craft beer. These orders include a $500,000 for a local bay area customer that consists of a 30 BBL system. The Europe order is a 10 BBL system for $350,000 , and the Arizona order is a large 20 BBL system with additional equipment for $700,000 . The cannabis equipment being sold is for $85,000 for support equipment to work with the cold water extraction system.”
Meet BrewBilt Chairman at https://www.brewbilt.com/media
MASSIVE SQUEEZE potential is the one good thing I see out of all of this short selling... they will be forced to cover, and I only hope it can't be quick enough ....
I would laugh so hard if they released positive TLD tonight or tomorrow morning LOL ...
Gap filled 1.73 - 1.81 .... can go back up now ...
Do you realise that spreading unfounded rumours like "Merck" creates additional hype and eventual disappointment which could negatively affect the share price? ... discussing your hopes and dreams is one thing, but phrasing it in a way as if it is an inevitability does a major disservice to all investors...