Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not what are. What were? The LQMT IP has been used by this company for over five years. The products of this company have been restricted from the USA.
Were the USA restrictions lifted? I don’t think so.
Are USA companies permitted to earn revenue from parts sold in its footprint in Europe? If so, I saw no revenues reflected in LQMT’s bottom line from abroad as these products have been sold in parts of LQMT’s footprint abroad.
No $$$ has been reflected yet in LQMT’s bottom line. No lawsuits have been filed.
LL’s job title is to oversee the CEO’s fiduciary responsibilities along with the other executives.
What are the ramifications? Simple if LQMT cannot collect a penny from any of these part sales. The ramifications are the same as LQMT failing to sign a deal with any company here in the USA that might use LQMT’s amorphous metal! The revenues decrease and the investment dice roll remains a failure until LQMT increases revenues or increases potentials to earn revenues. They do not increase when hype or speculation thinks so.
The ramifications are simple and were simple. The fundamentals never changed and the price dropped from 0.44 to where it is today around 0.06 cents!
As always I could be wrong and usually I am. Could be the reason why trading volumes have declined significantly are due to the fact that most who wanted to average down, have done so.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
We need it!
Yes, it would have been nice in hindsight had we all sold even at TC’s stock options SP in 2017. We then would all have had the opportunity to buy back in at .06 .07 .08 etc.
Who knew?
Good luck to you.
Why don’t they discuss the reasons for failures more openly so that all outsiders can have a better understanding to make suggestions to help turn the next potential clients into successful ones.
From what I can make out of all of their commentary and hundreds of pipeline prototype dreams they have touted is that they never ever want to have that honest conversation with outside investors in the first place. They seem to be always hiding something. Or as you eloquently put it in other words Maybe they have nothing to hide because they are doing nothing.
It’s just a thought and not a conclusion. But what the hell have they done to dispute it? As far as I can see, nothing! Not even is there any live public dialogue between shareholders and the company.
Can anyone positive or bullish, negative or bearish, bashers or sycophants, pumpers or dumpers, tell me and document, when was the last time LQMT had a public forum between outside shareholders and the company, where back and forth dialogue took place?
Tic tic tic tic tic tic.
Good luck to you.
So with all of the many new products out there that can potentially use amorphous metal parts the bottom line is and without any disrespect is that you are still not sure.
And who the hell can blame you? After two decades of the same nonsense from LQMT failing to perform.
One thing is for sure. It’s not the investors who are falling at guessing success for LQMT. It’s LQMT who are falling all, who are guessing for LQMT’s success.
!!!It is LQMT who are failing at success!!!
Another week passes and LQMT is up 3.1% from 0.062 cents to 0.0639 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
It has been 16 months since a new contract.
All of their recent financial statements 10K’s and 10Q’s back this up and are in direct contrast and at odds with any spin given by anyone outside of LQMT who believe LQMT is doing just fine and deals are imminent.
Any share price under .25 cents tells me LQMT is not doing fine and anemic trading volumes are also telling me LQMT is not doing fine. Both have to increase at the same time.
The trend for LQMT is to continue to head lower. This fact has been proven all the while LQMT had $64.5 million $55 million $45 million or $35 million in assets and makes no difference how many shares an insider owned during the same time frame of seven years. (See LQMT’s filed statements for the same time frame if anyone needs proof.)
New real interest in LQMT has dissipated from new outsiders. (See trading volumes.)
Manufacturing capacity is not what is preventing LQMT from inking a deal according to TC @ LQMT!!!
Of course I disagree with his position about a backup supplier. But maybe he knows he has a deal in the works without one and that is purely speculation on my behalf. And if he doesn’t have a deal in the works without a backup manufacturer then someone is definitely pulling his strings also as I noted in a recent post.
Li’s consortium of companies abroad are claiming to be doing deals and contracts with whales.
The logic for many to hang on is if Li, can do it abroad what prevents him from doing it in the USA? Or what prevents TC from doing what his mentor has been doing abroad?
For others it is (fear of missing out) FOMO.
Even the most ardent upbeat enthusiasts are grasping at straws as research for information has turned into continuous guesses and less actual DD on LQMT.
The use of LQMT IP BY CHINA IN THE PAST HAS BEEN RESTRICTED TO CHINA’s FOOTPRINT.
There is some proof on the www that LQMT’s IP USE IN PARTS HAVE TRICKLED INTO LQMT’s FOOTPRINT.
So far it means absolute dukas!!! (Read LQMT’s filed statements for proof.)
The LQMT website has a ton of information and is constantly being updated. I have posted some of what was known to me but not all of what is there with the purpose of getting all invested in LQMT to focus on LQMT and not to speculate. There is a trail of real (….&- - - -.)
THERE ARE ALSO CUES ON THESE PAGES AS TO WHY LQMT DOES NOT NEED A NDA FOR EVERY CONSUMER PART ENDEAVOR AND WHY THEY DO NOT HAVE TO UPDATE SHAREHOLDERS AS TO ANY PROGRESS. (Which I posted recently.)
HINT: Anyone see a lawsuit against the Apple headset?
All of the parts where LQMT uses forward worded language need no updates nor is LQMT indicating a potential sale, negotiation or progress towards any. Rather LQMT is displaying the capabilities and if interested a deal can ensue or one might be in the works or can be if one interested party is interested.
So that all might understand the last statement above, you have to do a little DD of the 10Q’s which were pointed out in a recent post.
What one outside of LQMT derives from this is speculation and anything else one wants to see and LQMT is in no way responsible for the spin that results from one’s imagination.
In other words sometimes LOGIC and FOMO are too embarrassing for many to hang on. So inventing and conjuring up other angles based on (so called great finds) good intentions becomes the reasons for hanging on. They don’t increase interest in LQMT or the bottom line. But they do seem more soothing for hanging on. Many in the last category cannot comprehend those who hang on for the first two reasons. Thus they tend to focus less on LQMT and more on things that have nothing to do with LQMT, as if in the know. This too, has been going on for more years then I want to know.
Perhaps in 2024 or 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2023, I’ll be very thankful and glad that they did.
Again, IMO, the share price be it a nickel or a dollar means dukas with volume under 2 1/2% of the float.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
FOMO LIVES! It is real. It is not speculative or hype. It is pure emotion. It probably is the real reason over any other for why anyone holds regardless of their positive, negative or realistic views.
Be it in auto medical industrial or non CE etc., a significant contract in any endeavor will rocket up the share price. Take the blinders off. It does not have to be CE, but I don’t think anyone would complain if it is.
There is nothing wrong with expecting skies are the limit or beyond. It just might take more time to get there. Time that many long terms don’t have any more.
Most LQMT investors too who only bank on LQMT.
Now, normally one would look at the charts after a dismal or should I say a disastrous 10Q and say; Wow! LQMT looks like it’s ready to breakout and bust out. The only problem with it is the daily trading volumes are still horrific, pitiful and anemic. Meaning the liquidity still (pardon my French)sucks. The liquidity tells anyone interested stay away unless you too want to roll the dice, where for the past two decades the payouts would violate the casino rules in Las Vegas.
The only reason IMHO, right now to throw a nickel or a dime at LQMT would be for FOMO.
There might be two other reasons for doing so. Either as an act of Christianity or as an act of temporary insanity. :)
As always my opinions are worth less than the price of a LQMT share.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
That is not true. Read the agreements again.
They have nothing to do with LQMT’s operations as far as inking contracts or how LQMT chooses to attract revenues up or down. But they do have the capability within the agreements to make it easier for LQMT to facilitate one and may have already done so.
They also must share through the CIP agreements in perpetuity or until the agreements are terminated.
Now, I could be wrong and I always am. But I don’t recall reading any specific terms regarding terminating or a time frame for terminating of the perpetual agreements.
Reread one of my recent posts and they (LQMT ) are under no obligation to state it.
It may be disrespectful in the way LL HAS MUZZLED AND TERMINATED FORMER EMPLOYEES FROM DISSEMINATING INFORMATION TO ALL OUTSIDERS. But that is just the way it is unless they are violating S.E.C. regulations.
The word help in this case is not narrow it is very broad. But if you look at it within a very narrow range, then you are correct.
Come on now. A true believer in chairman Li, who receives emails from chairman Li, never ever doubts the success of LQMT and never ever would express doubt of LQMT’s success and a true believer who receives emails from both LL & TC never ever let’s their e-mail buddies down at LQMT.
So far from reading all of the posts I have not found a true believer who has communicated or communicates with either one by email. :)
How about when one purports to be doing everything and puts out a10Q like they did it’s even more of a reason to keep it a secret. :)
At least if they said as you say they did nothing it is easy to see the bottom line results. But it’s more disgraceful when they show nothing while stating all of their efforts to do something.
Is there no shame in collecting salaries much larger than a 10Q?
NDA’s should not take this long to disclose all of the failures. In fact all of the failures are already known.
15 months and zero insignificant contracts! You don’t need an nda to sell insignificant contracts! You need to wake up every morning and go to work!! Or hand in a letter of resignation!!!
LL SURE KNOWS HOW TO PUT ON A FANTASTIC MARIONETTE SHOW
https://www.marionettes.cz/en/detail/326-pinocchio-handcarved-marionette
Good luck to you.
I have posted this page before and I believe at the time all were caught by surprise at the message and part’s pictures.
https://liquidmetal.com/consumer-electronics/
What I did not post was why LQMT has this on their website at all. Reason being is I don’t like to speculate as I did when I began to invest in LQMT. Like most others who speculate it sets you up for more disappointment period.
That said, from reading the 2010 agreements and subsequent additions and their terms for confidentiality I can only speculate, LQMT requested and was granted a waiver regarding using the term consumer electronics and a limited use. Or whatever parts they want to prototype and hopefully sell do not violate the agreements.
In previous statements by former executive BB, LQMT did state they were researching for a part or parts that don’t violate the law regarding (CE) consumer electronics. He (LQMT) would not state that at that time (a couple of years ago) if the 2010 and subsequent amendments were not in perpetuity.
Sometimes we only see what we only want to see or our vision for other obvious points of views are obstructed by the elephant in the room.
We do know one of the parties to the agreements is like an elephant and we do know the other is like a nat trapped in the eye of that elephant.
We also know that there are no active lawsuits against LQMT.
Again, I detest speculation. But let’s face it LQMT is often referred to as a roll of the dice, a crapshoot. So if what my thoughts are on this subject is considered speculative. So be it. But I do so in a positive way and not in a way that I expect a windfall soon. Just the possibility of it however remote based on historical and present day data released from LQMT.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
I wish TC luck.
Unfortunately for outsiders myself included, TC doesn’t seem to be a very good crapshooter.
Perhaps for all, his luck will change.
From current data flowing in it doesn’t seem like it is the material or the manufacturing capacity holding back a successful dice roll.
From the looks of all of the rebuttals, I would say you are correct in your points of view.
I forgot who said this but it goes something like this: Dumb people do not learn from their mistakes. Smart people learn from their mistakes and Geniuses learn from the mistakes of others.
I don’t try to place anyone in any of those categories for anyone who invested in LQMT IMO, has so far made a mistake whether they are up or down in LQMT or whether anyone is in it for 20 years or 1 year.
I do believe in why all are still in it and that end result will either place everyone in the first category or the last. :)
Eagle nailed it; FOMO.
It was great reading your post. It was the most purest glass of clean drinking water posted in a long time. It may not be easy for everyone to digest. But to me it was honest.
Good luck to you.
What LQMT is saying In essence and in my opinion regarding their last filled statement and since China vis-à-vis Eontec vis-à-vis LL has been telling outsiders, is this….
Where does one begin to argue against your position, after comparing what has been said during the cc’s vs what has been stated in the 10Q’s and 10K’s.
To attempt to do so would probably tarnish one’s own credibility.
Good luck to you.
Why its not LQMT…
https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/spinal-orthopaedic/cervical-arthroplasty/prestige-lp.html
In trying to research LQMT & medical. Often (100%) you come across why it is not LQMT.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
If you don’t know why? Read the last 10Q again for the first time.
Another week passes and LQMT is down 6% from 0.066 cents to 0.062 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
The trend for LQMT is to continue to head lower as it has been doing for six years now. This downward trend is factually backed up with the daily anemic outside interest, anemic daily trading volumes insignificant contracts, a loss of two major customers and operating costs exceeding incoming revenues from all sources continually. ( see accumulated debt annually.)
The dice roll therefore still rests on individual expectations, hopes, theories and for the most part FOMO as real interest in LQMT has dissipated from new outsiders.
To put it more plainly, manufacturing capacity is not what is preventing LQMT from inking a deal according to LQMT!!!
Li’s consortium of companies abroad are claiming to be doing deals and contracts with whales not just gold fish companies like LQMT!!! And if li can do it abroad what prevents him from doing it in the USA? The CCP? Or Nothing? Or something else? Or what prevents TC from doing what his mentor has been doing abroad? Or maybe he is doing something. We don’t exactly know. The pictures tells a story of prototypes worth many many millions. The 10Q’s and 10K’s do not!
Even the most ardent upbeat enthusiasts are grasping at straws as research for information has turned into continuous guesses and less actual DD on LQMT.
The LQMT website has a ton of information and is constantly being updated. I have posted some of what was known to me but not all of what is there with the purpose of getting all invested in LQMT to focus on LQMT and not to speculate. There is a trail of real (….&- - - -). All anyone can do is hope they connect with the bottom line one day soon. One day soon before all drop dead!
Could be a major reason why very few new dice rollers are placing bets at the LQMT table. They would rather increase the winning odds by paying a higher share price on a sure thing.
Perhaps in 2024 or 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2023, I’ll be very thankful and glad that they did.
Again, IMO, the share price be it a nickel or a dollar means dukas with volume under 2 1/2% of the float.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
FOMO LIVES! It is real. It is not speculative or hype. It is pure emotion. It probably is the real reason over any other for why anyone holds regardless of their positive, negative or realistic views. If you don’t believe FOMO lives. Just take a walk around the www and see the ever increasing grasping at straws info vs the actual decrease in DD and actual research in all aspects of LQMT’s endeavors. Be it in auto medical industrial or non CE etc., a significant contract in any endeavor will rocket up the share price. Take the blinders off
In lieu of this week’s LQMT 10Q release, This weeks post except for the share price change is identical to last week’s post and is fitting. The bottom line outcome only surprises those expecting much from so little. Mind you I know it is extremely difficult to deal in reality when it comes to LQMT.
It has not been easy for me to stay on point week after week regarding the reality of what LQMT reports vs what may be expected.
There is nothing wrong with expecting skies are the limit or beyond. It just might take a little more time to get there. Time that many long terms don’t have any more.
It’s not DD. What you say, what you want and what you desire and what every outside shareholder deserves from LQMT executives are very reasonable and sound answers and expectations.
But in reality those logical and realistic points of view you point out just does not sit well with LQMT’s DD on disseminating information or updates unless they are required by law.
In other words It’s not DD.
Don’t misunderstand what I am saying. As many do. I am in total agreement with all of your points of view. It’s just that the executives of LQMT are legally not!
And there In lies the disconnect and discontent between LQMT and outside shareholders who believe in the expectations of the words; “being reasonable. “
But, unfortunately it’s not DD.
For starters read page 2 & 18 of the 10Q of LQMT.
Never give up those values and views. Just keep in mind of the reality of what you are dealing with when investing in LQMT. It often sucks and it often is reality and I know you know it and that is what is called doing your DD. Hopes dreams expectations and compassion are all very nice. But again, unfortunately right now it just doesn’t fit the narrative of LQMT and their relationship with outside shareholders.
As always my opinions are worth less than the price of a LQMT share.
Good luck to you.
LQMT Sales…
Annually:
12-2022 $383 thousand
12-2021 $811 thousand
12-2020 $989 thousand
12-2019 $1,373 one million.373 thousand
Not exactly headed in the right direction are they?
And even if the numbers were reversed they still wouldn’t be enough to increase shareholder value.
The answer will always be…
Where are the contracts for profitability?
No guessing no what ifs no maybes.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
About those watches…
“In March 2009, we entered into a license agreement with Swatch Group, Ltd. (“Swatch”) under which Swatch was granted a non-exclusive license to our technology to produce and market watches and certain other luxury products. In March 2011, this license agreement was amended to grant Swatch exclusive rights as to watches as against all third parties (including us), but non-exclusive as to Apple. We will receive royalty payments over the life of the contract on all Liquidmetal products produced and sold by Swatch. The license agreement with Swatch will expire on the expiration date of the last licensed patent.”
Source LQMT 10K.
https://www.upcounsel.com/an-exclusive-contract#:~:text=An%20exclusive%20contract%20is%20between%20at%20least%20two,provide%20new%20opportunities%20and%20bring%20in%20additional%20revenue.
https://juro.com/learn/exclusivity-meaning-exclusive-contract
So the more complicated questions might be this since Liquidmetal parts have possibly trickled onto LQMT’s footprint…
Is LQMT circumventing any exclusive agreements between LQMT and The Swatch Group, by collecting revenues from a competitor who contracted with a manufacturer in China and may have an agreement to pay LQMT X amount of $$$ per part? Is yihao obligated at all to pay out?
I don’t see any agreements to that are in effect between yihao and LQMT regarding Eontec and LQMT.
So did li vis-à-vis China circumvent the agreements to avoid sharing any $$$ sales where parts are sold outside of China’s footprint?
I can go on and on with the hypothetical questions. So far the only answers are is that LQMT has received squat.
And no lawsuits have been issued. So either we assume no laws are broken. Laws are broken. LQMT is in cahoots and on and on , which gets us nowhere but distracted from the fact that it has been well over a year since LQMT has announced any deal or 8K to increase shareholder value.
The hypotheticals and the hype mean bullshit until the bullshit increases the share price!
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Yep, as far as I can remember, when imagining revenues with LQMT there is always a big fricken “IF”. Always a gray area. Never does one want to deal with the black and white facts of the past or present. The future has always been about moving the goalposts to fit one’s positive position.
Dealing with the present facts and 0.06 cent share price never fits that narrative, when imagining LQMT’s future. It’s been this way for over a decade. Perhaps more.
For sure the future can’t be based on LQMT’s actual results. No one dare reference those numbers. It has to be based on ifs maybes and other schemes.
As I recall this was the question: “Are those LQMT USA agreements with The Swatch Group still exclusive? ”
Are those LQMT USA agreements with The Swatch Group still exclusive?
Time to do some DD.
Since no one else said it. Of course if they have a plan to ink contracts and make use of their trademark then it can go above two dollars a share and at that point and only at that point reverse split to reduce the ridiculous amount of outstanding shares or initiate a plan to buy back 25% of those shares. Nothing like seeing confidence from insiders to drive more interest in the company. At that point skies the limit for the share price.
Anyone see a business plan? Hmmm?
Why do I ask? Hype, NDA’s and the bottom lines of 10Q expectations just don’t cut it anymore. Neither are fees of 6% with a burn rate of 5% and growing.
Oh well, let’s hope one of those 21 darts they hired hits a significant target and it sticks.
They slowed down the hemorrhaging at the expense of revenues. (Study income statements before the OH and after the OH in LF CA..)
China then from what I see, proved companies are interested in the materials, terminated executives at LQMT during the entire process and excluded LQMT USA from those revenues by restricting sales to their footprint. But now the cat is out of the bag and all here are expecting the same to happen. The big problem with this is the supplier. Whales need guarantees and LQMT cannot give them that under the current plan of infrastructure. When a planted ceo tells you the company doesn’t need domestic capabilities to ink a whale. The ceo is either lying or has a deal or his strings are being pulled. And don’t blame TC. Who the heck would turn down a quarter of a million just to have a title and not worry about anything else?
It’s why very few give a rats about the upcoming 10Q. Remember not too long ago, when there was a lot of excitement and enthusiasm before one of those? The share price would pop on the hype and there would be real interest and high hopes and expectations!!! The volumes would increase not decrease. The share price would increase not decrease. Imagine now, many will think it’s great when they see the pps go from the nickels to eight cents. How pathetic.
It should be going past a dollar not a dime every time LQMT inks a deal. The contracts should be significant and not insignificant.
My opinions are always worth less than the price of a LQMT share.
And even though the share price can drop to 0.01 cents a share, IMO BASED ON ITS ASSETS CURRENTLY ITS WORTH AT LEAST 0.03 cents a share.
As always my opinions are always worth less than the price of a share of LQMT.
As predicted LQMT closes below 0.06 cents.
Looks bad on paper. But means dukas due to anemic trading volumes. It would mean the same thing even if it were trading at 0.15 cents or Even ($1.00) one dollar a share. It would look good on paper, but you could not sell it to take a profit.
It’s why the wash rinse and repeat cycles work so well when they occur. Like the song “fools rush in.”
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Don’t be fooled by the price drop. It’s selling way above what it is worth. As Eagle often states. He is in it due to FOMO. With all of the data in so far, he has the most plausible reason for holding. I don’t think he is alone no matter what anyone’s views are. Positive, negative or realistic.
I don’t think it’s amazing when a company with revenue sales headed south doubles its outstanding shares, receives $64.5 million loses its domestic manufacturing facility and goes from 0.06 cents to 0.44 cents and back down to 0.0525 cents in 7 years time and has jack sheet to show for it. All at the same time the company in China purchasing its name (Liquidmetal) and ip is purportedly selling to whales using the same executive.
It’s not amazing. It sucks!
Like a poster once recently stated: “Get a grip. It’s a penny stock. Nuff said!”
Another valid observation as predicted past and present. LQMT dipped below 0.06 cents today. However, given the anemic volumes trading, it does not mean diddly squat. Except it looks bad on paper.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Any new contracts? Amazing how well the SP has been supported or as some would say manipulated. It definitely is not the potential holding it up. For some see great potential. If that were true we wouldn’t be the only geniuses holding shares. The volumes would be much higher and the share price would be closer to a dollar on the hype alone.
All valid points from a before and after observation.
Good luck to you.
Try telling these people it’s only a penny…
https://www.aaii.com/investingideas/article/23964-is-liquidmetal-technologies-inc-lqmt-stock-a-good-investment
Since it is not an anomaly, and the norm, I guess not. It has been so long since LQMT mentioned a repeat contract of a specific size. In fact, I don't recall anything being mentioned. Could be they (the customers) found a better material or a cheaper one or could not absorb the higher costs. I don't think it was fraud. There would have been lawsuits.
Déjà vu; Liquidmetal(R) Technologies (Nasdaq:LQMT) today announced that Samsung Electronics is using high-strength Liquidmetal(R) alloys for the hinge housings of its new SGH-E715 and SCH-E3200 model mobile phones--the latest in a growing line of Samsung models featuring the revolutionary material in this critical-performance application.
Press Release
Liquidmetal Technologies Produces Over 1 Million --And Counting-- High-Performance Hinge Components For Samsung Cell Phones
The above PR from LQMT happened in January 2004.
19 years ago.
Will they do it again?
For a few perhaps Déjà vu is another reason for holding and not just FOMO.
It’s 2023 19 years later and I sure could use a little more Déjà vu;.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Jan 21,2004. It could happen again.
Once in awhile it’s good to look back. Sometimes it’s better than what I can see right now. Don’t believe it? Just wait till you see the next 10Q.
Another week passes and LQMT is down 4.7% from 0.0693 cents to 0.066 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
The trend for LQMT is to continue to head lower as it has been doing for six years now. This downward trend is factually backed up with the daily anemic outside interest, anemic daily trading volumes insignificant contracts, a loss of two major customers and operating costs exceeding incoming revenues from all sources continually. ( see accumulated debt annually.)
The dice roll therefore still rests on individual expectations, hopes, theories and for the most part FOMO as real interest in LQMT has dissipated from new outsiders.
To put it more plainly, manufacturing capacity is not what is preventing LQMT from inking a deal according to LQMT!!!
Li’s consortium of companies abroad are claiming to be doing deals and contracts with whales not just gold fish companies like LQMT!!! And if li can do it abroad what prevents him from doing it in the USA? The CCP? Or Nothing? Or something else? Or what prevents TC from doing what his mentor has been doing abroad? Or maybe he is doing something. We don’t exactly know. The pictures tells a story of prototypes worth many many millions. The 10Q’s and 10K’s do not!
Even the most ardent upbeat enthusiasts are grasping at straws as research for information has turned into continuous guesses and less actual DD on LQMT.
The LQMT website has a ton of information and is constantly being updated. I have posted some of what was known to me but not all of what is there with the purpose of getting all invested in LQMT to focus on LQMT and not to speculate. There is a trail of real (….&- - - -). All anyone can do is hope they connect with the bottom line one day soon. One day soon before all drop dead!
Could be a major reason why very few new dice rollers are placing bets at the LQMT table. They would rather increase the winning odds by paying a higher share price on a sure thing.
Perhaps in 2024 or 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2023, I’ll be very thankful and glad that they did.
Again, IMO, the share price be it a nickel or a dollar means dukas with volume under 2 1/2% of the float.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
FOMO LIVES! It is real. It is not speculative or hype. It is pure emotion. It probably is the real reason over any other for why anyone holds regardless of their positive, negative or realistic views. If you don’t believe FOMO lives. Just take a walk around the www and see the ever increasing grasping at straws info vs the actual decrease in DD and actual research in all aspects of LQMT’s endeavors. Be it in auto medical industrial or non CE etc., a significant contract in any endeavor will rocket up the share price. Take the blinders off.
I lose.
Good luck to you.
Sometimes it is better to be silent…
Then to relive this debacle…
https://securities.stanford.edu/filings-case.html?id=103080
Silence is one thing. But this is ridiculous. This is not silence. This is on life support. This is what it is like to be in a dice roller coma. Where the trading range, trading volumes, trading liquidity, trading interests number of trades and trading share prices all add up to one thing. Dice rollers anemia.
Were the only I. V. Hook up is from the drip of the cash burn account. From the 64.5 million dollar penthouse down to the sub basement level of hype expectations and FOMO all are barely coexisting, until a contract of significance is achieved.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
I look at those pictures of parts LQMT so beautifully displays and I see $Cha $Ching hundreds of millions of dollars in revenues. Then I look at the executives and the bottom line and I say; what the Fuh. :)
Are we in the money yet?…
https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/LMPinChrome--martin-luxe-liquidmetal-bridge-pin-set-chrome
Hmmm?
And how come nobody ever mentioned….
The Liquidmetal® properties translate into a watchcase that is scratch-, dent-, and corrosion-resistant, and at the same time provides a high gloss that can be polished to a luxurious jeweler’s finish. Swiss luxury watchmaker TAG Heuer is featuring Liquidmetal® as the casing of a new, special edition timepiece.
https://spinoff.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/liquid_metal_web_3.jpg
Anyone?
Wasn’t this taken care of? Hmmm?
https://www.spews.org/technology/john-kang-liquidmetal-explained-in-plain-terms/
Then again far be it from me I'm no lawyer.
Where’s Brez?
Need a little more history….about LQMT?
https://www.liquidmetal-coatings.com/who-we-are/our-history/
Most folks here don’t know.
Might as well read a little, while waiting for $$$$
I thought this one was going to be huge, when I was into speculation and spin over 10 years ago…
https://www.swatchgroup.com/en/services/archive/2010/liquidmetalr
Not enough to keep Apple away.
Another Ouch!!!
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.