Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Mav - what evidence do you offer - direct, indirect, by inference - that the impact of the journal is “baked into” the share price? I just do not see that. OTOH this Board is full of negative commentary much of which would be discredited or disproven by a JA. And we could have a little FOMO bump even if temporary, but not necessary so.
Doesn’t really matter of course as the JA will or will not issue, but IMO the case that the JA I’ll have no effect is insubstantial.
I certainly may be wrong but at least I suggest a rationale and some limited factual support for my opinion.
barn and ATL just my 2 cents on JA impact (assuming it is published). This comment relates really to the timeline where JA precedes other important PRs.
I don’t see why the delay would have caused any reduced impact. Yes, daily followers are tuned to other things. But a large majority of those interested in the medical and scientific developments (assuming those are well developed in JA) will be impressed now just as much as would have occurred a year ago. The thinking otherwise I believe reflects and overweights our narrow view here. Best—
BB thanks. Agree. Thanks
Doc thx. Have a great weekend. Monday… who knows?
Bright- I’m down for that as well. Only been to London a couple of times not nearly enough. Put me on the list.
Gary yes we remember the spreadsheet. Also the one on TLD date. We’ll see on both.
wi: spoken like another resident of “flyover country!”
Gary and Mike I’m down for that. Gary has pm’ed me and I think you have my email. While we’re all bored here maybe we can be constructive and get a list of possible attendees. That would be more useful than other recent activity.
Mav I agree with your conditional premise that if all RA approvals are multiple months or longer in the future your accusations are merited. And that the few communications and more so lack of more fulsome communications leave longs guessing/hoping. I don’t think that will be the outcome. Good Luck to you and all others hoping/predicting that NWBO succeeds.
Thanks bio
Maverick- not to pick on your answer but I believe the first and last statements you attribute to LP are true - she and management “cannot wait” (meaning as colloquially used, “we are very excited”) to share unblinded results and they are working toward release of TLD. The second statement is not absolute but rather conditional and as a prediction must be judged against the task identified.
I am more bothered by silence amid extended delay. But I think the weight of factual evidence is that legitimate business reasons are more likely the motivation than purposeful fraud. IMO. Also, to your comment, I believe that plans change, which at least is a reasonable explanation for the withholding of TLD pending a JA.
Maverick the question was WHAT is your theory? The statement that “surely you have a theory “ (to support your personalized accusations) was as you know rhetorical.
Hope so hoff!
Maverick a sincere question. If you really believe that management is intentional in “playing with retail” and “hiding,” what is your theory about the reason they are doing so? Surely you have one?
Happy I agree 100%
Happy, actually I think the question is, “why are 70 internationally renowned experts (reportedly) appearing as co-authors on a journal article announcing a failed PIII result?” Along with, “why did the parents leave all that ammo and those guns lying all over the place?” in your analogy.
incline I love this post and I like you have reached my holding limit which is substantially more than I initially intended and substantially more than necessary if sp even only gets to $3.00 (tho I have small needs). I have one disagreement tho with your analysis. I personally believe that the extremely knowledgeable and sophisticated nay-sayers (“Nabobs of negativism” - love that) here very likely are long bc they don’t really believe the garbage they post. I’ve asked ex directly but that was deleted. Anyway thanks and have a nice evening!
Doc thanks for your reassuring view. I think this is more or less what has been and is happening. With the overlay that management won’t give anyone anything to sue over (lawyers — go figure!). Way too much time, activity and investment for a failed outcome not to mention we know there was no failed outcome. There, I feel better already!! GLTA!!
Happy: I agree that having a medical/scientific article with 70 internationally renowned authors is almost exactly like, as you say, “a parent leaves a house full of teens over the summer with an unlocked liquor cabinet, a few unsecured guns with accessible ammunition and parked cars with keys in the house and then puts one of the teens 'in-charge'.” The question is “how many internationally renowned experts who endorse DC Vax is too many?” Setting aside, of course, that the company doesn’t control the drafting or publication process. I hardly in fact can think of two situations more nearly identical!
Scotty what is the basis that you “think” the market is looking for NWBO revenue. That seems very doubtful imo
RJL a sincere question I am very very long but the delay is wearing. If there’s a deal and the signs are clear (according to some including yourself) why is there so little hedge/related institutional investment? I understand funds cannot buy OTC but there has to be literally billions of €€ and $$ that could buy before deal is announced that presumably will miss the SP jump. Appreciate any response private or public.
Yes that was my understanding thank you for confirming
BSB yes - I have the same question what do you mean hit the bid?
jammy - last post replies to yours
Why are you surprised in only one direction of market moves? Seems inconsistent if this is a genuine opinion. I recognize you are unlicensed perhaps that’s a reason(?).
Judge - Hunker down and don’t go out with that hat in, you’ll lose it. In fact, for our collective benefit, don’t go out at all!!
Thx Turner. My very amateur interpretation is shorts believed in August and earlier September it was safe to trade now they are getting more cautious.
Thanks I will!!
Viking would you mind posting the short info for 9/15 and history pls when you have it TIA
Key development was figuring how to inject without having antibodies destroy. Carried in fat bubble (sorry for non-technical explanation).
flip and kd8s - thx for timely question and good summary putting together several points that I have not seen strung together (of course I could have missed it!). GLTA, something has to happen … soon/eventually…
On the issue of what is “TLD” this is likely what the lawyers are relying on when they say TLD has not been released. And presumably this definition fits reasonably within the (presumed) embargo. Tx as always flip!
ae - NASDAQ claim tweet has been deleted
Stonk- I suspect that anyone who responds likely after some back and forth would be invited to pay to be a sponsor/presenter at the conference.
Hy. Get over it, move on, cease and desist.
skit: IMHO the best time for the JA to be released would be… tomorrow around noon! Or nearly as good, say 1:00 pm.
Stonk - yes including very large trades that seem to lower SP (I cannot determine for sure with my limited service). PS my friends who have purchased would probably like to cytogenetically preserve me…
Thx Judge. Have a nice weekend all.
Soj all the best look forward to your return (at a higher SP!)