Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well I’ve never seen them backtrack before. Hopefully a sign of bad things to come for Andrew Left
Did the citron report get taken down?? I can’t find it.
That video is the post of the century.
Would love to see that trade confirmation
Yes, I hear you loud and clear- same team, man. That being said, even in explosive growth, some indicators are still reliable intra-day or even intra-trend, which is where the RSI(5) maximum came from. I want that a quant whenever you get it hammered out. Happy to beta that for you, if you're looking for guinea pigs.
So if im reading that correctly, williams is calculating from 6/5 (14 periods ago), which we have since seen a 75% price increase from the close that day, and the extreme OB is just confirmation of a heavy uptrend, if not totally unreliable. That's my takeaway, anyway. I am not saying we aren't going to see a pullback- I hope we do, but I don't think momentum indicators are reliable for predicting a retracement when we are seeing 10-20% price increases per day at the open after a month and of half of relatively stable pricing. I am looking at RSI(5), max, right now.
HAHAHAHA- you're looking at a wiliamsm%r on a 3m? Or is that a 6m?? Thats a momentum indicator that is SOMETIMES reliable on like a 10d, but I wouldn't even trust it on a 5d in this market, much less with HIGHLY IRREGULAR price action. Thats a day trade indicator. We are all long on here. But you probably know more about the technicals than I do. What happens if you run it on a 1d??
HAAHAHAHA- WHAT????? This guy is hilarious!
"By mgmt announcing an add'l 100,000,000 to be floated they have in fact shorted it themselves.
Why? They're selling it and to guess who? YOU.
In effect it's just like a short."
O/B indicator?? I thought you were a technician- what are the inputs??
Sure, I can do that for you. People and institutions bought a bunch of shares, so the price went up. Then more joined in, so it kept going up. And now we’re at 5, so some of those people and institutions who bet against it going above 3 are in a tight spot, so they might need to buy some too, which would also make the price go up.
Absolutely bankrupt or “technically bankrupt?” HOPE those of you who were paying attention yesterday catch my drift
Interesting. What are you basing that on?
The Longs are euphoric over all the money we are printing right now. This must be brutal for the shorts.
No submission of what? What are you talking about? Good morning, by the way.
Sure but that wipes out all risk associated with holding until 100 (or whatever the additional indications are worth in sp value), and cash in hand now if you want it. I would take a 1:1 all day, and hold whatever is left after I buy a beach house for the additional indications to pump azn, then get a boat for the beach house.
Well, I guess right around the time the sp jumped 50% over three trading sessions (hard stop).
Hahaha Got it- hitting the red button now. Thanks for using the big letters. Best of luck to you.
No, not at all. What is your definition of bankrupt?
I would agree with that. The last 6ish months have been hard selling on positive news. Lots of premarket pump for news at the bell. This spike could very well be the load up going into something big. Which is good news for the longs, as long as they stay long. Potentially good news for shorts too. Everybody wins on Cydy haha.
Oh wow- so that other post about Nader’s compensation missed the mark big time, huh? That’s bizarre.
Sounds to me like a pretty average c-suite compensation package for a pre-rev Pharma company with a multi-billion dollar market cap at this stage in the approval process, but I guess im not as well versed in corporate compensation as you are. What would you say the industry standard is?
So would you say drugs like remdesivir have proven to be safe and effective per your definition of evidence and proof? Please explain what the FDA considers proof as opposed to evidence referencing remdesivir vs leronlimab. Ratio of Patients with adverse reactions? Rate of efficacy?You seem to know the process well. Help me understand.
BLA includes information from the trials, so obviously it is not available. The FDA is clearly complicit in this scheme. Nader payed them to play along, and they agreed to blind the results from the trials to fake everyone out. Everyone should be panic selling their shares right now.
Yes, I am familiar with the level of proof and/or evidence required by the FDA to satisfy each phase of a clinical trial. By meeting the primary endpoint in their phase 2b/3 trial for efficacy vs placebo/safety in a human trial at the presumed labeled doses, the criteria for proof and/or evidence was met. Would you agree? Please elaborate on the evidence required for a phase 3 clinical trial that has not already been satisfied.
Would you mind elaborating on this statement:
"The science shows evidence but no proof"
I appreciate all of you for your dedication to protecting me from myself. Without your sage advice, I may have accidentally bought in at .40 and 10x'd in less than a year, which would have been a shame. If you want to get ahead, buy high and sell low. Technical analysis: initial investment multiplied by 10. Also thanks for the pre-rev valuation. Obviously don't invest in pre-rev companies; that has never panned out for anyone. Pre-rev companies will never have revenues. Ever. Fact. Invest in small pharmas that have always had revenues- thats the play.
Was Dr Patterson's paper regarding the CCL5 (Rantes) discovery ever published? I was under the impression it was going to be distributed within 24 hours of the CC.
Thanks, justaguy- even better. Sounds like capacity is not an issue, so to me, a J&J partnership or buyout does not seem necessary. I think Yang foregoing his portion bodes well- prevent a situation in which he voids the trial by letting results slip. I hope the price does fall tomorrow, and I expect it to. Could the last chance for MMs to rake in stop losses and get in cheap. I've got cash ready to roll if they do. Also, if you're long, why would you want SP to pop now- so you can pay more for your shares as news trickles out? I hope it falls steadily into big news. But who knows- its still an OTC stock, so still tons of unknowns. Still 300k authorized but unissued. Mitigate your expectations until we have something definitive. This is my last post of the day because I am waiting for approval from the admins, but good luck everyone.
If they get an EUA, the first 40k will be spoken for immediately, but NP said in the presser on Monday that Samsung was capable of producing 1.4m by the end of the year, and if necessary, could halt production of other products to produce upwards of 1m per month, if I remember correctly.
Absolutely! I think another huge takeaway from the Q/A is his implication that treating the virus itself is somewhat useless if you cannot get the body's immune system to operate properly. What is killer about leronlimab is that it works upstream by regulating the immune response, and preventing the inflammation that puts so much stress on the patients organs. He also touches on the topic of "immunity protection" after being infected. That is such an important factor in determining when people will be able to do normal activities, like go back to work and be around other people. If we find that immunity protection is a limiting factor in whether individuals contract covid, and leronlimab regulates the immune system in a way that combats covid, then it would be logical to say that the drug is also effective in preventing individuals from contracting the virus. That is NOT to say it is a vaccine, because it is not an innocuous version of the virus, but who cares if what it labeled as if you can take it preventatively? These are, of course, my opinions and rationale, and I am not a physician. However, I do work in the medical industry on the business side, and if that is the case, there is a lot of money to be made from a lot of different angles.
Hey guys, I posted this article yesterday but had some technical difficulties and was unable to respond to few of you. The doctor in this article discovered the link between hiv and aids- he is the authority on the topic of hiv/aids- Dr Michael Saag. Identical language to CYDY PRs:
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/what-renowned-infectious-diseases-doctor-learned-when-he-got-covid-n1186451
Same doc wrote up the findings for leronlimab’s (CYDY’s drug) phase 2 hiv results:
https://aac.asm.org/content/54/10/4137
The point I was making is that Dr Michael Saag seems to be advocating for leronlimab as the front runner treatment, based on the verbiage he uses; specifically in the portion of the Q/A beginning with "to get a little more technical." I think he is treading lightly due to the GILD situation with the SEC. The second article was simply to show his familiarity with the drug- I was not making any claims based on that article. Though he is known for his HIV/AIDS research, he is extremely well versed in a number of viruses. If Dr Saag publicly advocates leronlimab, the medical community will listen. He is a big deal. Hoping for good things.
Hey guys, first time poster, long time follower. Been in CYDY for 2 years. Just signed up to share something- not sure if this has been brought up or not. The doctor in this article discovered the link between hiv and aids- he is the authority on the topic of hiv/aids- Dr Michael Saag. Identical language to CYDY PRs:
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/what-renowned-infectious-diseases-doctor-learned-when-he-got-covid-n1186451
Same doc wrote up the findings for leronlimab’s (CYDY’s drug) phase 2 hiv results:
https://aac.asm.org/content/54/10/4137
I have a feeling that if this guy advocates for leronlimab publicly, the medical community is going to rally behind cydy.
Nonetheless, I think its important to remain cautiously skeptical until we have news from the FDA. I work in the medical industry (device) and I know first hand how putting all of your eggs in one basket can get you scrambled.... good luck everyone.