Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Earnings whisper has the 24th but it's weird as to how it has its name.
Tommy had a feeling on the 23rd being a big date.
I know nothing definitive. Just sharing the rumors.
I can understand questioning if an uplisting will occur but when you make silly claims besides that, it does demonstrate that you are full of it.
For example, to question uplisting....that is normal. To suggest that they are so cash strapped that they are flying cheap for some stupid purpose is to demonstrate that you are just being a troll. To suggest that a NASDAQ uplisting would result in 10%-20% increase and that's it and then down, that is demonstrative of being a troll.
You can question things reasonably and still be viewed as pessimistically reasonable. Being ridiculous shows something else. IMO.
Can you offer a little more....
Spike every 1:30. Watch again at 2:15 ET
someone is trying to accumulate a lot in segments
Yes but those reasons were also pertinent yesterday and the day before and the volume was not anything like this.
Some consistent big volume this morning. Any idea as to why?
M*A*S*H*?
The hit came when it was lower than 6. And if the hit came just from their short, they wouldn't make that much.
If they haven't covered, then there must be a reason why. One would think the drop enough was enough to make a lot of money. So why the continual attack? Shouldn't they just take the money and run? There isn't much more to take out. At $1.50 or so, how much more is worth the risk? It's not going to be worth less than zero.
That's why it makes more sense that they NEED to get it lower. They need to keep attacking it.
"So far" and "last laugh" are mutually exclusive.
I'm long and I agree with your take entirely. I was only responding to those who are watching day-to-day.
This is my concern. Let's hope that I am wrong.
I worry that the support might not be there. Are the longs already full and awaiting NASDAQ? If so, the short sellers control the day. That is what has happened before. The short sellers know this. I hope that there is support as I am long but I worry.
if that were true, why would you tell us?
It will work out. You're going to clear $2M on that. In an unrelated topic, do you have an heir? Asking for a friend.
I agree. If they were to post more "research", nobody would believe it. They took their shot.
Also, I don't think they took a second shorting of any significance. That was just an attempt to scare more people into selling. Just my guess.
if it goes down as you say, I suspect it would be NASDAQ announcement on Monday, ringing bell on Wednesday.
Yes. I believe you are correct. I had forgotten.
It makes sense. Otherwise, a company wouldn't spend the money and time to apply if an attack can happen. It makes sense to first clear the threshold and then apply.
It almost seems that the short sellers know that the NASDAQ is imminent and they need to keep it under $2. Every time it approaches, another attack. Which obviously can't continue forever.
How is vehemently denying any better than what they did?
Had they done that, wouldn't the short sellers and you be saying the same thing - that they didn't address the allegations but just made a blanket claim?
I know.
Who said it is happening today? You said it was dead because it was under $4 and quoted one requirement and seemingly intentionally omitted the very next line.
Not mad at all. Just pointing out what I thought was a disingenuous response. If you actually did not see that requirement on the next line, then I apologize for implying that you intentionally ignored it.
I'm just pointing out that as proof that NASDAQ is dead, you cited one requirement and very conveniently ignored the VERY NEXT LINE. Had you mentioned it and said " I don't know what the additional requirements are to get this exception so i don't know if one should rely on it" at least that would have been reasonable.
"However, a company may qualify under a closing price alternative of $3.00 or $2.00 if the company meets varying requirements.
Quote from the very next line.
That's exactly what it looks like. They are not happy that the price went up. Tommy also covered even though he is "confident" that it is going lower.
They were hoping for lower and it didn't happen. Some could cover. A lot can't.
I understand "still" short as simply their attempt to get more people to sell as they are worried. They need more people selling out of fear for them to succeed. If they need to cover now, they would be in very bad shape.
why would you cover?
I like your approach. If you like the long-term prospects of the company, then this day-to-day ridiculousness is irrelevant to you. You can just hold for a while and when it is up to a nice height, you can enjoy the return on investment.
Yes, you could have taken profits and then bought back in at the low and made some extra money but one can't be perfect in trading. If your long-term prospects play out well, you should be doing very well.
I have reason to believe it is happening real soon. I'm not certain though so take it for what it is worth.
I am expecting it. Don't ask me why but I am expecting it.
I'm hearing that it is already approved and it's not a scam company.
I don't care either way. You can post whatever you want. That being said, in a previous post you stated "WE have plenty of Ammo left" if memory serves. I may be misquoting or perhaps it wasn't you. If so, I apologize.
However, if that was you, how does that work with your "just the messenger" take now?
It's easy to manipulate on the pinks. That is what is happening. I watch it all day but as I invested due to long-term potential, these day-to-day fluxes don't matter to me.
My first post but I have been watching this board for a while.
First and foremost, I am long on this company. That being said, I truly believe that Barry is a scam. He has a history of being dishonest (to say the least) and he doesn't have the reputation of someone who helps people without compensation. Furthermore, he only needs to disclose his holdings (by law) if they are his holdings. I am pretty certain that the reason that he lives with his x-wife is because they are still together but by divorcing, he can trade shares in her account and not need to disclose it. He would need to if they were married.
So he trades up and down based on the advice that he gives but he isn't breaking any laws because it's all in his x-wife's name and she is no longer legally related to him.
My point is that don't be excited about this company because of Barry. I don't think he has your best interests in mind. However, you still should be excited about this company because the fundamentals are strong and there is huge value here.
I'm long because of the company. Barry's advice should be disregarded in my opinion. But I still think this is a great investment.
So I think Stockguru has it right.