Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I just happened to read your post and I can give you some information. Dr Moro of Biocurex is indeed one of the best con men around. His connection with Trent Davis came via Denis Burger, also of Portland. burger was taken in by Moro, hook line and sinker. Burger was a director of Paulson Capital and managed to have them do a 6 million public offering for Moro. Moro managed to milk millions of the money that Paulson raised to his own company, Pacific biosciences.
I more or less regard Trent Davis of Paulson Capilal a guiltly victim. Once he found it was a scam, he did not come clean with his investors and they all lost tons of money.
It looks like Dr Moro's latest scam may involve this:
"Ricardo Moro-Vidal is the President & Chief Executive Officer at Agoracom based in Richmond Hill, Ontario. Previously, Ricardo was the President at Pacific BioSciences Research Centre "
I know that Moro wanted to control information about Biocurex and used Agoracom to accomplish that. I cannot verify the above quote that I found but I do know that as a con man, Moro has no limits.
When Burger took the position of Chairman at Biocurex, Paulson asked him to resign for a conflict of interest.
Just for fun, I took the first name on the list, David Hingas and did a google search. He is a crony of Burgers at Yamhill winery and 76 years old, He has nothing to lose and just sells his name.
Iversen, another crony of burgers at AVI.
It would appear that Burger was compensated for recruiting these guys. Look in the filings, it will all be there.
Finesand, one other thing to watch out for with a biotech is the type of journal they use for publication. There are a lot of publications out there that look respectable but use a pay to publish business plan.
Also, don't ever think that a scientific advisory is of great benefit. It is just a tool to make shareholders think their investment in a penny stock is safer. The people on those groups just sell their names and get shares to sell.
The best indicator is probably management who actually own shares and not just options. Believe it or not, Dr Moro used to convert options to shares, vote them and then convert them back to options.
" the new science advisory board is more potent. ".
Be careful with this assumption. Check how these people are paid for their name. In most cases, that is all shareholders are getting. These people essentially sell their names and do nothing in return. In a lot of cases, it is a gimmick to dupe shareholders. Research the filings and see how these people are paid.
Thank you and I wish you the best in your investments.
I just find it difficult to give Burger a free ride with his involvement as chairman of Biocurex. Years ago, Burger was part of the management of Paulson and he may have been a participant in getting money for this stock and his position as science guy and board member may be a way to pay for that access.
Burger is older than I am and IMO, his winery is his total focus along with obtaining money to support his winery. I just think his free ride days are over and he adds nothing to this stock.
I do not have anything to comment about pro 140 or any other product they may have. I just think that Burger's presence here does not add anything to the value of this stock and could be a negative. The former employee of Biocurex did in fact tell me that the CEO told her that Burger was not to see filings with tax canada. That was how the ceo skimmed the funds into his own pocket. A lot of people got taken to the cleaners with biocurex including shareholders, paulson investors and private placement funds. I just don't see how Burger could have supported that stock when any due diligence at all with his access would have shown it to be a scam.
Actually I think it has been longer than that. I still keep checking to see what the former CEO of Biocurex is up to and I found that he had refired his Pacific Biosciences company to now sell other types of tests. I also checked to see if Burger was still involved with him and found this stock. I'm not saying this is a bad stock but the circumstances are a tad similar. I do find it interesting that his involvement with Biocurex as chairman is totally missing from his bio in the press release.
Biocurex had a pan cancer test which I finally determined to be based on faked data. I was a very active poster on that board rebutting an anonymous poster who was actually the CEO. The CEO was a lying scumbag. In the final days, a reluctant former employee actually contacted me and laid it all out how the CEO skimmed about 2 million from a Paulson placement of almost 6 million. Burger arranged the placement and for that he was given the chairman position and a wad of cash for his services. Burger also hawked the test in presentations for fees. IMO, his winery needed funding and he compromised his integrity as a science guy. No one with any science smarts would truly believe that test would be functional.
I would actually be very wary of any company who associated with Burger if they were aware of his past. I did notice that any mention of Biocurex was conspicuously absent in the press releases.
His position here seems to be familiar. A Paulson placement was involved and Burger gets appointed to positions where he probably gets cash.
I see that Denis Burger has been appointed the chief science officer. He was the Chairman of BioCurex, a full on scam out of Vancouver, BC. It is difficult to imagine he was innocent in all of that.
Hi guys, Thought I would stop by and see what this message board was doing. I still regret not dumpster diving when I stopped by AMDL. I bet that sign from the lobby was in there. Take care and see you next year.
The AMDL sign that was on the inside wall had been removed but the sign on the building was still there as well as the AMDL reserved parking sign. I bet the inside sign was in one of the two dumpsters.
I passed through Tustin yesterday and stopped by the old Radient Pharmaceutical office. There was an eviction notice on the front door dated 8-3-2016. The place looked empty. I went around back and two large container dumps were filled with the furnishings from inside with many fixtures still sitting outside with no room left in the containers. Someone exited the offices next door and said the people cleaning out the space had been working all week and had just left for the day.
The eviction notice was addressed to Dennis Charter and not Radient Pharmaceuticals. The entity doing the eviction was the survivor trust of the former owner along with Wells Fargo. I took photos of everything in case anyone wanted to see for themselves.
Whatever scam Dennis Charter had going with the old office building is over.
Mac would not have wanted to file for bankruptcy prior to or during the lawsuit. Doing so would have prevented him from using the remainder of the stock authorization to pay for his personal lawyers because the bankruptcy judge would then be over seeing the entire finances of Radient and there is no way a judge would let Mac pay his lawyers with company stock.
The insurance company formularies are published in late oct for the following year. The guidelines are followed by the formularies but if the proposed stands, the earliest effect would be when the formularies are revised.
FDA approval does not really mean much without insurance coverage. That really hurts exact sciences. That was also a killer for Radient when DR70 was not covered by insurance.
It is more than obvious that no former shareholders will ever get anything to recover their losses. What I find interesting is what the Aussies are doing with the remaining assets from Radient.
IMO, it was a cheap way for the Aussies to make sure someone else does not use the name and interfere with whatever scam they have going on.
I agree. The new scam beGan when the Aussies took over and just became apparent when cstamdl went on the internet.
LS, thanks for the info. BTW, at this point, I could not really care less about the group attempting to claim Radient will be back. That is just total stupidity. What I am really interested in the fact that you found the CSTAMDL site and that the Aussies have stolen everything, lock, stock and barrel that Radient ever had. To determine the extent of the scam is fascinating.
I have not used a proxy to look at the cstamdl site but it is very interesting that the photos are not the same. That means the changes in Tustin signs was done after the website was created. It also probably means the Aussies have a "fish" on the line. As for the building in Tustin, it has to be more than just paying the landlord to collect mail. Those sign changes cost money and even the parking sign replacement was not cheap. Either the Aussies are still manufacturing DR70 in that building or they have engaged the landlord as part of their scam.
I drove up north of LA to visit some friends and have dinner at my favorite Mexican cafe. When I stopped by on the way back, I was truly shocked the Aussies were not lying about the name change.
I also think the Aussies never shut down the manufacturing and the sale of test kits.
Wolfie, I have never owned any shares of AMDL or radient. The photos I posted were taken yesterday.
I have posted the new photos of the former Radient office in Tustin on the Ibox page.
Since the group of Aussies have taken over management of Radient Pharmaceuticals, they have looted the company of any remaining assets and transferred them to cstamdl.com, their personal company based in Hong Kong. The cstamdl site claims all previous clinical trial data as their own, they claim to have a manufacturing facility in the USA named AMDL and show pictures of the facility. They even transferred the trademarks owned by Radient to AMDL diagnostics so Radient is left with nothing but debt and disgruntled former shareholders.
Below are the photos of the building the Aussies claim as their own USA facility.
Just click on the show intro and you can view the pictures.
View through the front window.
View of the entrance where the new sign replaced Radient Pharmaceuticals.
View of the rear door where the sheriff's notice of seizure was removed.
View of the reserved parking spot.
View through the locked front door of the reception desk.
The Aussie's have certainly gone to a lot of trouble to make the building look "correct"
They changed all of the signs to AMDL or AMDL Inc including the reserved parking sign. They "posed" the front office in a neat manor instead of the just drop everything and walk away appearance it had before. They coated the side windows with heavy tint to make it near impossible to see inside the center of the building without interior lights on.
Radient was still manufacturing and selling kits when the Aussies took over.
Quote from the 8K:
"Despite significant financial hardship, the Company continues to maintain its offices and manufacturing facilities in Tustin, California, relying on selective former employees that continue to work as consultants."
The Aussies are thieves so they would not have missed the opportunity to have any money at all coming in. Obviously, Radient was selling enough kits to pay the rent and consultants. If there was any left over, it now went directly in the Aussie's pockets.
I was certainly surprised to actually see the AMDL logo on the side of the building. I was just passing down I-5 today and decided to stop by and see who was actually in the building. The landlord converted them to business condos over a year ago and some of the units in the building have been sold. LS contacted the landlord about a year ago and at that time, he was told the landlord was using suite 100 as a base of operations for the condo conversion.
Some basic assumptions now have to be made knowing the current facts.
1. What can be seen from the side windows is now empty when it was filled with cubicles last year.
2. The sheriffs asset seizure could account for the interior furnishings being gone or the Aussies may have just sold whatever they could to pay the amount due.
3. The AMDL logo that is on the wall in the front office is not on the same wall as the Radient Pharmaceuticals logo was on when I looked last year. The office now looks as if someone has posed it for a picture.
4. The picture of the logo on the cstamdl.com website had AMDL Diagnostics which we found to be an old photo taken in 2008. The wall today just has AMDL with the logo. On the back door, the plastic sign says AMDL Inc.
5. The Aussies are paying the landlord to retain this building. Where is the money coming from? They could in fact still have a former employee of Radient manufacturing kits for sale in one of the back rooms with no windows. When Mac turned the company over to the Aussies, he did in fact state they were at the time still selling kits. If the Aussies have maintained the kit manufacturing and sales, that could be paying for the rent on the building.
6. The Aussies have obviously considerable effort to change everything from Radient Pharmaceuticals to the USA branch of cstamdl.
7. The Aussies have intentionally cut off access to cstamdl.com to any US ISP so they do now want former shareholder of Radient or anyone else in the USA to easily know what they are doing.
8. My conclusion in all of this is that the Aussies have stolen everything possible from Radient and probably have some poor investor "fish" on the hook for their Hong Kong company.
The desk in the front looked somewhat different. There was a stack of some folded leaflets on the top of the desk. Otherwise, it was very neat.
The previous time I stopped by, you could see cubicles through the windows that were not blacked out. This time, the windows all had a heavy tint and you could only determine what was inside if you used your hands to form a window. Then you could make out the empty room.
The remnants of the tape were on the back door and front glass where the sheriff's notice of seizure was taped on remained. A sign that was previously on the back door stating "ring for deliveries" was gone and replaced by a placard saying "AMDL Inc.
The makeup of the front area also looked different from last time but I will have to find the previous photos to see what has changed.
No Jim, when you look into the side windows, it is just a bare room. Everything including the cubicles are gone.
Except for the desk in front, there is no longer anything visible via the side windows. What was there a year ago is now gone.
News. The Aussies have in fact changed the name on the building in Tustin. It now says AMDL. It is still locked with no one at the desk. I have taken photos.
When the Aussies took over, I stated they were going to steal everything and ship it West. Well, that is exactly what they did. They have now stolen the trademarks, stolen ADI, took all of the technical know how along with all the trial data claiming it now belongs to cstamdl.
Woofie and DC claim the Aussies to be "caretakers" but in this case, the caretakers just looted the company.
Jim, You are confused about the lawsuit. Radient was being sued and Mac was being sued. Radient was insured and the insurance company negotiated a settlement because the case was hopeless. Mac paid for his personal lawyers out of the employee stock fund which contained 10% of the total stock ( 500 million remaining shares).
After the narrow escape from being personally sued, Mac just wanted out and gave the entire company to the hands of the Aussies.
Jimtash, the Ausssies are thieves. Just look at all the bogus claims on their website of property that clearly belonged to Radient.
So, they are thieves, we know that. UNI is also using trademarks without permission. So, what do the Aussie thieves say? "hey thief, stop using those trademarks." I really doubt one thief is going to yell "stop thief" to another thief.
Living, you stated: " I also think the agreement is continuing."
If the agreement with UNI is still continuing, why then did UNI cease working on the patent application and let it die?
Are you attempting to "cherry pick" the agreement to claim it is continuing? Or is the null and void because the patents have expired just as was stated in the agreement?
Woofie, you stated that Patricia Baker never worked for GCDX. Once again, you are WRONG.
The following is a pdf article from Gartner's GCDX website.
First, a patient or doctor fills out the "Order the Test" form on the company's website. Then, the company ships the test with full instructions. After, a patient visits a blood draw location (whether or not a physician's order is required depends on the state) and sends the sample overnight to the company's certified laboratory run by Dr. Patricia Baker, phD, for analysis. Finally, either the patient or physician (again, depending on the state) receives the results of the analysis.
http://www.globalcancerdx.com/uploads/Google_News.pdf
The above confirms that at one time, Baker was indeed working for GCDX.
Woofie, you need to get the facts straight. Patricia Baker never worked for Provista Diagnostics. She was an employee of Provista Life Sciences when it was run by Gartner.
LS, good find that cstamdl is just blocked to usa isps. Well, one thing has been proven correct. My conclusion that the Aussies were just going to steal any remaining assets certainly has been proven correct.
You are also correct that cstamdl was blocked from the USA because of this message board. Also, this is just the Aussies method of preventing the former shareholders from knowing what they are doing with Radient assets.
Jim, I agree that Radient still owns the trademark and financed patents and clinical studies but look at who controls Radient. It's Charter and he can do just about what he wishes. He can grant cstamdl the right to use the trademarks, studies or whatever else he wants to do. Is it morally correct for him to just give all those rights away for free? Probably not but he can do what he wants. As a former shareholder, are you going to sue him? I don't think you or anyone else will so Charter is home free to do as he pleases and he knows it.
No one put a cease and desist order on his website. There is no organized effort by any of the former shareholders to do anything.
IMO, he probably did read this website and saw comments about cstamdl.com. If he does not have any investor fish biting at this time, why leave all that ammo up for continued comment. It just give more opportunity for a potential investor to read negative comments when his website contains a bunch of lies.
Wait and see. If he gets any potential money biting, he will fire up that website in a flash.
living, I think you are in left field on the cease and desist order. Who would be financing that effort? No one that I know of.
I have an idea that Small-Howard may be the reason why the site is shut down. I think they want her involved and they have not reached terms. They would definitely like to have her work on the site and she may want some things cleaned up first.