retired but keeping my sense of humor
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stokd NLST WOW🔥what a turn... Mr Yoder gone for good it seems. This is the—JOINT STATEMENT RE: SAMSUNG'S REQUEST FOR TRIAL CONTINUANCE DUE TO MEDICAL EMERGENCY—filed 2 days ago when I posted the notice to seal.
"Samsung requested a 1-2 week continuance for new lead trial counsel to get up to speed. Netlist agreed to a week's continuance but because two of the three members of its trial team have trials scheduled on April 15, April 29, and May 6, a longer continuance was not feasible."
"Samsung notified Netlist's counsel o f Mr. Y oder ' s condition and the need for substitute lead counsel to get up to speed, and asked whether Netlist would be willing to agree to a continuance of the trial date. Netlist's counsel asked what Samsung had in mind, and counsel explained it was not yet clear but at minimum one or two weeks."
"NETLIST STATEMENT—Samsung reported on Mr Yoder's health emergency, stated that he will not be able to continue on the case at all"
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.469.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565946034.png
Stokd
Yesterday 9:38 PM
$NLST I hope it's clear that I did not describe/state each motion's ruling, nor did I state which parties motion it was, I only referenced the names of the motions—which could be Netlist's or Micron's—and who won on the motion. Kind of confusing, but I was limited by Stocktwits character limit, and chose to format that way.
For example—and it would be obvious upon reading the doc—Consolidate & Pre-Suit Damages went for Micron, meaning no Pre-Suit Damages for Netlist and no Consolidation for Netlist... even though as written in my post it seems that I said Pre-Suit damages were expected, I meant the result... same as to Consolidate, which is in the Micron win column, not that Netlist can Consolidate.
Another example is Netlist win on Noninfringement of 912 & 417 patents... which is Micron's motion, hence listed in Netlist win column by name which can seem there was no infringement.
Anyways... I think you get the gist.
the post referred to....... https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/565922351
i'm not a pc geek or tec, but i do have the capabillity to detect, nasa we have a problem !
Stokd
2m
$NLST Here is the link to the doc (screenshot) from my previous post— https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.73.0.pdf
Also dropped in 294 & 293 is an Order to compensate the Special Master.
294— https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.74.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565924591.png
Stokd
20m
$NLST Tried to take a day break and this drops lol
ORDER ON PRETRIAL MOTIONS, MOTIONS IN LIMINE, AND EXHIBITS
From Micron294 pretrial conf Mar6. Rob/Prime/Bolliver reported results on them, we're getting specifics here, especially on "In-Part" rulings.
In my opinion a very favorable overall outcome for Netlist—Consolidation was long shot & Pre-Suit Damages with our scenario as to marking & notice are somewhat expected like Samsung463/same ptnts. MILs also good considering what Micron cannot raise in court.
Read doc for specifics/context.
Motions Netlist won:
Asserted Patents Not Standard Essential
Dismiss Micron Defense of Breach of RAND
Obligation
Noninfringement of 912&417
Lack of Written Description of 417
Supplement Expert Reports
Compel Deposition Transcript from Samsung294
Motions Micron won:
Strike Opinions of Halbert
Pre-Suit Damages
Consolidate
Supplement Expert Reports
In Part:
All 5 Strike Export Report motions
Micron’s Affirmative Defenses
yes they did. now we need to go to court lol !!
yes, to simplify your assumption. we did very well.
NLST 294 Pretrial Motion Rulings. Read up!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.73.0.pdf
without a doubt.
$NLST case 0293
691 Mar 14, 2024,,,Main Document,,,,Order https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861664/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
$NLST case 0294
Order 73 and 74 ,,,,Mar 14, 2024 Main Document https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
and ihub approved. what a mockery of the msg board community.
NLST ROTH CONFERENCE https://www.meetmax.com/sched/event_101113/conference_home.html
468 Mar 14, 2024 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO SEAL AND JOINT STATEMENT RE: SAMSUNG'S REQUEST FOR TRIAL CONTINUANCE 454 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court grants in part and denies in part the application to seal. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) (Entered: 03/14/2024)
Main Document
Leave to File Document Under Seal https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
NLST NETLIST TO ATTEND 36TH ANNUAL ROTH CONFERENCE
IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / March 14, 2024 / Netlist, Inc. (OTCQB:NLST) today announced the Company will participate in the 36th Annual Roth Conference. Netlist will participate in 1-on-1 meetings on Monday, March 18th. Investors who wish to meet with the Company should notify their Roth representative.
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2120/us-press-release.html?airportNewsID=fbf29467-efcb-45c6-9e18-701c1c0f2dc7
SilviaJ
12m
$NLST It is hard to say what the HBM3 and HBM3E might be worth at the “street price” for the Nvidia device, but if it is a mere 25 percent uplift from HBM2 to get to HBM3, then of the approximate $30,000 street price of an H100 with 80 GB of capacity, the HBM3 represents $8,800 of that.
Moving to 96 GB of HBM3E might raise the memory cost at “street price” to $16,500 because of another 25 percent technology cost uplift and that additional 16 GB of memory.
It will be interesting to hear the rumors about what the H200, with 141 GB of capacity, might cost. But if this kind of memory price stratification holds – and we realize these are wild estimates – then that 141 GB of HBM3E is worth around $25,000 all by itself.
https://www.nextplatform.com/2024/02/27/he-who-can-pay-top-dollar-for-hbm-memory-controls-ai-training/
what do you expect from children.
yoder has been diagnosed with pathological liar syndrome.
that is exactly my point and a contradiction to the tos. especially when i have you on ignore and blocked. yet your allowd to undermind the system and respond in that format to my post so i can see it.
same here, the judge needs to step in say time to play.
$NLST EXPLOSIVE upside move is imminent.
This stock is ssoooo undervalued, but will soon become a cash cow and important player in the memory/chip/AI sector.
Even the stupud pink clown poster knows it - it is the reason they post.No need for pink clowns.
So, ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seatbelts. It's time for lift off.
NLST BOC so far….2 Judges have agreed with NLST. 2 Judges have decided it’s ambiguous. 0 Judges have agreed with Samsung. 1 Jury have decided infringement was wilful. So far… we’re doing just fine. Looking forward to next few months
TOMKiLA
8:13 AM
$NLST lol
Samsung is reportedly planning to adopt a manufacturing technology used by its HBM rival SK Hynix. However, the company has denied the rumors.
https://www.ccn.com/news/samsung-denies-plans-to-copy-sk-hynix-hbm-chip-manufacturing/
if they agreed it cant be bad. no need to over think that one.
birds of a feather so they say. once we can get in the court room again, prevail we will.
i think your about right. its cowardly and decietful hence why they keep delaying getting in front of a judge.
pink is a nice color. it shows ones true self. maybe scamsong and micrap should use it their logos. nlst should go with deep green.
right now its all a play of words holding it up. what would be fantastic is if the judge intervened and informed both parties of a show up to court date or forfeit. there both guilty and even they know it. thats why they keep trying to stay out of the court room.
Doc...464 STATEMENT of the Case filed by Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Feinstein, Marc) (Entered: 03/13/2024)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.464.0.pdf
lol !!! that day is coming !!! was only looking forward to a quick fix, but thx....
is there anyway i can turn these stupid emojis off so i dont have to see them ?
the way this is playing out right now who knows. still need the judges signature to say whether or not it is medically approved so the clown with emoji ocd's can keep busy. then you need scums reply to this..........
NOTICE OF DELAY IN PREPARATION OF REVISED JOINT DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS—"Plaintiff Netlist, Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel, respectfully submits this Notice that the parties have been working diligently on preparing revised jury instructions. Netlist sent its last proposal at 5:20 PM on March 12, 2024. Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. sent its last proposal at 2:30AM on March 13, 2024. Netlist is waiting for Samsung’s final approval to submit a joint document. As soon as that is received, Netlist will file."
they so dont want this trial to happen.
the 29th looks good so far but still to far off to be put in stone.
i just want this part to happen............ Case No. 8:20-CV-0993-MCS (ADS)
NETLIST’S PROPOSED
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Judge Mark C. Scarsi
Final Pretrial Conference:
Date: March 18, 2024
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Trial: March 26, 2024
Stokd
12:47 AM
$NLST Switching to something else, but staying with the BOC case, Netlist just filed—PLAINTIFF NETLIST’S PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS—"Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) respectfully requests that the Court ask the jury panel the following additional voir dire questions:
1. Who here has any familiarity with how the U.S. patent system works?
2. Have you, a relative, or a close friend, had any experience with patents or trade secrets or the United States Patent and Trademark Office?
3. Do you or does your employer rely on patented technology or trade secret information as part of its business?
4. Do any of you have strong opinions about a patent or a copyright or a trademark granting exclusive rights to the owner of the intellectual property?
5. Have you ever been accused of breaking a contract?
6. Have you ever sued someone for breaking a contract?
7. Have you or someone close to you ever considered filing a lawsuit, but chose not to?
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565562113.png
lol !!! you know whats funny about frivolous ? it comes with clown emoji's all over the nlst board all of a sudden mind you. like this frivolous post......... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174015749
behave in a silly or light-hearted way, rather than being serious and sensible. I just decided I was a bit too frivolous to be a doctor. Synonyms: flippant, foolish, dizzy [informal], superficial
very fitting....
Stokd
1:34 PM
$NLST It's official for the Micron 294 case — "Jury Selection originally scheduled for 4/22/2024 has been RESET for 4/29/2024 at 09:00 AM followed by Trial Day 1" — and this is good news. Didn't wan't to say anything till we got confirmation, but Sheasby has trial Apr 15, which would mean back to back trials if our case started Apr 22nd... this way he has a week between to prepare and get his head focused on our game.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565478448.png
date coming, NLST Gilstrap is making it clear with his recent rulings in the Micron 294 & Samsung 293 cases, that he intends to hold trials, and there will be no escaping justice.
Gilstrap renders the same 🔥denial🔥 to Micron's Renewed Motion to Stay Pending IPR in 294 case — "ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants Micron's Renewed Motion to Stay Pending IPR. In the Motion, Micron requests that this case be stayed pending inter partes review of the two Asserted Patents in this case U.S. Patent No. 11,093,417 (the “’417 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,619,912 (the “’912 Patent”). Having considered the Motion to Stay, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion to Stay should be and hereby is DENIED."
Link to full 3pg filing below--
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.72.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565449768.png
NLST Another 🔥win🔥 for Netlist, this time against Samsung in 293 case — "ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Renewed Motion to Stay Pending IPR. In the Motion, Samsung asks the Court to stay this case pending final decision in Samsung’s petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the patents in suit. Having considered the Motion to Stay, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion to Stay should be and hereby is DENIED."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.689.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565439227.png
TOMKiLA
7m
$NLST Samsung: HBM Production to Increase 2.5 Times in 2024, Another 2 Times in 2025
😂😂 omg! The damages should increase exponentially between this and the next year!
Han Jin-man, Executive Vice President in charge of Samsung’s semiconductor business in the United States, stated at CES 2024 this year that Samsung’s HBM chip production volume will increase 2.5 times compared to last year and is projected to double again next year.
Samsung officials also revealed that the company plans to increase the maximum production of HBM to 150,000 to 170,000 units per month before the fourth quarter of this year in a bid to compete for the HBM market in 2024
. Previously, SK Hynix forecasted that by 2030, its HBM shipments would reach 100 million units annually. As a result, the company has decided to allocate approximately KRW 10 trillion (approximately USD 7.6 billion) in CAPEX for 2024.
Stokd
15m
$NLST So there's no confusion as to the Denied-As-Moot on Netlist's second motion — "The second motion before the Court is Netlist’s Motion to (1) Dismiss Micron Defendants’ Counterclaims or in the Alternative Sever and Stay and (2) Strike Micron Defendants’ Affirmative Defense of Patent Misuse."
From the conclusion pictured below — "For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is granted. Additionally, as the Motion to Dismiss CONCERNS THESE SAME CLAIMS, the Court finds it should be and hereby is DENIED-AS-MOOT." — Meaning it is irrelevant to dismiss/sever/stay/strike Micron's counterclaim & defense since the first and main motion was already ruled against Micron and granted in Netlist's favor... Micron lost on their Antitrust Counterclaim and Affirmative Defense of Patent Misuse.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565377526.png