retired but keeping my sense of humor
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
is everybody ready, hong for president!!!!
thank God it was that easy!!!
Sep 19, 2024 Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2024 at 10:00 AM in (Texarkana) before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III has been CANCELLED. (aeb)
Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co, LTD (2:22-cv-00293)
District Court, E.D. Texas
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861664/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
hopefully it just got filed out of order and is referring to the old dates being rescheduled. if not, we'll find out soon enough........
robcobb $NLST Well we got Judge Gilstrap back on the case for the 293 trial,that is a good thing!We know what we have with him. I really thought Judge Schroeder would have been alright,but Judge Gilstrap knows every little thing that Samsung has done (mostly bad) for the last two years + in all the hearings and the 463 trial ,not to say that he judged the same patents in the Micron 294 hearings and trial that will be judged in the 293 case!Once again I am disappointed with the delay but happy Judge Gilstrap is back on this case! After reading Judge Gilstraps order today I think there will be no more delays with the tone he used in his order! I will be ready Oct 8 to witness the pre-trial and rulings on the motions and attend the trial in november.now/ we need a little Scarsi love and make the final ruling on the BOC,hopefully no more delays!GLLs
Stokd $NLST Netlist's Response is due today on Micron's post trial JMOL & New Trial motions in the 294 case won by Netlist. Following is Micron's Reply which is due by Oct 3rd with Netlist's Sur-Reply due by Oct 17th. After that we await Gilstrap's ruling, which presuming is a denial, will start the 30 day clock for Micron to appeal to CAFC. Remember that Final Judgment was already issued by Gilstrap affirming the jury verdict.
Things are progressing nicely whether that's realized and appreciated or not. The way all the many aspects reconcile and when carries heavy implications and can have a big impact. So don't decry the state of things currently and understand there is plenty of we don't know what we don't know as well as behind the scenes activity we're not privy to.
There is a reason for everything whether we understand it or not, so trust the legal team and let it play out!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_586575730.png
yes indeed!!! and yw, now alls we need is scarsi to stamp final judgement on that boc for starters lol!!! cafc comes later......
''specially set'' What is a special set hearing in Texas?
A special set hearing means that your hearing is the only hearing set before the court on that date and time. Hearings are sometimes set on a general docket, where a number of cases are set on the same date and time, meaning that the court may not have time to hear all the cases set and some will have to be continued.
lol!!! an unedited one too!!!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.791.0.pdf
This case has been set and reset several times due
to various impediments. The Court does not intend to alter this setting or to again continue
this trial.
what i gather from the context of that document is gilstrap has had enough and this trial will not be delayed!!!
This case has been set and reset several times due
to various impediments. The Court does not intend to alter this setting or to again continue
this trial.
get the dogs ready !!! strap just made my day!!!
strap and pain ya gotta luv it!!!
i must say, i'm looking forward to it even more now!!!
lol!!! strap wants blood!!!
anyone watch ? just got back from the dentist.
i hope that means scamsong is really getting screwed!!!
$NLST You can watch the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today at 10 am ET through this link below. FYI, there is more on the agenda than the two IP bills.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-activity/hearings/09/19/2024/executive-business-meeting-1
AGENDA
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room G50
Thursday, September 19, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.
— S. 2220, PREVAIL Act
— S. 2140, Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
WO is me.......... one of these days......or in this case, one of those days..........
As co-founder and CEO of Netlist, a small company that develops advanced memory
technologies, https://innovationalliance.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Netlist-PREVAIL-PERA-Letter-of-Support589.pdf
and one from 7-30-24
https://netlist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Netlist-RESTORE-Statement.pdf
i mean the more time we spend here waiting the more we wont be lol. until the dog runs we just waste away or go stir crazy in my case!!! you have diversions, my dumbass went all in. yes i know, my fault!!!
yw.
bet ya a dollar you wont be lol as hard when that 6 turns to a 7 !!! lol !!! but yeah, i'm here till the end as well.....
alls i can say is your a better man than i !!!
i'm not a tec guy either but what your saying is common sense, and time is of the essence..........
for those wondering about the timeline for CAFC appeals. The chart has the days for each process
https://cafc.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/RulesProceduresAndForms/FilingResources/Life_of_an_Appeal_Narrative_and_flowchart.pdf
no, its too bright and you have to look away, but you know its there!!! word up......... and gm to ya......
this is one of those times i have to say, any time soon for any one of them is ok with me!!!
you'll be just fine once this is over!!! just remember, one of these days..........
might as well run now. if they cant delay, they sure as hell dont want to step in front of a jury.
lol!!! let me ponder that for a few...........
they can all quit but the trial date stands!!!
Time will tell....... it always does........
Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. (2:22-cv-00203)
District Court, E.D. Texas
503
Sep 17, 2024
Main Document
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63378313/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-inc/?order_by=desc
TOMKiLA.....Patent 912, Samsung case, the trial is approaching and here is my hypothesis.
First of all, let's analyze the data from the Micron case which affects two of the three patents that will be cited at the end of October.
“ involved two Netlist patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912 and 11,093,417. The infringing products were all Micron DDR4 RDIMMs and DDR4 LRDIMMs”
“The amount of damages awarded by the jury covers infringement by Micron from April 2021 to May 2024 for the ‘912 patent and from August 2021 to May 2024 for the ‘417 patent”
• the 417 LRDIMM patent worth 20m $ •The 912 LRDIMM and rdimm patents worth $425m
about $140 million in damages p. 912 per year per micron (150 if we also consider p.417)
math helps us for two reasons, samsung is the first company in the business with a value double of micron and then there is also another lrdimm patent cited that however little, it could be worth between 30 and 50 million $.
912 damages start from April 2021 and damages will be cited up to November 2024 so a timing of 42 months against the 35 months of the micron case, more or less the same thing also with the other 2 patents.
samsung could be liable for $220/250 million in damages 912 per year (12 months) * 3.5x = potential $770 m - $875m damages 912 + $80/90 m damages lrdimm patents.
So the damages could be around a range of $8/900 million. We take away 20% and we find around a range of damages between $700 and $750 million. This data will surprise many shareholders but it is exactly what we could read in 6 weeks.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Netlist_/comments/1fixnsp/patent_912_samsung_case_the_trial_is_approaching/?share_id=qWrgsP-qNcdzSMc6FVw5Q&utm_content=2&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1
TOMKiLA $NLST In the first half of 2024, already 40 billion dram revenue and 90/95 billion dram revenue is expected in 2024. next year with the action of many new products including cxl and the exponential growth of hbm, dram revenue will be more than 110 billion $. Netlist is accumulating billions of $ in royalties. You will see with your own eyes the impact of the next two patent cases samsung and micron.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_586248082.png
NLST 🔥Just dropped in 293 case with Oct trial on 912 ptnt is Samsung's Renewed Stay Motion—DENIED by new Judge Schroeder🔥
Occurred Sept 9 but parties had a week to make redactions to the sealed doc, so order just dropped now.
"Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Renewed Motion to Stay Pending Appeal of the PTAB’s IPR Final Written Decisions Invalidating the Asserted Claims of the 912 and 417 Patents. In the motion, Samsung asks the Court to stay this case pending the appeal of the final written decisions in Samsung’s petitions for IPR of the patents at issue. The Court holds that the motion should be DENIED."
"Almost all of Samsung’s arguments repeat positions already considered and rejected. The only difference between this motion to stay and the last motion to stay is the fact that the PTAB has now found the 417 Patent to be invalid in addition to the 912 Patent, which is unpersuasive for the same reasons discussed in previous denials.
Full doc link https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.789.1.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_586237519.png
pre trial is still waiting to be scheduled......... https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.770.0.pdf
McKool Smith Secures $192 Million Patent Infringement Verdict on Behalf of Mojo Mobility Against Samsung
https://www.wvnews.com/news/around_the_web/partners/pr_newswire/subject/legal_issues/mckool-smith-secures-192-million-patent-infringement-verdict-on-behalf-of-mojo-mobility-against-samsung/article_673e0480-c436-58ba-829e-0a179173b1f8.html