is...not in
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The number of plants is most certainly closer to 1000 than it is to 100. Did you even look at the photos?
The crop is much longer than it is wide, and extends from the house to the back fence.
Here is the view away from the house toward the back fence, which best shows the width of the crop. You can see that the wooden posts divide it into 3-sections, each which is 7-plants wide, making it a total of 21-plants wide.
Here is the view away from the back fence toward the house, which best shows the length of the crop. For there to only be 100-plants, the crop would only be 5-plants long (5x21=105)... Do you not see how ridiculous this estimate is? To me, it looks like the crop is AT LEAST twice as long as it is wide. If it were only twice as long, it would contain 882 plants (42x21=882). To me it looks like it is maybe 50-plants long, which is where I got my estimate of 1000+ (50x21=2050).
Now tell me which part you disagree with, the length, the width, or the math.
1000+ plants is barely enough for two gym buddies?
It sounds like you smoke a lot more than I do :).
You do realize that the word "ground" has different definitions, don't you?
The farm is being grown by CaliPharm's other subsidary "Pacific Cannabis Growers".
http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/calipharms-and-pacific-cannabis-growers-execute-acquisition-term-sheet-otc-pink-kget-2203373.htm
Here's their permit:
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/loco-media/loco-media/blog/post/18406/ZCC-16-135%2B%2BStaff%2BReport.pdf
Here's the location of the farm they're building:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/109+Pampas+Ln,+Fortuna,+CA+95540/@40.5818984,-124.1202218,314m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x54d40dd401ca8475:0xfb207bf0862487e0!8m2!3d40.581649!4d-124.119682
Someone posted a similar thing a little while back:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132040766
It sounded like their frustration had to do with the current share price, which is understandable. I'm hoping that they might have a change in heart if Bo's ever able to move the price up.
I asked Bo about it and he denied it. I didn't mention my communication with him before this because I understand that Bo lacks credibility here, and I had no evidence beyond his words... But here's the message that I got:
All I'm saying is that I think those pictures were taken at the property listed on the permit, and I've provided y'all the evidence I used to make that opinion.
I understands your skepticism. The market understands your skepticism. If people weren't skeptical, we wouldn't be able to buy in at .0001.
At least the pictures provided by Bo are consistent with the google map of the area of the address on the permit.
Here's my previous posts on the topic:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131838730
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131839718
https://tinyurl.com/y8adl443
Here's Google's map of the property. Notice the structure with the red roof on the lower part of the image, and the shed and house with the gray roofs on the right part of the image. Also notice the big tree in the center bottom.
Notice that the red roof can barely be visible on the left edge of the image, so the tanks are positioned at the bottom of the property. Also, that nearest big tree is positioned in a way that is consistent with the tree in the bottom of the google map. Also notice a distinct looking tree with a curved up branches in the center right of the image in the far background.
You can see the same distinct tree with curved branches in this picture of the crops.
You can see the gray roof house and shed in this image.
You can see the same house in this crop picture.
Maybe more like these:
https://www.ntotank.com/5000gallon-potable-drinking-water-tank-x7901832?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIjNqJ5Y_J1AIVkbrACh11ZAezEAkYECABEgIqvvD_BwE
And you're right, I continue to be impressed by the size of the operation they're putting together out there.
Considering the amount of money they received from their shareholders, it's strange the contempt they seem to show you guys :\.
Yeah, they were probably assuming I was there to ask about the status of the deal between them and KGET.
Though, it was surprising they responded so quickly (within a couple of hours). If they'd closed up shop, I would've expected my request to dangle eternally... And if they were still working to hold things together, I would've expected them to grant my request... I don't know what to make of this... Beyond them just not liking to answer shareholder questions :\.
I tried following HPBev's Instagram page, and it appears that they responded by blocking me :(. The only activity I have on my page is that I'm also following CaliPharms. I wonder if that's the reason.
If anyone is curious, I looked up the parcel number of that previous farm. Here is the parcel info and map, the parcel number is: 531-072-004
https://common1.mptsweb.com/megabytecommonsite/(S(gdztlklvptkzd22cil44mzcr))/PublicInquiry/Inquiry.aspx?CN=humboldt&SITE=Public&DEPT=Asr&PG=AsrMain&Asmt=531-072-004-000
http://co.humboldt.ca.us/assessor/maps/531-07.pdf
Here are greenhouses that fall within or near the parcel, it might be one of these:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Cappell+Rd,+Hoopa,+CA+95546/@41.2468518,-123.7635016,112m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x54d10a94dd189f71:0x9d882be29635e493!2sCappell+Rd,+Hoopa,+CA+95546!3b1!8m2!3d41.251908!4d-123.7695711!3m4!1s0x54d10a94dd189f71:0x9d882be29635e493!8m2!3d41.251908!4d-123.7695711
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Cappell+Rd,+Hoopa,+CA+95546/@41.2516351,-123.7605227,128m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x54d10a94dd189f71:0x9d882be29635e493!2sCappell+Rd,+Hoopa,+CA+95546!3b1!8m2!3d41.251908!4d-123.7695711!3m4!1s0x54d10a94dd189f71:0x9d882be29635e493!8m2!3d41.251908!4d-123.7695711
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Cappell+Rd,+Hoopa,+CA+95546/@41.249346,-123.7558531,112m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x54d10a94dd189f71:0x9d882be29635e493!2sCappell+Rd,+Hoopa,+CA+95546!3b1!8m2!3d41.251908!4d-123.7695711!3m4!1s0x54d10a94dd189f71:0x9d882be29635e493!8m2!3d41.251908!4d-123.7695711
I deserve that, I should be more careful :)
Oh damn, I shot that last message out without paying attention. I thought I was talking to rawman. My apologies. I don't have examples on the tip of my tongue for you. I'll let you know when I do :).
You totally missed my point.
In your example his picture supported his statement. That makes sense, even if what you claim is true.
In this example, the picture he posted appears to contradict his statement, that makes less sense, which makes me wonder if there is another explanation.
I'd also like to point out that the posts are nice and vertical now... The picture you were complaining about was one where they'd dug the holes but hadn't yet put in the cement or set the posts. You guys jump to the worst possible conclusion without waiting for all the information... And you continue to do so... That is my thought about this.
How can you say for sure that my suggestion is BS?
I can see a benefit to placing the bottom of each pot into a shallow hole, then maybe filling in around them with dirt or rocks. I don't see a benefit in using super tall pots, just to dig super deep holes for each one.
Or another possibility is that the people doing the work are giving him written updates that are out of sync with their photographic updates, and they are actually further along then the pictures would suggest.
To me, these possibilities make more sense than the suggestion that someone would be so dumb as to intentionally provide pictures that disprove their associated caption.
You can see in these pictures taken from roughly the same angle that there are large piles of dirt or rock in the second photo that don't appear in the first:
Was anyone here able to get some of those .0001 today? Anyone?
Is it possible that they buried them "in the ground" only a few inches deep? The pots in the first set images all appear to be taller than those in the most recent set of images... No???... It'd be a lot of extra work and not much benefit to bury them all the way down to their stems. Here's another message by Deeznutz that explains how futile it would be to dig those holes deeper: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131921541
Old pictures of pots
New pictures of pots
LOL, do you really think that it was "smart" investors who drove that price up well over twenty cents? The "smart" investors were the ones who got in during the .000s, and then sold during the hype.
rawman, I gave you the entire set of ordinances on the issue. If it is a rule, then CITE THE ORDINANCE!!! I made it REALLY EASY for you.
Did you even read the quote I posted?
Read it again, it's pretty clear that the requirements for shielding, etc. is only required for: "Those cultivators using artificial lighting for mixed-light cultivation"... Therefore one can reasonably conclude, if they are NOT using artificial lighting for mixed-light cultivation, then these things are NOT required.
rawman, I keep asking you to provide links to support your assertions.
Where are you reading that a "mixed-light" grow facility is "required to proceed with the MJ grow"???
Again, from what I've read, having a "mixed-light" permit does not mean that you are "required" to use mixed light. It only means that you "are authorized" to use mixed light. Again, officials issuing the permits seem primarily concerned with ensuring that lights do not offend neighbors at night, so if proper shades are not in place, it doesn't mean they can't grow, it means they can't run lights at night. Here is the ENTIRE section for "Performance Standards for Mixed-Light Cultivation:
Here's the accompanying post:
https://upticknewswire.com/calipharms-ceo-bo-linton-interviews-uptick-newswires-stock-day-podcast/
Bo Linton just did an interview about Calipharms:
rawman, where are you getting your information that they require a "physical building in order to proceed with actually cultivating MJ". You've said this multiple times without any evidence whatsoever. If you're going to make these assertions as if they're fact, can you please provide references or links to support your statements? Because I think you're just plain wrong here.
I've looked and I can't anything to suggest that they need additional buildings. The permit itself says that they have clearance for "10,000 square feet of new mixed light cultivation, with no improved floors" (I assume that no improved floors means "the ground"). The only mention of buildings I see in the permit is the statement that the "cannabis will be dried and machine trimmed in an existing barn and garage" (And the google maps do in fact show an existing barn and garage).
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/loco-media/loco-media/blog/post/18406/ZCC-16-135%2B%2BStaff%2BReport.pdf
Below are links to the ordinance and Frequently Asked Questions document from Humboldt, and I can't find anything stating that mixed light cultivation has to be in a building. And in fact, an answer to one of the questions implies just the opposite, stating that it is okay to include an indoor space if desired: "It is not an uncommon practice for an outdoor or mixed-light cultivation operation to include an indoor space for propagation of seeds and clones for use on the property"
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/media/uploads/post/14832/Ordinance.pdf
https://humboldtgov.org/DocumentCenter/View/55152
So again, where are you getting your information???
What I'm picturing a mixed light area looking like, is that which I showed earlier for Country Junction Farms, which is simply an outdoor area that is covered with a temporary frame and sheets of plastic (picture shown below)... Something that could quickly and easily be assembled before or after the plants are put in place. And I'm not even sure that they are "required" to have that. The primary concern for permitting mixed light facilities seems to be making sure sure that lights aren't visible from nearby properties during nighttime hours... So if they don't have the proper shades in place yet, the simple solution to remaining legal would be to not run their lights at night.
Thanks for the info
If Bo's hiring promotion firms, hopefully that means he's at the point where he's got something ready for them to promote. And his last PR suggested that there's more than what we've seen:
And thank you bigmanc79 for actually trying to ask them about their relationship. Hopefully they provide a response.
You keep posting the same thing... And you're right, we don't know the details of their business relationship.
Here are the two videos posted... I hate watching these so I can't tell if they're identical to the original or are not... A "Growth Circle" clip was added to the beginning of both and the first one looks like it may have been splashed up a bit.
This is different...
Bo's little set of motivational videos were just posted to this guy's youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoPFK8oy8xNJY6KUm74u-JQ/videos
It appears he runs some sort of publicity firm:
Ok,I'll agree. You guys might have a point there.
I could see why one might think that their new "Management Company" might handle both the "Country Junction Farms" properties as well as others that we're seeing on the site.
For whatever it's worth, by reading their posts, it appears that they changed their Instagram name around March 15th. Also, on March 12th, they talk about "Expansion".
A couple more Country-Junction-Farms harvest pictures are up:
https://www.instagram.com/west__sac_management__company/
Check out the "community sentiment" chart for today (it was maxed out "bearish" a second ago)... It does appear that someone is "sad"... Though considering how close the bid and ask are from moving up, I have a hard time believing that it's the longs who are sad this morning.