Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It works for me, website is not shutdown.
Wikipedia entry for "Scient Inc." one of the companies listed in the PR associated with David Wood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scient
Can anyone explain how, if Maxwell is being spun off to allegedly go public, current SSOF shareholders will retain an interest in Maxwell?
"Additionally, with the spin-off of Maxwell, existing shareholders will have an interest in Maxwell Exploration as it continues to grow by continuing to acquire and develop oil and gas assets."
Looks like 10sion is no more...
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1756680/000157570519000101/rw_10sion.htm
No revenue last Q, but debt looks completely cleared up.
New quarterly report filed just now. Haven't had a chance to review, but here it is
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/232145/content
https://northeastremsco.com/our-team/
http://10sionholdings.com/our-team/
Things look like they are on the up and up.
Unfortunately, looks like he passed away recently.
https://www.mountainviewtacoma.com/obituaries/Walter-Kaplin/
If you go through some of his older posts, I am pretty sure he is pointing out that the info on the website is outdated and incorrect due to the recent filing. I don't think he is pumping the stock; quite the opposite.
One of the more entertaining mornings on this board in a long time. Carry on.
Paint manipulation at the open?
My thoughts are that highlander and KSweets are somehow the same person?
What are your thoughts about this?
Ok. It is a "fact" that the Company said an audit would be done. It is pure speculation to say that an audit will actually be completed based on the Q1 or any PR.
I can say I am going to the moon tomorrow. It is a fact that I said it. Doesn't mean it is actually happening.
Company has said audit coming since 2017. So saying one is coming is also speculation, regardless of what is said in the Q1 or any company filing or PR.
I think its a simple typo. There are several in the annual and Q1.
In that scenario, why would anyone buy from SSOF when they could just buy from Five Star (or any other equipment supplier) directly, and presumably at a lower price? That's what I don't get. What value could SSOF possibly provide to Five Star now that Five Star is on its own?
Five Star itself is not why the PPS tanked. It was the LOI with Bland. PPS hasn't recovered since. And if Clayton was the problem (not not Five Star as a business) they could have gotten rid of Clayton but kept the business.
That's fine and I understand your point. But I also don't think its an error or irresponsible to state opinions which are rooted in history or logic even if the company does not expound upon that history in its filings. Opining that any future acquisition will be divested at some point in the future is not (in my opinion) manipulation, because it has happened so many times already with this ticker.
If the company puts out a PR tomorrow saying that it will uplist by the end of the year, does that make it a fact or something that a potential investor should rely upon? I for one know that, given the history here, I would never rely upon that type of statement from the company when determining whether to invest.
This thing may run, but I will be getting out as soon as it does. Good luck to all that are planning to hold long term.
Just because something is stated by the company in a filing does not make it a fact and does not mean that it is true. They are forward looking statements, and there is no guarantee anything will come to fruition. Remember all that talk about the $68 million rig deal? Or the audit? In other words, relying on the filings does not mean that your opinions are rooted in fact. And relying on history does not mean that those opinions are rooted solely in speculation. In fact, I believe that relying on history provides a much more solid ground for predicting future events than relying on what the company says it may do.
The company may very well acquire another business or businesses. But it's the end game that matters, and history says that the end game is likely to end up one way.
I have read the Q. I understand what it says. There may very well be an acquisition. I think the point that others are raising is that, based on the history of this company, it is entirely rational not to take everything the company says in filings as true or at face value. It is also rational to predict that any future acquisition will end up the same way every prior acquisition has ended up; with assets spun off and SSOF starting from scratch. You may have a different prediction, and that's fine. But what SOOS and Wadi are saying is also rooted in reason and logic. I sincerely doubt they are trying to manipulate others into selling so that they can load. Neither am I.
I am hoping this thing pops a bit and then I am getting out with likely a small loss. If it goes the other way, so be it.
I am holding shares. I hope this thing pops, but I also have no intention to make everything seem rosy when it is not. The Q1 states that Five Star has "agreed" to work with SSOF moving forward to wrap up existing business and then as part of a potential joint venture. But, I see nothing in writing signed by Five Star, and I also can't fathom why Five Star would have any incentive to work with SSOF when SSOF is merely a shell and Five Star can proceed as a private company and conduct business as usual.
It may be a "fact" that the Q1 talks about a potential acquisition. That does not mean the acquisition itself will ever be a reality or, if it does become a reality, a long term benefit to shareholders. Forwarding looking statements aren't facts. It is all speculation either way.
I don't disagree about the complaints regarding Clayton. Maybe it is good that he is gone. How is it good that the sole operating entity of SSOF is also gone?
So you have no thoughts or concerns on the massive change? No more Five Star? No more actual business operations? No more Clayton?
A nice acquisition would be great, but we are completely speculating at this point. For the record, I am holding shares. Not bashing the stock but I don't see the great news in the Q1.
I am at work and only had time to skim it, but looks like Five Star is gone. Clayton and Joslin are out. Frazier is president/ceo/sole owner of the A1s. Doesn't look like SSOF has any assets. Continued partnership with Five Star (for now) until current business deals are closed, then Five Star goes its separate way. Anyone have any additional insights? Seems like we are starting from scratch.
Fluid End is gone. Does SSOF currently have any assets? Or is this now a shell again?
What are your thoughts on the financials? Is Chase’s opinion wrong? If so, why? How are these fins a PPS driver?
Right. Nothing that was allegedly said warrants keeping it “secret” until
Monday if it wasn’t insider info. I can’t wait for the big “reveal” on Monday.
Ridiculous.
Right. These type of posts are beyond annoying. Why dance around it in three separate posts when it would take the same amount of time to just tell us what allegedly was said? Makes no sense.
But the 10sion website lists "ken@10sionholding.com" as the e-mail. No "s" at the end. So the website is wrong?
OK, so not based on any news from the company. I understand they are "due." We will see if they actually deliver.
Speculation or do you have actual info?
Would it be so hard to provide a 1-2 sentence summary? That would actually be helpful.
How do you know how many shares VNDM has? Also, are you saying it was smart for management to not put out financials by February 15th as promised?
Yeah, we know it is pink current. But it has indeed been 3 weeks since the company blew its own deadline, and the company hasn't said anything about it. People have the right to be pissed off at that. Not a great sign. Maybe SSOF will come out with great news in the near future, but the silence is not the way to deal with shareholders, especially after the company just promised to improve shareholder communication.
So the company can’t even accurately put out a simple
Press release? And hasn’t read one of the dozens of emails sent by shareholders about the missed deadline? Come on.
Ridiculous.
STSC is at .60 and has been dropping steadily. And that's AFTER a reverse split. Pre split price is at about .002. That stock is dead.
Or longs who simply are frustrated with the state of things. No matter what you and others may think, ever person posting "negative" things is not hoping for the PPS to drop. Quite the opposite.