Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Can you please quantify your statement please. I don't mind discussion as to the viability of such a system but why "far fetched"? Are you an expert in the industry and have you been privy to information? I am long on this company and trust me when I say, I don't care for pumpers and/or bashers as there is no objective discussion in either situation. POS, "news tomorrow", RS guaranteed, waste of bits and time IMO.
Just wasted bits and noise. Really R/S planned? How do you know?
Since there hasn't been any SP movement, wouldn't the scam artists be pumping and dumping this thing considering the daily volume & theoretically could be selling shares at a higher price? I am asking those who hold on to the 5T theory.
Why the silence from the company? Very intriguing story to say the least.
To those with OTC experience (ABWN is my 1st), I have looked at other equities that some have branded "scams" and in my totally amateurish opinion, ABWN doesn't seem to fit the mold.
How can this be a scam when they have verified business relationships with 2 NYSE listed companies & 1 EU listed company. Have participated in related conferences A patent in the oven.
On the equity side, aside from the SP currently which I know isn't good right now and I am not trying to minimize that fact, can one explain why all the buying? Somebody or something is accumulating the heck out of this for about a month now. Again to my amateur eyes, it looks like that flat line is starting to look like basing.
Regarding the 5T & 30K to 1 stuff, mathematically those extreme numbers seem far fetched. I know this part will continue to be debated until there is resolution but I am of the belief that it is being used as a "poison pill". A RS inevitable, yes I would have to agree but it will be strategically done IMO and not at 30K to 1.
Also, to those that have witnessed an OTC stock explode from these levels, I would imagine the same type rhetoric was being spewed at those equities also.
Just my thoughts. for the record, I am in a .0006
I know this means nothing and is just plain old conjecture but after re-reading and with FBs cancellation of it's program.....who know's. Please don't bash me for having an imagination. I am just a long trying to put pieces together.
To our knowledge, the closest approach to Infinitus is Facebook’s proposed use of drones to provide network coverage. This approach resembles Infinitus, with two major differences. First, we believe that the use of large, unmanned drones (with wingspans the size of a Boeing 737/757 aircraft) flying overhead, solely depending on solar power, may not to be the safest method for providing this service. Second, we have a U.S. patent, which is recognized by many of the world’s nations, and protects Infinitus from competitors seeking to utilize our technology, although this patent expires in September 2018. However, we also filed an additional patent application on July 25, 2017 seeking the right to exclude others, commensurate with the scope of the patent application, from using our method of synchronizing free space optic links between aircraft in flight, which we believe, if obtained, will be instrumental in making Infinitus operate successfully. Currently, this patent application is undergoing prioritized examination at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and we are continuing to prosecute this patent application in order to get the patent granted as soon as possible. We do not believe that our competitors own similar patents in those countries that recognize U.S. patents, nor do they have a license to use the technology covered by our patent and patent application.
http://sec.edgar-online.com/airborne-wireless-network/s-1a-securities-registration-statement/2018/05/03/section19.aspx
The test took place using a Cessna light aircraft just north of Los Angeles, California, with the ground station based on a rooftop in the neighborhood of Woodland Hills.
Woodland Hills and Simi Valley (ABWN HQ) are right next to each other. Very coincidental.
I am still long this one. Is this the part where there is blood in the streets?.....
https://seekingalpha.com/filing/3648745
On August 3, 2017, Airborne Wireless Network, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), issued a press release announcing that Marius de Mos, the Company’s Vice President of Technical Affairs and Development, as inventor, has filed with the USTPO on July 25, 2017, a new non-provisional patent application, number 15/658,761, which describes a “method of synchronizing laser-links between aircraft”.
https://www.dgap.de/dgap/Documents/Research/?companyID=390218&documentId=67272247
Dated 5/17/18
I assume a German analyst for Mynaric....I had it translated and I came across this paragraph. Not sure if it translated properly but what I highlighted sure is interesting commentary.
Last August, Mynaric announced the signing of a design and
manufacturing agreement with the US company Airborne Wireless
Network. As part of this,
extensive tests with laser technologies of the company are to
be carried out in the coming financial year . Here, up to 20 aircraft will be equipped with laser technology from Mynaric
to obtain a laser-based communication network.
This cooperation has taken another important step in the
series production targeted by the company. The necessary
funds were raised in the course of the successful IPO
(gross issue proceeds: EUR 27.3 million).
It appears we still have some naked shorts out there.
https://otcshortreport.com/company/ABWN?index=rfmk&action=view
Still wondering what the issue with the 4320 is? Been about 2 weeks since ABWN has been on this list.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/market-activity/reg-sho-data
https://otcshortreport.com/company/ABWN
Wondering if this info is indicative of anything. Some say an eventual short squeeze, I have read this isn't necessarily going to happen. Opinions?
Another possibility for PR is their patent application. Essentially a year since their application.
Maybe this will have a bearing on patent issues. This is what some people have been waiting for since it have been close to a year since the application was made.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/airborne-wireless-network-assigned-new-patent-application-entitled-method-of-synchronizing-laser-links-between-aircraft-300499078.html
SIMI VALLEY, Calif., Aug. 3, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Airborne Wireless Network (OTC QB: ABWN) is pleased to announce that Marius de Mos, the Company's Vice President of Technical Affairs and Development, as inventor, has filed with the USTPO on July 25, 2017, a new non-provisional patent application, number 15/658,761.
The patent describes a "method of synchronizing laser-links between aircraft." The Company will be using this method as a roadmap to attempt to exponentially increase data transfer speeds for the Company's contemplated Infinitus Super Highway. Marius de Mos has agreed to assign the patent to the Company for a symbolic $1.
To reiterate, from Mynaric's 2017 Report, dtd April 2018
http://ircenter.handelsblatt.com/download/companies/mynaric/Annual%20Reports/DE000A0JCY11-JA-2017-EQ-E-00.pdf
Excerpts from Mynaric's 2017 Annual Report:
Our American subsidiary – Mynaric USA – is now primed and ready to take our products into the key US
market, where our collaboration with Airborne Wireless Network continues apace. In August 2017 we
signed an agreement with Airborne that underscores our ongoing expansion into the thriving US market
and in December we delivered two laser terminals for an upcoming test. This is just one example of how our
team continues to tap the huge US market potential.
The GmbH’s 2017 sales of EUR 1,639k refer to delivered finished products or self-contained milestones of a
major customer project. Significant sales revenues resulted from the delivery of a ground station and an
airborne terminal and the successful demonstration of these products in an air-to-ground scenario for a
major US customer. The transmission speed achieved, 10 Gbps, represents the fastest wireless connection
from an aircraft to the ground known to us up to now. In 2017, other significant sales for the GmbH resulted
from technical milestones achieved with an optical ground station for communication with satellites, which
is under construction and is to be mass-produced following a successful demonstration.
MYNARIC’S STRONG MARKET POSITION
It is widely accepted that the answer to the planet’s current connectivity issues is only practicably deliverable
through the creation of airborne or spaceborne constellations that sit above the planet providing an
interlinked canopy capable of providing global coverage.
It is a solution that Mynaric wholeheartedly subscribes to. The current market focus is, understandably, on
the initial move to establish faithful and reliable vehicular interconnectivity to establish constellations. The
first movers in this area are already working with us to create this laser-linked network.
Each linked aircraft – we are at the moment actively engaged in equipping aircraft – must establish, firstly, a
connection between the aircraft and then, secondly, a connection with the ground. These key connections
between the aircraft and between the constellation and the ground are provided by Mynaric. Laser terminals
establish connections between the airborne constituent parts and ground stations, then receive the data to
send back down from the skies.
With the potential for numerous aircraft to be linked-up, we have made a conscious and market-changing
decision to pursue a business model that permits serial production of affordable units which can, in turn,
speedily and cost-effectively populate the planned airborne networks in the sky.
Our move towards serial production does not just allow us to become a prime mover in the fledgling
airborne constellations planned by high-profile, active constellation-builders such as Airborne Wireless
Networks, Facebook and Google but it also sets us up to be a ‘first mover’ in the developments planned by
the likes of SpaceX and OneWeb who are anticipating thousands of satellites in their low Earth orbit
constellations. As these standard-bearer companies forge ahead with plans to establish constellations above
the clouds, many others are also now beginning to see the potential of this entirely new industry of
aerospace communication networks.
Whilst the move towards the skies and space for delivery of internet is a relatively new endeavor on the part
of the companies that are planning it, the technology underpinning our products is served by 20 years’
development at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and this has underpinned the design and introduction
of products that have overseen two records in the recent past: an air-to-ground demonstration of 1 Gbps
over a 60 km distance from a fast-flying platform, and, an air-to-ground demonstration of 10 Gbps. To date,
no other company has managed comparable achievements with commercial products.
With these technological milestones under our belt, and with the strongest focus on commercialized
products of all of the laser communication specialists primed to populate airborne and spaceborne
constellations, we are leading the race to equip the networks that will fire this new telecommunications
revolution.
Successful tests of our products on aircraft in Germany and the United States, and the collaborations we are
engaged in with companies in the US realizing these airborne constellations, demonstrate the undeniable
ability of our products to be the indispensable factor knitting data constellations together. And with New
Space companies such as SpaceX silencing naysayers and critics with successful launches of rockets that are
made up of reusable parts, the reality of satellite constellations linked by lasers draws ever closer.
I hate legal speech so I looked for a layman's / Cliff Notes translation for rule 4320 and found this here. There is more to this post, I am just pasting an excerpt from it.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60602302
New FINRA 4320 Short Sale Delivery Requirements
FINRA 4320. Short Sale Delivery Requirements
(a) If a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency in a non-reporting threshold security for 13 consecutive settlement days, the participant shall immediately thereafter close out the fail to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity.
(1) Provided, however, if a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency for thirty-five consecutive settlement days in a non-reporting threshold security that was sold pursuant to SEC Rule 144, the participant shall immediately thereafter close out the fail to deliver position in the security by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity. The requirements in paragraph (b) shall apply to all such fails to deliver that are not closed out in conformance with this paragraph (a)(1).
(b) If a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency in a non-reporting threshold security for 13 consecutive settlement days (or 35 consecutive settlement days if entitled to rely on paragraph (a)(1)), the participant and any broker or dealer for which it clears transactions, including any market maker that would otherwise be entitled to rely on the exception provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of Rule 203 of SEC Regulation SHO, may not accept a short sale order in the non-reporting threshold security from another person, or effect a short sale in the non-reporting threshold security for its own account, without borrowing the security or entering into a bona-fide arrangement to borrow the security, until the participant closes out the fail to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity and that purchase has cleared and settled at a registered clearing agency.
(c) If a participant of a registered clearing agency reasonably allocates a portion of a fail to deliver position to another registered broker or dealer for which it clears trades or for which it is responsible for settlement, based on such broker or dealer's short position, then the provisions of this Rule relating to such fail to deliver position shall apply to the portion of the fail to deliver position allocated to such registered broker or dealer, and not to the participant.
(d) A participant of a registered clearing agency shall not be deemed to have fulfilled the requirements of this Rule where the participant enters into an arrangement with another person to purchase securities as required by this Rule, and the participant knows or has reason to know that the other person will not deliver securities in settlement of the purchase.
(e) For the purposes of this Rule, the following terms shall have the meanings below:
(1) the term “market maker” has the same meaning as in Section 3(a)(38) of the Exchange Act.
(2) the term “non-reporting threshold security” means any equity security of an issuer that is not registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act and for which the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act:
(A) for which there is an aggregate fail to deliver position for five consecutive settlement days at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more and for which on each settlement day during the five consecutive settlement day period, the reported last sale during normal market hours for the security on that settlement day that would value the aggregate fail to deliver position at $50,000 or more, provided that if there is no reported last sale on a particular settlement day, then the price used to value the position on such settlement day would be the previously reported last sale; and
(B) is included on a list published by FINRA.
A security shall cease to be a non-reporting threshold security if the aggregate fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency does not meet or exceed either of the threshold tests specified in paragraph (e)(2)(A) of this Rule for five consecutive settlement days.
(3) the term “participant” means a participant as defined in Section 3(a)(24) of the Exchange Act, that is a FINRA member. The term “registered clearing agency” means a clearing agency, as defined in Section 3(a)(23)(A) of the Exchange Act, that is registered with the SEC pursuant to Section 17A of the Exchange Act.
(This is 3(a)(23)(A): The term "clearing agency" means any person who acts as an intermediary in making payments or deliveries or both in connection with transactions in securities or who provides facilities for comparison of data respecting the terms of settlement of securities transactions, to reduce the number of settlements of securities transactions, or for the allocation of securities settlement responsibilities. Such term also means any person, such as a securities depository, who (i) acts as a custodian of securities in connection with a system for the central handling of securities whereby all securities of a particular class or series of any issuer deposited within the system are treated as fungible and may be transferred, loaned, or pledged by bookkeeping entry without physical delivery of securities certificates, or (ii) otherwise permits or facilitates the settlement of securities transactions or the hypothecation or lending of securities without physical delivery of securities certificates.
(5) the term “settlement day” means any business day on which deliveries of securities and payments of money may be made through the facilities of a registered clearing agency.
==========================================
WHY IS FINRA 4320 SO EXCITING TO THE SECURITIES LAWYERS AND THE CORPORATIONS THAT HAVE SURVVIVED THESE NSS ATTACKS?
1) It finally addresses abusive naked short selling in non-reporting issuers. Up until now the regulators and SROs have found that the investors in development stage corporations somehow did not deserve the provision of investor protection.
2) Even though it is entitled “short sale delivery requirements” it covers the failures to deliver (FTDs) involved with intentionally mislabeled “long sales”. One way to bypass the newer short selling rules is to illegal mislabel your short sale as a “long sale” and just voluntarily fail to deliver the shares.
3) It affects FTDs held in “ex-clearing” because all (approximately 1,000) clearing firms that are “participants” of the NSCC/DTCC are indeed “registered clearing agencies” in and of themselves. (see 3(a)(23)(A) in the smaller print above.)
4) It addresses the FTDs of even market makers held at registered clearing agencies. The bona fide MM exemption from needing to pre-borrow or “locate” shares before making admittedly naked short sales is the main loophole being abused. THIS IS A VERY BIG DEAL.
5) It expressly forbids a crooked clearing firm from “crossing” failed to be delivered shares to a co-conspiring clearing firm in order to reset the 13-day clock. These illegal “wash sales” are pandemic.
6) There is no “grandfathering” in of old delivery failures held in illegal “ex-clearing arrangements” as these are still FTDs as nothing ever got delivered. The mere marking to market of the monetary value of failed delivery obligations has nothing whatsoever to do with making the “good form delivery” of the securities sold needed to accomplish the “settlement” of a trade.
7) In the abusive naked short selling world there are very, very bad guys and other semi-bad guys. The semi-bad guys will probably voluntarily cover their not so huge naked short positions BEFORE the really bad guys will have time to. They may even go net long after covering knowing that their bigger brother bad guys might be in deep doo-doo.
8) All of the crooks are not going to run willy-nilly tomorrow morning and cover BUT THOSE CORPORATIONS WITH IMMENSE NAKED SHORT POSITIONS THAT ARE ABLE TO PULL OFF SOME SORT OF LARGE CORPORATE ACCOMPLISHMENT WILL BE GREATLY BENEFITTED AND THEIR NAKED SHORT POSITIONS MIGHT RISE TO THE TOP OF THE “SHORT POSITIONS TO IMMEDIATELY COVER” LIST.
This is the rule in question.
4320. Short Sale Delivery Requirements
(a) If a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency in a non-reporting threshold security for 13 consecutive settlement days, the participant shall immediately thereafter close out the fail to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity.
(1) Provided, however, if a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency for thirty-five consecutive settlement days in a non-reporting threshold security that was sold pursuant to SEC Rule 144, the participant shall immediately thereafter close out the fail to deliver position in the security by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity. The requirements in paragraph (b) shall apply to all such fails to deliver that are not closed out in conformance with this paragraph (a)(1).
(b) If a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency in a non-reporting threshold security for 13 consecutive settlement days (or 35 consecutive settlement days if entitled to rely on paragraph (a)(1)), the participant and any broker or dealer for which it clears transactions, including any market maker that would otherwise be entitled to rely on the exception provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of Rule 203 of SEC Regulation SHO, may not accept a short sale order in the non-reporting threshold security from another person, or effect a short sale in the non-reporting threshold security for its own account, without borrowing the security or entering into a bona-fide arrangement to borrow the security, until the participant closes out the fail to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity and that purchase has cleared and settled at a registered clearing agency.
(c) If a participant of a registered clearing agency reasonably allocates a portion of a fail to deliver position to another registered broker or dealer for which it clears trades or for which it is responsible for settlement, based on such broker or dealer's short position, then the provisions of this Rule relating to such fail to deliver position shall apply to the portion of the fail to deliver position allocated to such registered broker or dealer, and not to the participant.
(d) A participant of a registered clearing agency shall not be deemed to have fulfilled the requirements of this Rule where the participant enters into an arrangement with another person to purchase securities as required by this Rule, and the participant knows or has reason to know that the other person will not deliver securities in settlement of the purchase.
(e) For the purposes of this Rule, the following terms shall have the meanings below:
(1) the term “market maker” has the same meaning as in Section 3(a)(38) of the Exchange Act.
(2) the term “non-reporting threshold security” means any equity security of an issuer that is not registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act and for which the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act:
(A) for which there is an aggregate fail to deliver position for five consecutive settlement days at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more and for which on each settlement day during the five consecutive settlement day period, the reported last sale during normal market hours for the security on that settlement day that would value the aggregate fail to deliver position at $50,000 or more, provided that if there is no reported last sale on a particular settlement day, then the price used to value the position on such settlement day would be the previously reported last sale; and
(B) is included on a list published by FINRA.
A security shall cease to be a non-reporting threshold security if the aggregate fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency does not meet or exceed either of the threshold tests specified in paragraph (e)(2)(A) of this Rule for five consecutive settlement days.
(3) the term “participant” means a participant as defined in Section 3(a)(24) of the Exchange Act, that is a FINRA member.
(4) the term “registered clearing agency” means a clearing agency, as defined in Section 3(a)(23)(A) of the Exchange Act, that is registered with the SEC pursuant to Section 17A of the Exchange Act.
(5) the term “settlement day” means any business day on which deliveries of securities and payments of money may be made through the facilities of a registered clearing agency.
(f) Pursuant to the Rule 9600 Series, the staff, for good cause shown after taking into consideration all relevant factors, may grant an exemption from the provisions of this Rule, either unconditionally or on specified terms and conditions, to any transaction or class of transactions, or to any security or class of securities, or to any person or class of persons, if such exemption is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
07/09/2018 ABWN Airborne Wireless Network Common Stock OTCQB No Yes
https://www.otcmarkets.com/market-activity/reg-sho-data
Maybe referring to this?
It was referencing this...
http://sfvbj.com/news/2018/jul/09/internet-sky/
Something to read. It says a bit more than other articles.
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2018/june/20/skyhawks-help-build-data-network
An article about Inflight broadband, from 9/17. Not ABWN centric but gives some insight into the market potential.
http://www.inmarsat.com/news/34067/
From Mynaric's 2017 Annual Report, dated April 2018
http://ircenter.handelsblatt.com/download/companies/mynaric/Annual%20Reports/DE000A0JCY11-JA-2017-EQ-E-00.pdf
Our American subsidiary – Mynaric USA – is now primed and ready to take our products into the key US
market, where our collaboration with Airborne Wireless Network continues apace. In August 2017 we
signed an agreement with Airborne that underscores our ongoing expansion into the thriving US market
and in December we delivered two laser terminals for an upcoming test. This is just one example of how our
team continues to tap the huge US market potential.
Our move towards serial production does not just allow us to become a prime mover in the fledgling
airborne constellations planned by high-profile, active constellation-builders such as Airborne Wireless
Networks, Facebook and Google but it also sets us up to be a ‘first mover’ in the developments planned by
the likes of SpaceX and OneWeb who are anticipating thousands of satellites in their low Earth orbit
constellations. As these standard-bearer companies forge ahead with plans to establish constellations above
the clouds, many others are also now beginning to see the potential of this entirely new industry of
aerospace communication networks.
That report has some good reading. Funny how their report puts us in the same breath as FB and Google...
For those of us with a longer view, I would like to think we realize that this is a gamble but other than the AS issue (which many of us have accepted as a protective measure), nothing has changed and that it is a gamble worth taking.
We have seen the compilation of DD here and many of us have deduced that this company is worthy of investment.
If this was a "sure thing" it wouldn't be where it is at now, hence the potential for great gains.
This is an excerpt from an interview with the CEO of Mynaric 11/17 (I know it is old)) but it is these types of tid bits of information that point to what AWBN is doing.
http://www.equitystory.com/Download/Research/20171120_Mynaric_Vorstandsinterview_ENG_Final.pdf
GBC: What objectives are you going to pursue on an operational and technological
level over the coming years?
Dr Peschko: To begin with, we expect increasing quantities in the field of laser terminals
for aviation. In this respect, we shall be seeing network demonstrations with aeroplanes
or other platforms and several dozen of our laser terminals. Following this, we then anticipate
the beginning of operational roll-outs of our products for aviation, which will be
required in three to four-digit quantities. At the same time, we will continue to develop our
laser terminals for satellites, which we started at the end of last year and which we hope
will be finished towards the end of 2018. In 2019, we plan to fly the terminal on a satellite
into space for the first time
Sounds like ABWN doesn't it?
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/airborne-wireless-network-assigned-new-patent-application-entitled-method-of-synchronizing-laser-links-between-aircraft-2017-08-03?siteid=bigcharts&dist=bigcharts
IMI VALLEY, Calif., Aug. 3, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Airborne Wireless Network (otc qb:ABWN) is pleased to announce that Marius de Mos, the Company's Vice President of Technical Affairs and Development, as inventor, has filed with the USTPO on July 25, 2017, a new non-provisional patent application, number 15/658,761.
The patent describes a "method of synchronizing laser-links between aircraft." The Company will be using this method as a roadmap to attempt to exponentially increase data transfer speeds for the Company's contemplated Infinitus Super Highway. Marius de Mos has agreed to assign the patent to the Company for a symbolic $1.
Another article ABWN is mentioned. Circa 2018 but it isn't dated.
https://www.spacefoundation.org/what-we-do/space-technology-hall-fame/inducted-technologies/miniaturized-laser-terminals-skies-and
Something to read. If you go to the conference website itself, you will notice that ABWN was a speaker and an ABWN member is on the advisory board of this conference.
http://newenglandnewsonline.com/airborne-wireless-network-soars-at-the-2018-global-connected-aircraft-summit/
Just saw another ABWN commercial on Fox News.
Not sure if this has been posted before but it is some interesting reading. Analyst report (10/2017) on Mynaric with ABWN mentioned. It is obviously old but it does mention timelines which appear to have been carried out so far.
https://www.researchpool.com/download/?report_id=1586393&show_pdf_data=true
I am just pointing out things that I notice. People can make their own conclusions. It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out.
Just a thought.....in one of the PRs, there was mention of the test being successful with the land unit mounted on a house in Woodland Hills. For those that don't know So Cal....Woodland Hills is essentially neighbors with the Simi Valley (ABWN address). California is a pretty big place......coincidence?
I did.....Just food for thought.
Could this ABWN....new here still figuring out things a bit I did a little research and if you can follow me.....could this be ABWN.
Go to ABWN partners website, Mynaric. Click on the news tab and look at the latest entry dated 6/28.
From there, click on the headline and it will direct you to a page with just a headline. Copy that headline and do a search. You will find a youtube video about what FB did. Lot's of parallels.
Just reporting.