Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Janice, as I stated my broker was giving me a possible scenario for the lack of info, etc. I did state that it was off the record and only based on speculation. If he should be reported for this hypothosis then I need to take the blame for pushing him for it. Given the recent lack of information by any involved parties I thought it may be interesting to learn about his thoughts, perhaps seeing it from a different perspective and having nothing to loose or gain either way. I thought it was an interesting theory and I thought that I was clear that it was only a speculation based on the information I provided. This was in no way advice to myself or anyone here and I would hope that everyone knows that. I thought it was interesting enough to share with the board. After all, with no news what else do we have but to speculate!
Kim
This is only speculation on his part. That is what I asked for.
His speculation "Off The Record" was just based on my querry as to a possible reason that this isn't resolved yet. The SEC may still be conducting their investigation also. I too wish I had a crystal ball to determine the reason for the lack of information. I thought it was an interesting hypothosis though, so I thought I would share it with the board.
I am keeping my fingers crossed that this is the case. I have contacted the SEC and they are not able to provide any insight at all. So I'll take what I can get.
Cheers,
Kim
Good morning folks,
I had a long talk with my broker yesterday and he made some interesting suggestions "Off The Record" I explained everything that has been going on in length and asked for a little insight. He has suggested that perhaps Ksw is using this suspension to buy some additional time to get deals and/or patents closer to completion. There has been no mention by the SEC in regards to any litigation against the company and that is a very good sign. He also suggested that if Mr. Anderson or KSW was not legitimate, their 11th hour press release regarding the suspension would likely not have happened for fear of additional recourse by the SEC. In fact they may have listed the company prematurely in regards to their patents and licencing to raise a little capital for the initial expenses. Perhaps we'll see this come back on the ob market at a substanstially higher price. Either way, he told me not to expect any NR or correspondance until they are close to relisting. In all probability we should be OK in the near future.
This is all speculation of course, but hey, we can hope.
Cheers ,
Kim
The SEC is on a roll with suspensions !!!
1 more yesterday and 2 more today !!
..All in the best interest of the shareholders yet they do not feel the least bit obligated to report to said shareholders !! I'm so impressed.
K
YAHOOOO!!!!!! What a ride!!!...
Cheers everyone I just got the news!!!
GLTA,
Kim
Trading to resume after midnight tonight. Monday morning will be trading again.
Thanks for looking into that.
Cheers,
Kim
Calgary,
You seem to know a little about web pages. I checked out Kswj's page today and when I right click to properties of different areas of the pages it gives me created and updated dates ranging from 04/15 to 04/18 and 04/19. Does this mean they've been updating the info or am I incorrectly assessing the information? I haven't noticed any changes other than the contact info. Would you have any insight as to whether their web site has recently been updated or not? I'm not sure if I was seeing that right.
TIA.
Kim
Happy Easter!!
Kim
Damn the univesity anyways!! LOL..This plays out right I'll sent her to school in Switzerland!!
LMAO
Kim
Hi folk, sorry about the short post about the pink sheets page, it was late. I'm not sure if he talked to George regarding the info. I know that he had tried to get a hold of the company. He said that he left several messages but that he was going to keep trying to contact them.
Then I got the message that pink sheets would be updated and that he had confirmed the recent info. I only know that I like the direction this is going. If the whole thing were a scam why not be on a flight out of here and be done with it. What would be the purpose of updating your web site if you don't plan to have a company after the suspension. I can't think of a good reason other than to use this time to get things in order.
I have e mailed them, but have had no reply so far. I really don't expect anything until we're closer to the 21st. This is JMHO but I think things are going to play out OK.
Kim
I talked to a fellow at pink sheets.com and he did some work at updating KSWJ info.
He did confirm all new info and listed it on pink sheets company info page. Perhaps we're looking up.
Here's to hoping folks!!
Kim
I found something at the patents office. It coinsides with the start up of ksw In Oct. 2005 Very interesting. This application was only released to public on Thurs.
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FP....
Not saying this it ~ but it sure all fits their claims and some of thier references to the process of the EM-100. This is REALLY interesting. I'm not a techie so if anyone has any thoughts after reading it let me know.
HMMM...makes you wonder...
Kim
Stockound,
You make a good point. The SEC really isn't asking for much. They should have no problem being re instated if they just answer a few questions. The SEC isn't accusing them of anything only asking them to provide some answers. That's fair.
I think it will be trading as usual in a couple of weeks. I re read the e mails that Mr. Anderson sent in response to my questions and I don't sense anything but sincerity in them still.
Answer a few questions and be done with it.
IMO
Kim
It is all assumtiom here but there are other George Anderson's that have relevant electronics company experience. Here's one that I thought may have been a possibility.
Deltacomm Electronic Solutions Ltd
83 Church Road
Addlestone
KT15 1SF(Road Map)
Surrey
Tel: 01932 844454
Fax: 01932 844998
Internet: www.deltacomm.org.uk
Managing Director - George Anderson
Sales and Marketing Director - Clive Anderson
Manager - Mandy Woods
Products and Services
Assembly Services - Sub-contract
Automatic Control Systems - Industrial
In which case maybe he doesn't have a lot of stock market experience.
If this turns out to be legitimate, I would expect many of us would get involved if they try to lynch George Andersons and KSWJ.
Kim
I will give it a shot. Will let everyone know..
Kim
I just got here. I am not surprised to see this. I am surprised it didn't happen sooner. I don't think it's Enron, I think the SEC got propably as many questions about KSW Industries as George Anderson has had e mails. There is definately some conflicting information out there that needs to get straightened out. This is the only way to do that. I think this company might come out of this smelling like roses. The SEC only wants to know the same information that we do. I don't believe Mr. Anderson would be coresponding through e mail as he has done if this was a scam. Perhaps the SEC straightens this out for all of us. I believe things are going to be better for it in the long run. This has happened to other companies before, and it's not all doom and gloom. I'm OK with this. We were going to have to wait a couple of weeks for a PR anyways. This just means the MM's will not be able to screw with the prices for a while. We may all be pleasently surprised on the 21st. We've all had questions and have been running on faith. It sure will be nice to have a solid foundation to base our faith on. This IMO is a good thing.
GLTA,
Kim
LOL Lakedweller. Would you stop that. LMAO
Kim
Cheers All!! KSWJ is now my #1 holding !! Good luck to us all who weathered this rough water!! Our thanks will come soon enough IMO..I can wait.
Kim
To: "George Anderson" <kswinfo@hotmail.com>
>Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:47:57 -0700
>
>Dear Mr. Anderson,
> Please release something soon that might give investors a degree of
>confidence as I don't know whether this company is even strong enough to
>fight back against the current sell off of shares. I understand that due to
>licensing and patents you can release very little information but I think
>the shareholders are feeling very unsettled given the slow decline of their
>investment and the uncertainty of the legitimacy of the company. Perhaps
>some reassurance given the current situation may be in order. Even a
>confirmation of some sort is better than nothing. So far the only ones
>talking are the cynics and doom-seers. Your shareholders need to know that
>this is not "Flash Gordon with his ray gun" as was stated on one of the
>discussion boards. Anything you can provide would be appreciated. Hope I'm
>not going down with a sinking ship.
>Sincerely,
>Kimberly
REPLY~~~~~
Dear Ms.
We have begun the process of patent applications and it is lawyers who are
doing this on behalf of the company, in case anyone out there wonders if we
have retained lawyers. I assumed from the pr we did that everyone would
understand that, but from the e-mail we have been getting that is not the
case.
Once the patent pending part of the application has been reached, then we
can complete some of the negotiations that are in progress right now.
In the meantime, we will upgrade the web site.
I would hope that shareholders would understand that because of the fact
that this is new technology, we can reveal very little until the patent
application process has reached the point where we can reveal information.
I do not know how to help shareholders in reagrd to the stock price.
G. Anderson
This was just recieved.
It restores my confidence to some degree. I didn't think I'd get a reply within the same day let alone within minutes. It's a bumpy ride but I think I'll hang on with both hands.
GLTA, Stay long It may be worth the ride!!
Kim
Re: Technology'
If anyone wants to do a little dry reading, you can find that the DOE was funding research into a technology very similar to this back in 2000/2001. They have a lot of tech jargon involved but it does seem that they proved the technology. However, there is is very little mentioned about it after or at about the time of 9/11. I'm wondering if perhaps the pulled the $4 million R & D funding for it at that time. The theory is sound as far as I have researched, but then I don't have a Physics degree either. Do some looking into the technology and I think you will find that it is not only feasable but quite likely very possible that it has been perfected.
IMO
Cheers,
Kim
Welcome over California! I too wasn't comfortable talking OT on RB boards.
Kim
From how I'm reading his reply I would say they are still awaiting patent pending status. It takes longer for a world patent. However being that they are in negotiations with someone to market this product is very promising. I believe once the patents are pending the negotiations will be finalized. I believe Mr.Anderson's sincerity when he said...
" Next, as to the reality of the company unfortunately until patents are
pending we cannot reveal much about the actual process nor are we at liberty
to state who we are negotiating with if they don't give us permission to say
so until the deal is closed.
I wish I could provide more but my hands are tied.
George Anderson"
I think we all can appreciate that!!
I'm holding about 2 million now and not giving any away!!
GLTA
Kim
I had those pump and dump e mails sent to me also. It was a short time after I bought the stock. I e-mailed the company at that time about it and they told me that it was not the company, it was individuals perpetrating this. They had not authorized any such release. These Pump and Dump campaigns are almost always an individual or group of individuals trying to cash in on the hype THEY create. They are scams in thier own right but not the company perpetrating them. I lend very little credence to this as to establishing the validity of the company. I believe that I have a wise investment still. I am pleased with the response I recieved back from Mr. Anderson yesterday and have purchased more on this dip. I think his response says something about him as a person. I am again confident that this will all be something to laugh about one day soon. I understand his position and will hope for news soon...
GLTYA,Kim
Regarding my post about the college fund..
That WAS only figuratively speaking of course..I would just rather see her go to Harvard instead ..lol..
I would assume that everyone could see the money go to good use :0)
Kim
FREBET,
Perhaps he felt sorry for me when I said I was using my daughter's college fund..LOL..
I guess I should feel privileged...
Longest reply I've gotten yet..
GLTA,
Kim
Thanks Lakedweller!!!!
I've been trying to do that half the day. Good Job.
I'm OK now. Back on track!!!
Kim
I just recieved an e mail from George Anderson.
It Goes like this....
To George Anderson,
> I need you to confirm that this company is legitimate. I am a avid
>supporter of this stock and company, but at this moment I am a little
>unsettled. You have a phone # that is an answering service and as of yet I
>have not seen anything other than "intends to" nor any information as to
>who you might be in negotiations with. I have substantial holdings of this
>stock but with my daughter's college fund at stake, I would appreciate
>something solid. I understand the sensitivity of the position you are in
>regarding patent filings, however, some of your supporters are losing
>confidence and asking some serious questions regarding the validity of this
>company. The lack of information is seriously raising suspicion among
>shareholders, myself included. As this company has potential for serious
>growth I have stood solid through the claims that this is a stock scam. I
>would appreciate any confirmation from you regarding these concerns.
>Sincerly,
Kim
////////////////////////////////////REPLY//////////
Dear Kim,
First, I would not commit my children's college fund to anything less than
blue chip.
That said, the 'answering service' appears like that because we get 100 plus
calls a day.
Next as to the reality of the company unfortunately until patents are
pending we cannot reveal much about the actual process nor are we at liberty
to state who we are negotiating with if they don't give us permission to say
so until the deal is closed.
I wish I could provide more but my hands are tied.
George Anderson
Duelittle...
I, and many others I'm sure thank you for all the effort you put into this. Like you I have had some questions, but have been afforded no answers other than " News will be forthcoming"
George Anderson has always replied. Usually quite promptly. My initial position on this stock hasn't changed and I will continue to hold. This has potential to be huge. I am a Canadian and I have family and friends in Alberta, and some of the main issues with this new oil sand boom is the enviromental impacts, water usage( SAGD Extraction process) and the amount of natural gas required to extract the heavy oil. The Alberta Government is pulling out all the stops to encourage companies to develope new technologies for the oil sands and has commisioned impact studies to be done. Over the weekend you might want to google Alberta Goverment and Oil Sands Studies and look into the potential for this tech.
It makes for an interesting read!!
Good Weekend!!
Kim
Hi Finn,
I am posting the reply I recieved from George Anderson. I recieved a reply within about 15 min.
>From: "Kim xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <kswinfo@hotmail.com>
>Subject: testing
>Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:53:52 -0800
>
>I am inquiring about whether you have begun field testing the em 100.
Could you tell me what companies, if any, are interested in the technology and when to expect some news. In one of your pr's you mentioned "joint venture"
>who might that be with and where are you planning to test?
>Thank You For You Response,
Reply:
~~~~~~~~I can only tell you that at this time there will be additional news
forthcoming answering all your questions.
Not very informative but at least something..
I belive 69 charge( Chris) also e mailed him and recieved a respone.
Maybe just try again, I hope you let us know what he says if you hear anything..
TIA,
Kim
Rocket what does CLYP mean??
K