Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
hi, I just searched, but I didn't find any similar to her, I really don't know who she is.
I didn't make that image, I have that image since April 2016 from twitter's #fanniegate
Will it be the same compensation for each share?
Or the time since the share was purchased will be taken into account, for example, someone who has held the share for 10 or 12 years should be compensated more than someone who bought it for 5 years
hi, we are all on the same boat, in the same companies, we are together on this, commons and preferreds
FHFA was created for several purposes, one of them is to preserve and preserve the assets of FnF shareholders.
There must be many agencies that look after the interests of taxpayers, but FHFA must only protect FnF shareholders interest (preferred and common)
ALL the FnF money that was sent to us treasury for its CONSERVATION and PRESERVATION must MUST be available to return to Fannie and Freddie at any time that is appropriate.
Preserving and conserving assets or money means it cannot be spent or sold because that would not be conserving and preserving.
but if the government can take the assets of fnf, then as compensation it must be equal to the assets taken by the us treasury
The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution reads as follows: “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
if SCOTUS said tha by law govt. can take fannie and freddie
OK they can take it
but we MUST receive compensation ASAP IMO
easier scotus ruling after amend
almost all is about the Net Worth Sweep
all lawsuits started after 2012 NWS
maybe there would not have been no lawsuits without 100% sweep
plaintiff already said that they want to keep 2008 10% terms
so the govt "only" will have give back to FF $30b - 40b ?
now is easier and faster decision by SCOTUS
AND with this amendment it became clear that the NWS was a robbery
We already know the SCOTUS opinions...
NATIONALIZATION !!!
yes a taking...
exercising or not its a taking
no only for that 0.00001 illegal price
in 2012 government changed a temporary conservatorship for an infinite conservatorship
infinite because NWS take all 100% profits forever, fannie and freddie would never be able to build capital to exit conservatorship
a taking
us treasury Will have to send back to fannie and freddie all "dividends" received... $300B+++ since 2008
Buy the Drop because FNMA Always POPS!
I would say +6000% =)
Leaked videos from Govt. after SCOTUS...
me too, 100% FNMA Commons!!!
Buy the Drop because FNMA Always POPS
=)
$700 p/share FNMA
=)
I am waiting that drop to 0.00001 to buy around the price the government has buy
if Fannie and Freddie would have needed a bailout, a dilution could be accepted
Fannie and Freddie had $95 billion before "conservatorship"
Fannie and Freddie never needed a bailout, a conservatorship, much less a NWS
there can't be any dilution in a FRAUD...
this is not a taking of private property to compensate later...
this is a taking of private property and not wanting to compensate.
the biggest robbery in History in the world by the U.S. Government
this is socialism, this is communism, this is North Korea, this is Cuba, this is Venezuela...
this is what you get when you vote for democrats