Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
WHEN THE FACTS ARE BAD, FICTION IS GOOD?
When reality sucks, many choose to live in a fictitious orbit, but it doesn't change reality no matter how many people join the orbit...........
Your claim is that, "figures don't lie", and now you say the figures which prove what a failure this has been, don't "mean anything", and anything in the past for SRMX and Maxine are irrelevant.
Bets on the future are based on the past. That's why the Chiefs are favored to win the SB next year and the Bengals are not.......
Credibility and facts matter. Bullshit doesn't.
Where is the information that proves this is a HIGH BETA stock?
*****GREAT LYING AND CRYING OPPORTUNITY SRMX*****
GREAT EXAMPLE OF RECKLESS AND TOTAL BULLSHIT POST!
Why is there no disclaimer indicating the photo-shopped SkiQ/T-Vision is totally bogus?
Why is there no disclaimer that the SkiQ shown is from 2017 and it was deemed OBSOLETE by the SRMX CEO on 1-29-20?
Why are fake, make believe products being shown on this board?
Note that the now obsolete SkiQ, received a DESIGN patent, NOT a FUNCTIONALITY patent.
Note that SkyFidelity has not been mentioned by SRMX for a loooooooooong time.
Note that there is no paper trail of proof that the other 2 patents are owned by SRMX.
Note that the CEO frequently says and issues false information about the company and its business dealings.
Note that the only proof of ownership of the 2 patents falsely claimed to have proof they are owned by SRMX, are ASSIGNED to persons Roy Ting and Max Li, not SRMX, and as others have researched and confirmed, there is NO PROOF these 2 patents, which are both over 8 years old, belong to anyone except for the persons they are listed as being assigned to by the USPTO.
Inventors: Ting; Roy (New Taipei, TW), Li; Max (New Taipei, TW)
Applicant: Ting; Roy, Li; Max
Assignee: Max Li (New Taipei, TW) Roy Ting (New Taipei, TW)
Family ID: 47678065
Appl. No.: 13/209,400
Filed: August 13, 2011
Inventors: Li; Max (Dana Point, CA), Ting; Roy (New Taipei, TW)
Applicant: Li; Max, Ting; Roy
Family ID: 48780556
Appl. No.: 13/349,237
Filed: January 12, 2012
Hopefully the 2 new followers quickly realize what they are following, and it ain’t pretty.
Don’t be fooled by photo-shopped pictures, gimmicks, and false information.
Only facts matter, not bullshit.
HOW TO KNOW IF A POST IS BULLSHIT:
When a challenge is made to a post, with facts and proof to back up the challenge, and there is NEVER a response to the challenge, or the only response is to repeat the original falsehood(s), that's how you know a post is bullshit.
For example: If someone says a prediction was made when the pps was .0039, that the price would fall to .0003, but they offer no proof of this claim, and then someone provides proof that the prediction of .0003 was actually made when the pps was .0011, and still the original claim of the prediction being made at .0039 is repeated over and over, with no proof to support the claim and continued ignorance of what the facts and proof show, then you know the original post is bullshit.
Easy.
This is a perfect example of ignoring facts.
The proof that it was falling like an avalanche and at .0011 when the .0003 "call" was made, is documented, it's clear as can be, and yet denial of reality.
June 2018, Bands so tight you can’t drive a pin through them.
Ummmmmm, 19 months later it looks like a truck could have been driven through them.........
Thursday, 06/21/18 05:22:12 PM
Post # 54812 of 65617
So, this .0039 has been debunked many times, but no admission this is a fake narrative.
I was wrong about the call to .0003 being made when it was .0006. It was actually made when it was .0011, which is much closer to .0003 then .0039 is.
Numerous posts each time this .0039 is mentioned, which prove it is a bullshit claim.
On 6-21-19, the call was for .05
On 7-1-19, it was down to .0011 and the call was then made for .0003
Here are the facts, AGAIN, from 4-11-19:
.0003 call when it was .0039? Not even close.
The call for .0003 was made on 7-1, when it was already down to .0011
And on 6-21, only 10 days earlier, the call was for .05.
So, the call was for .05 and it fell to .0003 within a couple of weeks.
Facts always trump fiction.
———————
Thursday, 06/21/18 05:22:12 PM
Post # 54812 of 65617
ALERT—Going to .05!!! Bollinger Bands so tight you can’t drive a pin through them!!! Imo. GET BACK IN NOW!!!!!!! $$SRMX$$$$$
————————
Sunday, 07/01/18 02:29:56 PM
Post # 55710 of 65617
.0003 on horizon imo
———————-
Price on 7-1 was .0011
Who will admit the call for .0003 was not made when it was .0039??????????
This is the post from 4-11-19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=148159179
Your claim is that, "figures don't lie", and now you say the figures which prove what a failure this has been, don't "mean anything", and anything in the past for SRMX and Maxine are irrelevant.
Bets on the future are based on the past. That's why the Chiefs are favored to win the SB next year and the Bengals are not.......
Credibility and facts matter. Bullshit doesn't.
Where is the information that proves this is a HIGH BETA stock?
Of course. The whole call will be SRMX.
What else would TMUS possibly talk about?
Maybe they will reveal details about the fake and photoshopped SkiQ/T-Vision image.
So, it’s going to 1’s and 2’s now?
Well that’s just wonderful.
IGNORING FACTS DOESN’T MEAN THEY DON’T EXIST...........
THIS POST IS RECKLESS AND TOTAL BULLSHIT!
Why is there no disclaimer indicating the photoshopped T-Vision is totally bogus?
Why is there no disclaimer that the SkiQ shown is from 2017 and it was deemed OBSOLETE by the SRMX CEO on 1-29-20?
Why are fake make believe products being shown on this board?
Note that the now obsolete SkiQ, received a DESIGN patent, NOT a FUNCTIONALITY patent.
Note that SkyFidelity has not been mentioned by SRMX for a loooooooooong time.
Note that there is no paper trail of proof that the other 2 patents are owned by SRMX.
Note that the CEO frequently says and issues false information about the company and its business dealings.
Note that the only proof of ownership of the 2 patents falsely claimed to have proof they are owned by SRMX, are ASSIGNED to persons Roy Ting and Max Li, not SRMX, and as others have researched and confirmed, there is NO PROOF these 2 patents, which are both over 8 years old, belong to anyone except for the persons they are listed as being assigned to by the USPTO.
Inventors: Ting; Roy (New Taipei, TW), Li; Max (New Taipei, TW)
Applicant: Ting; Roy, Li; Max
Assignee: Max Li (New Taipei, TW) Roy Ting (New Taipei, TW)
Family ID: 47678065
Appl. No.: 13/209,400
Filed: August 13, 2011
Inventors: Li; Max (Dana Point, CA), Ting; Roy (New Taipei, TW)
Applicant: Li; Max, Ting; Roy
Family ID: 48780556
Appl. No.: 13/349,237
Filed: January 12, 2012
Hopefully the 2 new followers quickly realize what they are following, and it ain’t pretty.
Don’t be fooled by photoshopped pictures, gimmicks, and false information.
Only facts matter, not bullshit.
Probably another 3 years too early......#norush
Well, well, well. High Beta been used before.......
Was bullshit then, as it's bullshit now.
Sunday, 05/12/19 07:57:50 AM
So, this .0039 has been debunked many times.
I was wrong about the call to .0003 being made when it was .0006. It was actually made when it was .0011, which is much closer to .0003 then .0039 is.
Numerous posts each time this .0039 is mentioned, which prove it is a bullshit claim.
On 6-21-19, the call was for .05
On 7-1-19, it was down to .0011 and the call was then made for .0003
Here are the facts, AGAIN, from 4-11-19:
.0003 call when it was .0039? Not even close.
The call for .0003 was made on 7-1, when it was already down to .0011
And on 6-21, only 10 days earlier, the call was for .05.
So, the call was for .05 and it fell to .0003 within a couple of weeks.
Facts always trump fiction.
———————
Thursday, 06/21/18 05:22:12 PM
Post # 54812 of 65617
ALERT—Going to .05!!! Bollinger Bands so tight you can’t drive a pin through them!!! Imo. GET BACK IN NOW!!!!!!! $$SRMX$$$$$
————————
Sunday, 07/01/18 02:29:56 PM
Post # 55710 of 65617
.0003 on horizon imo
———————-
Price on 7-1 was .0011
Who will admit the call for .0003 was not made when it was .0039??????????
This is the post from 4-11-19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=148159179
Now?? Been over a year of calling .08-.10.
And called for .0003 when it was .0006.
Then it went down to .0001.
Not impressive on either of these.
So nice having SOME accurate information in IBox.
So easy to prove what is real and what is fake.
Can it be this easy to prove what is true? Yes.
Your claim is that, "figures don't lie", and now you say the figures which prove what a failure this has been, don't "mean anything", and anything in the past for SRMX and Maxine are irrelevant.
Bets on the future are based on the past. That's why the Chiefs are favored to win the SB next year and the Bengals are not.......
Credibility and facts matter. Bullshit doesn't.
Where is the information that proves this is a HIGH BETA stock?
WOW! Something big on horizon for 2 years and still nothing.
Maxine's horizon with SRMX has been 10 years and still nothing small, much less big.
Facts Matter.
SRMX is a HIGH BETA stock. ROTFLMAO!!!
This post is bullshit.
We have not “heard” anything from TMUS. Where is the TMUS statement or joint PR? “Hearing from”, is not defined as simply seeing a device on a website, along with many other non-SRMX devices.
So, what have we heard from TMUS about SRMX?
We have not “heard” anything from Quectel. Where is any link to Quectel mentioning SRMX?
The claim that a product being on a website means we have “heard”, doesn’t work here because there is no SRMX product on any Quectel website.
So, what have we “heard” from Quectel about SRMX?
Fact: We have not “heard” anything from TMUS or Quectel about SRMX.
Another fact: Eminent? LOL
Facts matter.
High beta stocks are those that are positively correlated with returns of the S&P 500.
Over the last 2 years, the S&P is up 21%, while SRMX is down over 95%.
How is SRMX a High Beta stock exactly?
But we have proof that Maxine does!
True, figures don’t lie:
Down over 95% in 2 years
Zero revenue
Zero functionality patents
Zero retail products
60 fluffdates that have meant nothing
Thanks Nite! Just trying to present the facts, as they are, and everyone can decide for themselves what lens to view them through.
For this situation, I don’t like that Henry didn’t deny using stuff from other sites, and he didn’t even attempt to defend what he did. Instead, he shut down the APP site, which seems to confirm it was not legit. If it was, he would have left it alone.
Might want to do some actual DD here, since I brought you to this ticker.
TMobile has not made any public comments about SRMX.
Any claims that we have “heard” from TMobile about this company is false.
While the product is on the website, that is different from TMobile making a statement about SRMX.
Glad you trust me enough to follow me here.
APP website "under construction".....You're all welcome!
It concerned me when I saw the comments last week, and verified that the APP website contained illustrations that were the same as on other websites, so I decided to confront Henry about it via text.
The texts were on 1-30 and 1-31, and the website change was made approx. 48 hours later.
What does this change prove? You decide, but Henry didn't say much and didn't deny copying the other sites, which suggests the APP site may not have been legit.
As usual, I am able to prove what I'm saying.
Here is what was said:
And now the AP site is "under construction". You decide what it all means.
Link to what we "heard" from Tmobile already??
Where is the link to TMobile's comments about SRMX/Tricascade??
Well that's just great, isn't it? Whatever it's for, debunks the claims of it being used to further the cause.
Pennyland is EMINENT? EMINENT: famous and respected within a particular sphere or profession.
How is Pennyland eminent?
Link to where TMobile said anything about SRMX?
The module on the TMobile site is not the same as TMobile saying anything about SRMX.
And Quectel is selling to SRMX, so what?
This is a High Bullshit post......
High beta stocks are those that are positively correlated with returns of the S&P 500.
Over the last 2 years, the S&P is up 21%, while SRMX is down over 95%.
How is SRMX a High Beta stock exactly?
High Beta stock? Moves fast? Pennies in a day?
This post is total bullshit.
But we know Maxine does...........which is why it will take hearing from TMobile before anything Maxine says will be believed.
Anybody using facts for the past 2 years isn't expecting it.
Fiction and fantasy lovers expect it daily.
Maybe it's insider trading based on non-public information.
1.6 MILLION in cash/stock lawsuit settlements coming.......
Don’t forget about this nugget.
Cash settlement to be paid over 3 years and stock could be hundreds of millions or even billions of shares issued soon.
“Another fabulous Tricascade product”? LOL
“Another”, means there has been at least one previous fabulous product. Since Tricascade has been able to market one fabulous product in 10 years, this can’t be “another”.
Not to mention the SBC-700 has not been deemed as “fabulous” by any legitimate authority.
The fact is that Tricascade has not delivered any “fabulous” products, period.
Any comparison to Microsoft is absurd.
Does Maxine or SRMX have anything in common with this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft
The bullshit posts never end, but still .0003......
Could for 2 years, but never have.
What proof is there of “many whales jumped on board”? Is that an opinion, wish, hope, dream, or fact based with proof that can be provided?