Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There is no greater irony on iHub than people here posting every day about other people posting every day.
The “big boys” took things into a court room, sold off the assets, paid as much debt as the proceeds would cover, and shut the business down, just like the law says.
The OTC con artists made up a lie about the company being bought out and used it to flip the stock for a profit. Those con artists are still here today peddling a few new bits, but mostly just recycling the 4-5 year old crap, and still feeding it to the folks whose money they stole. They’ve added in “people still here debunking our BS means someone must be paying them and good things must be coming,” and that seems to be enough for people who believe a company liquidated and shut down 5 years ago was bought in a secret transaction nobody but the con artists figured out.
LCYB bought the plant at that address. I am puzzled by why it’s some sort of big deal that they list the address as their location.
Unless, as always, you’re just distorting things as always to keep the folks you conned out of their money distracted.
No, it isn’t “pending.” Cytovia Thereapeutics and Isleworth terminated their business combination agreement:
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isleworth-and-cytovia-terminate-merger-agreement-301579200.html
You refuse to read things that contradict what you want to believe. If you’d get current, read up on Chapter 7 bankruptcies and the court records of this case, you’d have a shot at recovering some sanity.
The address is where the plant is. What other address would you want them to list?
Have you ever considered reading the rest of the document you extracted that passage from, or the rest of the court records? It would be very enlightening, and you could really use it.
Who cares what sort of loans and other business LCYB does? You don’t own it.
Here’s some additional questions for you:
In August of 2018, the board of directors and every executive of BioAmber resigned. After that, the monitor was given complete control over the company to complete its liquidation and shut down, which they did.
If you truly believe something “under the radar for over 5 years” is going on, tell me who is doing it in the absence of a board and executives?
Tell me why there hasn’t been one single whisper of news directly from the company since August of 2018?
While you’re at it:
Tell me how stock that you own could be bought/sold without telling you at all?
It must be fascinating to you (it is to me) that people still cling to your every word as though it’s gospel even though you’ve been consistently wrong about everything for 5 years. I know that “buy this stock and you’ll be rich beyond your wildest dreams” is quite seductive, it’s why it sells way better than “that guy is lying to you to flip the stock for profit,” but you’d think after 5 years they’d start to ask for a little more information about the step by step to getting rich. Human nature….
It’s like the “people are still here debunking my BS, that must mean good things are coming soon!!” message, so absurd on its face, but when I consider the audience are folks stupid enough to believe a dead, empty, liquidated, shut down, bankrupt company was going to be bought out, I can see how it sells to them.
Immune hasn’t invested in anything. Immune Pharmaceuticals is being liquidated. The only person working on Immune in the bankruptcy trustee. You want to ignore that fact and what Chapter 7 bankruptcy is because it doesn’t suit the delusion you cling to with the few brain cells you have left.
Immune is dead, over. Your investment was a total loss.
2 things: all the proposals/bids received were revealed in the 6th monitor’s report. There was nothing else proposed.
The only non-disclosure that outlived the proceedings was the judge’s order to the shareholders lawyer not to disclose the Vinmar contract they were provided a copy of. That’s it, and that was included in the judge’s final order.
All this crap about anything “ongoing” when the board and executives resigned, everything was liquidated, employees gone, the judges closed their proceedings and discharged the monitor, is just absurdly stupid.
Grasping at straws. I can tell you one thing they aren’t looking for, and that’s a dead, empty, worthless, former pharmaceutical company with no assets, employees, or business operations.
Nobody believes this pump. Know why? Because if anybody really believed the SPAC fairy was going to stuff money into the pockets of a stinky pink OTC company, it wouldn’t matter one little bit what the day to day PPS was and nobody spend a hot minute pumping it. All you guys here pumping wanting the PPS to go up “to da moon” obviously don’t believe it and are looking to sell, likely because you’ve read about the RS that will happen one way or another before any SPAC shares/money are distributed.
In case you begin to think the "THis is Financial Advice" YouTube might be some sort of beginning of the end of the APE Get Shorty movement, then there's this:
https://stocktwits.com/PeteTong/message/546409405
The GoFundMe has netted $33k so far.
I'm surprised it's playing out the way it is. Jake bought a shell, and merged his company into it. At the time, he had that BS on the balance sheet showing $420M of accounts receivable offset by $420M of deferred revenue (something the SEC told him was BS when he submitted an S-1). His initial pump was the company was worth its asset value, so that's where his claim against OTC link got its value. Anyhow, the shell had history like a lot of them do, but was still trading, so Jake says OTC link is responsible. If it were me, I'd have told either the arbitrator or judge that you'd think Jake, his lawyers, his accountants, would have done some basic due diligence when they bought it.
It's like Jake bought a car without test driving it from a lot that is known to be "buyer beware" with no warranties expressed or implied. The car doesn't run, so Jake decides to file a lawsuit seeking not the value of the car but the value he's assigned to new stereo he installed (which is about 1000X's the price of the car). And, he's not suing the car lot, he's suing the BBB because they should have told him the lot was going to screw him over.
I still follow that board for amusement.
The arbitration is BS. It alleges that OTC Markets/Link had a duty to tell Jake that he was merging into a bad shell (NUVG) since they "approved" the RM.
Here's the text of it in response to comment 2 of an offering they were processing:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671132/000167113222000016/filename4.htm
So, just to be clear, you think that when they said in an 8K they were redeeming the stock and shutting down, they decided not to do that and have been lurking around secretly ready to spring up and cram money in your wallet for shares of a dead, empty company....
Not only that, you believe all of the 8K except for that part, the part that contradicts the fairy tale, the lie that you are pretending to believe.
Do I have that right?
Yeah, you probably should read the rest of that…
Specifically item 8.01:
KAHC redeemed their stock and shut down. It's gone.
Keep up.
The proof is in the pudding. There was no other transaction, just like the court records said, just like the monitor told the shareholders' lawyer. It's been 5 years... not a single peep out of the company since. Wonder what that means?
Sure did collect up most of the con artists who made up the BS about a buyout, only a couple missing.
That is so well done. Facts, well presented, logical, with humor infused. I'm about halfway through it, usually lose my interest in that sort of presentation within 5-10 minutes.
Sorry, not buying it. Nobody with $150k in "play money" is stupid enough to toss it into a bankrupt company's stock where the plan approved by the court said to cancel said stock.
You're just here to troll now, pretending that you still believe something you never have.
$150K is "fun money" and you're farting around on the OTC...
Sounds legit.
Guess that means those 911 trade signals were BS.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172919311
So, these options that were way out of the money when Eno resigned from the company (just prior to the liquidation) and never executed are relevant because?
So, you find a defunct agreement from 2011 "interesting" and somehow relevant to BioAmber and/or the two unrelated companies building plants in Arizona?
You are easily amused.
That’s hilarious. “Dissolved” = “wound down”
Did you see who submitted that article? Isleworth Healthcare Acquisition Corporation….
You’ll never find the truth because you don’t want to look for it.
You're just making it up as you go...
So, when Isleworth published this, they were lying?
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isleworth-healthcare-acquisition-corp-announces-cancellation-of-special-meeting-of-shareholders-redemption-of-public-shares-and-subsequent-dissolution-301612843.html
Doubt it, since they disappeared off the face of the earth.
And the Cytovia Therapeutics deal?
https://www.spacinsider.com/news/mhaddad/isleworth-healthcare-terminates-cytovia-deal
Guess they lied twice, eh?
You're not quite as "amazing" as you think you are. You ignore facts that you don't like. Like the one about Immune Pharmaceuticals being in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which is liquidation and shut down by law. They've already been substantially liquidated, there are no employees or business operations, and the stock registration was revoked by the SEC. It's over, and you'd serve yourself well to come to terms with that as it is clearly a waste of time to live in denial.
The ones “afraid of the truth” are the con artist pumpers who don’t want to do the exercise and compare track records because they know it’d show the “bashers” are spot on in the scams they call out while the “pumpers” are pumping stocks/companies that are those scams.
The truth hurts.
Here's an exercise for you. Check out the track record of those calling this a scam, post history is there for all to see. How're they doing? Do the companies they call scams wind up being legit or scams? Then pick a few con artist pumpers singing the virtues of this and other companies. How do the track records compare?
Show your work.
I get that you'd prefer a boiler room setting to post in, nobility and truth would have no place there, that way you could con everyone who stumbled in off a Google search out of their money. Ain't happening, though.
Being a con artist pumper is a far more pathetic life than spending a little time telling people the truth about this scam.
No, you don't. You pick and choose only the filings that support the fairy tale you've fabricated in your head, ignoring the others and the court records of Immune's bankruptcy proceedings because they contradict the BS you push. Isleworth's last filing was a de-registration statement, filed because they'd announced they were redeeming their stock and shutting down. You ignore it. Immune's last filing was about that bankruptcy, and it's been in Chapter 7 since April of 2020. You won't look at those, nor will you read the court records or even what Chapter 7 and how it ends every time by law. You just enjoy trolling along with the 3-4 guys who still believe that a bankrupt, liquidated, shut down company with neither business operations nor employees is some sort of "winning" investment.
A little last minute wash trading to create an illusion that maybe the utter BS about the stock surviving this bankruptcy might be true. The con artists pushing that fairytale are the scum of the earth.
So, Isleworth themselves stating in black and white they were winding down isn’t the truth, the outcome you have in your head and wish to be true is.
That’s just absurd.
Isleworth and Cytovia Therapeutics terminated their business combination process
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isleworth-and-cytovia-terminate-merger-agreement-301579200.html
Isleworth then redeemed their stock and dissolved themselves
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3876961-spac-isleworth-healthcare-to-dissolve-after-failing-to-complete-merger
Anyone saying otherwise is delusional. Keep up.
Couldn't care less about the BS chart narrative, they've increased the O/S from 320M to over 2B in one year, so every time a new pumping angle is in play, they dump onto it.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172856019&txt2find=dilution
Yeah, go ahead and pony up all the info on linking to your other accounts to that exchange in Singapore, then try to sell that dead, illiquid stock.
That was all for pumping and nothing more.
Oh, please, this thing is all about dilution, nothing more than a share selling scam. $0.000003 per share dividend, big whoop...
The monitor didn't release any reports after they were discharged. The liquidation wasn't the end of the proceedings, they still had some inventory and tools to sell, and still had to divide up the proceeds amongst the creditors who got some recovery. They also had to deal with the shareholder's lawyer wanting to review the contracts with Vinmar for possible enforcement (even though BioAmber was the one technically in default), which resulted in an extension of a month and received zero support from the secured creditors who'd have to pay for it.
Idiot, I'm not the one who's waving around that article about the SEC imposing a fine like it's some sort of vindication that naked shorty is the culprit for this (and every other POS) stock's horrible performance.
So you're in agreement that, in the absence of FTD's, there isn't some huge naked short position out there invisible to all that has suppressed the PPS and will need to be covered resulting in the MOASS, then? Why talk about naked shorty at all if that's the case?
Yeah, deflect attention away from the facts posted, then screw up and post a little article that confirms exactly what I'm saying. If you sell a share, naked or otherwise, and fail to deliver it to the buyer within 3 days, it gets marked as an FTD, period. If there aren't FTD's, there aren't naked shorts.
All this crap about naked shorts is just a fairy tale told on POS stocks to deflect attention away from the con artists selling for profit and onto another invisible boogeyman as a scapegoat.