Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ive stated many times that its foolish to rely on ANY claims made on a message board that arent substantiated with facts that anyone can find. Its a simple formula and negates need to blame others for fake news.
How can that be? If that were true it wouldnt have such a great following would it?
Dont forget bankruptcy, reverse split and fda clears junk that doesnt work. lol
It becomes e waste junk after the battery dies. Bravo
Is it time to sell again? Tell me when so i can buy more shares.
LOL. First "I've been to my local drug store in Mesa Tres Rios Mexico and they too had no ActiPatch, NONE!" Now its "why spend the time and money in gas to go look for this junk"? Lol lol.
6002 north 7th street cvs phoenix az.
Wow thats quite a shock given that there are 9800 cvs stores in the U. S. and the soft rollout placed them in 200. A little dd can find the stores that have them.
Yeah im VERY pleased every time the price goes up. That wasnt how i framed my initial post. Its not like its the first time ive ever pointed out a price rise. geez
And you think that was my point? Read it again. There are many perspectives. I was only addressing one specific event.
Thats a very fair balanced opinion. lol
If its cryptic then go back and look at what initiated the post. Then maybe it wont be "cryptic".
It was if you bought at .0006 and sell at .0008 and have "significant" shares to trade then that fits the definition of "significant" doesnt it. All done with this. Pretty funny considering my first post on the subject simply stated up 33%.
Is it? Its interesting when other things trickle in to a single point made. THATS bias.
33% increase. DOESNT MATTER WHETHER THE STARTING PRICE IS .0006 OR 10 DOLLARS. Its all about profit taken. Most longs dont care about 33% at this level but some do. But thats not the point.
Just wrong and ive proven why with numbers.
Its all about simple math. Clear as day.
Up 33% yesterday. End of story.
Now they cant be sold because of the volume? Because volume was light today doesnt make that statement quite accurate. Most days there is plenty of volume to support these trades. Whether share price is pennies or dollars profit is the same. Point was never about shares but 33% increase is significant no matter the share price. AND as jn correctly pointed out, it is much easier for these large percentage changes in penny land. Thats why people play. End of story.
And ive already proven with hard numbers that that assertion is completely false. Shares held has EVERYTHING to do with it. Topic over.
lol Someone jumps in at .0006 for 5 mil and sells at .0008 and makes 1k. What does that have to do with the price going down? Thats not what we're talking about. The conversation is based on a 33% rise claimed to be insignificant. Facts indicate otherwise.
I call NO BS. If it happens it must be FACT. LOL AGAIN
Who calls it bias? So my example was not valid or realistic? lol And yes i am biased when having to decide 200 profit or 1000 profit. Or isnt that real money?
33% is 33%. Starting price is irrelevant. Actually i take it back. Someone owns 100 shares of a $6 stock, goes up 33% to $8=200 dollars. Someone owns 5 million shares of biel at .0006, goes up 33% to .0008=1000 dollars. Yup starting price DOES MATTER when price rises 33%.
Dont let the facts get in the way. How much have they spent on advertising? Have you heard, they are in cvs(soft rollout which means no advertising). Just got va recognition. Up 33% today.
Proof of a negative or proof of a positive. No difference. Asking for proof of a statement with no foundation other than 'i dont believe you' AND providing no evidence to counter doesnt hold water. Price predictions? Do they really need proving? Or are they CLEARLY just predictions which have no value.
There is PROOF that Actipatch works. There is proof that bankruptcy was NEVER "right around the corner" after years of predictions. There is proof there has been no reverse split even though "Andy said it was right around the corner", another claim made for years. Those are the important issues, as a shareholder,that needed proof.
If you cant PROVE its wrong, not sure how you can call it bs. PROVIDE PROOF ITS WRONG.
And there it is again. As a shareholder I dont condone or encourage the hype. But it would be kind of stupid to refute it wouldnt it? Then there are attempts to erode the value of my investment. Thats when im biased. Has nothing to do with the company. Ive never told anyone to buy or sell. I dont think ive ever predicted a share price. If it fails, i wont blame anyone.
Theres a big difference between a prediction of 18 cents a share and bankruptcy right around the corner.
Yup, bias toward the truth.
Thanks for illustrating my point. We all know the negatives. We all know the positives. I have a problem with only focusing on one side and not a balanced approach. For every claim of 60 losing quarters, i can counter with fda delays, setting the company back years and millions. That gets met with fda is not to blame and the product doesnt work etc. For every claim of incompetent Andy, I would say he has made some mistakes BUT he has also brought a tiny company to fda clearances and va, b. braun Mundi pharma. among others. There are many counter points to just about every claim. Im more than willing to have a conversation when the perspective is balanced.
So logical reasonable negativity doesnt have to be a bad thing then theres that nasty ludicrous and endless hype. But theres never logical and reasonable "hype" and ludicrous and endless negativity? Must be another board.
I know , right. That constant negativity is so unproductive.
Kind of like those negative paid sites where they never talk about anything positive to influence investments.
Because its accurate and positive information, it should be ignored? lol
Part of proper dd includes providing links/facts to back up claims. Otherwise its just another opinion. Best not to rely on opinions. Sometimes common sense is as good as facts when you dont have them all.
A wise investor relies on THEIR OWN dd and not opinions as to whether a source is credible or not.
Last post from me on this subject. The two examples you cited were based on TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT SCENARIOS. One was based on a soft rollout and not expecting share price being influenced and the other based on your "miracle" and the potential if your "miracle" transpires. Its very clear and concise.
No, my post was clear and thats not quite what i said.