Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Back to the bumbling ceo. His critics couldnt have done half as much with so little. Them that cant, criticize.
I named just 5 companies. You point out 2. There are many more examples of companies that made it after,as you keep pointing out, 60 months of losses. Many had horrible finances and somehow made it. Failure to acknowledge that this company may rise above is a pretty disingenuous observation.
Unbiased reading of ONLY criticisms. lol
I chose 5 companies that had 5 years of losing as has been pointed out about biel. Thats all, nothing more or nothing less. No other factors were discussed in those posts regarding the reasons. None of them had an fda dependent product either.
Taking an unbiased look, I saw the only thing constantly repeated was how many losing quarters with no regard for reasons i have stated.. Now suddenly it becomes necessary to say but amazon had great sales numbers. They also had great expenditures(like biel) which resulted in them still being unprofitable. Unlike Amazon and these other companies that didnt make a dime for five years, biels road has been much more difficult. Their sole existence is dependent on an fda which failed them for years. Their plan from the beginning was to penetrate other markets(which they have). This was never going to be an overnight sensation and maybe it never will. There are reasons for lower sales in other countries, but there are sales. Theyre still working and thats all that matters. Thats unbiased, not this company and ceo suck.
Why is that? Companies that lost money for 5 years, (as you keep telling us about biel), that became profitable. It doesnt fit the argument. But it does keep changing Do you know seasoned investor?
YOU keep talking about losing quarters. And thats what im talking about. Thats a fact comparing what youre talking about to what i showed. Now we bring in some other factor not previously mentioned . "Appreciable sales" is relative to the size of the company. They still lost money no matter how you spin it. Thats not even a defense. Next
That consecutive losing quarters thing seems to be the cornerstone of your argument. Here are 5 companies that didnt make a dime in their first five years;fedex, turner broadcasting, AMAZON, espn and tesla in my 30 seconds of research. NEXT
Did andy make some money over 10+ years? He sure did. I would be lying if I didnt believe anyone would do the same. That evil term dilution has done what? It has paid for manufacturing, research, submissions, studies etc. It has kept the company from bankruptcy and there has NEVER been a reverse split, which destroys shareholder value. How anyone, as a shareholder can complain is quite interesting.
Cherry picking one of the many legitimate points i made and not addressing the advertising issue and lack of knowledge of the technology by the general population. lol
I made my point. You got me on the 7 to 8 rise. That wasnt the point of my example. You left that part out.
As do predictions of bankruptcy right around the corner and gizmos that dont work. Yeah, i know you didnt make any "grandiose predictions" and you didnt say any of those other things either. Now you dont have to point that out.
Or, does it make for less contentious discussion if positives AND negatives are given equal time BY ALL?
"The whole story doesnt paint a positive picture". Especially if positives are NEVER pointed out.
Holy crap. Is it 60? Whats the record?
Number of shares is always the point in a penny stock. You own 100 million and price goes up 12.5% or .0001, $10000 dollars profit or increase in portfolio(call it what you want) invested at .0007 price 70,000 dollars. You bought 10000 shares of a 7 dollar stock(same cost). Price goes up 12.5 percent $7.87. Profit $8750. Simple. Much much more realistic that .0001 on a triple zero penny occurs (because it happens daily)than .87 on a 7 dollar stock. Then the argument becomes that there arent enough shares traded to allow for profit taking. Thats day trading mentality. Many arent in it for short term gains.
Lol but 12.5% is pathetic given where the price was. What does the claim of flippers paradise have ANYTHING to do with what I posted. Actually, it makes my point. Thanks. And btw, market makers have NOTHING to do with price manipulation here? Another lol. Number of shares have ZERO to do with how that works. Marker makers have no influence. A claim made by marker makers.
"12.5% sounds impressive until you look at the starting point then it just looks pathetic". Unless you bought a lot of shares at .0003. Many of us are in that group, therefore not complaining.
Up 12.5 percent but great math skills.
Thats YOUR guess. Indeed.
I see over 900 followers plus those who never post. True enough.
All predictions made on message boards that get constant scrutiny as if it were the company making those predictions. I find that outrageously hysterical.
Holy crap! Every single thing is doom and gloom and yet all eyes are on this company. Wonder why?
Yeah ok. You got that right. No worries.
Wrong as well. He said when share price improves.
paul has shown a propensity for that sentiment as a few have witnessed when asked for information.
I didnt think that was claimed or even implied. But thanks.
Also r/s right around the corner cause "Andy told me", gizmo/snake oil doesnt work, bankruptcy right around the corner(for years), no fda clearances, blah blah blah.
Now hes working with "b list players". Good one.
There is plenty of info provided here that comes with no proof. I want to see the proof that the actipatch doesnt work and that a reverse split and bankruptcy are right around the corner. We cant always get what we want.
And what will you say if it beats YOUR numbers? Btw, youre the only one on the planet throwing out those numbers.
Wheres the rest of my post?
But its a gizmo and snake oil. Isnt it amazing that when people actually use it for what its meant for, it works.
Proof is in my post. Next
Not from me ever. Funny though i bring up .005 and it becomes pump and dump. And theres NO OTHER REASON for a price rise. What a narrow, biased view.
What like stay away from this scam? Only balanced views get credence. Not theres no hope when we know thats a false sentiment.
Diverting from the point AS USUAL.
Lollollol and it made it to .005 on little news. lollollol
Thats how to take something and spin it.