Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good, find out how much cash they have and create a brilliant business plan and submit it. lol
Continued pattern of failure without including legitimate reasons acknowledged earlier.lol
Thanks for clarifying our point in detail. All these things occurred AFTER the fda rejection TEN YEARS AGO! And as you stated share price would have been better and there would have been no need for these events that followed. The one exception would have been dr. Oz. Had the product been fda cleared, it would have been a springboard for major sales. Thanks again
Another excellent distortion of the actual meaning of a post.
Just a bunch of empty hypothesis. First if fda cleared years ago, then andy is an abject failure. Cant have it both ways. If fda cleared years ago, share price would most likely have increased(according to you) and therefore, by association they would have had funds for advertising and no need for dilution. Thanks for proving an obvious point. fda lacking in knowledge about this technology, set them back years, not your bobo.
Just .005 with a complete cvs rollout? Yeah thats realistic. It gets to .005 on little news and just .005 on a full rollout? Sure thing, spot on, delusional, biased.
Nope, NEVER said "when profitable". Said when share price improves. Doesnt mean when profitable. Them that cant, criticize.
Dont be mad at Andy because had the ambition to start his own company. The critics can always do it better. Suggestions left and right. Andy did this wrong or Andy did that wrong. The joke is on his critics. Its his company and hes doing just fine moving it along with little capital. Talk about share structure and 900 losing quarters and dilution and there they are, still in business and moving forward. In spite of all the attempts at share price manipulation, he hasnt reverse split this, walked away and left everyone crying as he could have. But he didnt. That counts in my book. Thats all that matters.
Saying it and doing it are completely different. Have you ever discussed the potential of a full cvs rollout? How about the potential if/when there is an earnest advertising campaign? EVERY positive is refuted. Sorry, facts speak for themselves. Conversely, I have spoken about dilution, share structure, family missteps heavy debt etc. The whole enchilada because thats what unbiased research looks like. Opinions are a different thing all together.
And im not afraid to address ALL of them. lol
Thats how you intrepret my post? Sure it is.
"Been marketed worldwide for years". Sure it has. lol. Been sold worldwide with little or no marketing. Maybe featured in a news story or with one or two tv and magazine ads. Almost nothing in the u.s. save for a dr. oz segment. We all saw the potential even though fda hadnt cleared it yet. If thats the defenition of "marketed worldwide for years", so be it. We can all see the potential, and not just for the 50 dollar profit flippers.
You keep talking about the 1000 samples. Seems to me they did their part. What exactly did you want them to do after that?
Some thoughts, opinions and facts. I do this purely for entertainment because nothing said here is going to change the outcome of this company. I will NEVER offer an opinion meant to influence someones investment choice except to say that one should NEVER rely on opinions when making a decision to buy or sell. As an investor, i am biased when it comes to wanting share price to rise. But i wont sell my soul to lie or misrepresent or continually disparage or praise UNLESS ITS WARRANTED. What do i mean by that? It means that although the history is not as i would have hoped for in a perfect world, there are many things that give me hope. To date, the biggest milestones that i never dreamed of happening are 1. fda clearances and 2. cvs shelf space. To say nothing has changed is quite a disingenuous sentiment. The most difficult task this company faces right now is product recognition. The conundrum is where to focus their limited resources. Do they advertise and sacrifice producing adequate supply and forego the cost of additional submissions to the fda or do they focus on advertising? I dont envy the decisions they must make. This is a company that has made mistakes along the way. No doubt they could have done things better. Constant criticisms of Andy are mostly unwarranted. I dont personally know him so i have no agenda one way or the other. He got products cleared. He penetrated foreign markets. He got cvs and va to recognize the product. Their biggest hurdle as i said is getting the name out which also means education regarding what pemf actually does. The road is difficult, but as an investor, constant complaints and criticisms are an unproductive waste of time. Its a penny stock with no guarantees. All things being equal, theyve done amazing things to get to this point. Hopefully patience will pay off for those who deserve it.
Thats not the complete list.
Not time to buy yet?
The correct term was called "marking the close" which the sec stopped years ago.
First, there is no such thing as a fake close. Second predictions/opinions have been chronically incorrect FOR YEARS.
lol. Their money is as good as anyone elses. lol
Can someone tell me what percentage rise from .0008 to .0014 is? Thanks. How long did it take? Oh, only two days! How many big board stocks have almost doubled in two days? Thanks again.
Actually its not all speculation.
Love the inventory thing. Its all just message board speculation. Really not even worthy of discussion unless the company tells us, and why would they?
Excellent info already posted a million times. Dead cat? Cats have 9 lives. lol Up 50% yesterday.
Unbelievable!
As i stated, no one knows. Up 50% today. Holy crap.
Cant make 3 cents based on what facts? Answer=none. The FACT is there is no way to predict what the price could be if there were a major announcement to hit the wires, or a profitable quarter or a featured Dr. Oz segment. Just no way to predict. Next.
Lol. Of course thats the reason.
OR maybe it can still work BECAUSE of him. If we're going to blame and criticize for failure, we should credit for success. We shall see.
More conflation. What i said has ZERO to do with the response.
Of course it does. We're talking about the addictive nature of opioids and not always blaming it on addictive personalities as well as how biels products can, IN SOME CASES mitigate the use of drugs.
So youre saying your analysis is not based on swot. Exactly
Ok, completely gloss over what i said about how people get addicted. Thats biased? lol.
More apples and oranges comparisons. Which doctors prescribe alcohol for pain?
What like a swot that doesnt quite pass muster?
What part of my common sense, well known factual post is biased?
Thanks to "uncle andy" the company is still in business and we can keep talking about it and investing in it. Thank you Andy for not shutting the doors and walking away as you could have the way they do in most pinkie scams.
Some people have chronic pain and need opioids for long periods sometimes leading to addiction. There are many powerful drugs that sometimes make it impossible for people to stop on their own. Has nothing to do with "addictive personalities". Doctors also overprescribe meds. Has nothing to do with "addictive personalities". Many other factors.
Unfortunately we dont see much of that, especially in unregulated penny land. Its like the wild west. Thats why each should do their own dd and not rely on opinions not backed up.
Who said it wasnt? Not me. As i told you before, my bias is wanting share price to rise. I do not spout all negative OR all positive. I dont care or try to influence investment decisions. That is what a balanced, realistic view looks like.I dont claim to know everything but i use common sense to form my view on all things and post opinions. I am realistic, understanding and discussing the positive and negative. That is a bias totally different from a one sided bias, positive or negative. Neither of those views helps anyone.
dd means researching the good AND the bad and making decisions based on BOTH. Not just the ceo sucks and crap like that. Spinning every positive into a 'yeah but' is hardly unbiased dd.