Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It will happen. Only a matter of time.
Agreed.
I think most folks here are getting wrapped up in the weeds. Focus on the big picture and be logical and use logic. For example: An executive from Zimmer came to work for Amedica, and is “all of the sudden” back with Zimmer. Think about that. That isn’t normal. It’s damn near obvious Something is going on between the two companies and it’s just a matter of time before we find out exactly what it is. The financiers/hedgeeees are going to get theirs and so will we. How much is the only question that remains.
Amedica*
After reading that statement, I feel pretty comfortable saying that It sounds like everything is just about in place. Just a matter of a few more things falling into place. Ryan Long working for itty bitty America and all the sudden now he’s back at Zimmer?....I don’t think so. Tick tocm, tick tock.
Do you still think annual meeting is replaced with DEFM?
So with all warrants and preferreds converted, how many new common shares are we talking potentially hitting the market? 28M? Hope the merger value is steep my friends!
DING DING DING! ....why would this terminology all of the sudden appear now?
So how many new shares of common stock are hitting the open market?
So how many additional shares are we looking at potentially hitting the common share market?
Where is this so called “rumor” posted at? Who posted it?
I find it interesting where Hanson mentions the words “culture change”. What about their culture is in fact changing?? Sounds like a pretty big deal to me.
Just sounds like a quicker way to phase out current inventory if you ask me. They don’t care as they know their bound to generate a killing in the near future with the technology.
So two annual meetings to be held in the year of 2018? One for this year and one for last?
Question is why in the hell would you accept payment in the form of warrants if you knew the share price wasn’t going to go anywhere.....unless of course you plan to go short
On another note—-why not do an offering right out of the gate to pay Hercules off instead of taking on another note to do so and then do the offering?.....there is just an obscene amount of emotional negativity surrounding this with waaaaay too many things that point towards a really big positive....
If anyone is going to come to post, post the facts and a connection to the fact. Otherwise why waste your time here????? I mean really people. It’s rediculius. If you have nothing better to do than post information with no supporting evidence then shame on you. We only know what we know and that is what’s made available to us.
Yep. It makes zero since to regain compliance and then turn right back around and fall right back out—-especially when it is a matter that they can control/manage unlike the stock price.
So where is our annual meeting or the non compliant letter from the Daq??
That’s what I thought. So at the time of aqusition (assuming all outstanding warrants have been exercised) what would our total OSC be?
Got it. Didn’t know if the warrants were still exercisable or not after the loan has been paid off
What about our friends at Hercules?
How many possible warrants (total) are outstanding for possible conversion?
Nuvasive just acquired Vertera----who's next?
Odd to me.
Not that it means much, but interesting that the previous two scheduled meetings were scheduled for 9 am local time for August 14th & September 7th and the next one is scheduled for 8 AM... hmm.
I don't have the site in front of me at the moment, but From looking at other boards, I guess it does---your thoughts on this move?
Boston-how do we know this? Does it say this in the vote site?
It should be received the day after the defieciency was made. See this example:
Deficiency notice:
https://marketexclusive.com/biostage-inc-nasdaqbstg-files-an-8-k-notice-of-delisting-or-failure-to-satisfy-a-continued-listing-rule-or-standard-transfer-of-listing/2016/11/
Deficiency determination:
http://ir.biostage.com/2017-05-22-Biostage-Announces-Receipt-of-Nasdaq-Listing-Determination
What leaves you to believe that? Just curious. I mean the DAQ clearly states that they would receive a letter if the requirements were not met, just like they received one when they failed to meet the deadline for the first grace period. They received the letter on the 14th and PR'd it on the 15th.....something is going on...what I have no idea. All I know is that if being listed on the Nasdaq is of any importance to them, they wouldn't be playing the cards that they are playing right now. RS would've been voted on well before the 14th, and SP would have been over a buck by that point. IMHO
No PR OR 8-K notifying shareholders of delisting and here we are four days after the letter was probably reiceved (the 15th)........hmm
Here you go sir:
A company must publicly disclose the receipt of a notification of deficiency, public reprimand letter or delisting determination, including notification of an additional deficiency for a company already in the Hearings process. This disclosure must include the Rule(s) upon which the deficiency is based and describe each specific basis and concern identified by Nasdaq in reaching its determination that the company does not meet the listing standard. For example, if the Listing Qualifications Department determines to delist a company based on its discretionary authority under Rule 5101, the company must include in its public announcement the specific concerns cited in the delisting determination.
If a company fails to make this disclosure within four business days of receipt, or the disclosure is incomplete, Nasdaq will halt trading in the company’s securities and Nasdaq may make a public announcement with the required information. Failure to make this disclosure will be an additional basis for delisting.
Publication Date*: 7/31/2012 Identification Number: 428 Mailto Link
See NASDAQ site here: https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/Material_Search.aspx?mcd=LQ&cid=107&sub_cid=32
Right. All I know is that trading will halt on the NASDAQ. So if we don't get notice today, something is definitely up.
I wonder the same thing....we'll find out for sure this afternoon. Because they HAVE to make shareholders aware of this or else they'll boot'em to OTC....
Agree boston. Completely agree
Exactly. It will be halted from trading on the NASDAQ and move OTC. That's my point. No agenda of any kind here. Just making an obvious statement. Dang.
"If a company fails to make this disclosure within four business days of receipt, or the disclosure is incomplete, Nasdaq will halt trading in the company’s securities and Nasdaq may make a public announcement with the required information. Failure to make this disclosure will be an additional basis for delisting." Checkmate. Might wanna read the NASDAQ Website.
Right.
They MUST PR or file 8-k for the receipt of the delisting letter within 4 BUSINESS days of receiving it or trading halts.
Now: for the hearing they have 7 CALENDAR days to request this upon the receipt of the delisting letter, but if they plan to do this it can't be until after the 8-K has been filed to notify the public of the deficiency.
So in our situation that puts them at having to disclose receipt of deficiency letter tomorrow if they did in fact receive one on the 15th.
http://finance.zacks.com/nasdaq-delisting-rules-7450.html ---see "delisting letter" & "hearing process" sections
I know one thing and this is fact: if we don't see an 8-K or a PR tomorrow stating that we didn't meet the minimum requirement for the bid price of $1.00 by August 14th, trading will halt my friends. (This is assuming they received a the letter from NASDAQ on the 15th)