Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
A better question for Jim would be what’s the status of the detailed engineering that tedro questioned so many years ago? Is your confidence in the project so low that you ask associated companies to ban employees from discussing the project and pointing out the obvious issues with the timeline?
Hey Jim, why does this dumb message board have such an impact on your project funding?
A better question for Jim would be what’s the status of the detailed engineering that tedro questioned so many years ago? Is your confidence in the project so low that you ask associated companies to ban employees from discussing the project and pointing out the obvious issues with the timeline?
Hey Jim, why does this dumb message board have such an impact on your project funding?
RE: Question 5
You all didn’t know Shah is the Mayor of Superior, Colorado and constantly rails against oil and gas development in and around that city on environmental grounds while turning a blind eye to the impacts of mining in Nebraska?
Good luck with your investment decision.
Nope. No proof at all.
How long do you think that will take? Which engineering firm is left to take the work that hasn’t already been burned by NB?
See my first post today. EXIM won’t even be in a position to make a decision this year, which is exactly what your management team wants. The gravy train is flowing for them.
You realize that Niocorp is on the hook for actually paying any consultants EXIM requires for diligence don’t you?
It seems I’ve triggered you. Ask yourself whom you’re actually upset with.
Then ask yourself who’s going to sign off on information sent to EXIM.
You can regurgitate old FS info all you want, it doesn’t change the fact that FS engineers were stiffed. The game is up. The accounts payable and current liabilities tell the same story they always have, but the long desire to get on the big board has increased the visibility and opened the door for short sellers. The only real question that remains is how long the old Moly crew can milk this thing to your detriment.
lol if you think “IR” is going to give anyone a legit answer, let alone me.
Technology does solve a lot of things, but it’s not within EXIM’s scope to show this. That burden falls on the applicant.
One of my last posts mentioned mining the moon and asteroids. I said Elk Creek becoming a functioning mine is more likely than that, but on second thought I may have been wrong. Both options are technically feasible yet financially irresponsible, but at least environmental concerns of asteroid mining are minimal.
You want to know what’s even less likely than EXIM financing this? EXIM even making a decision on it this year.
When will EXIM determine if the National Environmental Protection Act applies? If they do (likely), how long will that review take? And will they approve?
When will the environment and social impact assessment be complete?
Gee, I hope nobody points out the tricks they tried to play with the USACE and State of Nebraska while attempting to get approval to dump water with who knows what minerals directly into the MO River.
And of course the question that’s been asked multiple times, what financial analysis/relevant feasibility study has NB submitted?
Not opinion at all. Believe whom you want. A lazy man could just hit CTRL+F and search the FS for the rest of information on thorium. Someone that was really curious would use the open records act to see what NHHS thinks.
Or just ask Sims. While you’re at that ask him why he disparages our Corps of Engineers.
NHHS never confirmed any of this. The U and Th levels are quite elevated. Many samples are above regulatory limits, while the testing NB has done after leaching has been done on very small areas of samples. It’s ultimately up to the regulators to decide it Niocorp’s plan for handling them makes sense. By going to EXIM the regulatory hurdles are higher.
The point in regards to radioactive materials is that no regulatory authority has confirmed the opinion of the FS or approved permitting. The broader point is that it doesn’t really matter because it’s simply uneconomical without this potential issue.
Check the projections of ALL of the other potential scandium producers and the most recent USGS numbers.
Effectively all of them. Most are just administrative in nature. They have never reached a consensus with the state as to how the possession of radioactive material permit would work, at least per my last freedom of information request with the state. They have a long history of suggesting they are working on these things, but similar to the potentially unnecessary USACE permits, the record suggest NB has paused these activities.
The radioactive material permit was not necessarily one that would be at risk of getting approved, but it was quite clear it was always going to take a lot longer for approval than planned. By going to EXIM they have opened themselves to a higher level of scrutiny than they likely would have experienced through NHHS.
I remember that one. Sims created a new low for himself, quite a challenge given his history, by throwing the USACE under the bus and blaming them for permitting challenges, when it was later proven that USACE was simply waiting for information from Niocorp in order to proceed.
That’s not what I said. This stuff really isn’t that hard to find. Just look at old posts and see how people addressed him. Here’s a random one below. He obviously changed his opinion on the stock after being one of the diehards.
Apologies to T&T.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139046026
Duplicate
I’m mistaken. Obviously T&T is a newish account. It must have been DOA that I also traced back to mnga.
No matter either way though. Do you still think this board is influencing the share price for this big bad Nasdaq listed company? If you do, how so? Are we the evil shorters that have prevented you from obtaining your billion dollars in financing after all these years?
Yeah…. And you can go back to all of my post history, and our own interactions, to see I’ve only posted under one name. Weirdos like you stalking me led me to change it during my hiatus. Walter thought he was clever when he found me on arrowheadpride.com.
Or maybe, just maybe, the Niocorp management team is fleecing you.
Nah that can’t be right. I must be the real cause for NB’s poor performance.
Same account since day one. Started as tedro84. If you email an admin they will change your name for you if you’d like. Isn’t T&T formerly known as makeniogreatagain or something? Mine was temporarily “nunosh”. I got it from a random alias generator. You won’t find anything on ihub under that name. Everything I’ve posted here, sans deleted posts, can be found by clicking my profile.
Keep looking for your conspiracy. Or look to Occam’s razor instead.
1. Yes. I changed it temporarily but never posted under the other name. My post history speaks for itself.
2. They check my whereabouts via LinkedIn, where I have the bare minimum presence, nearly every time I pop back in on this board. It’s a flattering, weird obsession they have with a middle class guy in the Midwest while they are supposedly working so hard to get a billion dollar financing package. This weeks version:
They milk shareholders for money via various financial instruments while inflating their messaging as much as possible to control the narrative.
They had Rockwell so confused about their strategy after Sims first complained about me that senior management thought I was a director inflating Niocorp.
My initial response was I would consider it. This was peak Covid, mind you. I later accepted. He never responded. They got what they wanted after a year and a half of trying, which was to silence critics that were causing concern amongst European investors. They never intended to meet with me anyways. It was an intimidation tactic.
The biggest point to all of this is to simply ask yourself why they continue to be so worried about what a bunch of randos say on a retailer stock board. If they can’t whether criticism from their own shareholders, how do you think they will negotiate with the big boys of Wall Street? I think the GXII acquisition already answered this question.
I popped in here last week saying next to nothing, and right away they are checking up on my whereabouts. Does that sound like a company that’s on the verge of a billion dollar financing package?
Yes, however they have never done anything that would be against regulations as it pertains directly to this. This is more of an issue of why would they go after a known shareholder because of anonymous (to everyone besides Sims) messages on an Internet forum. I shared my iHub alias with Sims voluntarily well before any of this transpired.
Living quite well rent free in the heads of you, Walter, Sims, and Honan. It’s flattering how much interest the latter two have in me. Big Nasdaq company still perusing my social media after their SPAC failure. I guess it’s better the shareholders pay them to keep tabs on me rather than sit around all day waiting on the Big F though, right?
Walter doesn’t have a clue about what he’s communicated in his “newsletter”. He was laughed at. The story actually starts way back in January of 2019 while I was a shareholder, with Sims complaining to Rockwell I was threatening financing efforts. I never operated behind a pseudonym in my emails with him. Our previous exchanges were mostly tied to the German Untied Loan Guarantee (whatever happened to that?) Jim and other Niocorp execs complaints about me all stemmed from me pointing out that “detailed engineering” had not started and the company was not being truthful with investors about the permitting process with the Corps of Engineers. FOIA requests showed this to be true. These actions all tied back to them working to secure the next private placement, which we know was funded by Belgians. Go check my posts from that time. Unfortunately you deleted a few of them.
More to come. As I’ve told Walter, I’m not your bogeyman. As I’ve said before, my knowledge on the Elk Creek deposit comes entirely from my introduction to it by a UNO geologist in 1999 and continued interest in the project over the years as it overlaps the scandium market that E21 worked to grow once upon a time via golf clubs and fishing rods.
I’ve been quiet lately only because this board has nosedived and I have nothing of substance to add to the posts from guys like scooter, T&T, and LCP.
Finally, for now, go read the original PR on the subject you think you know so much about it and compare it to other company PR’s. Maverick operates independently from any organization I’ve ever been a part of.
I knew I must’ve missed a message from you.
Doesn’t even look like it will take that. I don’t think it dipped below .40 since April 2014.
Have you checked the 10 year chart? It will be at a ten year low in just a few months if it doesn’t go on a big run.
Lol. They get very sensitive about the detailed engineering that they claimed started in 2018 or so.
In other words there isn’t any competitive tension for potential REE’s.
Maybe they were working with GX sponsors before GXII was even formed. It would explain a lot.
Remember that $100MM invested comment? (I may be off on the amount.)
I speculate that GXII was the “investor” all along for Niocorp, but Niocorp was always the backup plan for GXII to keep the investment near risk free.
I didn’t even think $1.70 would be a possibility before April 2024, but it looks like even the sponsors may have taken on more risk than they planned.
And this doesn’t even account for the nearly 5 million shares the founders will receive in six months. Unfortunately because of an amendment an S3 filing has been removed and we can no longer see which founders will get those shares, and more importantly which ones will be considered insider trades.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172475019
https://content-archive.fast-edgar.com/20230823/A8ZIQ22CZ2228JZ2222C2ZZZJNMTZ36SH252/
The Yorkville advance share request is based on the pricing from last Wednesday through Friday. It seems somebody wanted to boost the PPS to increase the price Yorkville would pay for the limited number of shares NB is able to issue under the advance shares clause. I’ve got ideas as to who may have driven that price action but it still seems odd to me.
Do you have even a shred of evidence that funding was close late in 2019, or are you just banking on MS statements?