Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Get outta here with that garbage. You dont know what you are talking about. There is no talk, no filings, or nothing to support that crap. Quit trying to scare people out of their shares and harm our investment.
UHLN ticker change with Tru-foods acquisition is going to be huge! Here’s a few examples recent ticker changes and how they’ve turned out:
TLNUF to AXXA: 0.0013 to 0.011 in 4/2018 (nearly a 10x increase from ticker change alone and trading in the 0.02-0.04 range now)
BBTH to FUSZ: 0.10 to 0.51 in 4/2017 (>5x increase from ticker change alone and trading over $1 now)
EXOL to SNPW: 0.20 to 0.715 in 11/2017 (>3.5x increase from symbol change)
GMUI to VMSI: 0.02 to 0.165 in 2/2018 (>8x increase from symbol change)
GEQU to ARGQ: 0.0035 to 0.0072 in 3/2018 (>2x increase from ticker change)
UHLN to ???
Fake wall at .008
Retreats when slapped
This company is on fire! New leadership, updated filings, and new website in a matter of days. Im impressed
Thanks for the recap ki. Thats helpful. Its been tough to keep up with all the posts lately so i wasnt fully up to speed on all that (probably also because im so annoyed with the shorting talk ive been paying even less attention to those posts).
I am by no means an expert on the naked shorting rules, but from your explanation it sounds like the mms trading with each other bought them more time. So does that mean theyll just continue to do that and never have to close the short position then? And if not, what mechanics will stop them from doing that every time that the deadline arises?
Yeah not really what i was saying as ive been in fusz over a year (my first purchases were in the .10 to .15 range). I just feel like the day traders and flippers are using the naked short talk to their advantage. And you say your interest resides in the tech not moass, so im assuming youll agree with me that the shorting talk is distracting from the tech talk which is another one of the main reasons im sick of hearing about it.
Next week? Does anyone actually have a real time frame on when naked shorts will need to be covered resulting in a share price increase?
Seems like ever since this naked short talk started (about a month or so ago), its been a downhill ride with constant talk of “next week theyll have to cover” and “tomorrow theyll have to cover” and “MOASS imminent”...
Starting to feel like people are using this mantra to coax people into being bagholders (while awaiting the “moass”) while they unload.
Ps: ki this is not aimed at you or anything like that. You do not seem like the manipulative-type. Just kind of hit my boiling point with all the naked short stuff.
I like this train of thought badge. I am a consultant pharmacist for skilled nursing facilities, and i have also thought about how my industry could use this tech. Several avenues: nurse/patient education/training, patient surveying, marketing, new drug education and marketing, etc.
Good stuff UHD! Love mergers, especially with connections to fusz tech. Will definitely be checking out qm*r
Good momentum building on the chart. Love the share structure, super low float, and merger news. Will be getting a position here soon
I’d expect them to enter the float. Only way they wouldnt is if the convertibles were held by insiders (im not familiar enough with their debt situation yet to know who the lenders were), but even then since they were executed i believe they would be eligible for trading on the open market regardless of who held them.
Definitely expecting some kind of dip here today, which may be a good buying opportunity. Now what i really want to know is when the convertibles are completed, but wont have time until after work to check that in depth.
Hope that is helpful!
Thanks badge! Yeah u r right: hard to beat fu*z with share structure, cleared debt, and insider buying (thats why a vast majority of my $$$ is there). So my confidence isnt quite as high here, but i may be throwing some cash in CELZ as i do like the clearing of debt that is actively occurring and there is some good insider buying.
GLTY
Thanks veronica! Thats what i was looking for. Seems my calc differs from fly’s slightly because i see creative medical health’s shares as a subset of the ceo’s whereas fly is counting that twice as below:
Ceo holds: 65,107,894 (58,635,927 of those shares being creative medical’s) *this is how im reading the 10k, but fly is seeing those as two separate holdings totaling 123,743,821
I dont think these are supposed to be totaled together... At least that’s how im reading the table from the 10k.
Hey badge (seen ya over at fu*z in the past). Sog would know better about the strong holders that may make the float tighter as ive just started my dd on this ticker, but his opinion looks strong based on some of the dd hes provided to this board (thanks for that sog!).
Since nobody really seems to know what the float is, i still decided to dig through the sec filings to calculate a rough idea of what the float may be myself (still tough to actually know as the share structure is changing often as these convertibles are being executed, etc.). Here’s what i came up with:
OS: 480,035,712 (from 8k on 4/12/18)
Insider shares: 84,314,561 (from 10k page 20 item 12)
480,035,712 - 84,314,561 = 395,721,151
Float: 395,721,151 (this is neglecting any restricted shares of private investors that are not mentioned in the 10k, but im not sure theres many/any of those anyway)
Good news looking at this is insiders own nearly 18% of os. And i saw sog’s post about remaining convertibles not really raising the os a whole lot more, which is very nice to see. Plus you and i both know how nice cleaning up debt can turn out for an otc company (as we’ve recently seen with fu*z).
Hope that info can help! Feeling pretty good about this one!
Thanks already checked that stuff out (and theres a lot there so i couldve missed it), but dont see those two things.
Hi all, new to this board and doing some research, but im having a little trouble finding some info. If anyone could help thatd be greatly appreciated!
Anybody know what the float currently is?
I know os is currently 400mil, but was it 120mil in january? I realize theres been a lot of convertibles lately (to be expected in biotech/medical) so im just trying to gauge the change over that period of time.
Thanks in advance!
Then sell whatever shares you have and go away. You keep posting the same thing over and over...
Nobody cares what you think... If you truly think its a dump then sell and go
No problem. Yeah i didnt realize ihub hadnt updated it (probably been on otcqb for about a year because it happened right around when i first purchased shares). Wonder is any of our mods can get that fixed???
Yeah rory is totally referring to uplisting to nasdaq or nyse and as rusty rabbit pointed out thats why they are seeking out board members now.
Cheers!
Already on otcqb
I thought the marketo post you are referencing was taking about how many clients marketo has total. Not that have signed up for notificrm... so it was discussing potential rather than sign ups
Good point! Even if the subs goal hasnt been met yet rory just keeps executing with these big deals. Gonna be a fun ride!
Im not buying the 25k subs example as a hint. He prefaced that example by saying that the numbers he used were not accurate and hypothetical...
Thats like if you asked a girl on a date and she said no... then you read into the way she said it or body language to convince yourself that she actually said yes.
As you said rory is a straight forward guy so you should take him saying “this is hypothetical” as a fact
Im with eagle on this one. I too feel like rory flipped on this...
His attitude in jan/feb indicated that we would blow through 20k subs (ex: mentioning the subs contest for hawaii, saying he wouldnt make us wait until 1q ‘18 for numbers in a shac, talking about the hawaiian shirts and diets, etc.)
But now that 1q is over his attitude toward the sub numbers has did a 180 (ex: not releasing numbers, or saying we are going to hawaii, etc.)
Im obviously not in the room for the negotiations with potential customers so i guess sub numbers could be a leverage issue... but imo if i were a potential large client id want to at least have some indication that fusz has some decent sized customer base as that would make me feel better about knowing whether they could handle my business.
Overall, i do trust rory, but the attitude change im sensing toward the sub numbers is making me think theyve not reached their goal of 20,000.
Why is my tdameritrade showing 0.852 this am? Its never did that before even with t-trades.
Any insight?
Yeah i hope this isnt the case... but it sounded like the subscription numbers were being pushed aside due to not hitting goals.
Great informative post trding! Seems like itd be a good idea for nfusz to add compliance tools (such as the opt out link) to the product. Im sure nfusz would rather deal with happy customers (that have compliance tools/info) than angry customers that just got fined for noncompliance (due to lack of these tools/knowledge).
Since notificrm targets a very wide range of users, including the inexperienced newbies, i think tools/info for compliance with anti-spam laws should definitely be an added feature.
500k per week (or 6% of previous week’s volume) can be sold. Not per day.
Yeah you are correct. Rory did confirm for me.
It is the greater of the two. Not 500k + 6%
Ok to put it to rest rory said it is the greater of the two. Not 500k +6%.
Hopefully hes ok with me sharing the clarification. We have a great ceo!
Wow now that i read it again i think you may be right with 500k + 6%...
I was looking at it the same way as yoginvest... my mistake
Big buyer on the bid
Yup thats exactly what i came up with too.
I dont know where the 500,000 + 6% of last weeks vol came from... the 8k clearly says the greater of either 500,000 or 6% last weeks vol
Sorry i cant pm ki, but i feel the puzzle pieces fit (assuming my numbers and stuff are correct). And im real confident they are as i got pm confirmation shortly after and saying good analysis.
Seems you have the same mantra as i do: know what you own.
Cheers
Not claiming to know the answers but heres my thoughts:
Why now? I’ll agree my concentrus cost is speculation, but you have to admit that theres some cost to it... and that is upon us now as they have already contracted them and are working on integration as we speak. So that definitely supports the needing money now factor.
Regarding putting shares to kodiak: this is where i think you may be missing something as i think there was a put to kodiak in 12/2017 from my recollection (somebody correct me if im wrong; i believe it was in a shac vid or something like that). If so i think that means theyd have rights to the 4mil shares at .25 (which this was then improved upon by the new deal as discussed previously).
The why now price will be higher later argument doesnt pass the test for me because you can never say with 100% certainty that pps will be higher later and how can fusz release the oracle pr (to increase pps) without cash to pay concentrus for the integration? They needed this deal to cover this and rory even said he wanted to speed things up. The wait option you suggest would not only slow fusz down but also slow down the pr for oracle (due to no cash reserve), while banking on a “pps will be higher” risk (plus putting oracle off longer would probably actually result in the pps going down if fusz slow plays the integration).
With regard to why add shares now? Id expect kodiak wouldnt play ball on this deal without some benefit (giving them the ability to obtain an extra 1.3mil shares as i think theyd already be entitled to the 4mil as mentioned above). However, as discussed before this also increased their avg pps so seems like as best case scenario.
Hopefully that helps!
Im interested in your concerns. If your comfortable with it do you mind sharing?
From your last post it seems you are mainly concerned about why now? And what was the reasoning for using kodiak in this way?
I think some of that can be answered with my follow up post on my analysis (post #34503) did you check that out? Its definitely speculation but i suspect it has to do with not only reducing some of kodiak (and other previous debt holders effect on the share price; ex: increasing kodiaks avg pps) but also covering near-term future expenditures related to integration (ex: concentrus cost, etc.)
Let me know what you think or if you have other concerns id be interested in hearing them. Thanks!
Hey engines, sounds like your still skeptical about the recent filings. Were you able to get in touch with rory as you mentioned in response to my analysis yesterday?
Disagree if you may.... im glad u messaged rory but im pretty confident he already read my analysis ;)
Somebody did mention to me that i missed mentioning the additional benefit of adding the leak out clause to the new terms (cherry on top that should help reduce harm to the share price). So thank you for that (unfortunately i dont have pm privileges on ihub or id thank you privately but you know who you are ;) )
And regarding your assertion about kodiak taking all shares: i totally expect them to opt for all shares as well so sorry if i was misleading on that part. I was just making sure that i had the data in for both scenarios as its not a forgone conclusion that they take all according to the 8k (but again theyd be stupid not to as you and other posters are suggesting).
Hope that helps but i think im also limited to 3 posts/day on ihub so this is prolly my last one today (i know, i know... i shouldnt be a cheapskate and should get the paid version of ihub but im currently putting all extra funds into fusz ;) )
Have a nice weekend all!
Now i dont know how much the concentrus partnership is going to cost (just speculating), but if rory and the team are true geniuses itll prolly cost:
Either Less than or equal to $375,000 (which is what fusz would be net positive from the aforementioned deal if kodiak does not obtain all shares at .25).
Or less than or equal to $900,000 (which is what fusz would be net positive with kodiak taking all shares possible)
Because then the deal makes even more sense as it gets rid of debt while also covering near-term future expenditures with integration. Id also bet that if concentrus costs more than $375,000 rory knew that kodiak would opt for all shares prior to making the deal (now that would be truly genius).
Ran the calculations and this is what kodiak has:
Either 3,048,105 shares at .328 per share
Or (if they obtain all 2,100,000 shares at .25 as well) 5,148,105 shares at .2962 per share
Where fusz is net positive $900,000 ($1,525,000 - $625,000 to pay off all debts plus void kodiaks $100,000 deal) if kodiak takes all possible shares
Versus what fusz would’ve had without this deal:
Kodiak owning 4,000,000 shares at .25 per share and fusz being net positive $275,000 ($1,000,000 from kodiak - all debts to ema, auctus, pup, and kodiak)
Overall, no brainer for me... way more $ in fusz pocket, no debt, and higher avg share price for kodiak (at the expense of kodiak having an extra 1,148,105 shares- still assuming they obtain all at .25; or having 951,895 less shares than originally agreed upon if they decide not to obtain all at .25)
I feel like using nfusz tech in internet dating (and any social media really) would help reduce the amount of fake/catfish accounts out there too. Really a great fit!