Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
On July 10th we started discusing
Post# 69756
Charter Communications released this in the July 1st 8-K
https://ir.charter.com/node/27246/html
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1091667/000119312519187406/d754169dex991.htm
Issuance of 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2049
On the Closing Date, Charter Communications Operating, LLC (“CCO”) and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp. (together with CCO, the “CCO Issuers”) issued $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2049 (the “2049 Notes”). The offering and sale of the 2049 Notes were made pursuant to an automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2017 and a prospectus supplement dated June 25, 2019.
WELL
On July 10, 2019 Altice USA reported in there 8-K something similar
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1702780/000162828019008729/alticeusa8k1billionseniorn.htm
Item 1.01
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
On July 10, 2019, CSC Holdings, LLC (the “Issuer”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Altice USA, Inc. (the “Company”), issued $1,000.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.750% senior notes due 2030 (the “Notes”) in a private placement conducted pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulations S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Offering”). The Notes are unsecured obligations of the Issuer and are not guaranteed by any of its subsidiaries. The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated as of July 10, 2019 (the “Indenture”), between the Issuer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee. The Notes will bear interest at a rate of 5.750% and will pay interest semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on January 15, 2020. The Notes will mature on January 15, 2030.
Subject to certain conditions, the Issuer may, at its option, redeem up to 40% of the original principal amount of the Notes at any time prior to July 15, 2022 with the net cash proceeds of certain equity issuances at a price equal to 105.750% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. In addition, at any time prior to January 15, 2025, the Issuer may redeem the Notes in whole or in part, at its option, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus the relevant Applicable Premium (as defined in the Indenture), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the date of redemption. On and after January 15, 2025 the Issuer may redeem the Notes in whole or in part, at its option, at the redemption prices set forth below (expressed as a percentage of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed), plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on January 15 of each of the years indicated below:
And EX-4.1 2 seniornotesindenturedue2030.htm EXHIBIT 4.1
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1702780/000162828019008729/seniornotesindenturedue2030.htm
INDENTURE dated as of July 10, 2019, between CSC Holdings, LLC, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Delaware (the “Issuer”) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (the “Trustee”) and paying agent, transfer agent and registrar.
Each party agrees as follows for the benefit of the other parties and for the equal and ratable benefit of the Holders of (i) $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s 5.750% Senior Notes due 2030 (the “Initial Notes”) and (ii) an unlimited principal amount of additional securities having identical terms and conditions as the Initial Notes except as otherwise set forth herein (the “Additional Notes”) that may be issued on any later issue date subject to the conditions and in compliance with the covenants set forth herein. Unless the context otherwise requires, in this Indenture references to the “Notes” include the Initial Notes and the Additional Notes that are actually issued.
That is a lot of zeros.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Charter's 10-Q released 7/30/2019
https://ir.charter.com/node/27331/html
From the bottom of page 19
Sure sounds like they are talking about UOIP!!!!
In addition to the Sprint litigation described above, the Company and its parent companies are defendants or co-defendants in several additional lawsuits involving alleged infringement of various intellectual property relating to various aspects of their businesses. Other industry participants are also defendants in certain of these cases. In the event that a court ultimately determines that the Company infringes on any intellectual property, the Company may be subject to substantial damages and/or an injunction that could require the Company or its vendors to modify certain products and services the Company offers to its subscribers, as well as negotiate royalty or license agreements with respect to the intellectual property at issue. While the Company believes the lawsuits are without merit and intends to defend the actions vigorously, no assurance can be given that any adverse outcome would not be material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. The Company cannot predict the outcome of any such claims nor can it reasonably estimate a range of possible loss.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Another day closer to the Chanbond Cisco appeal. Looking forward to a good clean fight.
UOIP will prevail and we shareholder will rejoice.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
I agree we will share in the settlement.
Long UOIP
Magnus
I believe that Carter will share a settlement with the shareholders.
Carter has a plan to pay Chanbond $5 million so the agreement is completed.
We are better off placing your trust in a Carter than some corporate troll or making a very poor investment in CommScope (comm)
When the settlement is paid and CommScope indemnifies the 13 MSO’s - UOIP shareholders will be celebrating.
I am amazed anyone would believe in companies like CommScope, Cisco, RPX, or CISCO. Keeping their investors in the dark. SMH!
Long UOIP,
Magnus
Email from the Chief Deputy Clerk
Mr. Magnus,
Our arguments are open to the public. We make available on our website a Guide to Oral Argument that should answer your questions about attending argument (skip to page 7). It is available at http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/arguments/OralArgumentGuide.pdf
Yes, that is the address for the courthouse where this case will be argued.
We hope this information is helpful to you.
Jarrett B. Perlow
Chief Deputy Clerk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(202) 275-8000
-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 12:04
To: ChiefDeputyClerk <chiefdeputyclerk@cafc.uscourts.gov>
Subject: 18-1886, PATO, ChanBond, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc
Can you please provide me with information on the oral argument, can the public attend?
Is this the location of the hearing?
Howard T. Mackey National Courts
717 Madison Place
NW, DC 20439
18-1886, PATO, ChanBond, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc Panel F: Tuesday, August 06, 2019, 10:00 A.M., Courtroom 203
Can you provide a FAQ for attending, what is and is not aloud?
Thank you,
Magnus
You have no proof for anything you post
Why don't you post facts? - odd at least we have PACER. LOLOL!
Delaware will be the site of a huge party when the patent trolls win!!!
New 8K, New Accountants, New Future
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1422059/000166357719000317/mainbody.htm
Long LAHO,
~Magnus
On July 26, 2019, CommScope, Inc. (the “Issuer”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CommScope Holding Company, Inc. (the “Company”), issued a notice of conditional partial redemption (the “Notice”) with respect to its 5.000% senior notes due 2021 (the “Notes”). Pursuant to the Notice, the Issuer gave holders of the Notes notice that, subject to the satisfaction of specific conditions precedent stated therein, it will redeem $100 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes on August 7, 2019 (the “Redemption Date”). On the Redemption Date, $100 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes will be redeemed at a redemption price equal to (a) $1,000.00 per $1,000 aggregate principal amount of Notes plus (b) the accrued and unpaid interest to (but not including) the Redemption Date. Following the redemption, $550 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes will remain outstanding.
As permitted by the terms of the Notes, the Notice and the redemption of the Notes are conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including, without limitation, the Issuer’s board of directors not having resolved that the redemption is no longer advisable and in the best interests of the Issuer. The Issuer will be entitled to delay, and may delay, the redemption of the Notes until such time as such conditions precedent are satisfied. There can be no assurance that the redemption of the Notes will be consummated.
This Current Report on Form 8-K does not constitute a notice of redemption with respect to the Notes. The Notes have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction, and may not be offered or sold absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction. The Issuer called the Notes for redemption only by, and pursuant to the terms of, the Notice.
The information contained in this Item 7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
http://ir.commscope.com/node/13041/html
Long UOIP,
~Mangus
Intent to acquire 100% of Global Stem Cells Group Inc
“We are very pleased to have successfully completed our due diligence,” said Dave Christensen, CEO of Lans Holdings, “And we are looking forward to the closing of the acquisition.”
Due your due diligence and read the press release for yourself.
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/07/29/1892911/0/en/Lans-Holdings-Successfully-Completes-Due-Diligence-of-Global-Stem-Cells-Group.html
Long LAHO,
~Magnus
I will message zomby for the details
That would be wonderful
Myself and couple holder friends will be there
Long UOIP,
Magnus
Stickied
OMG UOIP is on auto pilot.
It does not matter anymore. The company is private, there is no longer a public marketplace to buy and sell your shares.
It does not matter what anyone says about this stock. When the case is settled we will be informed what we will get paid and NO ONE and I mean no one actually knows the amount.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Carter does not control the vote and the board, get your facts straight.
UOIP is a sound Delaware corporation that will take care of their shareholders.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Congratulations to shareholders who have stood their ground and stuck with UOIP
UOIP is not a scam!
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
LMAO! That is too funny - shareholders in a private company will make millions from there investments.
Shareholders won't get a penny - they will get mega dollars from this record breaking earth sharking stock UOIP.
Follow UOIP and their court cases
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Sorry there isn't a UOIP - it is just UnifiedOnline Inc. a strong and powerful corporation
UOIP is a strong and resourceful corporations. Investors are protected by corporate lay
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Once again the point was missed - shareholders have many avenues to pursue if Chanbond receives a settlement etc.
All Carter has to do is have Unified pay the capital to Chanbond and the shareholders rich.
No need in filing a civil complaint and try to get it certified as a class action.
Carter plans on sharing any of the proceeds from a settlement.
This is exactly why serious and sophisticated investors bought UOIP.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
That is a great point AllinFun, prison is a great deterrent
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Sticky Message and iBox Help Request
I would like to get a list of questions and answers together regarding where we now stand with our investment. I imagine lots of people are going to be asking the same questions. So let's pull together and reply with questions and answers.
1. Where is my money?
We will now own shares in a private company (UnifiedOnline the parent company), not a public company. Where the actual cash will go.... IDK
2. Does Billy Carter own UOIP? No
3. Does Billy Carter own Chanbond? IDK, but he is the manager.
4. Since Billy Carter does not own UOIP, can he receive the stock money? IDK
5. Do we as share holders of UOIP have any legal control of Chanbond's activities?
These are just some of the questions I have already been asked by my friends that have invested on my recommendation :-/
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
The sky is the limit for cell-based meat!
Stem cell technology isn't restricted to the healthcare and cosmetic industry. This is a very interesting article regarding other possibilities for stem cell research.
https://www.gfi.org/memphis-meats-jessica-joslin-pioneers
Long LAHO,
~Magnus
I will call the clerk of the court on Monday and ask what the address is for the court case.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
Industry news regarding Stem Cell Treatment. Increasing medical cost and advances in stem research will forces more people to seek the less invasive treatments of stem cell therapy. LAHO/GSCG has positioned itself to take full advantage of this.
...Dr Richard Webb, Research Scientist for SCRABEL, said: “The NHS has identified key challenges it will face in the near future due to an aging population. One of those is the substantial cost conditions like arthritis will have upon the NHS budget due to a rise in the number of older people needing hip or knee replacements.
"Arthritis UK estimate that from now to 2030 the cost to the NHS for people with arthritis needing hip or knee replacement could rise from £3.4 billion to £18.6 billion. Stem cell treatments, like those we are working on, could provide an alternative, cheaper and quicker recovery option for 1000s of people.”...
read the complete article at:
https://www.canterbury.ac.uk/news-centre/press-releases/2019/New-lab-to-help-develop-stem-cell-use-in-regenerative-medicine.aspx
Long LAHO,
~Magnus
UOIP up 6.67% @ $0.016
Volume 503,408
as of Jul 12, 2019 2:26pm EST
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Diamond studded walker added to my amazon shopping cart LOL!!!
Age is a reoccurring statement here and I cannot help but laugh to myself. What will people think when they see the group of us getting together celebrating our new found wealth.
“Look at that geriatric convention. They party like they are all loaded”
LOL!!!!!!
Come on UOIP
~Magnus
I am not exactly sure and I will search for some statistics. As far as the appeal I go the following information from the Appellate Procedure Guide.
http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/AppellateProcedureGuide/AppellateProcedureGuide.pdf
Myself and a fellow investor plan on attending the appeal. Looking forward to meeting anyone else that shows up.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
ORAL ARGUMENT
Richmond Sessions
The court sits in Richmond, Virginia from Tuesday-Friday during six separate “court
weeks” scheduled between September and June. The court hears and decides cases
in panels consisting of three judges. Each panel hears oral argument in four cases
each day during court week. Additional days and sessions are added to the schedule
as needed.
Special Sessions
Special sessions are scheduled at law schools and other locations within the Circuit.
The court generally hears three cases at a law school, followed by a question and
answer session. If argument is scheduled for a law school session but counsel prefers
to present argument in Richmond, counsel should notify the clerk and request that the
case be scheduled for the next available Richmond argument session.
Courthouse Security
All visitors are required to show photo identification before they are directed through
screening by Court Security Officers. Prohibited at all times are weapons and potential
weapons, including firearms, pocket knives, scissors, letter openers, screw drivers,
mace, and pepper spray. Umbrellas must be left at the entrance. Food and beverages
may not be brought into the Courthouse or Annex. Storage lockers are not available.
Additional time should be allowed to complete security screening.
Electronic Device Policy
On the days the court is hearing argument, attorneys and their staff may bring electronic
devices into the Courthouse or Annex (other than devices that serve only as cameras or
recorders). All electronic devices must be turned off in any courtroom or chambers, but
may be turned on with all sounds muted during oral argument of counsel's case to
enable counsel to refer to documents previously downloaded to the device. Wireless
Internet access is available for use of personal electronic devices in the library but not in
the courtrooms. Electronic devices are prohibited on days the court is not hearing
argument. More information may be found in the court's Electronic Device Policy
Pre-argument Registration
Attorneys appearing for oral argument must register at least 30 minutes in advance in
Room 222 on the morning of argument to learn of panel assignment, courtroom
assignment, order of appearance, and allocation of oral argument time. All counsel to a
side must check in together to agree on the allocation of time. Attorneys check in
between 8:45 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. for oral arguments commencing at 9:30 a.m. En banc
oral arguments start at 9:00 a.m., and counsel check in for en banc arguments between
8:15 and 8:30 a.m. Arguments on the last day of the session commence at 8:30 a.m.,
and counsel checks in between 7:45 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.
Argument Panel
The identity of the argument panel is kept confidential until the morning of oral
argument.
The chief judge presides over en banc sessions of the court and over all three-judge
panels on which the chief sits. The active circuit judge most senior in service on a panel
is the presiding judge for all other oral argument panels. The presiding judge sits in the
center of the panel; the next most senior judge sits to the right of the presiding judge;
and the least senior judge on the panel sits to the left of the presiding judge.
An appeal may be heard and decided by two of the three judges assigned to a panel,
when one judge becomes unavailable. If a panel is reduced to two and the two cannot
agree, however, the case will be reargued before a new three-judge panel which may or
may not include prior panel members. IOP 36.2.
Argument Time
A digital clock with timer lights is used to track argument time. The timer light shows
green until only five minutes of argument time remain, at which point an amber light
appears. A red light appears when argument time has expired.
All parties to a side must share the time allotted for oral argument. The party filing the
first notice of appeal or, in the event the parties noted an appeal on the same day, the
plaintiff in the proceedings below will be deemed the appellant for purposes of both
briefing and oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(d); 28.1(b). Each side is normally
allowed 20 minutes, except in en banc cases, in which counsel is allowed 30 minutes
per side. In social security disability cases, black lung cases, and labor cases where
the primary issue is whether the agency's decision is supported by substantial evidence,
and in criminal cases where the primary issue involves the application of the sentencing
guidelines, each side is limited to 15 minutes. Loc. R. 34(d).
Since the appellant is allowed to open and close the argument, counsel for appellant is
asked to allocate their time between opening and rebuttal. Loc. R. 34(d). In a crossappeal, both appellant and appellee may reserve rebuttal time. No more than 1/3 of the
time may be reserved for rebuttal. In a 30-minute argument, counsel may reserve up to
10 minutes for rebuttal. In a 20-minute argument, counsel may reserve up to 7 minutes
for rebuttal. In a 15-minute argument, counsel may reserve up to 5 minutes for rebuttal.
It is recommended that no more than two attorneys argue per side. Loc. R. 34(d). Care
should be taken to avoid duplication of argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(d).
Counsel may request additional time by written motion stating reasons, filed after
notification that the case has been calendared for oral argument. Loc. R. 34(d). At
argument, the panel may reduce or increase the amount of time allotted for oral
argument. Loc. R. 34(d).
Briefs for cases assigned to an argument panel are distributed to the panel at the time
the assignments are made, and the judges hearing argument will have read the briefs
and be familiar with the case. Therefore, in oral argument, counsel should emphasize
the dispositive issues. Loc. R. 34(d). Counsel should not read at length from briefs,
records, or authorities. Fed. R. App. P. 34(c).
Upcoming oral arguments for United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Panel F: Tuesday, August 06, 2019, 10:00 A.M., Courtroom 203
18-1886 PATO ChanBond, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
This hearing scheduled 8/6/2019 may be a historic event for us holders of UOIP and I wanted to point out what other important event happened on this date. Hiroshima an event we shouldn't forget.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Current stock price information on UOIP and the companies involved in this case.
Company Name....Close Price 7/11/19....52-wk low....52-wk high
=======================================================
Unifiedonline (UOIP).......$0.015............$0.065........$0.0001
Commscope (COMM)....$15.04............$14.92........$32.48
Cisco (CSCO)...............$57.30............$40.25........$58.15
Comcast Corp (CMCSA)....$44.08............$32.61........$44.14
Atlantic Broadband (CCA)..$98.99............$61.68........$99.60
Cable One (CABO)........$1217.57...........$704.60........$1230.90
WideOpenWest (WOW).....$7.58...............$6.40........$12.91
Cablevision / Altice(ATUS)...$25.43...........$14.50........$25.46
Charter Communications...$410.25..........$271.56........$411.70
Charter - Time Warner
Charter - Bright House
RCN Corporation / TPG Capital
Wave Broadband / TPG Capital
Mediacom Broadband
Cequel Communications
COX Communications
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Nice job Tony and the CISCO appeal is less than 4 weeks away. Commscope and UOIP's fate could be sealed on that very day.
On August 6th 1945 An atomic bomb was used containing more power than 12,000 tons of TNT and producing more than 2,000 times the blast of the most powerful bomb ever dropped before was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, killing an estimated 140,000 people in the first use of a nuclear weapon in warfare. The bomb nicknamed "Little Boy" with 130 pounds of uranium-235 produced the equivalent to about 13 kilotons of TNT. On August 9, 1945, America dropped the second Atom bomb on Nagasaki effectively ending the war when Japan announced their surrender.
August 6th could very well have another significant event.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
I am happy to be here with each and everyone of you.
We have:
- Diggers of information.
- Entertainers. Without your comments this wouldn't be as much fun
- People who provide definitions and explanations.
- Individuals that expound on topics
We are a great team giving each other talking points and research ideas. I am looking forward to meeting each and everyone of you, especially the entertainers and those with glowing personalities.
The 10 most expensive court judgments
https://www.nola.com/news/crime_police/article_73c6c3f5-7685-5613-843c-358e0624c6be.html
10. Pfizer $2.3 billion
9. GlaxoSmithKline $3 billion
8. BP $4.5 billion
7. Anadarko/Kerr McGee $5.15 billion
6. CitiGroup $7 billion
5. Bank of America $9.3 billion
4. JPMorgan $13 billion
3. Bank of America $16.6 billion
2. BP $18.7 billion
1. Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement
It required the companies pay those plaintiffs $10 billion annually for the indefinite future. The original four companies agreed to pay out at least $206 billion over the agreement’s first 25 years.
Where will be on this list?
UnifiedOnline, Inc. (UOIP)
Other OTC - Currency in USD
0.01500.0000 (0.00%)
At close: July 10 3:44PM EDT
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Maybe 1.25 billion times the 13???
Long UOIP,
Magnus
I found what they want the $1.25 billion for, but I wonder what "general" includes????
Use of Proceeds:
The Issuers intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to repay certain indebtedness, which may include the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2020 issued by Time Warner Cable, LLC, with any remaining proceeds used for general
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1091667/000119312519187406/d754169dex991.htm
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Does the following mean anything to us?
Charter Communications released this in the July 1st 8-K
I saw $1.25 billion and got excited, but I do not understand what's being said
https://ir.charter.com/node/27246/html
On June 25, 2019, Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp., as issuers, CCO Holdings, LLC, as parent guarantor, and the guarantors party thereto entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named in Schedule I thereto, with respect to the issuance and sale of an aggregate of $1,250,000,000 principal amount of 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2049. The Underwriting Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants of the parties thereto, conditions to closing, indemnification obligations of the parties thereto and termination and other customary provisions.
A copy of the Underwriting Agreement is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1. The foregoing description of the Underwriting Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Underwriting Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.
Thanks in advanced and long UOIP,
~Magnus
$67.50 PPS in 2025, 5 years away
$270 billion dollars by 2025
4 Billion Authorized Shares as of 7/1/2019
270 / 4 = 67.50
I will be here for the long haul.
Could even be an increase of $13.50 YOY
$13.50 x 5 = $67.50
..."GSCG operates in the global stem cell market which is forecasted by Transparency Market Research to reach $270 billion dollars by 2025 of which roughly 40% or $100 billion will be derived from outside of North America and growing at a 13.8% compounded annual growth rate."...
From
http://www.stemcellsgroup.com/tag/benito-novas/
Long LAHO,
~Magnus
“This transaction represents a significant opportunity for our company to enter the explosive field of Stem Cell technology with a proven and seasoned team and I look forward to working closely with GSCG to execute on their growth plans.”
Dave Christensen, CEO of Lans Holding Inc
Long LAHO,
Magnus
Thank you for that review of the pros and cons. I am long and plan on seeing just what Global Stems Cell Group and Benito Novas brings to the table.
Long LAHO,
Magnus
Hello AllinFun it’s nice to see you here. Are you in on this one? I like it and feel equally as good about this as I do UOIP
Long LAHO,
Magnus
CommScope has continued to get hammered. Today they set a new 52 week low. It could be a market maker that’s loyal to COMM that has been running the UOIP price down to 0.0001
If that’s the case then it just goes to prove they are scared and willing to do anything to rattle UOIP. But it’s not going to work
Long UOIP,
Magnus