Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
According to the Sate of Delaware
Ceased Good Standing - This represents an entity that failed to pay their annual taxes timely. For example: 2002 taxes due June 1, 2003 were not received by end of day June 1, 2003.
For one reason or another they have an outstanding tax bill.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
Actually the term “Cease Good Standing” means not in good standing.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
Used the Delaware Entity search and paid the $20 to get the full details for Chanbond, LLC and they can be viewed here.
http://uoip.atwebpages.com/EntitySearchStatusCopy_03252019.pdf
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Can you please provide an example of someone who has posted "the contract between chanbond and the attorney(s)" while the case is underway?
Can you please provide a NYSE company that provides such contact information?
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
This may be even more confusing, so I will include as many links for your enjoyment
On April 23,2014 UNIFIEDONLINE, INC. (formerly IceWeb, Inc) entered into a subscription agreement (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1097718/000135448815005061/uoip_sc13d.htm) with UnifiedOnline! LLC (William Carter) see exhibit 10.1 of the Subscription Agreement (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1097718/000135448815005061/uoip_ex101.htm) and purchased 400,000 shares of Series AA Preferred Stock which were converted on January 5, 2015 to 903,825,954 shares of common stock becoming a majority shareholder in the Company (UNIFIEDONLINE, INC.). William Carter paid for the stock from his company (UO! IP of NC, LLC)
Added side note, some people have asked what is the "!" in the Inc. name and does it mean we are not purchasing the correct stock:
UNIFIEDONLINE!, INC. and UNIFIEDONLINE, INC. are the same company (see below: STATE OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION)
Corporate Entity Searches
================================================================================
https://www.sosnc.gov/online_services/search/Business_Registration_Results
Legal Name: UO! IP of NC, LLC
SosId: 1102741
https://businesswiki.info/company/nc/1102741/uo-ip-of-nc-llc
Company Overview
Uo! Ip Of Nc, LLC is a Limited Liability Company located in Greensboro , North Carolina. The company was registered on 2009-06-17 and it is approximately 9 years years old. According to North Carolina business register Uo! Ip Of Nc, LLC status is Current-Active.
Uo! Ip Of Nc, LLC agent is Carter, William R., Jr.. We don't have information about this agent address.
There is 1 director in Uo! Ip Of Nc, LLC.
================================================================================
https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx
Entity Name: UNIFIEDONLINE! LLC
File Number: 5504684
================================================================================
Entity Name: UNIFIEDONLINE, INC.
File Number: 703828
================================================================================
Entity Name: ICEWEB, INC.
File Number: 3440022
UNIFIEDONLINE!, INC. and UNIFIEDONLINE, INC
================================================================================
STATE OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
State of Delaware
Secretary of State
Division of Corporations
Delivered 05:07 PM 12/22/2014
FILED 5:07 pm 12/22/2014
SRV 141574856 0703828 FILE
UNIFIEDONLINE!, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:
1.The name of the corporation is UNIFIEDONLINE!, INC.
2.That a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation (Title of Certificate Being Corrected) was filed by the Secretary of State of Delaware on December 16, 2014 and that said Certificate requires correction as permitted by Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
3.The inaccuracy or defect of said Certificate is: (must be specific) CUSIP will not issue a new number if the new name contains an exclamation point. The corporation is a public company and is required to have a CUSIP number for its stock.
4. Article FIRST of the Certificate is corrected to read as follows:
The name of the corporation (hereinafter "corporation") is UnifiedOnline, Inc.
SEC Filings
================================================================================
http://filings.irdirect.net/data/1097718/000135448815000023/iweb_8k.pdf
January 5, 2015
From 8-K
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) January 5, 2015
UnifiedOnline, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
0-27865 (Commission File Number)
13-2640971 (IRS Employer Identification No.)
4126 Leonard Drive, Fairfax, VA (Address of principal executive offices)
22030 (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (816) 979-1893
IceWEB, Inc. (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Definition of "Subscription Agreement"
================================================================================
Subscription Agreement
REVIEWED BY WILL KENTON Updated Mar 30, 2018
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subscriptionagreement.asp
What is a Subscription Agreement
A subscription agreement is an investor's application to join a limited partnership. It is also a two-way guarantee between a company and a subscriber. The company agrees to sell a certain number of shares at a specific price, and in return, the subscriber promises to buy the shares at the predetermined price.
BREAKING DOWN Subscription Agreement
In a limited partnership (LP), a general partner manages the partnership entity and brings in limited partners using a subscription agreement. Candidates subscribe to become limited partners. After meeting standard requirements, the general partner decides whether to accept the candidate. Limited partners act as silent partners by providing capital, usually a one-time investment, and have no material participation in the business's operations. As a result, they typically have little to no voice in the day-to-day operations of the partnership and are exposed to less risk than full partners. Each limited partner’s exposure to business losses is limited to that partner's original investment. The subscription agreement for joining the limited partnership describes the investment experience, sophistication, and net worth of the potential limited partner.
Broadly defined, a partnership is a business agreement between two or more people who all have personal ownership in the business. The partnership entity does not pay taxes. Instead, the profits and losses flow through to each partner. Partners will pay taxes on their distributive share of the partnership's taxable income based on a partner agreement. Law firms and accounting firms are often formed as general partnerships.
Subscription Agreements With Private Placements
When a company wishes to raise capital, they will often issue shares of stock for purchase by either the general public or through a private placement. The primary disclosure form for potential general public investors is a prospectus. The prospectus is a disclosure document listing information about the business and its underlying security.
A private placement is a sale of stock to a limited number of accredited investors who meet specific criteria. The criteria for accredited status includes having a particular level of investment experience, assets, and net worth. Investors will receive a private placement memorandum as an alternative to the prospectus. The memorandum provides a less comprehensive description of the investment.
================================================================================
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1097718/000135448815005300/uoip_10q.htm
Commission file number: 0-27865
UNIFIEDONLINE, INC.(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
13-2640971 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4126 Leonard Drive, Fairfax, VA (Address of principal executive offices)
22030 (Zip Code)
NOTE 17 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On April 23, 2014, we [UNIFIEDONLINE, INC.] entered into a Subscription Agreement with UnifiedOnline! LLC (the “Subscriber”), a Delaware limited liability company, pursuant to which the Subscriber purchased 400,000 shares of Series AA Preferred Stock which were converted on January 5, 2015 to 903,825,954 shares of common stock becoming a majority shareholder in the Company. UO! IP of NC, LLC is a related party to Unified Online! LLC. In consideration for the Shares, Subscriber paid $116,087 to various vendors and obtained the agreement of a certain related party lessor to temporarily forbear exercising non-payment default remedies. Since entering into the Subscription Agreement, the Subscriber has advanced approximately $1.0 million bearing interest at 10% per annum to fund general working capital. The balance due was $1,090,255 and $1,029,005 at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively, and is reflected as note payable, related party in the balance sheet.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
I like your logic as it pertains to liquidity and the patents being worth more than the stocks.
I appreciate all that you share here and offer my thanks.
Keep calm and long UOIP,
Magnus
Wasn't that settled for $2,150,000?
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1507605/000149315218010729/ex10-1.htm
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
You did all of us a solid and I thank you very much for that.
Keep calm and stay long UOIP,
~Magnus
Apparently you have not read anything others have posted in response to your rants. Facts have been provided along with wishful thinking. Who in their right mind would invest in anything without wishful thinking of the outcome.
Institutional investors, there will not be any because the company is operating in the dark and originally submitted the proper forms to the SEC. It wasn't until afterward that Mr. Howe had health issues that may or may not have lead to the lack of financial filings.
I highly doubt many sophisticated wall street investors play around with penny stocks. Most wall street types are like Mortimer and Randolph LOL!!!
Keep calm and long UOIP,
~Magnus
It's apparent from the posts this week, people are concerned with the status of UOIP. So after reading the "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE" dated 2/25/2019 I would like to point out some facts:
1. UnifiedOnline was required to show cause BY 3/11/2019 and could have at any time up until then.
2. There would not be a public hearing.
3. If UnifiedOnline failed to show cause by 3/11/2019 they MAY be deemed default and the proceeding may be determined, and securities may be revoked.
4. If UnifiedOnline provided fillings, the commission will issues further proceedings or issue its final order.
The SEC keeps this stuff close to their chest and we will know nothing until they are prepared to tell us.
Keep calm and long UOIP,
~Magnus
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2019/34-85194.pdf
Accordingly, SYDYS and UnifiedOnline are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by March 11, 2019, why the registrations of their securities should not be revoked by default due to their failure to file an answer and to otherwise defend this proceeding.
When a party defaults, the allegations in the OIP will be deemed to be true and the Commission may determine the proceeding against that party upon consideration of the record without holding a public hearing.
If a Respondent fails to respond to this order to show cause, it may be deemed in default, the proceeding may be determined against it, and its securities may be revoked.
Upon review of the filings in response to this order, the Commission will either direct further proceedings by subsequent order or issue a final order resolving the matter.
Very true and the Boeing stock averaged $420.00 last week and is now down 11% at $374.00
NYSE, Boeing grounding planes around the world?
Celebrities charged in college admissions scandals?
Textbook rental company Chegg (CHGG) doubles in 12 months.
and soon to hit the news wire ====> Chanbond, a subsidiary of UnifiedOnline Inc. (UOIP) helps 3 inventors from Harrisburg PA fight for their patent rights against 13 US broadband cable companies. The inventors and the investors are enjoying the proceeds from the multi-billion dollar settlement. (this is not in the news yet!!!!)
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Thank you khenry
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
khenry458,
Is this a new pacer?
1:15-cv-00842 ChanBond, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC Posted: 12 Mar 2019 09:34 AM PDT [- Transcript] (351)
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
ytse, I do not like reading much of anything. I listen to audio books and watch Ted Talks. I have become quite the master at google and the CTRL+F (find function) on web pages and PDF's. I read the paragraph before and after what I searched for and determine if it's relevant, all of this while minimizing my screen every time the boss walks by
As for the writing on the wall, I like to think of it like art on the wall. Lots of people here including myself see a masterpiece that's beyond words. Art that surpasses words and speaks to your soul. As for IG and and the other new comers, they look at this and can not begin to understand what we see.
"If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then the person who is observing gets to decide what is beautiful."
Therefore UOIP is in the eye of the beholder!
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Comcast 10-K filing Jan 31, 2019 regarding indemnification.
https://www.cmcsa.com/static-files/beb50cca-b5fa-4935-9dd0-506a03aaa9e7
page 27
We may be unable to obtain necessary hardware, software and operational support.
We depend on third-party vendors to supply us with a significant amount of the hardware, software and operational support necessary to provide certain of our products and services. Some of these vendors represent our primary source of supply or grant us the right to incorporate their intellectual property into some of our hardware and software products. While we actively monitor the operations and financial condition of key vendors in an attempt to detect any potential difficulties, there can be no assurance that we would timely identify any operating or financial difficulties associated with these vendors or that we could effectively mitigate our risks with respect to any such difficulties. If any of these vendors experience operating or financial difficulties, if our demand exceeds their capacity or if they are otherwise unable to meet our specifications or provide the equipment, products or services we need in a timely manner (or at all), or at reasonable prices, our ability to provide some products or services may be adversely affected and we may incur additional costs.
Page 103
Contingencies
We are a defendant in several unrelated lawsuits claiming infringement of various patents relating to various aspects of our businesses. In certain of these cases other industry participants are also defendants, and also in certain of these cases we expect that any potential liability would be in part or in whole the responsibility of our equipment and technology vendors under applicable contractual indemnification provisions. In addition, we are subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While the amount of ultimate liability with respect to such actions is not expected to materially affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial position, any litigation resulting from any such legal proceedings or claims could be timeconsuming and injure our reputation
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Check out what WildOpenWest had to say in their 10-K filed 3/7/2019
http://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001701051/5ead27c3-9817-40ac-816c-c846682436c0.pdf
Page 28
Our business may be adversely affected by the application of certain regulatory obligations governing the intellectual property rights of third parties or if we cannot continue to license or enforce the intellectual property rights on which our business depends.
We rely on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and licenses that are proprietary to our business, as well as our key vendors, along with other agreements with our employees, customers, suppliers and other parties, to establish and maintain our intellectual property rights in technology and the products and services used in our operations. However, any of our intellectual property rights could be challenged or invalidated, or such intellectual property rights may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current industry trends or otherwise to provide competitive advantages, which could result in costly redesign efforts, discontinuance of certain product or service offerings or other competitive harm. Claims of intellectual property infringement by third parties under applicable agreements, laws and regulations (including the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998) could require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, incur substantial monetary liability or be enjoined preliminarily or permanently from further use of the intellectual property in question, which could require us to change our business practices or offerings and limit our ability to compete effectively. Even claims without merit can be time-consuming and costly to defend and may divert management’s attention and resources away from our business. Also, because of the rapid pace of technological change, we rely on technologies developed or licensed by third parties, and we may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses from these third parties on reasonable terms, if at all.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Oh yeah, forgot about that.... Arris/CommScope to the rescue.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
MEDIACOM BROADBAND LLC filed their 10-K on 03/08/19. They seem to believe that any current legal proceedings will not effect their cash flow or business. Their investors are not being told that their estimated 1.2 million subscribers, that they provide broadband service to, are using Chanbonds patented technology without consent or compensation.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
https://mediacomcommunicationscorporation.gcs-web.com/static-files/be8d7d80-b63f-4f22-87b8-c37dbd4191ff
pg 24
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or business.
It's difficult to deny facts that are confirmed and published with our very own government. Hopefully Glow will be satisfied with the facts provided regarding UOIP, Mr Carter, and Chanbond
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Good Morning Adude,
My estimate for the settlement was derived from and only from what I feel each and every broadband subscriber should pay to the inventors as a royalty. No royalties have paid since 2011 and therefore the total amount should realistically be at least $1.92 Billion and that's without demages, lost revenue and/or the 3 times multiplier set forth by US Code 35 U.S.C. § 284, a patent owner is entitled to "damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty."[9] Lost profits that result from infringement of their patent are also compensable. Reasonableness is determined by the standard practices of the particular industry most relevant to the invention, as well as any other relevant or similar royalty history of the patentee . Lost profits are determined by a "but for" analysis. (e.g. "My client would have made X dollars in profit but for the infringement of his/her patent.")
If an infringer is found to have deliberately infringed a patent (i.e., "willful" infringement), then "enhanced" damages can be awarded of up to three times the damages found or assessed. Legal fees can also be assessed, under 35 U.S.C. § 285, if the case is deemed "exceptional." Willfulness is determined from "the knowledge of the actor at the time of the challenged conduct." On appeal, the standard of review is abuse of discretion.[10]
An infringer can also be enjoined from further infringement of the patent, even to the point of being forced to remove an infringing product from the market.
Until the 2006 Supreme Court case of eBay v. MercExchange,[11] plaintiffs routinely sought, and were granted, injunctions prohibiting infringement of their patents. After 2006, injunctions were much harder to obtain, leaving plaintiffs to pursue remedies only for damages. Because patents last for many years, it is common for lawsuits to conclude before the patent term has ended. This has opened up the question of whether and to what extent a court should craft a remedy that includes a royalty for infringing activity that has not yet occurred, but which likely will occur in the immediate future if the infringer continues his infringing activity. According to a 2009 article in the Federal Lawyer,[12] courts have been willing to grant such remedies in appropriate cases.
==========================================================
From my previous post #57474
The math for my $1.20 PPS
According to https://www.statista.com/statistics/217348/us-broadband-internet-susbcribers-by-cable-provider/#0 there has been 40 million broadband subscribers each year since 2011, so that’s the number I will use for this example. You can also work up your own spreadsheet using the PPS from the list that Scruffer is keeping (thank you for that)
1.6 billion shares
My guess of $1.20 per share
1.6billion X 1.2 = 1.92 billion
1.92billion / 40million = $48.00 per Internet subscriber
$48 per subscriber / 8 years = $6 royalty per subscriber per year
$0.50 per month per subscriber..... Let that sink in.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
==========================================================
$0.50 per subscriber per month is will in line with all of the other "Taxes, surcharges and fees" that our neighborhood broadband providers charge us for.
Your history lesson:
Uo! Ip Of Nc, LLC is a Limited Liability Company located in Greensboro , North Carolina. The company was registered on 2009-06-17 and it is approximately 9 years years old. According to North Carolina business register Uo! Ip Of Nc, LLC status is Current-Active.
Uo! Ip Of Nc, LLC agent is Carter, William R., Jr.
==========================
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1097718/000135448815005300/uoip_10q.htm
On February 27, 2014, Agility Ventures LLC sold and assigned the Master Lease and Equipment Schedule to a third party, UO! IP of NC, LLC (see Note 5). UO! IP of NC, LLC has advanced the payments made on this lease to the Company at a rate of 10% per annum. The balance due to UO!IP of NC, LLC was $635,000 at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively.
On April 23, 2014, we entered into a Subscription Agreement with UnifiedOnline! LLC (the “Subscriber”), a Delaware limited liability company, pursuant to which the Subscriber purchased 400,000 shares of Series AA Preferred Stock which were converted on January 5, 2015 to 903,825,954 shares of common stock becoming a majority shareholder in the Company. UO! IP of NC, LLC is a related party to Unified Online! LLC. In consideration for the Shares, Subscriber paid $116,087 to various vendors and obtained the agreement of a certain related party lessor to temporarily forbear exercising non-payment default remedies. Since entering into the Subscription Agreement, the Subscriber has advanced approximately $1.0 million bearing interest at 10% per annum to fund general working capital. The balance due was $1,090,255 and $1,029,005 at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively, and is reflected as note payable, related party in the balance sheet.
On January 5, 2015, IceWEB, Inc. changed its name to UnifiedOnline, Inc.
====================
Aug 15, 2014
CHANBOND, LLC was formed in Delaware as a Limited Liability Company
====================
Jan 5, 2015
https://www.einpresswire.com/article/242649598/iceweb-name-change-and-reverse-split-is-complete
We’re also branching into the area of Intellectual Property Monetization around patent portfolios we’re negotiating in our lines of business; there’ll be more on that later.
I’ve never been more excited to be a part of anything as I am to be making these changes. We’ve worked extremely hard to get our company into position to make this happen. Our model is sound; our approach is right; our systems are perfected, and our resolve is solid. Come along with us! Be a part of UNIFIEDONLINE!, INC (UOIP: OTC BB). It’s a new day and a bright future!” Howe said.
====================
Sep 21, 2015
Chanbond files suit against 13 cable providers. Chanbond and their legal team MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP file suite against the 13 cable providers
====================
https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=11104682
Oct 27, 2015
purchase agreement by and among Deirdre Leane, and ChanBond, LLC
Company purchased Chanbond, in exchange for a cash payment of five million U.S. Dollars ($5,000,000) payable on or before October 27, 2020 (the “Cash Payment”) and a shares payment of forty-four million, seven hundred thousand (44,700,000) shares of the Company’s common stock
====================
Oct 27, 2015
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1097718/000135448815004760/uoip_8k.htm
Robert M. Howe, III of UnifiedOnline, Inc. purchases ChanBond, LLC
Robert M. Howe, III of UnifiedOnline, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among Deirdre Leane, (the “Seller”) and ChanBond, LLC (“Chanbond”)
====================
Oct 27, 2015
https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=11104682
Deirdre Leane is the Manager of Chanbond. LLC
according to her signature on the 10-Q Deirdre Leane is the manager of Chanbond, LLC Schedule 2.2.7
====================
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1097718/000135448815005300/uoip_10q.htm
On October 27, 2015, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among Deirdre Leane, (the “Seller”) and ChanBond, LLC (“Chanbond”), pursuant to which the Company purchased Chanbond, in exchange for a cash payment of five million U.S. Dollars ($5,000,000) payable on or before October 27, 2020 (the “Cash Payment”) and a shares payment of forty-four million, seven hundred thousand (44,700,000) shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) par value of $0.001. The obligation to make the Cash Payment shall be evidenced by a promissory note (the “Promissory Note”). The above securities were issued in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and/or Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act.
On the Closing Date, pursuant to the Agreement, the Seller executed an interest assignment deed which assigned, transferred and conveyed all of its membership interests in ChanBond to the Company and ChanBond appointed William R. Carter, Jr. (a related party to the Company) as sole manager (“Manager”) who shall have sole and exclusive authority over the business of ChanBond.
Effective October 27, 2015, the Company entered into $5,000,000 no interest Promissory Note with the Seller. The Promissory Note is due and payable on or prior to October 27, 2020. If the Promissory Note is not paid in full by the Maturity Date, the aggregate principal amount shall be increased by Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) for each month such payment is delayed (or pro rata portion thereof) until paid in full.
Until the Note is paid in full, the Company shall be obligated to make payments on this Promissory Note to the Seller from 100% of any Net Revenues, derived from the monetization of the ChanBond patent portfolio, within thirty (30) calendar days after each calendar month commencing with the calendar month ending October 31, 2015.
In October, 2015 a forbearance agreement was reached between the Company and UO! IP of NC, LLC which forbeared its enforcement of rights due to the existing defaults and amended the payment terms of the lease. The final payment date has been extended to October 31, 2017 at which time the then outstanding principal balance, together with all accrued but unpaid interest on the unpaid balance, shall be due and payable in full
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
CEO Mr. Robert "Rob" Maull Howe III was UOIP's President and Secretary up until his death. Mr Carter was and is not the person to "file any financial information since 2015"
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Those are bold accusations, do you know for a fact that Carter is a "OTCM serial scammer". What proof do you have to make such a claim? What about innocent until proven guilty?
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
When making my decision to invest in UOIP, I followed the investing advice of Warren Buffett. I believe that Mr. Buffett is much more successful than you.
==========================================
Warren Buffett: If you invest this way, ‘you can’t miss’
Published Fri, Jun 1 2018 • 2:05 PM EDT • Updated Mon, Jul 2 2018 • 3:23 PM EDT
Emmie Martin
@EMMIEMARTIN
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/01/warren-buffett-if-you-invest-this-way-you-cant-miss.html
When Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett makes investing decisions, he focuses on one thing only: the facts.
“You have to be able to play out your hand under all circumstances,” Buffett told shareholders in 2006. “But if you can play out your hand, and you’ve got the right facts, and you reason by yourself, and you let the market serve you and not instruct you, you can’t miss.”
Your opinions and emotions aren’t likely to help you. “Being contrarian has no special virtue over being a trend follower,” Buffett says. Instead, the Oracle of Omaha suggests taking a pragmatic approach to investing decisions. First, gather all of your facts. Next, learn how to dissect them to find the pertinent information you need to make your decision. For Buffett, that means looking for the pieces that are “important and knowable.”
“If something’s important but unknowable, forget it,” he says. “I mean, it may be important whether somebody’s going to drop a nuclear weapon tomorrow, but it’s unknowable.”
These quotes reveal Warren Buffett’s legendary business mind
Focus on the variables that you do have at your disposal. Once you’ve narrowed down your information, “then you decide whether you have information of sufficient value that — compared to price and all that — will cause you to act,” Buffett explains.
===========================================
This board and the wonderful members of iHub aided in the variables at my disposal and I used that information of sufficient value to make my personal investment in UOIP, with absolutely no regrets!
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
I am a OTCM investor and I bought into this stock knowing very well what I was getting involved in. I researched the patents, the inventors, and the legal team. I have shared my research, and others have shared theirs as well. We have discussed the good and the bad regarding UOIP. People on this board recognize the risks, they are bluntly obvious.
I-Glow you have made your point that you wish to help the investor that has not done their research, and I applaud you for your concern. You have made statements about Mr Billy Carter being a patent troll. You have taken the comments of a single article and have attempted to make it an absolute truth. However lawyers and law offices like IPNAV are necessary, because the majority of inventors do not retain the legal knowledge to fight a fortune 500 company which is using their technology without permission. Our very country is battling with China regarding intellectual patents, appears that there is a need for a "patent troll" to represent the United States of America. Go figure
I am very pleased with the quality of our United States Judicial System and the legal counsel of MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
You do not speak for me. I did not jump in without research.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Thank you kid shaleen, the members of this board have been an inspiration to me as well. Just like you, I too have learned so much from all the knowledgeable people here. I have learned that others use this board to pump people up, to get them so excited that they buy without thinking for themselves. I have also learned that some people use this board to scare people into selling their shares.
That’s why it’s so important to do your own research, share it with others, ask questions, and be willing to admit when your wrong, and celebrate when you are right. The people here are willing to help you learn, all you have to do is participate. Because fear grows from a lack of knowledge. Everything people say on this board can be googled!!! So arm yourself and laugh at their fear tactics.
Use the links, references, and government documents that are provided by the members of this board regarding: UOIP, Chanbond, Billy Carter, The inventors, and the people that brought the inventors to this point.
We are all here to learn and make money. Some by helping and some by spreading fear. Look back though the history of this board and you will see who has been here a long time answering questions about UOIP. History tells a lot about a person and their motives.
I firmly believe that UOIP is going to make a lot of people rich, because for to many years the huge cable companies have been using their product to get rich without any concern for the inventors. They need a patent attorney that can fight their deep pocketed attorneys. We are all invested in seeing our attorneys win. Not every lawyer is scum or a patent troll.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
Thank you psychocharttrader, I wasn't aware you could not PM. I will start looking over the this information.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
What does this mean? Thank you khenry for your contributions
Long UOIP,
Magnus
I agree with you GBall. These mental FUD exercises are tiring.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
Little change of pace.
Cable One, Inc.
10-K
2/28/2019
http://www.snl.com/Cache/c396915016.html
-= From page 30 =-
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, we periodically receive claims from third parties alleging that our network and information technology infrastructure infringes the intellectual property rights of others. We have generally been named as joint defendants in these suits together with other providers of data, video and voice services. Typically these claims allege that aspects of our cable system architecture, electronic program guides, cable modem technology or VoIP services infringe on process patents held by third parties. In addition, we have been subject to various civil lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, including contract disputes, actions alleging negligence, invasion of privacy, violations of applicable wage and hour laws and statutory and common law claims involving various other matters. We do not view any of these proceedings as material to our business and are currently not subject to any other material legal proceedings.
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
West, I am selling 15,000 on TDA at $0.015
Long UOIP,
Magnus
PacWest Transfer, LLC has sold all of its accounts and assets to another transfer agent and will not longer perform transfer agent functions.
last date registrant performed transfer agent functions
03/19/2010
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1172844/000135239210000077/xslFTAX01/primary_doc.xml
Much appreciated KHenry
This may be the people listed in the pacers.
Paul Prucnal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Prucnal
Andrew Cromarty
https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Andrew-Cromarty/3828008
Chris Bakewell
https://www.duffandphelps.com/about-us/news/chris-bakewell-named-in-iams-list-of-economic-experts
Cathleen Thomas Quigley
https://www.linkedin.com/in/quigleycathleen
Long UOIP,
Magnus
I know right and I love the May 2019 prediction of $10.305
Tea leaves, crystal balls, or inside information I love it
Long UOIP,
Magnus
This website has an awesome forecast
https://walletinvestor.com/stock-forecast/uoip-stock-prediction
Long UOIP,
Magnus
That‘s 3.68 billion after lawyers fees. I wonder how much the lawyers stand to make on this deal. I have a bad memory and can not remember if that been mentioned before.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
I am right there with you handMMJ, I also keep buying shares whenever I have the funds. It's like putting houses and then hotels on boardwalk and park place, eventually the 13 will land on my property
Long UOIP,
~Magnus
Take a stroll done memory lane. Start reading posts from 24000 (March of 2017). It's interesting to see all the different members that were posting and buying shares in the triple zeros.
Long UOIP,
Magnus
In 2015 "ARRIS may be required to indemnify the MSOs and/or pay damages for utilizing certain technology."
From Page 41 of their 2015 10-Q Q3 2015
View PDF
ChanBond v. MSOs, C.A. 15-cv-00848, et al, District of Delaware (RGA). On September 21, 2015, ChanBond filed suit against several MSOs alleging infringement of three US Patents. The complaint requests unspecified damages for infringement and injunction against future infringement. To date, no evidence of infringement or damages has been introduced. It is premature to assess the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify the MSOs and/or pay damages for utilizing certain technology.
Long UOIP,
Magnus