Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well a medical school teacher who uses different axis with different time frames to prove a point is kind of a tell.
Also that same teacher is fixed in using the guassian distribution without seeing the complete data set.Another rookie mistake.
Then you have the constant attempt at FUD, which makes you wonder why is a medical school teacher so fixated in saving us all from this horrible investment.
The 30mg does not mean no effect concentration signals effect in most cases.
Some patients at 30mg reach concentration of drug that gives effect.
Lastly it is not a small trial it is a properly sized trial given the use of biomarkers.
Some patients who lacked the gene still got therapeutic effects, as long as they reached the concentration as well as other genes to consider were present.
YES we all know nothing can change your mind lol
I mean 22k.5 is very large amount of narrative investing!
I'll take your views over a real life person with skin in the game! NOT SO MUCH (BORAT VOICE)
You are beating an old dog in a tiny tiny Adult trial that saw a signal in Adults!
Something never seen before! GL
Your narrative is comical!
Care to talk about how you expected no signal from the 30mg arm in AD?
But wait there was! Surprise!!
No I like to know the narrative being pushed, as the message is there and not on what is being said.
For those that are influenced by the actual words, yes I recommend the ignore button too.
This horse was beaten to death back then, and your math adds up.
However it doesnt change the fact that we got a signal in some ADULTs with RETT, in a tiny tiny trial.
Hopefully even better signal in these kids.
You see that is what happens when you provide 5% very insightful post and 95% FUD like posts.
Ever heard of the little girl that cried wolf?
To be fair he said, FUDsters, which would only apply to YOU, if the shoe fits.
Yup a shorts dream is for us long investors to sell our shares to them.
I have something to say about that:
PAY UP!!!
Yea no coincidence following a short attack, on a RISK-OFF day, for price cuts to be announced.
It is how the game is played, the sucker game at least.
Missing the trees for the forest is the goal, $28 seems to be a pretty good gain from today.
However the NARRATIVE IS: price is CUT!
Thank you Doc, your knowledge of this things never stops to amaze me.
In my opinion you sound like you are hedge fund Doctor of sort.
Maybe they are teaching these things in medical school now days.
GL with your "very small AVXL position".
I mean does a bear shit in the woods?
You are presenting your short thesis as if the board didnt already know you were already short LOL.
It would be nice if others would join you in stating the obvious and stopped pretending to be "long share holders".
Oh wait.....
The "cabal" you hate is the real world, with obstacles and all, that of which ALL companies have to overcome.
Sounds like you are taking this AVXL "investment" personal.
Maybe you should read this book to manage your expectations, since apparently your experience has not taught you as much as you think.
From Breakthrough to Blockbuster: The Business of Biotechnology
by Donald L. Drakeman (Author), Lisa N. Drakeman (Author), Nektarios Oraiopoulos (Author)
Yesterday was an opportunity, RISK OFF DAY, for shorts to cover a few shares.
Did they take advantage, or did they add?
We should find out today, no?
Higher lows, and higher borrow rates, makes a bear wonder WTF is going on, why aren't these losers selling to us at lower prices??
Exposition #22561
The WDGT group refuses to sell their all shares even after dilution and "questionable data"!
What do YOU make of that?
And it was down because a large percentage of its constituents were down yesterday.
It was a RISK-OFF day, and nothing to do with AVXL in particular.
I can not believe I actually thought you used to bring valid points to this board.
22.5K post later, I finally admit there is more to this agenda from this birds eye point of view.
GL with your 95% chance of being wrong on AD!
So now is juts in case we run a PM P3 ¿
Just in case doesn't sound like 75% to me.
And you know all about running a show?
LMAO!!
He saw the writing on the wall, or was it bowl.
As in toilet bowl
High stakes poker being witnessed here.
Odds aside, pun intended, human nature is explained in a high stakes poker table.
Who would of thought Dr.M was a grand master at poker too?
Oh by the way did we loose investor?
Did he finally sell all his shares?
Is it small enough to be negative?
How many shares do you owe?
Asking for a friend...
Again listen to the conference call.
It is not about the start, it is about a good start, in order to finish strong.
Missling the forest for the trees is very common around here.
We have data from the two largest indications (markets $$$$$) to be broken down and explained (AD P2/P3, PDD OE).
But you want trial announcements? really?
Beats the schhhiiiiet out of me.
I mean is better than playing with toilets.
But not quite as good as a real brain when it comes to bullshit detection.
I guess you dont own any insurance on anything you do?
Hey investor, did you sell any trading shares or core yesterday after the conference call?
Asking for a friend.
Or perhaps the analysts you speak about were cleaning toilets as well.
Imagine being a share holder and not being able to listen to the call because of toilet cleaning duties.
Lmao oh no my feelings are going to get hurt if you dont!
Are you sure you dont want to and arent going to?
Another enthusiastic share holder lol
What a joke!
Hey Doc are you getting wrecked by todays price action?
Or are you long again?
Let us know when you finally sell!
Let the SHORT ATTACK Commence!!
Correct, trial is large enough to not require AUC as mention by the Chris.
Note we want to have a 1:1 comparison to our competitor (trofinetide) in this field, so I do find this appropriate.
Oh thank you, as Captain Obvious would of said:
No I just noticed this part, which is the only part that matters since this is not the full data analysis, Ray Charles would of seen this:
See, it pays to have low expectations on earning calls.
Nothing new to announce but I do LOVE this part:
And you are still invested????
Beats me as to why....
You are excited?
Why does this bother you so much: