Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Those with cash are paying at historical high prices lol
I guess real estate is not subject to corrections, crashes, or impacted by economics.
DONT act like you are getting a deal, because history and data says otherwise.
But hey pin this post and lets talk in a couple years.
Dont forget to call the kids and let them know about your real estate purchase, for the 100th time, since I suspect the only one here who cares and for the wrong reasons is me.
Imagine buying real estate in 2024 and coming here to brag about it.
Stop embarrassing yourself Mr. Pompous.
conclusive-> fear, and reaction geared intentions!
You wish lol!
Don`t stress the emojis, they are there to get reactions.
Soon to take investors job, which apparently is the same, just get reactions.
Bonus when negative.
Unfortunately, it doesn't help with restless FUD syndrome related sleep disorders.
Investor is SOL, I`ll hand him a warm blanket, nobody likes to be exposed.
Days like today you walk around nude and exposed.
Grab coat, sit by a fire, and relax lol.
Thank you ill take your insult as a compliment.
You seem to not want to accept the FACTs.
Your entire argument is around CHMP engagement with Anavex, which you seem to question its validity.
Obviously, you are WRONG!
All good, it has always been.
WRONG!
Again nice try but WRONG!
You said this:
WRONG! The involvement of the CHMP in the EMA's regulatory process can occur at several stages, not just upon the filing of an MAA.
The CHMP provides scientific advice and guidance throughout the drug development process, including before an MAA is filed.
The Scientific Advice Working Party (SAWP) of the CHMP offers voluntary and non-binding advice on all aspects of drug development programs, aiming to support sponsors in generating adequate data for benefit-risk assessment at the time of MAA submission.
This early dialogue is intended to facilitate the introduction of new, safe, and effective medicines (Hofer et al., 2015). Moreover, the EMA qualification process for novel methodologies is another example of CHMP's involvement prior to MAA submission.
This voluntary process can lead to either a CHMP opinion or scientific advice on innovative methods or drug development tools, indicating engagement before an MAA is filed (Manolis et al., 2011).
Sources: https://consensus.app/papers/regulatory-watch-impact-advice-european-medicines-agency-hofer/554291715d1151709bd2f4de19b19498/?utm_source=chatgpt
https://consensus.app/papers/pathway-qualification-novel-methodologies-european-manolis/e492dcc2b94756d5bc4989698b9bdf85/?utm_source=chatgpt
Hard pass!
This makes zero sense. All available public information is what we know here, nothing else.
Something Jin knew as well before taking the job.
However he now know more private information than any of us here, since his hire.
Care to share what information you may have have that Jin doesn't?
I bet you liked what you read! Lol
If you knew it wouldn't be a short squeeze..
Did you already pivot once again?
LOL.
You see what you did, now I have poop and clowns all over myself.
Lol
Seems like you are using humor to try and discredit or make not believe a real phenomenon.
Oh well, I hope it works, for the sake of your handlers lol.
In the spirit of comedy, and just to let you know the ONLY reason I'm still invested here is because of YOU!
The day you leave is the day I sell and leave myself.
Odd first post lol
It is a terrible disease and desperate market indeed.
Definitely not fake news, and why we are all invested here, to potentially tap into this market.
For the record, I do recall your stand on these NONSENSE lawsuit pursuits.
Just don't recall your complaints about our trial designs, nor will I be searching.
I`ll trust my recollection while I still have it.
Yet, MINE is my MIND to waste.
How do I seem pleased?
Because I`m calling you out on some hindsight bias?
Cmon now you are better than that, and SMARTER!
lmao sure you did!
Care too look for it?
I sure dont, 23k too many for my simple mind.
Remember when you used to complain about trial size and design back when they were announced.
Yea me neither.
Nice, Leo I know as we age so goes our sight and sometimes mind.
AVXL board is where you find yourself in, as mentioned.
Looking for compliments? Maybe time to call the kids.
Why are you sorry and so repetitive lol?
Can someone please pin/sticky his post about needing more trials for approval and less than 50% chance with current data, seen or unsee (somehow).
You seem to keep want to state the same point over and over and over again.
Lastly didnt you say not to trust what the company says? Should it be both ways? nice!
Oh look me too, I QUESTIONED, am I doing it right?
You said generation, I said generation.
Apparently, the shoe was properly sized.
xoxo
Your opinion holds water in its original source, the rest are ASSumptions.
Pompousness/Cockiness/Condescension not foreign concepts of older generations?
Also why we are in such financial shit storm.
GL!
Impressive Leo, only you possess the ability to conclude people's comprehension from their emoji use.
Kudos!
Another example of hindsight 20/20:
Thank you, any more?
So, hindsight is 20/20.
Funny how you never mentioned these potential issues before lol.
I love these hypotheticals.
I`ll play along, what would have happened to share price back then when we announce a change in N? In the middle of the trial.
Specially since changing this N does not guarantee WGT.
After the fact, everyone is a genius.
AF in the past, has shown not to care about peer reviewed or not.
NWBO released a Jama oncology peer reviewed paper, and he claimed that all the doctors in the Jama Oncology paper although well intended, were wrong.
So, if that is his opinion in the light of facts, he can state it without consequences.
In my opinion he most likely does the same to AVXL no matter what the data says.
Pretty odd immunity journalists, from spreading such harmful opinions as facts......
Looking at his logic I think he forgot that water only boils at 100c at sea level.
or did he? lol
Conditions matter, if it flew over.
As Boi perfectly explains.
I hear you, just trying to figure the significance of it or why it matters in the grand scheme of things.
Mistake? if so does it matter? What are we trying to paint here, all I see is an ink blob.
Kind sir (using it loosely here wink wink), pretty sure I missed the discussion and importance of such update...
care to clarify or direct to the thread?
Nice, definitely SMART to have contingencies and parallel development.