Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
He will probably get a nice job at Biogen!
If what you are saying is true, his retirement will be negligible compared to what he will make in a BP job.
You really believe we got TLR even though it had less information than "Initial Results"
Well then I overestimated your experience in readouts.
What we did get was the same initial data presented in a direct way to compare to Biogens drug.
Which by the way considering safety profile and all, we blew out of the water.
In case you have forgotten, what a flat out lie or hopeful fool looks like!
I highlighted the LIE/hopeful theory!
Again not what was claimed from what IR told this individual.
But sure Bob!
What a waste of time LOL!
Can you tell me why these speculations bother you?
They were speculations and from my memory not claimed to be FACTS.
What should bother is the LIES about data being available before JP conference coming from IR.
Or the Medical Lecturer using the wrong distribution when trying to spread FUD.
Things of that sort.
Will never happen, nor you want a wrongful explanation.
Remember the IR LIE!!
Why would you want more of the same?
Another weak AD-HOMINEM attempt!
This is NONSENSE!
Question why did you say IR told you data for P2/3b AD trial would be available before JP conference?
That thing is a zero to the left of the decimal point in terms of value added.
Has been wrong about every single one of its calls, and claims victory.
Bas, is funny to me how our "share holders" "investors" are always so negative about their holding!
Always thinking of negatives, almost as if they want it to happen.
Imagine if they were short, would they be talking positively about what is going on with Anavex?
Curious to say the least.
So now this?
I see and stand corrected, but I do agree with BOI, it would of been horrible to look at interim in a drug that I suspect does not have a linear response in the short term.
We could of been at the pre therapeutic stage of the drug, or at a local maximum, to then be disappointed if it didn't follow through.
Our drug requires the time to work, we are not just tagging and deleting like current drugs.
Not agreeing with interim look does not mean we believe our data is weak.
It just means we are not desperate enough to jeopardize our trial.
What a bunch of NONSENSE!!!
If you believe this:
You can believe anything YOU would like to believe!
Again it proves nothing to ME!!
Nor validates schiiiet!
I can see how it could satisfy the same crowd that wanted to do an interim peek at our AD data potentially ruining the trial.
That crowed is filled with desperation!!
That would be very nice of you, but meeting Doc will be rewarding enough.
Indeed careful they also have drunks who wanted to do an half way peek at the ad data.
Also what is gained from an in person meeting again?
Like that matters lmao!
But hey drunks will be drunks, usually fat too, and VERY DEMANDING.
Again ANYONE who pays can participate in these conferences.
They are mainly composed of researchers, doctors, student residents, and
ALSO investment firms research departments who want to learn about what is going on in the field.
MS is big field of interest because there few medicines that are not very effective.
Again not just MD.
Zee Welcome.
Data is good enough to keep retail investors like yourself involved!
No? Prove me wrong then.
100% in agreement with this and has been my observation in my short experience in the market.
7years.
Also what I can conclude from every single book I have read in investing, trading, data analysis, logic and human action/phycology.
Cant use guassian in non gaussian environments.
So based on this, dont use charts?
Both seem to result in erroneous assumptions.
Investment is not the same as human pecking order.
That professor, wanted to impress others.
Dont try to impress others, even if by sharing an irrelevant death story to invoke FEAR, is the lesson I gathered from that story.
One might confuse it as the F. in FUD.
I`ll give you the props you earned, +/- 5% in play! kudos.
But Ray Charles also would of seen that MACRO conditions are indicative of risk off.
Our giant carrot, AD news drop at any time, is holding us up nicely all things considered.
What will the FEDs do? PCE up, real state sales up, everything they dont want up is up.
Can we stand the blow? Our giant carrot thinks so.
You seem to think so too. If so we both agree.
Luckily for me, time is the largest asset I have, to my awareness at least.
I'll take your investment advice..
Sure thing, you are probably using the same probabilities as the AA in AD ones.
But in case you missed it, IT WAS A MISTAKE.
I was referring to our OPEN LABEL trial Phase 2A study in AD, thank you for the lesson on P1, but I was aware it is in healthy individuals it was an early morning brain fart.
You really couldn't figure that out?
Or was this an ad hominem attempt?
There is also dose concentration and what happens to the individual after it reaches a certain dose concentration.
Some people in the p1 improved with lower concentration than others.
Why the minimum concentration is just one factor but not the only factor.
Why KEM is needed to use the other variables and why we suspect is non gaussia . Maybe even U shaped response.
We will find out.
Not sure you were trying to answer me, but because there are other factors that might affect the concentration asides from weight.
Example gut microbiota, genes, etc.
Oh snap thank you for the correction, you see, I knew you were more useful than just cleaning your toilet.
Thank you for the clarifying PM, you sure got me there!
lol not enough coffee this morning had an early 3am event for work.
Yup, been away all day too, making some more money to invest into this little promising company called AVXL.
I wonder when DOC is going to give us a chance to read one of his claimed, to have written peer reviewed paper.
I mean I'm pretty sure he will be just as welcomed as Mayo, for the bravery of disclosure.
Do you have anything more interesting to say today?
Glad we held 10$?
Im really jealous of how well everyone seems to time the drops and tops.
Selling 100% of holding is pretty insane to me, unless it is all held in a tax free account.
I dont have the experience I suppose (yes I`m relatively young Leo, so my sense of humor still in tact or maybe too much so), I go the buy the dip route, but just on AVXL.
General market doesnt realize there is no more free money and a deep recession is needed.
Or maybe just doesnt care. Until it does.
Will it be a PDD P3 or just PD P3, well find out soon.
Also the power of Macro analysis on display.
But you are right knowledge is only subtractive, it points more to how useless TA is in this environment than how useful macro is.
I'll give out mine if he gives out his.
Not giving it a rest, I didn't claim to have written peer reviewed papers as a way to gain credibility.
While putting avxl down on every accomplishment they announce.
That was literally the purpose in my opinion.
Set it up to let them down, shake that tree up baby!!
What I call THE NARRATIVE!
Yea the real question is what did IR actually tell him/her/it?
Hopefully better information than that JP Conference one.
Maybe you should contact IR and tell us what they "told you" about near term timelines.
LOL
Question is are they all going down?
IF so how much?
As much as your SAVA investment?
I sure hope not.