Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Only ppl who respect him are the ones paying.
Thank you Dr.Hedge!
You forgot to mention the hair, fud incomplete....
So, to clarify:
PACER charges a fee to access publicly deemed court documents.
RECAP is a plug in, which a PACER user may have in their browser, its designed to copy documents in PACER (paid to access) to CourtListener (free to acess).
So a court person uploaded the original document to PACER, with those handwritings.
Another person tried to access these documents in PACER, and they were copied to CourtListener.
Where Investor found them....
It's all about convincing, but who exactly?
Oh!!!! You are referring to the actual readouts and not the trial themselves.....
Speaking of lame attempts to seem interesting, hey how are you?
2025 is only a year away, not too bad if put into perspective.
Yea, some of us don't mind getting our hands a bit dirty.
But with lots less frequency, I'm sure you noticed.
So you are bothered people dont want to interact with you via words lol
Awwwww.
Seems to be working on you too! Unless you sold and own no shares that is......
Good to hear you may still be buying :)
I hear you but why wouldn't the FDA or EMA accept 42/40 as a standard?
Is too far a stretch to make an easier to administer test a new standard or acceptable one?
Why instead and not also?
Maybe if you showed more humility you wouldnt be so butt hurt.
That makes two of you....
Yup, you did, but just couldn't refute my comment.
You are deflecting, I acknowledge that you changed your stance!
It is obvious you went from a WGT/Missling apologist to something else.
My original post was to the FACT that when trial design was approved by FDA, nobody criticized it then that INCLUDES YOU.
Now out of a sudden there is trial design criticism, which is hindsight biased.
Sure, because nothing can possibly go over yours, airspace is restricted by it.
You should try answering my original post!
I know is hard, try to keep up and not tip over.
This is when Anavex announced the approval from FDA of their AD·
Not even close!
But I'm sure you can easily pull up the posts.
No need to, I been here since you got here.
If anyone wants a great example of hindsight bias look no further.
If anyone wants to go thru 23K post, to find when trials were announced and look for such comments prior.
GL!
Facts!
Looks like 100% chance of you posting some negative comment!
I know as we age we loose our sight, but colors have meaning.
By the way kudos to the wife once again on putting up with LHS!!
No bias this or that way.....
Thank you for the morning chuckle!
Be well!
Great sentiment, simply unrealistic.
There is money on the line and dirty tricks being played.
Notice how there is constant negative views being posted about an investment, in which they don't belive in.
Why are they constantly trying to persuade people that this is not a good investment?
I sure don't go posting about how great an investment it is.
I just invest and correct misinformation as it comes.
Notice how also some try to bring their personal lives in here to try and make themselves seem real and discredit others.
Again, great sentiment and apologize to you and a few others.
But I don't run from the good fight.
Even if it means getting dirty and sinking low, that's on me to bear.
Hey bud what`s going on with BIIB vs AVXL today ???
Oh look Russell 2000 up and so are we.....
But but BIIB ......
Your 1% chance of approval is a good as Leos chance of not overpaying for his new house LMAO!
Or even better of Investor not trying to spin truth to fit his own agenda.
At least you put lots of effort in your distortion! Kudos!!
They must pay better where you came from.
The only dwindling hope is of YOU changing any minds with your INCORRECT information.
I just call BS when I see it, I dont do it often, but I do when I see it.
Did you learn your moonwalks from MJ, Bill Bailey or Cab Calloway?
Asking for a friend....
You are too funny!
I love it, two replies to embarrass yourself further!
No F150 nor motorcycles here.
Maybe you should hand the keyboard to your wife for a more coherent response.
But still think she made a poor decision in forcing a home purchase in 2024, so maybe not.
So now that you are teaming up Mr.Pompous, a 2024 real estate investor.
Can you try and refute my argument?
Does AVXL not belong to the Russell 2000?
Is the Russell 2000 not more prone to CPI numbers, which affect interest rates, which affect the ability of these emerging companies to raise cash?
By the way the young whipper snapper is learning plenty, keep it coming, thank you 🤭
hahah I knew I would spawn you!
Too easy....
Follow the original argument which you seem to have missed.
He claims BIIB drop was more correlated to the market than AVXLs drop.
He also claims that it dropped more, percentage wise it did, money wise it did not.
I never said AVXL was never in need to raise cash EVER AGAIN!
MY ARGUMENT: is that belongs to and index which is more prone to be negatively affected by CPI and higher rates.
I know this is not as easy as buying real estate at an all time high, but try to keep up.
Think about why AVXL is less correlated to the overall market than BIIB.
Did you look at the Russell 2000? and XBI? before making your assertions?
This is a fun game...
Change perspectives and everything fits nicely.
I'll give you a clue, stocks in the Russell 2000, need to potentially raise more cash than the rest for obvious reasons.....
Hot CPI = higher for longer, so more dilution or higher debt cost, we are just there and getting hit as collateral since we are cash plentiful.
Why because I pointed out your error?
That makes me a clown?
lmao I wonder what it makes you, just get better.
You said:
WRONG!!! BIIB, dropped around 2.79 BILLION in market cap yesterday. Anavex not so much, it lost 46 MILLION.
But you can skin that cat the way you need to, appearances and agendas must be kept.