Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The point proven is that the spam hyspters have no response except for more of the same tired old spam hype. Yawn. So unoriginal and boring.
LMAO+++
Sure it is. 1 in a million maybe? What else would they say? They have no liability or downside to reinforcing your fantasy.
LMAO+++
A reminder about comparisons...
IBM - all financial filings on time. Many $multi-billion product successes.
Abbott - all financial filings on time. Many $multiu-billion product successes.
QMC - complete breakdown of financial controls. Years of delinquent filings. No product success in anything ever.
Spam hypsters disingenuously want the gullible and ignorant to think that QMC, IBM, and Abbott are all the same because they shared similar failings on covid testing.
How stupid do you have to be to fall for that???
ROTFLMAO+++
More real FACTS:
The spam hypsters and marketing comedians have never accurately predicted anything about what this company would do. Never. Not even one time in more than 12 years. A 100% failure rate!!!
The real facts - QMC failed at EVERYTHING for 12+ years while others the spam hypsters want to compare them to, companies such as IBM and Abbott, succeeded at MANY things during the same time.
The spam hypsters want to extrapolate one shared failure all the way to complete parity. They want you to believe QMC is as good as IBM or Abbott.
Who, even and idiot, falls for that obvious stupidity?
LMAO+++
Defending spam hype with more spam hype. Too funny and just proves my point 100X! Purely disingenuous and intentionally misleading to the ignorant and those with no common sense.
IBM was in a successful anticounterfeiting test with the FDA, Merck, KPMG, and Walmart. Should we be giving that cred to QMC too??? Shared defeat but not shared success? Should we be expecting new AC products from QMC because IBM made that work??
So 'effin stupid it burns.
LMAO+++
Another great example of false comparison, intentionally misleading spam hype. Throw out some big name in a disingenuous attempt to put QMC in the same company.
More perfect examples of spam hype.
Post it once - OK, ultra low chance of benefiting QMC, but whatever.
Post it over and over, obvious attempt to mislead with spam hype.
RONTFLMAO+++
There may be a sucker born every minute, but some were born to be suckers...
I guess it's not surprising that the spam hypster can't see history repeating itself over and over. Heck he can't even see that posting the same spam hype over and over won't accomplishing anything here.
LMAO+++
Oh how the stories change when the facts come out.
Tell it to the Gov...
ROTFLMAO+++
Interestingly, searching the spam hypster's posts on other stocks, his posts are obvious spam hype there too. Hummm.... surprised... hardly... LMAO+++
How desperate are the QMC spam hypsters? Years old maps? Years old claims? Years old unproven BS...
It's such obvious BS, the real question is, "what terrible thing do they know that we don't?"
LMAO+++
Proof of claims: compare the facts:
QMC Realists - 100% track of being right about everything.
QMC Spam hypsters -100% decade+ long track record of never right about anything.
Who to believe....
LMAO+++
If it sounds too good to be true, you're being lied too...
One can only laugh at the QMC spam hypester's frantic death throws to fecklessly attempt to counter the immutable facts about the decade+ of failures of their prediction for this stock. Too funny.
Years out of date maps are not proof of anything except the spam hypster's ignorance and naivety. So sad yet so funny.
Who do the spam hypsters think is stupid enough to believe this sort of BS? History isn't as has been proven over and over and over...
LMAO+++
New? OK but no evidence of QMC. Typical spam-hypster post. A little nugget, of truth out of context, disingenuously trying to link it to QMC.
Just further supports all my posts about the spam hypster's intentional deceptions and attempts to mislead folks about this stock.
LMAO+++
More and more of the same tired old spam hype. Just how stupid do you think the people left here are? We've seen the BS over and over and always with the same result ---> nothing.
If it wasn't so pathetic, it would be LMAO+++
Wrong again. If he had shown any competency during the contracting process, none of the law suits would have been necessary. Just like with the Amtronics contract (and the financial reporting) - total incompetence.
Maybe not so good. Wouldn't be the first time someone made up similar false claims on other stocks...
QMC's spam hypsters have made nearly identical claims over and over for more than a decade and have been wrong every single time. 100% failure rate.
FACT.
The only thing that the QMC spam hypstrers have EVER proven is that they are wrong about what QMC will or won't do 100% of the time.
ROTFLAMO+++
Funniest post ever!
Just more of the same tired old spam hype and no proof of the original claim.
Just another spam hype failure in the making to carry on the 100% failure rate for more than a decade.
So you say but can't prove - as is always the case. Another thing that's always the case: when the proof rolls around, the skeptics are proven right and the spam hypsters are proven wrong.
By the way, who is "we?"
What we know from history is that every single claim like those littered out around here daily by the QMC spam hypsters has either proven to be false or irrelevant. All of them.
FACT.
Too bad there are no financial statements to check to see if there is anything to the claims repeated here ad nauseam or just a steaming pile of spam hype. History strongly supports the latter.
$100M? You haven't been paying close attention. It's $300M now.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/quantum-materials-amends-malpractice-suit-against-k-l-gates?context=search&index=9