Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How is this thing not at the top of the breakout board going this hard?!
970,000 shares at .009. Been waiting a long time for this, hope it continues :)
Absolutely
Two different trials.
US stem cell trial happening regardless via zoom: https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/3HWI6TY/USA_v_US_Stem_Cell_Clinic_LLC_et_al__11cae-19-13276__11519101.0.pdf
California stem cell case for 1/26: https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/24469480/United_States_of_America_v_California_Stem_Cell_Treatment_Center,_Inc_et_al
US Stem Cell clinic to have oral arguments in court (Or via Zoom) on Jan 11th 2021.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/29780910/USA_v_US_Stem_Cell_Clinic,_LLC,_et_al
USRM’s oral arguments are still to be heard in Jan despite a delay in California case. Only 2 month delay in Cali case btw but again, USRM’s oral arguments for appeal in their case will be heard before then. All good here.
Tick tock..
Appeal still in court and CA court case scheduled for Nov so I would say until those are both over, no.
By terrible do you mean harassed by the gov since 17’ which has made nothing about operating normally easy?
Agreed
Instead of arguing, I’ll just post the documents again. They say what they say.
Email chain that was not responded to by the Gov:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/KX4VYZQ/United_States_of_America_v_California_Stem_Cell_Treatment__cacdce-18-01005__0129.2.pdf
Also - Outline of events and efforts leading up to vacated trial:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/KKQYISA/United_States_of_America_v_California_Stem_Cell_Treatment__cacdce-18-01005__0129.1.pdf
Lastly, the proposal to have trial in August:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/K5GKQ2Y/United_States_of_America_v_California_Stem_Cell_Treatment__cacdce-18-01005__0130.1.pdf
It appears that the gov twice met with Venable (CSN’s lawyers) before the most recent conference and expressed that they were ready to proceed with trial. At the last second, they tried to pull a fast one.
But it looks like Venabale (CSN’s lawyers) are trying to have the trial set in August per motions filed today!!!
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/KKQYISA/United_States_of_America_v_California_Stem_Cell_Treatment__cacdce-18-01005__0129.1.pdf
EXACTLY
But I thought the CA case had nothing to do with the US Stem cell case? ??
Supplementary authority link US Stem Cell
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/PGRW5MQ/USA_v_US_Stem_Cell_Clinic_LLC_et_al__11cae-19-13276__11244106.0.pdf
Lawyer and Law blogger incredibly optimistic about CA Stem cell’s case.
He also makes a great point about a supplementary authority submission by US Stem cell’s lawyer in their case. He refers to the Supreme Courts recent ruling on Bostock vs Clayton. Both links below- law blog and supplementary authority submission by US stem cell lawyers.
https://rickjaffeesq.com/2020/07/18/stem-cell-breaking-news-cali-stem-cell-trial-adjourned-until-sometime-after-november/
http://assets2.pacermonitor.com/filings/USA_v_US_Stem_Cell_Clinic_LLC_et_al/USA_v_US_Stem_Cell_Clinic_LLC_et_al__11cae-19-13276__11244106.0.pdf?X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEE8aCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJHMEUCIQCk5DBGimVwsjFcAb2bEiMIsKD3Wjet%2B0nReFrXhN0ipAIgT7E%2BErAOZqmiOSaBOPwEZ2HHSw6pKB6RJyQM0DZ5nVMqvQMI%2BP%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FARABGgw5MjQ2NTE0MDgzOTgiDL1iJgMq3T6D50i%2FkSqRA6w0PArZXNvTf1Z6w%2F7XiSYRXvF4DLgdkvKBF97h7RjEWcxJ3l%2Bt519tw2mI7l1uOHCKHn2RfdBx%2FBWJg5fdvpO38iocMxYh81%2FYf%2BF7Zzu%2FHJ5LkvfNtgaeXccxkMZTbqQgIEWIXxJ26ebQmMEQQZaeP0mMjf75lYrLs4Q%2FXxrjfVc7JX%2Fq1%2BLYs6j0wsJ7v3APWruxMSJaeRN4hrj6InCHqEEm05IhddmHf2eQUmMZkj1T5IHEtHnfML4oXPL4ytdllWoPvNwvBnVCqMSkvh1shqKJvf7TgU6MASW1F%2BsQkqbulzpmtaymFVXqIA3R4w%2FYTBmn3Ud2VP%2BS7i2TFygVIZ4I58tqSvRmNX5jORqsUsmodPyIqL5wZ%2FwDqyK6Ow4E4YJxLnlnvuthimVtQFDQP4e785Pnu5uWVGCPMOX13I0Xwx1g2R2qGoKS1NEWgYT9%2Fu9zrEZxl7NqsFTsak%2F%2B1hhBHOpz%2FX5pgRPom3wxNdyz%2Bi4AXo551S0IUjkp2O%2FmbAwnLnVtKja8NJa3GdRtMPH1zfgFOusBhI1x%2BnYg6m%2F4jefdRHRXsRsbdSAbXmLFoJNG8aV%2BRuwryFX145J3UpFTBTWY2yklgksEXBm5WGeceBCWRXZsLZKOqslUNUPpUKU7GHiFHAbGaqN1lH%2Fab6VKEw%2FD0AwbmS6AOee2Nv29hEAlsl72aojliPU91bP6qf30KMVXa%2Fg%2FMrhgOpdiHUh%2FA07eaqcrk9qa5nsMDvizJS3q6OpZOF9zKF8qxKvL1Sn263k60Li5OAeZ3QCigFOg8nm%2BQ3pKUK3S3f8ZQ78hDcePOy7C4tlWCwFaHzfMm4Dlqpx0btxGJGin%2B7Anse4U0w%3D%3D&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20200718T230155Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=600&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA5OSMEZQHJNXOKEYP%2F20200718%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=4d827ca8e51f5563831d06f53825b7cf4ce60554c157390da463d014959d4a09
Exactly. If the cases had nothing to do with one another, US Stem cell wouldn’t have sited CA Stem cell case in their appeal and again in their supplementary judgement
Amen
Kristin presented live today in Vegas at the ICSS conference: https://www.instagram.com/p/CBqX-PmH97d/?igshid=1pvrf3pnqqyyc
https://cellsurgicalconference.com/
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 34-88465 / March 25, 2020 ORDER UNDER SECTION 36 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 MODIFYING EXEMPTIONS FROM THE REPORTING AND PROXY DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC COMPANIES
10k was addressed in recent 8k. Stocks been between .055-.075 for weeks. Still in appeal, Cali case still pending. Nothing’s changed.
5 month old hit piece. No news.
Amen
This isn’t news. Those have been from the website for sometime now. Literally months. Everyone knows the situation here. Waiting for appeal judgement. Decent chance as same initial tactics by FDA did not work in court in CA case. CA case will he decided by summers end, we may even have us stem cell ruling before then.
She is still the CSO of US Stem Cell CLINIC (no longer CSO of USRM) which 33% is owned by USRM.
http://us-stemcell.com/investors/ I posted this in my last post
Because she’s no longer an officer of us stem cell inc. She is the CSO of the clinic. There is a difference. Nothing I posted was debatable, right off of their website.
http://us-stemcell.com/investors/
“US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC, (“SCC”), a partially owned 33.3% investment of our company, is a physician run regenerative medicine/cell therapy clinic providing cellular treatments for patients afflicted with neurological, autoimmune, orthopedic and degenerative diseases. SCC is operating in compliance with the FDA 1271s which allow for same day medical procedures to be considered the practice of medicine. We isolate stem cells from bone marrow and also utilize platelet rich plasma.”
I looked at the account in my settings on my new phone, you are right absolutely but that was complete accident, why would i post something from another to account that I would proudly say myself. It was created 2 years ago and then gets 1 random post, that had to be by mistake. I didn’t even realize I was logged into another account until I checked account settings this am from that phone. Anyways how long does this last smh
Wait what?
Dude Idk it was created in 2017 and has two post clearly it’s not used. Just terminate it, I can’t even remember why it was created.
I literally have one account, a1tellem. I have TWO PHONES that are both logged in under a1tellem but that’s it. And I post like once every 4 months at that..
Don’t know why I’m in the jailhouse..can someone explain? I can’t post anything and I don’t even post that often. Moderator please inform me..
Gotcha
It appears that the trial will be rescheduled. In the motion below that was submitted today, the plaintiff (FDA) proposes that the pre trial date be set for May 11th with the trial beginning May 26th.
However the defendants (Cali stem cell) proposes that the pre trial begins next month March 16th and the full trial to start on March 30th.
More attempted stall tactics by the FDA but the judge has the option to either side with FDA or defendants about the new date. Will update as soon as something comes up.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/OFLABOQ/United_States_of_America_v_California_Stem_Cell_Treatment__cacdce-18-01005__0085.1.pdf
Again, the appeal had already been filed. They just waited until the decision to make an official stance and defense.
Yes agree, had a different ruling came out they would’ve had another defense in hand but not as good as this one. But I have a feeling they knew what would come down given the Supreme Court ruling on Kisor in June. They were just waiting for it to be exercised correctly by a judge.
They actually filed their appeal within weeks of them losing the initial trial. What’s interesting is that they asked for an extension on their appeal brief until the California judge denied the FDA’s summary judgement request.
This says that they were aware of the kisor decision and that it should effect the outcome of the Cali case but wanted to see the judge in Cali case to apply new law. Once that was done, USRM filed its brief the next day with all of the new information included. Including the summary judgement turn down by Cali judge.
Gone from board, still CSO of US Stem Cell clinic.