Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don't think most on this board appreciate this fact. Most are thinking dilution, and that's it. IMHO 1-4 is yes. No on 5, until the ship is righted.
Interesting. I wouldn't put it past Mona to behave this way. I am sure Dowling is doing everything he can to lower cost. My beef is that he bought share on the open market only once. He is paid very well with salary and auto allowance. Granted his salary was reduced, but still owed to him, so that cost is deferred, not reduced. One of the reasons I advise voting no on compensation.
Venting. It is beyond me how Mona was able to do what he did to so many investors. The man has no ethical morals.
No. Dominger stated we should sue the board. I'm saying sue Mona, he got greedy and gave cvsi a bad reputation. Also lots of manipulators on otc.
CVSI needs a break and less wormongering.
No on compensation... I don't thing they deserve bonuses for past year performance.
It was a risk to begin with. Sue only Mona, he's mostly responsible for this messvote yes on everything, except compensation
.
Isn't CW survive ability questionable as well? A mote in the eye?
Gladys, at least CVSI was up front, CW not as much in their reports. Reading both documents, one can see that neither company is on sure footing today. They are both in trouble.
IMHO, bashing one does not elevate the other.
Have a great weekend. Easter eggs abound! Have fun with family.
If you look at the larger picture, lets say the last year... what do you see?
I see both companies lost 80% +/- of SP value. CW had a minor run up prior to earnings, CVSI had a huge run up prior to earnings. your point has little to do with the ER of either company, both are being played.
Neither has done well. Only time will tell which will recover best.
I don't understand your posts... are you day trading? just visiting for entertainment purposes? CBD is not snake oil, only the pharma's think that. Took me most of my life to figure out they are not my friend, God given plants are.
Some positive movement. Now is the time for politicians to listen to the people and small companies instead of pharma and it's subsidiary the FDA.
Which means... Someone is wanting to buy lower. But for what reason? So they can also loose at an even lower price? Or... Strategy to obtain discounted shares to then sell as SP goes up?
Low volume.... Bad sign
High volume.... Bad sign
Normal volume... Bad sign
iyo
Why is that?
so.... If the company is taken private, doesn't it mean that the shares can no longer trade. Would that, perhaps, mean that the day traders simply loose a ticket to play with? Investors should not care if it goes private to build it up, then sell for fair market. A much better deal for shareholders over the SP set by day traders.
Just my POV.
The BOD is downsizing. I don't see an issue here. Could very well be they did not add much to the company, but did siphon off shares and pay? They may have been asked to leave, they chose to leave, or some othr reason they are departing.
I am more interested to see what the company does in the next few months.I would be interested to see who is buying in on the voting shares. That will be a tell in the direction CVSI is headed.
There is value in the patent, and I hope it does reach market.
The business model remains different, and costs are being cut.
Vote how you wish on the proxies. Everyone has their own opinion, and guaranteed nobody on this board has the inside track, just wanting support in their own space.
On the lawsuit, file the claim if you wish, or don't. Again, last time I looked we were still a free country with freedom of thought and words.
In all you do stay positive. After all, the old adage holds true: 1/3 of the people will like you, 1/3 will hate you, and 1/3 will be ambivalent. I say it doesn't matter, follow your heart, and allow others to do the same.
I would agree CVSI is on a bad place. However, what's to say this isn't currently the state at your favorite stock.
So many negative salivating comments on this board in the last few days. I find it ironic that this board is being attacked when the same situation may we'll happen on other tics.
Sad..
No, nothing to do with Mona. Minority number , in an individual holds maybe 10-20% of common shares, are they able to control the direction the company takes
Pure speculation question... Is it possible for an investor to gain control over company direction by gaining minority shares, then come on with a self serving deal to fund cv007?
Wow. This explains the lack of Q&A on Thursday. I will admit my optimism has served me poorly. Sharing GE_JOE's sentiment. WTF is going on????
Is this lack of investor respect coming from the new partner? From Joe? I know there is a lack of retail investor voting, but is this the way to solve it?
Some here may get their wish if a buy out.... But at a discounted value.
The next few weeks development will prove interesting , I picked the wrong week to go into the wilds, bad cell reception. Dang.
Stay calm.. and carry on.
I've been been an investor in CVSI for 5 year +/-. I've read this board and others trying to guess what the next step for the company will be, but more time that not, the board is wrong.
I want to vent just a bit.... Most of us are used to have CC cover financials, company direction, and have a Q&A. The reality is, the CC calls are a courtesy. There is no rule they must be given. What happened to day is a divergence from past CVSI CCs, but it is not unheard of. EXCEPT that the Street and investors immediately assume the worst. There have been CCs where the wrong words were used, or an individual let their guard down and the following assumptions had negative impacts on companies.
I'm curious as to why there was no Q&A today, but I can speculate as well as the rest, but if my opine differs, I am hoping for the best, I'm judged as being contrary or worse.
As an investor, it is my sole decision if I keep the shares in my position longer or dispose of them sooner. My finances will dictate my actions, as should everyone else will decide their own path. I choose optimism.
I wish everyone on this board a good weekend and great week next week.
Cheers.
I was a bit surprised that there was no Q&A. But, if there are negotiations are in the works, it may have been prudent to bypass the Q&A. I'm not even going to second guess on this. None of us can possibly know why, just giving opines, pro or con.
$4M less in sales $20M v $25M, yet $2M bottom line improvement $10M v $12M.
Financials will he interesting.
Ambiguity in the original post meNs it will be ready with more than one meaning. I took it as I understood the statement.
Actually, Wolf. They have kept their European supplier for US products. There is truth is what DY stated, it is shipped here in "barrels*, but that's we're the DY story ends. CVSI does refine it's own oil, then sends it to manufacturing of final product.
Cost effective, controlled processes.
Edited for darn autocorrect stupidity.
Was "Asset Light, Quality Focused Supply Chain" approach ignored?
again IYO
you stated the following, clearly an opine
IYO, others differ.
lol, read the full thread going back from your post..
This is the string discussin Canavest as the former name of CVSI. Has nothing to do with the post replied to,
Your opine on product quality. Mine differs. I go by the COA's I actually have access to.
Have a great day!
They never said they can't. They have a great relationship with their European growers. They chose not to drop that relationship when growing in the US became available. CVSI chose to do both, and as they had a ready supplier, it was smart not to burn bridges, until the US market can get caught up.
The great thing is, it didn't cost them a ton over overhead to do so, unlike some companies who chose that path.
Of course, and they all pass!!!
Here's a helpful link.
Certificates of Analysis CVSI does not require the batch number to look up the COA, it provides all of them on-line.
Mind you, some brands require a batch number first. Which means you need to buy the product and open the box before you have the COA. Just take a look at their product sites.
You'd have to ask this question on the other board. CVSI is great product.
Ahhh.. but because of him the SP came down. Residual damage.
It's an opinion, not a rule. I'm willing to wait until Friday.
Show me the rules which dictate timing of notice which cause negative reaction. Most would expect to have ER my period end,; sometimes sooner. Does it really matter date of reports, other than personal preference?
lol, $750k to ulimately save money and end a baseless law suit V. $98M on overstated assets. Truly unbelivable what is ignored.
CV Sciences, Inc. to Announce Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2021 Results on March 31, 2022
https://ir.cvsciences.com/press-releases/detail/192/cv-sciences-inc-to-announce-fourth-quarter-and-full-year
SAN DIEGO, March 28, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- CV Sciences, Inc. (OTCQB:CVSI) (the “Company”, “CV Sciences”, “our”, “us” or “we”), a preeminent supplier and manufacturer of hemp cannabidiol (CBD) products, today announced that it will release financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2021, after the stock market closes on Thursday, March 31, 2022. The Company will hold a conference call with the investment community at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time (4:30 p.m. Eastern Time) that same day.
Finally, CVSI and cw are different companies and have a different future product line up, different strategies. So why are we still comparing the two. Each should be judged on their own merits, IMHO.
I spent years counting and categorizing beans, and did well. But for the life of me, I never did well in finance or economics. I would not have foreseen the added cost to a B corp as a detriment.
Foreign market growth, I suppose, as any market, will add exponents. This statement may have, moreso, brought to light, for me, the fact that the OH for foreign markets had a large unknown factor... Regulations, banking, etc.
Thank you Anna.
My bad for not paying attention. Still, as I noticed them this time, it has become a concern. IMO, just because it is old news, doesn't mean it is irrelevant. Better to ask questions late, than not all all.