Followers | 24 |
Posts | 2,488 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/31/2017 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I’ve taken a lot of the table. I don’t play trades long term. Not convinced to short yet though.
@LJ, bottom line regardless of what any groups trying to do is when the company delivers closed deal then we can take this serious. Otherwise it’s pure speculation.
I’ve been doing due diligence on the Network 1 track record of placements and Nasdaq uplists. I will Post ideally over the weekend for the board to review. Looks like they have what it takes.
$VVUS - Total revenue for the third quarters of 2017 and 2016, was $15.2 million and $13.4 million, respectively. Revenue consisted of the following. Qsymia, net product revenue was $10 million in the third quarter of 2017 compared to $12.3 million n the same period last year.
$VVUS - Net loss for the third quarter of 2017 was $6 million, as compared to $9.2 million in the third quarter of 2016. Cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities were $236 million at the end – at September 30, 2017.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 amounted to $20.4 million, compared to a net loss of $140.6 million for the same period of 2016. The net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 reflected a gain from a debt write-off, arising from the settlement agreement with respect to the secured loan facility with the Royal Bank of Scotland plc (“RBS”), which was signed on June 30, 2017. The specific gain, net of related expenses, amounted to $42.2 million. The loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 reflected the result of impairment charges for seven of the Company’s vessels. Time charter revenues, net of prepaid charter revenue amortization, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, amounted to $16.0 million, compared to $27.7 million for the same period of 2016.
Time charter revenues, net of prepaid charter revenue amortization, were $6.7 million for the third quarter of 2017, compared to $8.0 million for the same period of 2016, mainly due to the sale of the vessels Angeles in November 2016 and Doukato in June 2017. This decrease was counterbalanced by the increase of revenues generated by the improvement of the Company’s fleet utilization and the decrease of off-hire days in the third quarter of 2017 compared to the same period of 2016.
$DCIX - Diana Containerships Inc. (DCIX), (the “Company”), a global shipping company specializing in the ownership of containerships, today reported a net loss of $8.7 million for the third quarter of 2017, compared to a net loss of $126.8 million for the same period of 2016. The loss for the third quarter of 2016 reflected the result of impairment charges for seven of the Company’s vessels.?
Very good day for those of us that loaded last couple weeks.
This holds very try. Important to look at history to make sure there is a clear path forward that isn’t set up to fail.
Yes it’s something I use to track investor sentiment in shipping.
Volume upticked on no visible development. Let’s not get carried away.
The market for all forms of conferencing and collaboration is rapidly evolving. While demand for remote access to colleagues, clients and partners is clearly increasing, the means by which we do so is expanding and more diverse than ever,” said Glowpoint (GLOW) President and CEO Peter Holst.
“With a strengthened balance sheet, the Company is now developing new services that extend its mastery of video conferencing into a broader support platform with the goal of accelerating end user adoption of UC1 applications. According to Wainhouse Research2, the 2016 UCaaS3 market was $6 billion, and is projected to grow to $14 billion in 2021 – a 5 year CAGR of 18%. There were 133 million UCaaS seats in 2016 – projected to grow to 343 million in 2021 but only an estimated 18% were actively used for UC. Given the growing market opportunity for end user adoption, the Company intends to release a subset of new services in the first half of 2018 to a select group of current and prospective customers who want to accelerate user transformation quickly and efficiently as they move to cloud services. We look forward to working with our customers and partners as they look to more effectively migrate and adopt next generation collaboration services.”
“We are pleased to have significantly strengthened our balance sheet by completing both the recapitalization of our debt in July and then closing a preferred stock offering for gross proceeds of $2.8 million in October,” said Glowpoint CFO David Clark.
$GLOW Revenue of $11.4 million, net income of $5.8 million and adjusted EBITDA of $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, or 9% of revenue. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure, see GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation later in this release.
Thanks for the clarification. Interesting but with that process I would think it’s not as much a free market as traditional markets at this stage.
ICO: comment continued: you suggested speculators outweighed skeptics and the like. I likely disagree here, how would we measure. Can it be shorted? Since there is a fixed supply the more of it held in friendly hands so to speak the less to sell so market is reaching that much more bubblish at the upper levels.
ICO: You’re right the dollar is accepted as payment and supported by our government. Understandably that too can change but it won’t anytime soon. BTC may be able to be used for some payment but I doubt regulatory bodies will let it affect the market against the dollar on a long stretch if it ever reached levels of mattering.
Seems like some positivity behind the bill. Could pave the way for the infrastructure bill making timing for a Deal very fortunate.
Thanks I’ll see if I can dig up some DD. Do you have any opinion about which reform is best or the impact?
Last trade $0.077 on 2.37MM shares traded. High of Day $.01.
$TVOG infrastructure assets are costly long-term investments. Many state and local governments that are responsible for delivering them are facing tight budgets and finding it challenging to deliver all the infrastructure they would like to. Bridging this infrastructure gap is a complex interdisciplinary challenge that requires creativity and innovation in the planning, funding, financing, construction, and operations of infrastructure assets.
$TVOG In 2017, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave US infrastructure a grade of D+ and estimated that an additional $2.1 trillion in infrastructure investments is necessary between 2016 and 2025 to meet demand and reduce negative impacts on the economy. What's more, ASCE has calculated that inadequate infrastructure funding could cost the nation almost $4 trillion in GDP and a loss of 2.5 million jobs through 2025.
From TVOG Twitter:
Every year, the US spends more than $400 billion on public infrastructure. But annual infrastructure funding routinely falls short of capital and maintenance requirements, contributing to deterioration of the country's infrastructure assets.
https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/risk/articles/infrastructure-investment-funding.html
Tax reform is going a pass already? I thought they were going to have to negotiate it to get it done.
ICO: Thanks for the share of article. I’m sure it’s got a chance to make money short term. I just want to caution people who think this is a long term asset class when it seems like it could very much have a significant pull back when the music stops.
ICO: I understand your points but my point is money keeps pouring in and price keeps going higher but what is the true value. Once buyers stop does it not end the pump? Does increasing use of it the catalyst? There are dozens of new ICO’s won’t this saturate the market? I won’t pretend to fully understand this asset class but these are questions coming up.
$GEVO The European Commission proposed on Wednesday (8 November) allocating €800 million from the EU budget to finance projects that will improve the infrastructure for cars driving on alternative fuels, like electricity.
"If we talk about electric cars, we need by 2020 somewhere around 800,000 charging points. So far we have 200,000 charging points," said European Commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic, in charge of the Energy Union strategy.
https://euobserver.com/environment/139798
$DK "Based on our updated estimates, the pace and magnitude of the merger synergies, expected debt retirement and the current balance sheet strength, we believe that DK will be able to implement a two-year share repurchase program during 2018/2019," Read said.
$LNG says it expects to make a final investment decision next year on a planned third liquefaction train at the Corpus Christi LNG export terminal in Texas.
$KMI lost almost -15% of its value this year, in an environment where the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF has posted mirror image gains of almost 15.5%.
The irony of this has not been lost on investors that continue to question the company’s credibility. The reality is that the longer-term picture is actually far worse, as the stock has lost more than 55.5% over the last five years.
But when we consider the combined effect of rising oil values, a falling US Dollar, and encouraging earnings performances, we could see an end to all of this negativity sooner rather than later.
Is bitcoin short for bubble?
I read it that the market got over excited before they structured and closed Deal. Market prospects and blue sky will be ignited by that alone in my opinion.
Financial ratios alone are not predictors of future success of a company. That being said, they can provide important perspectives and give you an idea of the path that a company is going on. In the case with Valero, its FCF ratios suggest that the stock can make a continued run along with being able to raise the dividend without problems in the future.
A significant rise in oil prices will possibly bite into Valero's profit margins. However, the dividend situation, as represented by the free cash flow to equity ratio, should reassure investors that Valero is still a safe stock to invest in.
UBS sees oversupply risk as very low due to shipyard capacity reductions and a substantial amount of capital and lending that has left the shipping sector, and .the inflection point driving freight rates back toward average levels.
UBS thinks fundamental signals are pointing in a positive direction ahead of a 2018 inflection point, as product tanker demand is expected to grow 3% and outpace supply growth of 2.8%.
Scorpio Tankers (STNG -1%) is upgraded to Buy from Neutral with a $5.50 price target, raised from $4.50, at UBS, which says the company could benefit from a looming supply-demand inflection point for product tankers in 2018.
Moreover, using fresh-start accounting, the company has impaired the value of its industry-leading fleet of roughly 250 vessels by another $2 billion or 70% from previous levels to just $870 million, down from almost $5 billion at its peak in early 2015.
After the recently completed financial restructuring, the company's balance sheet is among the strongest in the industry with zero net debt and cash of $460 million as of September 30. With the new debt not being due before 2022, Tidewater now has ample time to position itself for a potential industry recovery.