Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Maybe. Like I said, I am not a lawyer. Also, like I said, the writing is on the wall.
Making assumptions. Educated ones. The writing is on the wall, friend.
Seems an amount less than $50k will be awarded. We'll see. This is all new to me.
Check the online court record.
Then check this: https://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/Arbitration/Index.asp
"If the case is designated an arbitration case, an arbitrator is appointed once an answer to the complaint is filed. In cases involving a motion to dismiss, once the judge rules on the motion and the case is not dismissed, an arbitrator will be appointed"
Seems to all be falling into place.
Nice Jamie! Looks like both TTCM and Dr. Leonard have submitted their answers and certificate of agreement. Morgan may end up with peanut shells... After all, he is "only seeking what [he] is due".
No idea, I'm not a lawyer. I believe the ruling is on the motion to dismiss. The quote in my post is from yoyo, maybe he can explain.
Hidden lawsuit? It was filed in January (check the court records) and Morgan was tweeting about it on at least February 15th (check his feed). It was first posted about here somewhere around a week later (check the post history), and PR'd in March (if I recall correctly, check the PRs). It is now June (check the calender). Not so hidden...
I understand that not all of that was directed solely at me. However, speaking for myself:
First, if it was a scan of the original document of course I would believe it within reason (the only way to be absolutely sure is to obtain from the source)
Second, I will never blindly believe unverified info presented in a message board post. That would be obsurd no matter how likely it were true.
Third, I have never cried fake, merely "prove it". Can be verified through review of my post history.
Fourth, yes I would say TTCM believes the case is without merit because that is what they publicly state. Whether I personally believe that or not is of no consequence to anybody but me.
Fifth, I would like it to be posted 1) not because I am cheap or lazy, but because I am interested in reading it but not concerned enough about it to seek it out myself, and 2) to put the issue to bed on this board as it has gotten very old hearing all of the claims based on its contents sans evidence.
Congrats rukmusher on the changing of the guard! So..happy..
The company is the embarrassment? There are a number of other parties with interest that I consider more so.
Because he asked directly and they're not ready to put out a PR/8k yet. I have an approximately 85% response rate to my inquiries to Dr. Leonard. That number is higher for those channeled through IR. Ask and you shall receive.
It is tomorrow now. Image and hyperlink posting instructions are availabe in the FAQ. Let's see it.
Yes, some have been touting the refusal of dismissal for quite some time now. Thank you for sharing this. If it is accurate, it refutes one arguement TTCM had, at least at face value. Who knows, maybe at trial, when both sides can plead their respective cases in detail, the judge will feel differently. Likely not, at least on this arguement.
How did you get that excerpt in digital text format? Did you use an OCR scanner or did you transcribe it by hand? Any chance you could post a scanned copy of the entire document? TIA.
By now I suspect most here expected this anyway; therefore don't believe it will be a bomb shell of any significance. More like a dud, similar to the suit when it goes to trial. I know I'm not selling...
Yeah, rose colored glasses only look good on Elton John. I can't sing or play the piano, so I guess I'm out by default. I would like to hear his rendition of the TTCM theme song though.
1. I suspect they're rather preoccupied at the moment.
2. My guesses (in order): Dealing with a ridiculous lawsuit, wooing an F50 company, developing klickzie.
3. My guesses (in order): They have been advised to not discuss the lawsuit, the F50 discussions are in progress (premature), there is nothing to report.
I don't think it's pathetic.
My glasses are not rose colored, they're x-ray. That's how I see through all of this negative TTCM bullshit.
Wow, informative and objective. Thanks for sharing.
Two points, one post lol:
1. A self imposed restriction under advisement from counsel. Seems pretty common sense to me. I don't blame them; If I were involved in a lawsuit, I would be tight lipped as well until resolution. Morgan and his crew should take the same stance but they're not really that bright. His ego is way too big also. Oh well, let him assist in the sinking of his own ship. This should answer both of Yoyo's questions posed in a previous post.
2. TTCM never definitively said the case would be dismissed. They said they believed it is without merit and would be dismissed. As with anything in life, sometimes what you believe will happen doesn't always play out that way. That's life. So it goes to trial on merits, and TTCM and Morgan will make their cases in more detail.
That's just reality, no changing or skewing it.
Out of posts. Shucks, should have saved them for the important stuff. Good thing none of that was to be had today. Catch yall tomarrow.
Nice buys today, eh?
WTF are you talking about? I said no such thing.
How do you get
In order to net $500k at an average share price of .02 you would need to sell 25M shares. Assuming he is selling, and is the only person selling, we would have to see 1M/day volume at .02 for him to clear that much in one month. Considering we barely get 1M volume days (today is an anolomy), and the SP has not sustained .02 levels for any considerable length of time, and that there are other confirmed sellers (his supposed sells do not make up the entirety of the sell volume), and that he would have to file with the SEC, and etc, and etc, and etc... I have a really hard time "buying" your theory.
500k? With the volume how long would that take? Over how many people in this "scam" is such a fortune divided? Claims of Leonard, his family members, the nuge and his family members, bobby mac and his family members, not to mention all of their friends... So like, 5k each every 2-3 of months? Am I expected to believe that nonsense? Really? The "walking corpse" probably gets more than that in social security benefits. Friggin laughable.
That's not quite fair as no wrongdoing has been proven yet in that example. That is an unproven claim made by a confirmed scam artist and generally slimy individual which is still being decided by a judge. I'm giving Leonard the benefit of the doubt based on his previous (impeccable) track record. If the court rules against him after trial, maybe then I'll change my tune.
Yes, but one must start being a crook to "always" be a crook. I am inferring you are alluding to Dr. Leonard. Where has he ever been exposed as a crook? Why is he so hard to trust (for some)?
Lol. Sorry you feel that way, sounds stressful. "So funny"? Sounds like you're not laughing at all.
Agreed. Someone has been buying the shnikies out of this. It's someone smart as they're accumulating massively in big chunks without artificially raising the pps. Assuming it is one individual (and I believe it is by the pattern), Whoever it is believes in TTCM's potential and wants a substantial position. A great sign.
Please post the ruling and put the issue to bed. Simple.
Please explain. Just posting "massive dilution" does not cut it for me as I prefer a wee bit of contextual support. The caps lock and extra letters almost got me though...
Yeah, spellin aint my strong soote. Oh well. Are you abel too stil git my pointe? Yeah? Gud.
Agreed, poor symmantics on my part. I guess the term has been used so much that I have subconsciously adopted it. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. Apologies to yoyo.
Again, nice post. I selectively agree and appreciate the softening of your presentation. And FWIW, I'm not sure what you know but I only know what is publicly available, and not even all of that (I have not read the suit documents, admittedly foolish but I just don't care about it as I am already cashed out well above my initial investment and in the green with freebies).
Nice post, seriously. However, I would again caution against the use of absolutes. In this case, it serves to contradict your own statements:
Since TTCM has stated that they are in negotiations, and:
Tomato/tomato. FOIA/verbal request. Whatever. The point is the same. Split hairs.
Thank you Rocky, I see clearly what you are saying. No worries, we all make mistakes but only a few admit it when we do. Thank you for backing up your points also, it's more than some do.
How can you so often speak in such absolutes? Please share what the rest of us are missing, provided it is verifiable.
BTW, I tend to believe that you are correct about the Court's ruling (based solely on elapsed time, company silence, and the extremely limited info to be had without submitting a FOIA request to the Pima County CC), but I am admittedly holding out hope that you are not. That said, I do not hold your view on the predicted final outcome of the case.
I am not a blind supporter or insider of any company in which I am invested, including TTCM as you suggest. However, I will not succumb to unproven negative comments posted on a message board either. The vast majority of the negative information regarding TTCM provided on this board has been circumstantial, irrelevant, or trivial at best with the remainder being speculation, opinion, or re-hash of previously addressed points (IMO, obviously). If anybody has something new and provable to discuss, I am open - eager in fact - to have a rational and polite discussion of it. Anything else is just noise to me.
I did not ask you to prove a negative. I am simply stating, in less words, that you can not provide one shred of evidence that the company has lied to us about the F50. You're the one who states it, yet you consistantly fail to back it up. Further, it is quite hypocritical to request of me to post the judgement when you, not me, are the one constantly referring to it and have been requested to post it multiple times (consequently, you have agreed to post it yet have thus far neglected to do such).
There is no proof that we are not involved with an F50 company. Just jibberish indeed.
~TTCM = !! So..patient..
Don't feel sorry for me. I've cashed out well more than my initial investment and am riding freebies which, by the way, are a beautiful shade of GREEN.