Rebel
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No one here is drinking Koolaid. Why can't people have discussions without having to be placed in a box and insulted on a daily basis? It is so juvenile.
Questioning and/or having an open mind is not blindly following. This is a discussion and research board where ideas and information are discussed.. You can take or leave whatever you don't like without having to judge and name call.
On the other hand, accepting everything you read out of the SEC and DOJ and media is more like blindly following in my book. Does that make you a disciple?
I was talking about their US patent, not European.
More disinformation.
It is not an opinion. It is a questioning. It is hard to believe that almost immediately after being approved by Medicare, Mark decided to throw it all away by committing fraud.
Who cares? Now that is quite obvious don't ya think? lol.
That is sort of useless since it is based on OLD financials and information. MacroAxis, the company, is a rather sketchy outfit from what I have read.
What? No, So because Legos major patent expired in 1978, they can no longer make money? That is silly and didn't happen. Legos has been doing great despite the expired patent!
All it means is that other companies can now use the patent information to compete if they so desire.
It is normal for patents to expire. It doesn't mean the technology has expired. And they were not "so-called patents" either!
The corporation is in good standing with the Nevada SOS until 2/22/2022. That would be a good thing, nothing to be sorry about.
You are making some good points...illegal kickbacks vs. legal commissions; providing both Covid and allergy results...will a jury think the SEC was over-zealous in its actions because of its twitchiness about Covid while at the same time being bombarded with disinformation by stock message board posters? Interesting stuff for sure.
Agree. Why bother continuing to keep such close tabs on ARYC...it's a mystery!
Sounds like financials may be in ARYC's future (maybe just 2 years would satisfy them). They filed their Annual Report with the Nevada SOS on time, with Mark named as President. Secretary and Treasurer and Todd Martinsky as sole Director, both in "active" status. Next Annual Report is due on 2/22/2022.
https://esos.nv.gov/EntitySearch/OnlineBusinessAndMarkSearchResult
That's what it says. I didn't make it up. Take it up with the Experts or IHub.
Don't know how or where, but someone is buying with over a million in volume so far... now bid is .0002.
It is not Mike's "so-called expert market!" I can assure you he had nothing to do with it, lol. The new rule will kick non-reporting pink sheet companies down to the expert market if they do not file something by June 30th. Since ARYC has been trading in the expert market for more than a year, I am not sure if the new rule will affect ARYC, but I am aware that most brokerages may want to force-sell all shares held to make them disappear. Not sure how that would work either. I mean who would buy them? And what if Mark does prevail in the jury trial? There are lots of "what-ifs" that still linger in my mind.
We will just have to wait and see.
Lots of luck to you too!
Oh, OK, but who cares? Mr. Rotman knows what he is doing, There is no need to worry or pick apart the past,
Nice day today...
Is that the same Mr. Rotman who two months later, on July 16, 2020, announced a new manufacturer?
"Vystar anticipates receiving the first shipment of 10,000 RxAir400 units and replacement bulb cartridges from the new manufacturer in approximately 45 days. Vystar is currently taking pre-orders on its RxAir.com website. It has received cash deposits on pre-orders of approximately $1 million of RXAir products at retail."
THAT Mr. Rotman?
If you sold some of your dumped shares to me, I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart.
The buying opportunities over the past few months have been amazing. VYST is already a winner, even though it is not currently reflected in the share price. It's just a matter of continued progress and time.
Wow. This is awesome progress. Thank you for posting. This PR should be stickied.
VYST is breaking records in revenue and gross profits. They are making great progress, yet it seems some are unhappy and that is very weird.
May 9, 2021 Microarray Market (COVID-19) to Witness Astonishing Growth by Forecast 2021-2027 |Thermo Fisher Scientific, Agilent Technologies, Merck, Illumina, Phalanx Biotech, etc.
Major Key players profiled in the report include: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Agilent Technologies, Merck, Illumina, Phalanx Biotech, Biometrix Technology, Perkin Elmer, Applied Microarrays, Arrayit, Takara Bio, BioGenex, LC Sciences, US Biomax, AXO Science, BioCat, Cepheid, GE Healthcare, InDevR and More.
https://ksusentinel.com/2021/05/09/microarray-market-covid-19-to-witness-astonishing-growth-by-forecast-2021-2027-thermo-fisher-scientific-agilent-technologies-merck-illumina-phalanx-biotech-etc/
Published: May 5, 2021 at 4:57 a.m. Protein Microarray Market Size 2021 CAGR Status, Share, Growth Factor, Top Manufacturers, Future Trends, Analysis with Covid-19 Impact till 2026.
Top manufacturers of Protein Microarray market are MacBeath Lab, Applied Microarrays Inc, Agilent Genomics, VigeneTech, RayBiotech, Grace Bio-Labs,Arrayit, Intuitive Biosciences With a strategic analysis of the impact of COVID-19 and Compound annual growth rate (CAGR).
Detailed Profiles of The Protein Microarray Top Major Players in the Industry, Including:
MacBeath Lab
Applied Microarrays Inc
Agilent Genomics
VigeneTech
RayBiotech
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Grace Bio-Labs
Arrayit
Intuitive Biosciences
BioTechniques
Creative BioMart
INGM
OriGene
https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/protein-microarray-market-size-2021-cagr-status-share-growth-factor-top-manufacturers-future-trends-analysis-with-covid-19-impact-till-2026-2021-05-05
But since her sentencing date was delayed until after Mark's trial, i.e., through no fault of her own, a judge may decide to grant the request to change her plea especially if a jury finds reasonable doubt and Mark is acquitted.
These professionals who are non-criminals may well have been scared to death by the prosecutors because their ultimate goal is to NOT bring any case to trial, so who knows what went on during the bargaining process and what sort of horrible scenarios were described to them by the prosecutors if they didn't enter the plea. Both the SEC and DOJ complaints are sloppy and inaccurate, and going to trial will expose it all and show the jury the error of their ways. That can't happen when a plea bargain is reached. Maybe Mark's decision to go to trial will bring the errors and misrepresentations to light.
FYI: "More than 97 percent of federal criminal convictions are obtained through plea bargains, and the states are not far behind at 94 percent. Why are people so eager to confess their guilt instead of challenging the government to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of a unanimous jury?
The answer is simple and stark: They’re being coerced.
Though physical torture remains off limits, American prosecutors are equipped with a fearsome array of tools they can use to extract confessions and discourage people from exercising their right to a jury trial. These tools include charge-stacking (charging more or more serious crimes than the conduct really merits), legislatively-ordered mandatory-minimum sentences, pretrial detention with unaffordable bail, threats to investigate and indict friends or family members, and the so-called trial penalty — what the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers calls the “substantial difference between the sentence offered prior to trial versus the sentence a defendant receives after a trial.”
Of coercive plea bargaining’s many problems, two are particularly concerning.
The first is false convictions. Though it was once believed that a confession in open court — a guilty plea — was proof-positive of a person’s guilt, we now know that simply isn’t true. Indeed, of the more than 300 people definitively exonerated by the Innocence Project using DNA evidence, some 11 percent pleaded guilty to crimes they did not commit since 1989. The National Registry of Exonerations puts the total number at 20 percent since 1989. But whatever the precise figure, it is clear that innocent people are routinely coerced into pleading guilty to crimes they did not commit.
The other big problem with coercive plea bargaining is that it helps cover up an untold amount of prosecutorial misconduct. Even in the federal system, where prosecutors are held to a relatively higher standard, there has been a surprising amount of misconduct in the handful of cases that end up going to trial.
The framers of the U.S. Constitution put citizen participation at the very heart of our criminal justice system in the form of jury trials. With coercive plea bargaining, prosecutors have ripped that heart right out of that system and made sure that ordinary citizens have almost nothing to do with the administration of criminal justice in America."
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/prisons-are-packed-because-prosecutors-are-coercing-plea-deals-yes-ncna1034201
I provided research on the Federal rules on this subject. No matter what took place at the hearing, which I did not see, under the right circumstances she could change her plea before sentencing. You can take it or leave it.
Or maybe because Mark and his attorney believe they have a good defense.
Federal rules apply here, not California, and it IS possible to change a plea before sentencing.
d) Withdrawing a Guilty or Nolo Contendere Plea. A defendant may withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere:
(1) before the court accepts the plea, for any reason or no reason; or
(2) after the court accepts the plea, but before it imposes sentence if:
(A) the court rejects a plea agreement under Rule 11(c)(5); or
(B) the defendant can show a fair and just reason for requesting the withdrawal.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11#rule_11_c_1_A
I wonder if that is the reasoning is behind the fact that she won't be sentenced until AFTER Mark's trial.
I mean, why delay the sentencing if the court already approved the plea agreement?
I think that would be wonderful. Maybe the officials at the meeting would recognize the sloppiness of the SEC complaint with the several false and misleading statements made by the esteemed postal inspector in her Affidavit, and decide to withdraw the case.
You never know. Arrayit was chosen as a poster child for Covid 19 fraud largely due to false statements fed to them by stock message board posters, I do believe, starting with the suspension.
But how did the $69 million in alleged false claims morph into $250K, a DECREASE of $68:7 million?
Order Granting Stipulation to Stay Proceedings and Discovery (SEC v Schena).
ORDER
Based on the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY:
ORDERED that all current court-imposed deadlines and dates, including Defendant’s Answer, the Parties’ Initial Disclosures, the Parties’ Joint Case Management Statement, and the Case Management Conference scheduled for June 3, 2021, are VACATED;
FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this civil action, including discovery, are stayed until further order of the Court; however, for good cause (such as future unavailability of witnesses or documents), the Parties may conduct limited discovery by stipulation or by Court Order;
and
FURTHER ORDERED that, within 30 days after resolution of the District Court criminal case, United States v. Mark Schena, Case No. 20-cr-425-RS, (i.e., sentencing or dismissal, not appeal), the Parties shall file a request for a status hearing with the Court.
Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 04/23/2021. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2021)
The SEC isn't always right, and the SAME charges for making untrue statements should be brought against everyone who lies on stock message boards to further their own agenda. Should I report to the SEC all of the individuals who have blatantly lied on these boards? Personally I could come up with several dozen who have posted far worse, all of which are provable, some on this very board.
OK. So to be fair, the SEC and DOJ should investigate everyone who lies on stock message boards. Everyone has an agenda, and Nielsen did not sell those shares "illegally." Even if he did lie, that is AOK on stock message boards, just ask IHub. They won't delete lying posts even if the posts are proven to be lies.
If he were in cahoots with Mark, then that would be a different story and definitely illegal, but so far, that is not the case.
Good to hear, thanks for posting that!
No. That doesn't even make sense. Their allergy/asthma test passed several (maybe five) outside, independent proficiency tests with flying colors, and then the test was approved by Medicare Part B and other insurers.
There are also many other factors that have proven that the technology is good, i.e., purchases by government entities, hospitals, biotechs, etc., as well as the fact that the technology and supplies are still in use today, including for various Covid-19 related research purposes.
It appears Mark may have lied or exaggerated about many things, but the technology is real and does not seem to be in dispute.
Thanks for that information. It's Interesting that DE$N closed at $.015 yesterday.
Wow, that's quite a dissertation; however, it's the viability of their technology and tests that I am talking about.
FDA.gov Every test, including Abbott's, which received EUA , and not just Arrayit's, returned false positive and negative results. It was very early in the pandemic that Arrayit submitted its first test. No one knows how the improved test performs except that Attorney Pickles suggested in his brief that it was close to 100%.
"Every test returns some false positive and false negative results. The PPV and NPV help those who are interpreting these tests understand, given how prevalent individuals with antibodies are in a population, how likely it is that a person who receives a positive result from a test truly does have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and how likely it is that a person who receives a negative result from a test truly does not have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. The PPV and NPV of a test depend heavily on the prevalence of what that test is intended to detect. Because all tests will return some false positive and some false negative results, including tests that detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, broad use of the tests, when not appropriately informed by other relevant information, such as clinical history or diagnostic test results, could identify too many false-positive individuals."
There is no public information either way on the Covid test, other than the fact it was placed on the FDA's pre-emergency list after the first submission. There IS public information about their allergy and asthma tests, however, which speaks favorably to their technology.
I have seen so much worse posted on these boards than what Jason Nielsen posted. It was a confusing and chaotic time anyway and Arrayit never issued any official PR on a Covid test, so only a few people knew anything about it. So what if he was trying to sell some of his shares. He had many millions too many in the first place and he made a whopping $137K...small change for a wealthy person.
If people want to invest because someone on a message board "wonders" about something, then they have no business investing in the first place, but I don't believe anyone does that.
You can predict all you want. I don't expect much, but It ain't over 'til it's over.
"Mark and his minions still trying to pretend there's a valid company here."
They're doing nothing of the sort...not a word.
No. Arrayit's tests and technology are SEPARATE issues and are NOT in dispute. They are misundersood, innocent bystanders.
Poor things.