Rebel
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What would be the purpose of sending "follow-up comments to all those Rx Air tweets"? To bad-mouth VYST's products?
Poor Trini Lopez and all the others who have had their lives cut short because of this unrelenting monster. It is all so sad. It's comforting to know that VYST can help obliterate it once and for all.
My sympathies go out to you on losing your buddy.
Wow! Nice going. Has anyone gotten back to you??
There's MUCH MORE than fanciful dreams going on here, and dreams DO come true ya know.
Instead of beer and lunch money, maybe you should hold off long enough for a beach-front home, or maybe a Lamborghini Aventador or Bugatti Chiron or a villa at Lake Como (my favorite).
Just sayin'.
:))
Why on earth would anyone be afraid of holding over the weekend??? I mean, VYST is just getting started. You may risk flipping yourself out of the stock, if you know what I mean.
Of course, it IS beer money Friday, so that could be it I suppose.
In this Covid-19 era there is room for every type of product that will help in the fight, and Vystar’s Rx 3000 will be in high demand for a very long time to come. I think it already is. They have a HUGE advantage as a FDA -certified medical device backed up by research by the CDC, EPA, and FDA as an effective method of destroying all sorts of viruses and bacteria, including Covid-19... like 99.97% “on first pass.” That is amazing. And some of the technology they are using is proprietary from what I have read.
As bad as it is, the coronavirus has opened up incredible opportunities for VYST to participate in beating the monster that has caused so much pain and suffering and destruction of lives and economies worldwide.
VYST is growing even faster than anyone could have imagined a year ago.
Yep, but even at this price, the stock is still UP over 300% in exactly one month, so higher lows is what we’ve been seeing. The stock is doing fine and embracing the red to me means ACCUMULATE! We are going much higher.
The writing is on the wall.
:))
Uncertainty about the offering didn’t help the share price. It will recover.
Uh oh, lol.
We’ve got a winner here. Not too many worries or arrests looming that I can find. Good luck!
Right, and don't forget the deal they already have with China where they are set to receive milestone and royalty payments on sales of Oliceridine. Also, if the current London study on TRVN's TRV047 proves to be an effective treatment for Covid-19 patients whose lungs are in dire need of help and repair, TRVN would be a hero and the share price would fly to the moon, as they say. lol.
Eventually, the market will catch on. It's always fun to be early to the party.
Found this to confirm London study:
https://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/blog/dobs-staff/2020/07/14/funding-successes-july-2020/
Fantastic news and financially stable too. This FDA approval is enormously valuable in this opioid addicted world.
Sorry for your troubles - relief is on the way. Good luck with your shares.
Haha. He must be scratching his head. This was a huge miss on his part. I think he spoke without knowing very much about SRNE.
$19.00 1:31 p.m. This is getting spooky.
:))
I know, and that is true as of today as well, which begs the question of why? Why aren't they on the FDA's do-not-use list? Why hasn't the FDA issued a warning letter or cease and desist order as they have for countless other companies and labs?
Why why why? Only time will tell I guess.
There are 95 "Fraudulent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Products" listed on the FDA's website. Is Arrayit there? NOPE.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/health-fraud-scams/fraudulent-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-products
:))
Why do you keep saying this is a "serious situation"? Do you think there is anyone who hasn't figured that out?
Releasing Mark without having to come up with a single penny IS favorable, and allowing him to go back to work at the lab, IS favorable, no matter how anyone wants to spin it. For such a mean and nasty criminal selling fraudulent tests and endangering the public and trying profit from a global disaster, why on earth would the judge allow him to return to work at the lab? And why would the judge waive the $200K to secure the bond? There is no denying that those were favorable rulings.
As I have said before, Dr. Taguchi could have been asked a question like: Isn't it true that allergy test reports included additional results than the patient's doctor had not specifically ordered? She would have said yes. So there you have fraud! But does the DOJ know that ARYC's specific allergy test, which I believe was approved by Medicare, is a quantitative test and they would have had to black out any results that weren't specific to what the doctor ordered. For example, if the patient was allergic to bee stings, which can be deadly, ARYC would have had to black out that information from the report, maybe with a permanent black Sharpie. lol.
This morning’s 8K is giving CEO Dr. Ji a performance award if he reaches certain milestones where he will have the opportunity to purchase shares of SRNE at an exercise price of $17.30.
“In addition, for vesting to occur when the milestones are met, Dr. Ji must remain as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or Executive Chairman.”
“The exercise price per share subject to the CEO Performance Award is $17.30, which is a 20% premium to the closing sales price of the Company’s common stock on August 7, 2020, the date of grant.”
Wow.
You are actually picking on their gloves?
That's another goof. Mark didn't sell any shares nor did the company dilute during the DOJ's time frame. So that is another bogus claim. And WOWIE, the share price shot up like a DARN ROCKET while all of this was going on. I have never seen anything like it, have you??! It was a stunner all right.
lololol.
No, the fact that they haven't yet filed "one" financial does not make it nonsense.
Plain and simple.
Listen up, the Form 15 was filed and accepted by the SEC and is still in place. That is what I said because it is a FACT. I believe the company intended to become current with 2 years of audited financials and that was the reason for the filing. If you don't agree, that is fine and dandy.
As I said, believe it or not. He said it. As for attempting market manipulation by posters, that works BOTH ways. I don’t think anyone buys or sells stock based on what ANY poster says—positive or negative. Fair is fair. Two sides to the pancake.
All of that remains to be seen. No one here is claiming everything is peachy. The DOJ’s complaint contains many false statements that need to be corrected or deleted. And no matter what anyone says, Dr. Taguchi’s case isn’t closed either.
Yes, of course the bond is in place, but no money was required for Mark to be released. The public cannot view all the conditions of release, but that part was able to be clearly seen.
Mark said to a reporter that they were still working with the FDA on their test. Believe it or not. He said it.
I’m not “calling” anything. Just sharing the facts.
I agree, and listening to the town hall meetings that the FDA has held for labs every week that you suggested we listen to, are very interesting and reveal all sorts of information on testing they are currently working on without naming any specific companies, with a Q & A after each meeting.
The judge did not require a single penny from Mark; he was released on his own recognizance and there is no ankle monitor and he has been seen working at the lab.
Last we heard, in an interview with a reporter, ARYC was continuing to work with the FDA on their Covid-19 test.
Nice! "Sorrento Therapeutics (NASDAQ:SRNE) Reaches New 1-Year High on Analyst Upgrade. FRIDAY, JULY 31, 2020 | MARKETBEAT
Sorrento Therapeutics logoSorrento Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ:SRNE)'s stock price hit a new 52-week high on Friday after HC Wainwright raised their price target on the stock from $24.00 to $30.00. HC Wainwright currently has a buy rating on the stock. Sorrento Therapeutics traded as high as $10.53 and last traded at $10.04, with a volume of 1298298 shares changing hands. The stock had previously closed at $8.55."
Oh, c'mon. The DOJ just can't amend the complaint all willy-nilly whenever they feel like it. How could a defense be planned if the DOJ kept doing that? It should be obvious to you that in order to amend the complaint (after the 21 day period), they first have to REQUEST it.
Remember that Arrayit is NOT a defendant in this case; only Mark individually. Of course the FDA would want to pursue Arrayit's Covid-19 test if it helps save lives and further suffering, open up the economy, and SQUASH the monster once and for all.
And I don't know anyone who is qualified to say that my "beliefs" are wrong. My beliefs are based on logic anyway.
Yes you did. You said "if the judge has a problem with it the DOJ can simply amend it." I said that it was too late for the plaintiff to file an amended complaint because it was past the 21-day period and that if they wanted to amend it, it would have to be agreed to in writing by the defendant, and that would be unlikely. If the defendant doesn't agree, the the DOJ would have to withdraw the first complaint and start all over again. That's the true answer.
Geeeeez.
Just read “Amendments to a complaint are governed by Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure” as I have posted previously. That is the guide for the plaintiff to amend its complaint. We are not talking about a judge ordering that the plaintiff amend its complaint. We are talking about the PLAINTIFF requesting to amend its complaint, which they cannot do without the defendant’s written agreement if the request falls after the 21-day period. Your example is not what we are talking about.
I hear ya, Jerry. Ever the optimist, I honestly believe Arrayit is still working with the FDA or other government entities like the NIH and NCI (they are conducting validations of Covid 19 tests). It’s funny that the feds are now talking about finger-stick and microarray technology, quantitative testing, and home specimen collection, much of which was disparaged in the DOJ complaint. Even funnier is the fact that Mark practically invented the microarray technology currently being used in the first place!
If Attorney Pickles’ claim in his brief that ARYC’s updated Covid test is indeed “close to 100%”, then why wouldn’t ARYC still be in that loop? Also, there is clinical testing going on all over this country and Arrayit may be involved in that as well with their CLIA lab status. It seems to me that something must be going on because the buying volume on some days is greater than what we were seeing before we hit the expert market.
As to Mark, I just don’t get it and continue to reserve judgment until we hear both sides. You are such a sweetie pie and deserve to make some big buckaroos as a loyal investor. Never say never. :))
Amendments to a complaint are governed by Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 15(a) provides that:
(1) A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within:
(A) 21 days after serving it, or
(B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.
(2) Other Amendments. In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires.
(3) Time to Respond. Unless the court orders otherwise, any required response to an amended pleading must be made within the time remaining
to respond to the original pleading or within 14 days after service of the amended pleading, whichever is later. This means that you can file one amended complaint without permission of the Court or the consent of the defendant(s) so long as the amended complaint is filed within 21 days after serving the original complaint or the amended complaint is filed within 21 days after service of the answer or a motion under Rule 12(b), (e) or (f).
After the 21-day period has expired, you must get written consent from the defendant or the Court’s permission before amending your complaint. Unless the defendant(s) agrees in writing that you can file an amended complaint, you must ask the judge for permission to amend by filing a motion to amend the complaint and attaching a copy of the proposed amended complaint to your motion. Instructions for preparing a motion are attached.
If you file an amended complaint. It must be captioned as an “Amended Complaint.”
https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/Amend%20Complaint.rev7-1-10.pdf
lol. It's the Judge who would sign an Order after ALL parties have agreed in writing to an amendment if it goes past the 21 days. Of course, it is unlikely that the defendant would agree to it, which is why I said it is too late for the DOJ to amend its complaint.
There is really no argument here.
That's OK with me. There's nothing to do but wait anyway.
When this first came out, I was stunned and confused and felt betrayed beyond belief, as were all shareholders, and only after carefully reading the complaint did I recognize some serious flaws in their allegations. The bottom line for me is that it still seems impossible to believe that Mark is guilty of Medicare fraud and that Dr. Julie was involved. I mean, there HAS to be more to this story. Two law-abiding middle-aged citizens who are highly educated and know what to do and what not do as Medicare providers, just don't suddenly become stupid and morph into criminal beings one day, risking everything they have worked so hard for. It makes not a bit of sense to me.
But no matter what happens, life will go on.
Right, as I said, after the 21 days, any amendment must be by written agreement of the parties. It could happpen anytime while the case is still open.
The false statements found have been pointed out on this forum. Anyone who has followed ARYC for a few years could pick them out because they are so obvious.
I am not making light of Dr. Julie's dilemma, but we haven't seen anything pertaining to her case other than what the Postal Inspector stated in her sworn Affidavit, and it's difficult to rely on those statements since she had so many other things wrong.
Looking at both sides does not mean anyone is defending Mark. The man has every right to dispute the allegations and tell his side of the story. That's how it works.
Oh, and for the 100th time, the FDA did NOT "refuse" ARYC's Covid-19 test. The designation was changed to "Pre-Emergency Use Authorization." ARYC's new and improved test (or tests) may be in the hands of the FDA right now and/or being validated by an independent lab.
No. It's too late for that. It has to be done within 21 days at which time they can only amend it by written agreement of the defendant, which is unlikely.
The DOJ DiD goof up in their complaint, not once, but several times. Doesn’t it make you wonder what else they got wrong? They may not want to be embarrassed, but they already should be due to general sloppiness and false statements.
Dr. Julie may have been so intimidated by the feds, she may have said just what they wanted to hear. Happens all the time.
Right! And whoever let the .05’s back in should be punished severely. lol.
No worries here...