Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Delaware or Canada. Hippies or Cowboys. Sinners or Saints. Lawyers or Felons. All are welcome under the umbrella no matter if you identify as one of the above or simply as a shareholder or non-shareholder. OSB or PWC. LCY & NDA. Be whichever you can identify with, just be careful not to steal others identities. And don’t identify as a shareholder if you either don’t own any or even worse if yours are borrowed.
I see our employees woke up and chose to be petulant instead of persuasive. Going to make a longer day for them than it needs to be. Oh well, have a day fellow shareholders.
That’s how it shows for me. I’m disappointed in our employees and purchasers of our shares. Guess you can’t have all the things all the time. Since it’s free to keep all those shares right where they are that’s what I’ll do.
I don’t believe it does. Mine are still in my account as well.
When the time comes I think I would write a letter of recommendation for the Cassel’s crew. This blemish on the resume is going to need a little makeup on the job trail. Dedication has sure been impressive. Can’t quite fathom how one could have precisely 0 impact after so much time, however. I suppose if you were to quantity the opposite of the intended result it would be greater than 0. It’s like if you wanted to gain weight and ate every piece of food that came across your eyes for 6 years no matter what time or what it was then couldn’t even gain an ounce. It’s quite literally all pain and no gain. Our worst case scenario is a benefit on taxes which would certainly be pain but can be considered a win.
Decent job today, employees. Take time to self-reflect and identify areas you can improve. You’ll have a momentary reprieve while we all sit down to dinner with family and friends. Stay at your desk just in case, of course…
Are you being persuasive enough? Are you handling objections effectively? Are you forging a connection to bring the opposition around to your viewpoint?
As for the rest of you rascals whose share quantity numeral more closely resembles a telephone number (with country and area code) than your biological age, have a great rest of your Saturday. Keep em locked, boys.
That’s more like it. Stay vigilant and work on incrementally improving your response time. I can suggest some training scenarios to improve your performance if you feel you are overmatched.
You’re late. A friendly reminder if you want to continue under our employ.
You sleep when we sleep. You wake when we wake. If you’re early, you’re on time. If you’re on time, you’re late. If you’re late, you’re fired.
Don’t let it happen again. Take some time today to outshine iglow with how many lines of text you’re willing to slap together in the name of altruism. Make us proud little lady.
Morning,
Going to spend some time researching the value in our shares. Sure glad the OSB has them locked in place all these years later.
Volunteers is an optimistic way to characterize. They are compensated so by definition they are employees. Your employees in fact. Personally I’d be willing to let them have Sunday off if they all sound off for roll call in the next 7 minutes.
Time for the afternoon headcount which falls under the purview of management. Employees, announce yourselves and if you’re long the con or short the stock. Remember, you work for us. You’re here because we are. If you weren’t here we’d still be here.
We are getting a bargain as majority shareholders. We have 24/7 legal monitoring at precisely $0 cost to us. Never forget they work for us now.
09072Q106 is still in my account. Time to wake up and tell me why I’m the idiot.
How much per post do you reckon? The argument is either very depressing or falls flat. Say $1 or $8,500+/- over 6 years of 24/7 work. Same qualifier but $10 per is $85,000+/- or $14k a year. Not what lawyers charge… She’s on a flat fee and she answers to us at our discretion. In other words, she is paid by them but she works for us. The hours and minutes of her life are controlled by us. You want to wake up at 3am - she has to also. You want to stay up until 3am - she has to also. She can’t have a family, pursue a hobby, make new friends, read a book or travel. All that being said, remember, she wants you to believe you’re the idiot.
Flat rate pay until contract is fulfilled or dissolved will break anyone eventually, no matter how righteous or indignant.
Love the updated footnote in my portfolio saying “Security price is not available” considering some would have you believe “Security is liquidated, bankrupt, worthless, etc.”
Same to you fellow shareholder. Of course I wish this process was quicker but all we can do it sit on our shares. If only there was a dividend for all of us with 2 commas in our quantities!!!
Shareholders are winning the battles and soon the war.
This is correct. He would save $1,500 if single or $3,000 if married. Big savings on that investment.
I bet Sabby wishes they still had their shares, if they were real. That disgorgement should make Cassel’s nervous.
Update your pronouns and due to Canadian law they won’t be able to deny you.
Bill C16. My pronouns are windfall/in waiting. As you two know, you’re obligated to address me as such. So, please introduce yourselves and let’s get this dialogue started. I’ll go first, I’m a shareholder in BIOAQ and I’m looking forward to the share purchase and full reviews of the NDA’s.
How many do you need? I’ll tier price it so the more you pay the more I’ll surrender. $2,200 gets you 100, $5,800 gets you 200, $10,800 gets you 300. If you can’t figure the amount for what you need let me know and I’ll walk you through it. I would encourage you to swing big the first time because I’m not sure there will be a second offer. What’s it worth to have your life back? No matter how much you’re fixin to lose, remember, just because you made a bad decision doesn’t mean you’re worthless. Bankrupt only defines a person financially, I assume you have some intangibles still to offer your family. There’s a lifetime in front of you to course correct horrible decisions of the past.
Quid pro quo:
Show us your shares.
Not many Gypsy film aficionados here. Guess this is a collection of bag holders of which I am as well.
Typical shareholder mentality. Asking someone trapped in a Cassel if she wants to stay in an AirBnB! What a knucklehead.
Just had a look see and my shares are still there in 2024. Kept there by my broker and at no cost to me. Guess I’ll let them stay there so it’s no cost to me.
That’s a riot. When I get home if the wife has extras I’ll drop one in the mail too. Well played!
Woah, Kemo Sabe!!!!
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to routinely exclude 09072Q106 from your talking points. None of our accounts show 4612067 BUT they do all show the CUSIP. You know that, and your dedication to being cryptically semantic is truly impressive.
Morning shareholders. Another week of brokerage holding those share safe and sound at no cost to me.
As it pertains to 09072Q106 or as some semantically refer to it as Delaware 4612067…
In the realm of speculative investment forums, an intriguing figure emerges—a stock short seller who has devoted an unparalleled five years to dissecting the intricacies of a particular stock. This profile seeks to unravel the enigma surrounding this relentless poster, probing not only the motivations propelling their tireless engagement but also the underlying objectives that drive their unwavering commitment.
Understanding Motivation:
At the heart of this speculative analysis lies the assumption that the subject is ensnared in an intricate short position, desperately yearning for shares to cover. The motivations underlying such a scenario are multifaceted and warrant a nuanced examination. Is the individual driven by financial exigency, caught in the unforgiving clutches of a market that has turned against them? Or is it a tenacious belief in the imminent decline of the stock, compelling them to persevere despite mounting challenges?
One cannot disregard the psychological dimensions that accompany prolonged involvement in a speculative endeavor. Could this individual be grappling with cognitive biases, clinging to the hope that the stock will eventually bow to their predictions, regardless of the prevailing market sentiments? A thorough analysis must delve into the psyche of the short seller, exploring the psychological nuances that shape their unwavering commitment.
Examining Possible PwC Affiliation:
A secondary assumption surfaces—the possibility that the relentless forum poster has been strategically positioned by a reputable entity, such as PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC). This hypothetical affiliation raises questions about the intentions behind such an orchestrated effort. Has PWC, as an overseer of “liquidation” and “subsequent transactions,” strategically deployed this individual to influence shareholders? If so, what strategic imperatives underpin such a calculated move?
To elucidate this assumption, one must explore the intricate dynamics of corporate transactions, evaluating the potential cost-saving motives that might drive a third party to intervene in the market. Does the engagement of this forum poster align with a broader strategy to coerce shareholders into relinquishing their positions, thereby facilitating a more economically viable transaction for the acquiring party?
Conclusion:
To authentically profile this stock short seller, one must navigate the labyrinth of motivations and objectives that characterize their conspicuous presence on the speculative forum. This scholarly inquiry into the psyche of the subject, coupled with a discerning exploration of the potential affiliations with corporate entities, aims to unravel the complex tapestry woven by an individual whose online presence transcends mere speculation, embodying an intricate interplay of financial motives and strategic objectives.
Fellow shareholders - please enjoy this preview to an upcoming post with respect to shareholders and naysayers.
Scenario 1:
Shareholders who frequent this forum have done their DD, have a sunk cost as of now, and are only inspired to continue holding due to the volume of naysaying.
Naysayers are trying to shake free some shares by berating the FKA and shareholders alike. When Great-Grandma Smith and Policeman Jones passed away their estates saw holdings with no value attached and had them removed from their accounts but that didn’t add up to the target number needed. They still need more and in a sign of tremendous dedication, continue to hash it out with the same group who vowed to not relinquish their shares - day in and day out of course.
Scenario 2:
Shareholders who frequent this forum have done their DD, have a sunk cost as of now, and are only inspired to continue holding due to the volume of naysaying.
Naysayers are trying to shake free some shares by berating the FKA and shareholders alike. Only in this scenario the shares aren’t to materially improve the situation they are personally in. Rather, they are contracted by another entity to be ever-present and to present as omnipotent. There would be 2 primary shareholder targets in this scenario - I doubt those will be successful endeavors. In the face of failing their primary targets they take aim at all others. Anything they can shake free will save the 3rd party, who must be most unhappy on their ROI.
At any rate, day in and day out, one group says we will not relinquish, and the other says there’s no value in the CUSIP (to be fair they try to avoid that semantically) so we are dumb for holding.
Only time will tell and as always I’m sure thrilled to be a shareholder.
Anyone know what happened with ByronBucklesFL and Trader59 Tennessee who were so important to the editing of the BioAmber wiki page?
Come on! Bearer of bad news over here.
You mean to tell me that the evidence I have both Grok and GPT working up indicating that the shares are worth $44 isn’t going to be sufficient for my broker to add a few commas to my account value???? All the pushpins on my cork-board with red string running in every which way was all for naught?
As if that wasn’t bad enough, what are you going to say next? Something like when the shares have a value assigned those who are without them will need to buy them at the assigned value?
What a Grinch.
Good morning,
A little double-pane soundproof glass would go a long way around here. I hope all shareholders will have that discretionary spend at their disposal when the time comes.
Afternoon Koan,
As a shareholder I can do some pretty simple math and figure out what my shares are worth at various pps. From here I can subtract my cost basis and again, fairly simply, end up with what my gain can be. My math maths, as they say, partly because it’s so simple. Like others I am currently the owner of shares and a negative return on them.
I have a vested interest in following this saga because the equation n(shares) x y(pps) = $(profit). For clarity, I use $ because I was fortunate to back trucks up when shares were mere Pennies so I’m assuming a higher value resulting from the balance of the transaction.
What do you suppose the vested interest equation is for all of our non-shareholder colleagues?
It can’t be as simple as n x y =$ because they lack the n input for that equation.
I have a fun book about math equations, principles and theories. I’ll skim the appendix this evening to see if there is a theorem with respect to (borrowed). Pending the result of that search I may work on an equation that considers the hourly rate of a paralegal as well as a competent lawyer. Finding even the average of the two x 16 hours a day x 1825 days = a staggering amount of resources that certainly can’t be for no material gain.
Take good care and enjoy your evening fellow shareholder.
Mine are still there, too. Surprised we still hear so much about them given that no one has spoke up to say they were convinced to dispose of them.
Show me the Verde! A big thanks to my broker for holding these shares for another week at no cost to me.
Law of diminishing returns should mean these are the paralegals at Cassel’s at this point.
Some Chinese proverb like:
He who over exerts himself produces only shame and undesired results. He who lets nature take its course delights in the destination.
Admittedly, far too much lining up showing there’s more to this than has transpired, but the ever present do-gooders solidified my maintaining my holdings.