Paying attention ;-)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You could do that, yes....but I thought the conversation was about revenues?
It's trading as if there are a ton of people holding.
I couldn’t disagree more. We have enough guidance to reasonably assume Q3 could represent a 100% Q to Q increase. It’s also very likely that it will be the highest revenue in a quarter to date with the Bellissima brand. It’s also likely to represent the last quarter where revenues are sub $1 million.
While everyone knows Q4 will be when the party really starts, Q3 will be nothing to sneeze at. Good luck…
Some may look at Rich’ past as a negative. Others may look at it as his learning curve.
Wasn’t there a PR that stated revenues for Q3 were just about at Q2 revenues for the first six weeks? I don’t remember the exact wording, but there is a good starting point.
I would assume 90% of Q2 revenues for the first 6 weeks of Q3. The second half of Q3 is anyone’s guess, but I would just double the previous total for an approximation.
Your opinion is noted...gl
Your quote below is a fact, yes. What the future success of the brand will be in the next two years is pure speculation. Saying a reverse split is inevitable is also pure speculation. You may believe it to be the case, and your opinion is your right. It doesn't make it a fact. Only time will tell.
You were the one that expressed confidence in what will be the case 2 years from now. That is the type of speculation that lacks common sense. jmo...good luck.
How do you know this? Listen, I'm not saying they plan on buying back shares, as that would be pure speculation on my part. But so is your statement below. There is simply no way to know how much cash they may acquire in 2 years time. You have no idea of all the places Bellissima will be placed within that time.
You are making the assumption that everyone will value it the same way, and that the ticker will simply go to your valuation. It doesn't work that way in the OTC. Stocks here go way higher (and lower) than they should. Trade accordingly.
Sounds as if you are saying the pps is undervalued either way you look at it. Many would agree.
Now that is just speculation. Truth is no one knows when the next news will drop.
Those that are trading it, will trade it. Those who have been holding it, will still hold it. Those that have been doing both, will continue to do both. Nothing new to see here...yet.
Nobody believes it anyway...everyone just considers it comic relief.
93.23% of all statistics are made up on the spot
LOL...do you even bother to read the board?
Pretty simple to understand when you know that 4 million of the shares sold were a fat-fingered mistake, and that person is now buying back on the bid.
I don't think most investors really care about what wine snobs (not you, just for lack of a better phrase) think. They care about increased footprints in, as you put it, the mass market chains.
Even Millennials are drinking more wine these days instead of beer...and I highly doubt they are aficionados.
As long as there are traders looking for their 15-25% in and out gains, then yes there will be some pull-backs. There's nothing wrong with that since it's perfectly normal and it keeps the ticker fluid.
That said, as more and more major footprints are acquired for the brand, the ticker will continue to build upon new, higher, bases. This is nothing new. Chain store acquisitions can be ignored by some if they wish. It's their choice....it's just not one many would make. GL
Is this serious? It says 'today at 2:55pm' right on it. Tomorrow it will read 'Sep 21 at 2:55pm'
That's how emails work.
He doesn’t post on any social media forum
I see. I have a feeling you will be waiting a while.
We are not waiting...it has already been proven false. See my post a little ways down
If you’re starting with zero anyway, does it really matter?
Still hasn’t
TA is not gagged...here is the email I received.
https://imgsafe.org/image/419ca2b4ef
It shouldn’t be
I agree that .01 is psychological resistance...but I think the first barrier is the 50dma. I haven’t checked it the last few days, but I think it’s high .008s
Yeah, um, I think I'm just going to go ahead and call BS on this.
I've said repeatedly...do what you got to do. No one is stopping you.
Money is money
I have no problem with verification within reason. I also believe you have to question everything...including info from simply calling a chain's corporate office. Assuming the info, if any is received, is accurate or complete is simply not wise. I'm not saying to not do it. Knock yourself out. I just know where that road leads.
So at the end of the day, we are left with the same conclusion in this circular argument. There is risk involved.
Sure you do...even if you are only trading it.
Again...if only it were that simple. But I know not everyone has my level of experience with how chains operate. Do what you got to do. I'm not asking anyone to believe me.
It's a public press release. Could he be lying? Again, for all the ultra-prudent people out there...I suppose anything is possible.
Guess what? Trading/investing in any stock comes with risk. You can't split every hair. Do I realize this comes with risk? Yes I do. But based on my experience, I am comfortable with it.
On both sides of the fence
Even worse is getting completely inaccurate info. Or thinking you learned something, when the opposite is true.
Fair enough. I would always advise those that look for verifcation from major chains to take the info, if they even get any, with a case of salt. glty