sigh.......

:^D

WOW...is it 1999 again??!!

LOL

:^D

:^D

Hi all.....great to see so many old timers around here still.

I have not met me duties here unfortunately...little time for such fun.

Hope all is well.....hey FM....thought WE were gonna do the book??? Getting good now that AP is back in trouble again...who knows where that might lead!!!!

:^D

:^D

Hi Chris. Good to see ya.

Sorry about Kmart....hope things work out for your work.

:^D

:^D

GO ECNC!!!!

hehehehehe

:^D

:^D

Ditto.

hehehehehe

ecnc...still lives.....wow.

:^D

:^D

Damn....that sucks.

:^<

:^D

yeah.

wish I could get more excited.

This would have been great 18 months ago.

sigh......

:^D

Hey!!! I wanna be 1!!!!

:^D

:^D

lurking and posting elsewhere harry.

How's stp doing?

:^D

:^D

Do ya think Bill Gates had to deal with folks like this when he started MSFT? hmmmmm.....doooh!

:^D

a Major NUTTJOB! wow. amazing what climbs out when tom goes a roaming. sheesh......

:^D

hehehehehe....he's so much like tom it must make him crazy!!!! LOLOLOLOL

1. Its cheaper since you don't have to pay a lawyer or take off any time to deal with the case....someone does all the work for you with no investment of time or money from you and in the end you get something. Class actions are designed for claims that are not financially lucrative enough for folks to bring on their own but that as a group can spread the costs out to make the suit feasible.....plus it generates fees for attorneys if they win.

2. You can opt out if you think your claim is different from the class or that you have a better chance on your own either b/c you have a better atty, or whatever. It can also be leverage to force a settlement for you so they can concentrate on the bigger threat.

3. Statutes of limitations apply to almost all if not all claims. I don't know what it would be for this claim but generally they are 5 years or less unless it involves a written contract dispute.

4. hehehehehe...no comment.

5. LOLOLOLOL....no comment.

:^D

I just love how the goober filing suit against ecnc goes and issues a false and misleading PR just like he accuses ecnc as being the basis of his claim. His PR reads plural but the rest of the article clearly shows that he is reporting only his single lawsuit plus encouraging others to file separate lawsuits of their own. Yet his headline implies that there is a number of these lawsuits. Go figure....LOLOLOL!!!!

:^D

He's full of shit...bottom line. He's like the goober wanna be cop who dresses up like one and tries to act like one and bugs them constantly with bullshit he thinks is real and every once in a while he gives them a tidbit that is marginally useful so they tolerate him.

He's so deluded with his own self created image and ego that its sad.

Not my problem though.

:^D

I LOVE this subjective qoute:

"or ever done anything significantly wrong in securities markets"

I wonder how they define significantly?

I wonder what they DID do wrong?

LOL!

Playing in the shadows and deceiving everyone including themselves. What a sad joke of an exisitence.

:^D

I agree its good news and a sea change in where this company may be headed......which is good because I don't think ANY of us were very happy with where it appeared to be headed.......a nice downward circular motion towards the hole in the bottom of the bowl I feared.

Maybe this will fish us out of the toilet and put us back in the race!

:^D

Everytime you have to get someone else involved (another middleman) you have to peel off a portion of your profit to pay them for what they are providing. The pie is only so big. The more folks to feed the more slices and the more slices the smaller each individual slice gets.

hmmmm.....now I'm hungry. LOL!

:^D

hmmmmm....I like Verisign but does this mean eFunds is out of the picture? Is this a result of not being able to complete the purchase? Interesting.

But maybe this is also an avenue to the ATM market and getting certification to do debit transactions?

Interesting......but I see margin shrinkage....

:^D

Someone's dumping like crazy today.......dipping down.

sigh.......

:^D

LOL! bad boys, bad boys, what ya gonna do, what ya gonna do when they come for you!

Give me a break. Don't these folks know how to read?! First the headline screams the firm WILL represent ecnc in a defamation lawsuit then the last paragraph indicates it is only under "active consideration"????

sheesh......

:^D

ROTFLMAO til it hurts!!!!!

You are the ULTIMATE Whack job!

tooooo funny.

:^D

Do a ticker lookup on ecnc then go to the bottom of the page and click on more news or info on ecnc.

The articles were there yesterday.

As well as the PAL PR and the retraction notice.

:^D

Hi Dave!

The plot thickens.....as usual. sigh...

K I L L K I L L K I L L -- Protective Action League/


Editors should disregard HSTH012, "Protective Action League Plans Response to Bloomberg Financial Press for Defamatory Article Against eConnect" moved earlier today.


:^D

So what do ya'll think of the latest Dufus Evans faux paux?

What an idiot. He must have some strange sadistic desire to inflict trouble upon himself.

Some journalist. Can't write a freakin' story without revealing his total bias and walking over the line to get attention and imply wrong doing.

la hooo za her.

I'm not happy with ecnc or Tom but good grief they are angels compared to this runny toad turd.

The soap opera continues......sheesh

:^D

hey DC.....I loosened the reins I did NOT take them off. Personal attacks are still my #1 peeve and I won't tolerate them. If you are poking fun in good humor its one thing but if otherwise then keep it PM.

'Nuf said.

:^D

Glad to see everyone on forced vacation from the bull over here having fun.

I'm letting it run a little looser, adding length to the chain so don't push the envelope and make me clamp down! (I'm talking to YOU Ricky! LOL)

Enjoy!

Pump got us up a little.....lots of interesting stuff in a short couple day span.

Who wants more shares!!!!????

Tom needs a new lease on life so the press has been fired up again!

Woooo HOOOOOO

:^D

You bought in again!!!!????

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

ROTFLMAOTIHURTS!!!!!!!

hehehehehehehe

hooooohohoooohohohoo

:^D

Naw......you single handedly hurt everyone's feelings and scared us all off.

heheheehhehe

:^D

Alliance Equities announcement today.....hmmmmmm pump or is there some substance there? I like the idea of having some cash flow again although the sound of the printing presses is a bit disconcerting.

Hope this is a good thing!

:^D

ouch....sniff.....

:^<

:^D

Be nice!

:^D

&^%@ you and your stupid question! LOLOLOL

Seriously.....he can do anything he wants. There may be consequences however. Civil liability means nothing if you have structured your assets so they are judgment proof (i.e. irrevocable trust fund) and don't give a damn.

Any contract requires a meeting of the minds. Oral contracts run up against the statute of frauds if they can't be performed in a year. Beyond that you need it in writing or its like it never existed legally. Holding someone to any contract if they want to blow you off requires litigation which means $$$$. A surprising number of people are unwilling to enter that arena and incur that expense to enforce their contract rights.....particularly when the other party is expected to protract the process, run up the expense and ultimately avoid enforcement of any eventual judgment anyway. All you see is time and money down the drain.

I often have to tell my clients lets not throw good money after bad. Sometimes its best to cut your losses. Litigating on principal is rarely as satisfying in the end as it appears up front....and its expensive.

So....Tom can do what he damn well pleases and its up to the rest of us (speaking hypothetically) to do something about it if we think we have the scratch, patience and the balls to get after it.

fwiw

jmho

:^D

Now THAT was great! LOLOLOLOLOL

:^D

uhhh....sure....whatever.

What planet ARE you from?

Chill.......I don't see ANY spellings in the posts I ALLOWED to remain that I recognize from George Carlin's list of things you can't say on TV (most of which they now do say).

Ricky is having some fun.

I don't see that set forth as banned in the rules.

Personal attacks are. One of ricky's posts struck me as too personal and its gone.

Your post strikes me as personally offensive on many levels since you choose to attack me and other posters....but I think I'll leave in it place as it speaks for itself.......

Get a grip or take action.

If I'm not acceptable as chairman get iHub to boot me and elect a new one.

sheesh.....

:^D

neat new chairman features....gotta give a reason for removing a post and the post link shows who did it!

Way to go Matt and iHub!!!

:^D

you wack

hehehehehehe

:^D

Hi Ski...hope all is well.

Great link but really not the subject of this board....although its insight is applicable to our experiences here.



:^D

I've been there and preached that.....ain't gonna happen my friend.

:^D

I LIKE that image! Conflagration come on!!!!!

heheeheehhehe

:^D