Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ooops.. :) And that is not a 2 goal scary lead...it's a 3er. I hate Florida teams by the way...
I think you said this incorrectly(somewhat)....:
Might be worth a small buy with the divi. Those type of equities are shite' though in my opinion. So no go :)
No...that's the old copy and paste error. That shit drives me crazy for being so sloppy.
This is what Humbl still needs to do:
The REG A needs to be redone and they need to dismiss Borgers. No 8-k yet....thinking that it will be filed today or Monday at latest. They also need to file their quarterly by next Friday or extend. Not so sure they can simply include such in subsequent events....
And the only streaming platform just removed all the AFL streams:
https://vyre.tv/livetv/
Now the head coach of Minnesota Myth just quit. That team is owned by Hutton's wife..lol.:
Breaking: Rickey Foggie tells @reboundnet he has resigned as @Minnesota_Myth Head Coach. @RFoggie
— Rebound Off the Net (@reboundnet) May 10, 2024
And another bites the dust. That is two within 24 hours:
https://arenainsider.com/2024/05/philadelphia-soul-season-shut-down-for-remainder-of-2024-season/
Never seen anything like this. Another casualty...and it is just so wrong:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-for-stranded-georgia-force-players?attribution_id=sl:ab3a10fe-83e6-4125-9185-02d9bc0a564d&utm_campaign=p_lico+share-sheet-first-launch&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer
It seems that the SEC will not require a non-reliance from an Issuer due to Borgers. Unless other.....
Right, but that is usually how the chain works in athletics. There are a lot of safety issues in those venues as well. It's bad.
What a series. Man...if Rngrs end up 3-0, carolina is getting the unfair description..lol. This is great shite'
Oh...this ...... "I am sure his clients are not at all happy with him right about now, as his "investments" is the only "financing" they can get"
Is dead on...but he doesn't care. And again....says a lot about the Issuers..eh? ...lol.
Again, I don't see all of them as toxic. I do, on the other hand, see all Issuers that use them as "toxic".
I don't think he is trying to fool anyone. He just wants to argue his case..... which is warranted.
But, yeah...he probably doesn't have a chance..lol.
Yes..great descriptive word..." parasitic". Lol...fn' perfect. The most sensible "first" approach is amending the applicable rule. Simply make the minimal requirement @ one year and eliminate the six month hold. You clean out the Issuer and Lender ...as well as short term investor. There is no money in that though for the SEC...and the notion of liquidity will be raised probably. It's all bull shite' apparently.....as is everything...lol :)
Yes..I know. I also read the complaint. And yes...he knew what he was doing..and argues that same fact with regards to the SEC. The bottom line is that the Lender is not toxic, the Issuer is. That is the SEC target, but it goes for the cash instead.
My issue is what is deemed as a broker/dealer in this and similar scenarios. I wish the SEC would address such appropriately and go after the Issuer. That is where the rule needs to be placed..firmly.
Exactly. From memory, three cats got called up to the NFL that were in the AFL. It is supposed to be a professional organization. It's far from that. You can tell that said player and family are good to go no matter what. He has a great attitude in defeat. They'll be fine.
I don't know. The rule wasn't a clean unanimous vote. Doesn't have to be ..but still. Power Up was one of the only efficient ones out there and this statement just kills me:
Someone that does not want to hold any more. That's all. Granted, giving up here pretty naive/stupid....but that's just how it goes.
And so it goes Surf. And so it goes............
Yeah..and it goes way beyond business. This gets me so pissed here....and it's happening to most of the league's players as well:
https://arenainsider.com/2024/05/former-iowa-rampage-player-opens-up-about-sudden-termination-and-facing-eviction1/
I mean ... "moralities" ... eh? This is so wrong.
Ooooops...Two goal leads are scary. Still have a chance :)
This is not all on Brian though. First was the Pacific Lion debacle...then they had to get shite' short term financing....then this. It didn't seem as though Humbl put any effort into the website or ticket gig. Maybe that was due to no cash and/or seeing who these bums are(AFL). Probably both.
But they were supposed to put $10k per Month into this leading up to the start of season. If they actually did...then after two weeks they are still under water. And that's just with the small cash outlay.
I think they also already issued shares to the AFL as well...like roughly two weeks ago. I am pretty certain of a strong possibility of AFL lawsuits in the making. That piece of crap Hutten will drag Humbl into this and push some blame on em'. At least attempt to....because he is almost certainly that sleazy.
Sssshhhhh. You'll upset some body. So far...so "almost" good. :) Good luck...but the Rangers are scary as hell currently....like fn' dominant scary...lol. Alright, I'm done after squeezing that comment through.
The notion of Humbl actually getting paid by the AFL is becoming doubtful. They are already two weeks in..going on three. If we take that attendance link on face value..and if such would actually remain static, they would be lucky to get paid $200,000 for the season. Given that half the league will be wound up by the end of the week....well.... that's what you have.
I doubt they see a dime.
Those involved with this issuer(retail stock holders) just refuse to see it. This board should be lit up with positive vibes talking about all the cash the AFL and Humbl is bringing in for them. They got shite' on....and that sucks. But at some point ...you just have to realize "what is".
Sure ..It's only 4 years worth of auditing. That won't take that long or cost too much. No big deal.
Should see an 8-k any day now for non -reliance. The current 1- A is now invalid and will have to be redone as well.
Yeah...apparently. Not sure when the change was made...
Of course..just to follow up...they could never pull an AFL "quick cash gig" off given insurance and liability.
I have to admit. I'm feeling kinda' bad for them. It's been a real tough couple of Weeks. The thing is...Karma is real. Man....I know damn well that they wish they had more resources and use it in some bull shite' AFL rights acquisition. They don't even have enough authorized shares currently..."as is". Let alone cash.
So I need to refer to the PCAOB. Maybe I'm naive, but I have never heard of the PCAOB not understanding mathematics and samples...so I guess I'm done with that inquiry :)
Maybe that's a mistake....but not sure anyone has ever challenged them..be it their work...and proven any case.
Humbl has gotten the worse news ever these past couple of weeks. First the AFL and now the Auditor bust. Granted, they were partners with the AFL...but maybe they slacked off seeing what is. The Auditor situation is just a complete blind side hit. That's not on them...but they will probably have to file a non reliance on the last 10-k and every other since the S-1. They don't have the resources to spend on this shite'. I think it's over...unless they do the dumbest thing possible with the AFL ..as in..rights.. I have said too much for they could not be that stupid.
I would think so..at least for SEC reporters or legits'. The list isn't that great..lol. I would like to know the sample size of the SEC's decision. What I am saying is that the possibility of accurate audits exist outside the sample. But now such should affect those as well. If they exist.
I'm wondering if all current and those that are listed will have to file a non reliance. I mean, I would imagine so...but I do not know if all those involved meet the level of such. I just don't have enough detail...and have reread the complaint.
lol...I know that link. That is how lazy I am feeling. Was looking for a copy and paste. I'm even too lazy to hit the "more/next" tab. Thanks though..I'm looking at them now.
Website seeing changes...prepping at least. This should be getting ready.
That is what I wanted to ask you all. I didn't really dig into it that much, but seem to remember that it was dealing with a lot of Companies over the course of at least several years. Is there a list someone complied? lol....I know I can do it myself...just feeling lazy.
It just seems that it is going to really...really...f' up a lot of business(legit or not).
No...I am sure that is buried.
I don't see that much to audit beyond stock issuance and similar. Same old :)