Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Heatin up in here.
No, all mine are around .03
I mean its pretty clear no one is selling. $130 just jumped this 75%. I kind of feel like an idiot not working this one, buying .02 selling .03-.04 and reloading, oh well. The company makes good products in growing industries. Revenues from Haier should be interesting.
Someone's gambling today. It would be nice to hear something from the company though...
It seems like something else is going on here. This is stuck between .02 and .04. Every time it hits or breaks .04, right back down to .02 on big volume.
I thought they paid their debt, but it's acting like someone is converting/dumping shares.
They will always fool people. There is a certain conspiracy theorist quality to investors of penny stocks. The stock is being 'held down' because 'they' don't want it to succeed. 'They' are afraid it will disrupt the market.
And then the shady news sites, justified because the 'MSM' won't publish anything on the stock because they are in on the whole thing.
It's becoming pretty entertaining.
Oh, and the courts. The courts are in on it too, which is why they aren't ruling in SFOR's favor.
From the revered tech site "FashionObserver24" (wat) referencing global research firm QYResearch (??) a "Florida based" company with employees from China and India according to LinkedIn.
This all seems so legit. 2 legit actually. 2 legit to quit.
Is that the 'next up' list of companies SFOR will try to sue?
That one Christie Brinkley backed took off like mad, if they can get a solid celebrity spokesperson behind the mom and pop it could be promising.
This is lots of 'could's and 'might's though...
Nasdaq, a collection of companies that make things and money. Crypto market, a collection of 1s and 0s, no fundementals, no backing.
This would be right, if you posted it last year.
Not completely true, I have a few shares of a dead shell that doesn't show up haha.
Sounds like another one I follow, I’ll have to check this one out.
Please look more into blockchain and what Blocksafe is proposing to do before putting more money here.
Blockchain technologies are a game changer. But probably not the way you think. Don't think of transactions as monetary, when your computer asks for a website, that is a transaction. Those are the type of transactions that will become more secure using blockchain technology.
This technology can be held in an open ledger, or on an internal ledger for the company issuing the token. The tokens people are trading now will only be as useful as the people backing them.
I've only done a few hours of research on blockchain, it's easy to see how this will greatly increase information security. But I'm still unclear how these can be used as currency. I guess since each token is unique, but being unique doesn't necessarily equal value.
It seems like people are trading SSL certificates to me.
Realize that the reason crypto currencies have been hacked is not a security issue with the crypto tokens, but the exchange. And likely due to an admin at the exchange/bank giving away the keys. There is already issues with transactions taking a long time, blocksafetech is just making the process more complicated and slower. It’s not necessarily any safer.
I was excited when I thought this was BlockSafeTM, but it’s not.
This is essentially ADT saying America is under threat of attack, our product will provide 24 hour surveillance and protection for our men and women in the armed forces fighting over seas.
That's what they've been saying for years. They'll need to produce something, anything, to get us to believe again.
They didn't win against Microsoft. Microsoft settled to continue with their billion dollar Azure rollout. A delay would have cost more in lost revenue than the settlement cost them.
Cryptos themselves are a security protocol.
When people realize the 'hacks' are insiders allowing someone in, not some uber 1337 haxors, they'll realize how much of a joke this is. The way cryptos are supposed to work is a local wallet where you keep your coins anyway. This centralized storage is dumb, and a total perversion of how its supposed to work.
Revenue remains flat.
Phoenix. Southern AZ has a very different feel from mid/north. More what you'd expect from the Southwest with the adobe style. I hang out more on the northern side of the state where its has more of a pioneer vibe. Log cabins and mining town stuff.
Maybe its finally time to get out of pennies and into dimes.
Interesting theory, but that's really cost prohibitive. People flipping is the more likely reason this isn't taking off.
This one is always entertaining.
SFOR is playing the similar name game again, making it hard to find any concrete information. Their company/subsidiary/partner showing up after pages of real companies trick people into thinking they're connected to something real.
I would, but that link really doesn't look legitimate. I'll just go with what I see on linkedin, a known, respected site for professionals. Not the knockoff EU version.
His linkedin says he's the chairman of BlockSafe Alliance. not BlockSafe Technologies.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-barnes-blocksafe
Yes, about BlockSafe
Remember, you're buying stock in StrikeForce Technologies, not BlockSafe Technologies.
The ACS partnership didn't work out well, I have little faith this will pan out any better. It'll be great for Kay though.
There is a base OS, when things are instaled on top of that base OS, more resources are used. No benchmark needed. Adding “always running” software will always slow down a computer.
My PR guess: SFOR will be fueling our new subsidiary, blocksafetech (not to be confused with BlockSafeTM), with software and material goods while receiving 0 in payment and nothing in future royalties from blocksafetech,(again, not to be confused with BlockSafeTM.) Blocksafetech.com will be loosely involved in blockchain technology, and you know what that means...
SFOR will continue seeking partnerships with OEMs to bundle our many useless programs with other useless programs to greatly slow computer performance for the year 2019 and beyond.
Market cap is barely more than 2016 total revenue. When will the market catch on?
We need a new landing page, with company pictures and current info. The landing page here is too boring haha.
Think we’re going to be waiting until April like last year?
Thank you for clearly pointing out why you're SFOR strong... you have nothing, like all SFOR pumpers.
maybe it was someone with 999,997 and wanted to make it an even million haha.
Although if they PR anything with Blocksafe like people are speculating, it might be good for another pump. It has a lot of buzzwords that people don't understand.
Big deals always coming.
"Examples of the channel relationships that we are pursuing include our attempts to establish OEM relationships with other security technology, identity theft products and software providers that would integrate or bundle the enhanced security capabilities of ProtectID® and or GuardedID® into their own product lines."
SFOR, 2011.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7863543
3 shares traded haha how is that even possible
He ran a very successful... whatever you call it, on this stock. Super ambiguous with everything posted, duping people that have 0 knowledge on info security.
My favorite period was the DOD emails, where multiple SFOR investors emailed department heads, touting the canned 'we will review this and get back to you' emails as a success.
The current Bravatek board reminds me of heyday SFOR.
The comparison was to demonstrate how much faster digital empires grow compared to “Rome”. If SFOR were going to be big, they’d be big now. It doesn’t take this long for a good digital product to hit the market.