Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Agree with this.
Yes I’m sure that’s what he meant. ??
This is a very aggressive/optimistic reading of the bolded text. They are looking for game changing breakthroughs. They are not saying this is one (yet).
I think this is a very fair critique, unfortunately.
Outrageous speculation.
Can you please describe for us what conclusions you draw from this comparison given the vastly different “n”, scales used in the presentation of data and time periods?
You are connecting the wrong dots!!!!!!!
One successful “real” trial maybe?
It’s been in most all of their tweets since March.
You just need to connect a few more dots, Investor.
Fake news posted as fact!!!!!!!
Opinion stated as fact!!!!
1 + 1 = 2
1+1 = 2
Opinion stated as fact.
This is pure speculation presented as fact.
Fascinating!!!!!!
This makes no sense given the data and information we have so far. It is not a realistic outcome, IMHO.
No. It’s not.
Agree. Too much downside when the case is much more clear in a matter of weeks.
Added 10k. This is pure panic.
Above mine at 4.02 as well. Only took three years!
Really good question.
This board has been excellent lately. Thanks to all.
I’m going to look into this as well.
This is actually a very fair and important question. I am long and this bothers me.
The “too many eggs in one basket” speech doesn’t work here.
What exactly do you think this proves? That his name is on papers?
I’m not sure which is more interesting, the view that he is a scientist first and CEO second, or that this would be a good thing.
Thanks for sharing. When does the anavex shingles trial start?
Start with 6, but if you want to add more please do. I respect your background and measured approach.
As a long id like to see your thoughts as to why you think this will work and it would be good basis for discussion. Would be good change of pace from recent ramblings.
I am optimistic, but concerned about timing and lack of clear communication.
Absolute horse pucky
Probably a pretty good middle ground between all and none, no?
Simple question - are you content with the frequency of communication and content of that communication from mgmt?
My fear is that the sloppiness is due to them resorting and cherry picking data to try and craft a story that will sell. It gives the appearance of grasping at straws. I would think by now, given how long they have been following this group, they would be able to put together a very convincing timeline showing all that has happened.
One of the main problems is the very small sample size.
Thank you for injecting some realism.
Of course it was anticipated. Why do you think we have gotten no real news for the past several weeks even though updates were promised (full enrollment PR). It’s not some mysterious cabal holding the stock down. It is consistent lack of real, meaningful news and missed schedules.
It looks we will now have more of the same for the next 4-6 months. I have waited this long. What’s 6 more I guess. Nothing like averaging down over 4 years!
Pure speculation.
Great use of time. Thanks for your service.
Hooray. More recycled news.
I think this is a fair assessment. It is not what any of us hoped for in 2019 but progress nonetheless.
This should be pinned.
It’s 38 people. Not enough to draw definitive conclusions yet. This is a highly speculative biotech stock. It is either going to 100 plus or zero. Will know soon enough.
Risk reward is attractive. This is not a slam dunk.
No foundation in fact? It’s certainly negative, but he is more right than wrong in terms of missed timelines and delays.