Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SFOR is near the very end of the international patent application process timeframe and presently awaiting approval, correct?
Microsof settled with SFOR rather than have the possible exposure of their trade secrets in a Markman hearing. Others may do same IMHO.
Nope! This one is only waiting for a small craft advisory to be lifted to leave the marina and continue cruising.
I'm in perfect agreement with you! However, due to NDAs and possible US Government Confidentially Statements legally, SFOR sadly may not be able to PR them. The way we found out about the Microsoft settlement was in the fins of the year end, audited 10-K where in accordance with SEC regulations all must be revealed. IMHO that's when we'll get the empiricial evidence of facts and figures we need.
Yeah, "Used by Government agencies" (plural) is the exact phrase I heard him say!
Stop right there now! You dare to ask people to think longterm about SFOR and consider a one year chart? You wouldn't be one of those investors as opposed to short term flippers would you?
Gotta love those oft repeated words "Petitioner fails"! Thanks for findng and sharing them with us.
IMHO it's fallling on some intentionally deaf ears. Longs know what they own and believe the CEO's statement. It's only a matter of time until the year end 10-K validates it.
Strongly agree with that assessment!
"OS has changed minimally" in the last 18 months. Thank you for setting the record straight. End of discussion!
Rest assured many of us believe your posted SFOR OS figures, not others.
You're right on both counts! A million shares would be chump change, right now, to an outfit like Ropes and Gray.
It's simple. You believe what Mark Kay stated about the second half of the year or you don't. We'll all know when the audited, year end 10-K report is released. Those facts and figures will provide investors the empirical evidence needed to determine if Mark has brought home the bacon or not. Until then I continue to believe in SFOR and it's understated, hard working CEO.
I would add that the increased product awaweness created by those HSN spots is quite helpful.
Wise advice indeed. Longs know what they own. Best to "forget about all the rumors and manipulation games and check back in 3 or 6 months" or when the 10-K is released to vindicate our understated, hard working CEO, Mark Kay. Diesel repair completed tomorrow so I'm following your advice and continue cruising. GLTA longs!
Strongly agree! I will patiently wait for the audited, annual 10-K report where all this must be revealed in accordance with SEC rules. Then we will have the undeniable facts and figures, regardless of NDAs or Government agencies' Confidentiality Statements.IMHO it'll be just like how the $9.7 million Microsoft settlement came to light, in that year's 10-K financials.
So how could the HSN speaker state on the air "Used by Government agencies" (plural)? Are you saying HSN is engaging in false advertising now?
A lot of progress has been made by the company since my first post on this board back then. I initiated my position at .0009 and have enjoyed considerable appreciation. I anticipate more this year. So I guess that qualifies me as a bag holder also known as a long term investor.
Having a great time despite waiting for diesel engine parts a couple of days. Thinking about the system upgrades SFOR will enable this time next year on the water.
Agree, NDAs and based on the latest HSN spot sentence "Used by Government Agencies." (please note plural) SFOR would also be muzzled by having had to sign Federal Government Confidentiality agreements. We won' t know any specifics until the10-K because of those IMHO.
Same here! Also got in the same time, after the Microsoft settlement. I am impressed by the progress that has been made since then. I most of all am assured by that timeframe's ascending triangle pattern. As along term investor, with parient capital,that is the chart I look at.
BINGO!"Hold for a year & could put 100K in pocket." Some people had unrealistic expections for the second Q despite what the CEO said about the second HALF of the year. They were disappointed. IMHO Mark Kay will deliver, as promised then, big time! The proof will be in the pudding of the year-end, audited figures and facts of the 10-K.
The President proposes but the Congress disposes since under the Constitution it not the executive branch has the power of the purse. Let us wait to see if Congress restores any clean coal research and development funding by the 1 October deadline for the Federal FY. Bear in mind a CR could also continue funding for a limited time after 1 October.
Thank you for your insights based on technical expertise.
He may not be able to provide much detail due to NDAs IMHO.
Currently being on a sailboat I liked your video! You're right. SFOR is in heavy weather now but still on course. I've no doubt Captain Kay will keep her off the rocks and our ship will come in.
Bingo!"We should know by the end of the year" I'm in perfect agreement with you regarding that timeframe. Then all will be revealed with the year-end audited figures and facts of the10-K. IMHO investors will look back on this time of a depressed pps as the gift that provided them the opportunity to accumulate shares at fire sale prices and smile!
I'm guardedly optimistic. It's very telling that "testing will continue through September and October 2017". Then according to President's Trump's proposed DOE budget (Effective 1 October) funds will be reallocated towards nuclear energy and basic research. CCTC has one last bite at the DOE clean-coal funding. Then it's gone unless Congress restores it. Those test results had better be good enough to entice both the domestic and international clients to belly up to the bar and pick up the tab because Uncle Sam walks out of the saloon on the 1 October, the start of the new Federal fiscal year.
You either believe our CEO, or you don't. It's as simple as that. I believe him. That's why I remain long & strong SFOR. I'm not posting much as I am cruising the ICW & anchoring out a lot. IMHO when all is revealed in the audited, year-end 10-K Mark Kay will be fully vindicated! Regardless of any NDAs and/or Confidentiality Statements, the facts & figures will show he has quietly, competently, guided SFOR to a safe and profitable harbor.
Mark Kay stated it will be in the second half of this year. I patiently await the fins for the 3rd & 4th quarters to "see how SFOR delivers". The final proof in the pudding will be the year-end, audited, annual, 10-K. Being independently audited, those figures will be undeniable. I believe Mark, you don't. It's as simple as that.
Thanks but I'll believe Ropes and Gray's patent attorneys.
You're right! We've even had DoD subcontractors post on this board that is exactly how it works. The DoD procurement cycle is much more dynamic than the civilian banking sector because the stakes are much higher, soldier's lives not consumer loans. One subcontractor even stated here he "must be living in a fairy tale then". All this was ignored of course.
Ah, but who holds the first US patent (according to file date posted on the USPTO site) on OOB/MFA for mobile devices?
That's right SFOR's chief technology officer Ram Pemmaraiu!
8 reminders of what is in store for SFOR. These eight, linked references prove CEO Mark Kay has been quietly, competently, executing on the four pronged company growth plan he articulated to us. He also stated what the second half of the year will show. All we need is patience. As a long term investor I have patient capital invested here. However, I appreciate the fact that SFOR may not meet the compressed timelines of short term investors. SFOR is a get rich slow investment. But, being up 250% this year, as mrdrifter noted, is not too shabby IMHO. Long & Strong SFOR!
You're right, time will tell. A lot can happen between now and 1 October IMHO.
Great article! The reason behind their need for imported coal is the coal deposits are in most part in rebel held areas currently. The implication of the delegation's statement of confidence regarding importing US coal must have some basis in fact. The Ukrainians must know that rail transport & seaport loading will be permitted to enable this export to them. That of course is only made possible by coal dust control during rail transport. and the offloading/reloading at a seaport. Now what little company has the US patent that can make that happen? Yup, the same one that mentioned Ukraine in their latest webinar, CCTC!
Agreed. I'm quite happy with my ROI!
You're probably right. We won't know the "YUGE" magnitude of "it's channel partner value ...until 2018" with the release of the annual, audited 10-K.
Standing up US Cyber Command on its own as a separate command, no longer under the NSA underscores how seriously the Administration takes the cyber threat. This is good to see. Thanks ZPaul for finding and posting that encouraging article & the conference photo.
Yeah, the Rick Perry that still has FY 17 funds available to do so until the 1 October start of FY 18.