Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Let's see. There has been a substantial infusion of cash for litigation. On 16 August SFOR defensive software was used by major DOD contractors in an invitation only simulated cyber attack exercise in Washington DC. The HSN presenter stated SFOR's defensive software "is used by government agencies" (note plural) And sales both on-line and in brick & mortar stores continues unabated! Longs know what they own and where things are headed IMHO. I rest easy as I cruise the ICW about SFOR. I'm confident that by the next time I check in at a marina with wi-fi even more progress will have been made!
Another poster wrote Gold 49er went on a cruise. I have a weather window to continue mine along the ICW. Do not think longs taking a break from this board means a lack of conviction about SFOR. Longs know what we own and will IMHO be proven right with the release of the annual, audited facts and figures of the 10-K. GLTA!
Thanks for making those phone calls and sharing what you found out. The positive implication for SFOR is obvious!
The SBA successfully lobbied Congress to legislate that small business get a fair shot at DOD contracts a year or so ago. That and the sole source provision you cited are in SFOR's favor.
Thank you for correcting the misinformation.
Just don't expect a response. I contacted the company about a previous DOE grant deadline and recieved no reply. CCTC has some work to do on shareholder relations!
Thank you for that well referenced, timely, reminder that patience is a virtue here IMHO.
You're right again. "These things are stress tested for vulnerbilities". That's why ACS would be "working with DISA" and why SFOR's KTLS was put to the test on 16 August at the DOD contracor CSIO's simulated cyber attack exercise in Washington DC.
Another thing I agree with you is "under wraps by DOD request" AKA US Government Confidentiality Statement. Also, "revenue certainly doesn't indicate that its happened" yet. Stay tuned for the year end 10-K release on Feb 15 when all must be revealed in accordane with SEC regulations.
Once there is interest in product the paperwork can be accomplished. If this was not the case DOD could never deal with a new vendor, the US would lose its edge in technology and lose in the battlespace.
Te bottomline is that the troops will get what they need by vendors being brought into on back into the procurement cycle system.
Reactivating a SAM registration is not a Mount Everest size obstacle in doing business with the Federal Government. It's more a speed bump sized one that can be accomplihed in short order.
What about Alverez Associates? Ya gonna write the same thing?
Buyout?
Do you realize the potential size of a DOD wide contract to replace the current cumbersome way it's done now? It would not be chump change and the pps would reflect that IMHO.
SAM registrations can be brought current or accomplished in short order by vendors. Finance officers help potential vendors do this.
IF ACS gets a substantial DOD contract for SFOR's KTLS the SFOR's percent of the deal will not be chump change!
Good point. To address it you'll recall the ACS presentation where the briefer clearly stated they were "working with DISA". When you look up who attends DISA meetings you will see it is not only DOD cyber reps but some other agencies such as NSA. SFOR's KTLS would not have been allowed to play a part in the DOD Contractor CSIOs simulated cyber attack exercise on 16 August without approval. Much depended on Bo Dietl's ability to effectively show these large Defense contractors that KTLS met all their defensive software COMSEC requirements. DOD has a try before buy policy and a product's exercise performance is carefully evaluated. Let's hope SFOR's KTSL passed muster!
Good point. I don't have access to the full list of attendees. So, I can't say for certain if General Dynamics was there. However, I would be surprised if they weren't. Since they are among the largest of DOD contractors.
Thanks for that clarification.
Thanks Ram. I respect you also. ACS is our fully vetted DOD vendor selling SFOR's US patented KTLS. DOD has a Try Before Buy policy. The 16 August, invitation only, Washington DC, simulated cyber attack DOD contractor exercise provided Bo Dietl the opportunity to showcase it in action. Should Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Northrop-Grumman and/or Raytheon like how it worked and want it, any necessary paperwork can be updated/accomplished in short order. Assuming one of those heavy hitters in attendance don't buy us out first.
"did"? Their defense of SFOR IP is far from over!
You're entitled to your opinion which I could care less about. As far as DOD connections are concerned please explain Bo Dietl's presence at the DOD contractor's 16 August Washington DC cyber attack exercise.
17 Nov will only contain 3rd Q figures. 17 Feb will have the 4ths. It is Mark Kay who stated "the second half of the year". I believe our CEO, you don't. It's as simple as that.
I would like to add a 10th possible catalyst "Working with a large defense contractor" as evidenced by Bo's invitation to and participation in the 16 August cyber attack exercise with: Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Northrup-Grumman and Raytheon. Because ACS, SFOR's fully vetted DOD vendor had something to bring to the table, the patented KTLS they all wanted to see in action at that exercise.
My patience will not be tried until I see the audited, facts and figures contained in the year end 10-K report to be released 15 Feb. I require those to make a logical investing decision IMHO.
I agree.
Strongly agree! This will be proven when the 10-K is released IMHO.
You honestly believe HSN sales were the only source of income for the entirity of Q3?
You're right of course. Much depends on the figures which I believe will be good.Time will tell and that time will be Feb 15 with the release of the 10-K. GLTA!
Ask the originator of the message I quoted. I'm sure Hi-Lo would be more than happy to explain it to you. But generally, probable means most likely.
O.K. I'll bite. What's the "final blow" Mark Kay is going to give stockholders?
That time will be 15 Nov and 15 Feb IMHO.
Agree. "We may never know (because of probable NDAs) other than revenue in the quarterly or yearly reports." Nov 15 and 15 Feb
Yeah, CCTC hasa shot at that money but there is competition for it. Also, that opportunity depends upon ongoing test results.
Given our current financials a million dollars would make a world of difference for this company! I think shareholders should contact the company and encourage them to apply for this DOE grant money before the deadline.
In the final analysis you're right. Much depends on those test results. GLTA!
This "moron" looks at the pps appreciation since he initiated a position at .0009 and all that has been accomplished since then. This "moron" is a longterm investor that notes the ascending triangle pattern is still present since then. It all depends on your personal investment timeline as to whether you see SFOR in the "crapper" or not. I don't. You do, based on your shorter timeframe. To each their own. I understand that. Time will tell which of us is right. Let's continue the conversation after the year end 10-K comes out!
Short term you're probably right. Long term IMHO Mark Kay will be proven right and the pps will reflect that.
Correct. I believe SFOR is rrestricted in it's ability to PR things by a combination of NDAs and Government Confidentiality Statements which are legally binding.
Yup, yet another NDA stymies the flow of info investors need! Patience is a virtue here. I'm patiently waiting for the 15 Feb release of the year end, audited 10-K report when all will be revealed in accordance with SEC rules. However, we might get a preview of coming attractions on 15 November with the release of the 3rd quarter's 10-Q IMHO.
That's what I thought. Thanks for confirming that. Looking forward to that good news!