Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
He could be working for a new company... But he will have ties as emeritus to SGLB, so I don't see your negative stance. He doesn't own the IP... Unless he takes a solution across that gets around the patents. I doubt MC wants the headache. It's not worth walking away from those shares. You think the new company will financially reward him as much?
Maybe he is spent, but is comfortable retiring now knowing the last 10 years were not for nothing?
Yes. In your opinion.
Lol posted as a fact, how this is not true.
Seems pretty supportive of the company as emritius. No bad blood advertised so why would we believe otherwise.
Wait... Did you really just ask a question, then reply to yourself with an answer. Outstanding work!!!
Holy batman cow! Is this the turnaround? Should reads that way. More smoke and mirrors? Let's see if money starts showing up - they can only smoke screen for a short time before people realise they are bullsh!tting again.
You will never succeed in business that way. Highly immature approach IMO.
Every software has a 'help us improve this' option. Reporting bugs, issues etc. SGLB should be no different.
Lol, you just got squeezed out of a short.
Manipulative.
I find it strange that the linked photo clearly shows the guys facemask taking air straight from his ass.
Hahaha
He clearly said SGLB was late to retrace. Makes sense that what you are comparing too had already collapsed.
The quan? That doesn't even make sense. What does make sense is that lomiko will continue to stagnant until it starts making money... Yet to be proven.
*Yawn*
Show me the money!
It's a NASDAQ move. They will replace when they find somebody and the balance sheet is in control.
Armatures: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armature_(sculpture)
Sounds about right.
Perhaps a lot of the noise was from one (or more, who knows) people posting across several accounts about the doom of SGLB. Hearing closed loop was probably the bell to tap out - thinking it's just a matter of time before this this explodes?
Twitter is alive with the shortest posting wins. Hmph
Do you have proof that it "worked once yesterday so they out out a PR?"
Sounds like a short attack to me?
Beta of a piece of software questioned as not possible, something that sets SGLB as the continued leader. A piece of software that is to be integrated with our non Beta software.
Last year I called for predictions, and believe I made one myself that MC would be doubling down and working on Closed Loop which would be available late 2018/early 2019. Looks like this in track. Great work SGLB team.
Of course, having any facts to back this speculative down ramp on SGLB would prove you maybe right. As you don't provide any facts, I looks towards the facts that have been posted and note contracts in hand, the biggest names in the industry as being vested interested parties, R&D staged development company transitioning from consulting into an emerging manufacturing shift.
Dafaq? Twice I just saw you wish yourself luck on an annoymous board. Are you ok Kanya?
Can anybody translate Kanye Wests riddling? I'm not sure if I need to know this to strengthen my SGLB analysis.
Does anyone really think SGLB would want to continue doing business with GE? Not only saying no to R&D collabs, but R&D collabs GE will probably steal. After GE's actions over the last few years. GE has made it very clear what their intentions are.
SGLB knows what they have and probably knows GE will one day need them. SGLB will stand strong, not wavering to GE's governmetal perks. The Navy knows where they need to go when GE fails on both capability and timelines (unless they infringe on parents).
I'd be happy for a minimum $8 sale. I'm averaged in at $6 though.
"(now on version 3)".
Every product ever manufactured has a number of versions. Software especially. It's ignorant to think not.
Agreed, I was touting this was happening right at the beginning. SGLB is not only in a race to stay ahead of the game, until the game is in play,they are also at war. 800 pound gorillas are apex bullies.
Who is why and why not?
Are you the same guy on the stockhouse forum that's been bashing this stock for months? Text book short attacks by definition, only you are talking to yourself. Quite funny.
We need to read between the lines on this, but always couple it with what Lomiko is doing considering there's a partnership of sorts dating back quite a few years. See the latest Paul Gill interview (sorry I don't have it ready to link), and you will hear him talk about something similar being worked on.
I got my game on way too early on both GGG and LMR otc's. Worst investment ever so far.
GE's place in all this reminds me of when HP said they were entering the AM field. Everyone thought they are big and have money so will dominate. DDD's and SSYS price tanked and everyone was saying how it was all over for DDD and Statasys. Years on and the so called exisiting OEM killer is a failure. The issue with DDD for example is the industry is not fully ready, product development, and opperational issues. They are fixing the last two.
SGLB won't be taken down by GE. SGLB is also working on (fixed) the operational issues. All that's left is for the industry to mature and product development to keep on track and we'll see great success.
"...expect to deliver the first 3D-HD-HUD display systems in the second half of 2018."
I was about to give my usual 'so much talk, no sales' rant, but It's not very often we get an expected commercialisation date. Could be a good entry point betting on this actually getting off the ground. If it does, you won't catch the bounce until it's too late.
It's written by someone having a stroke?
Can't see it was successful. Just says applied. Plus, would GE's competitors pay through the nose to buy GE's QA? I don't think so.
Ok thank you for the response, cheers. eom
Or I should put it, what makes you think the AM industry, still developing production capable machines and software, training staff, and then actual manufacturing companies who have not full transitioned to the new world of AM, is no longer in its infancy?