Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Then why ANOTHER reverse split? Pretty stupid if you ask me.
Lousy $10? I'll take it! At least I'll break even. Anyone who thinks SGLB is a money maker is kidding themselves. The board cooked SGLB a long time ago and we let it. $10p/s? Take my holding!
Wooops, my bad. I meant wickw. Sincerest Apologies.
Alan is also somebody I have been listening too. Alan probably for longer.
Investing in SGLB has been the biggest mistake I have made in and out of investing. Period. SGLB is a lifestyle company for the people working there. And we are the smucks that kept throwing money at it. People are quick to shoot RFB down but RFB has been the ONLY poster that has been right with sound investing logic. Other down rampers just look transparent. Windbag etc. I started listened to RFB about 3-4 years ago and glad I did. People here say the product is good. Wrong! It's basic economics folks. Supply and demand. None of which is happening. Just smoke-screening to keep investors throwing money into the fire pit. Lifestyle company proven year after year.
We could also ask where all the sophisticated investors are that we were told would come IF we do the R/S.
That's what everyone was spruiking here too.
The Sophs are coming. The Sophs are coming. The Sophs are coming.
Meanwhile I'm a cob webbed skeleton sitting on my porch with a zipper at the back of my pants for easy access.
Brutal indeed.
They f'd shareholders a long time ago. Years ago folks here tried to tell me the R/S is good and i still hold the same. Not when it tanks, then the rinse and repeat becomes a strategy.
Worthless on all accounts. Can't believe SGLB was saying contracts was close not long ago. Crooks, the lot of them.
Rant over. Back under my rock to save energy.
Thanks for your thoughts Hyde.
Thanks for your thoughts Jekyll.
Working on a Tesla bought with grant money and working with Tesla are two very different things.
If by action you mean bent over and repeatedly savaged for years on end. Then yes, I will agree.
Every time JR speaks at conferences or trade shows I'd like to recommend we have a bunch of people chanting:
"No way, Get Fuc#ed, Fuck off!"
"No way, Get Fuc#ed, Fuck off!"
"No way, Get Fuc#ed, Fuck off!"
Untill he confirms a sale is made.
Perhaps do some research on GGG going back at least 6 years. GGG have lost revenue and promised many things and not delivered. They are a lifestyle company.
With the huge amount of graphene players, what makes you wonder that failing graphene labs is behind it?
So we become a software company now. Yay.
*Spits on ground*
Lol. Great proof to back it up. Love it.
SIGMA! F@0K YEAH!
*should have read that first.
Shouldn't have read this first RFB. I'm pro SGLB but have to agree with you. Am skeptical as Sh!t on this one... Enough to shout from the sidelines I've been on for the last few years. Time we'll tell.
Do you think all this, with perhaps some internal money, is being pumped to regain NASDAQ compliance. Potentially seeing a retrace in a few weeks?
Not sure. Hoping it's for real as I'm averaged at $6.30 from waaaaaaay back when. And I'd like to see her flourish. But I am skeptical still.
It certainly got a lot. We got rid of the weak, irrational and selfish 800 pound gorilla that has a terminal virus and is willing to make bad decisions in attempt to grasp the last breath of air before the ground swallows it whole.
Da-faq?
I feel like golden_cross is some sort of AI bot that can't quite draw the correct answers. Kinda like an (even more so) stupid Siri!
He knows what the document says. What are you saying? Are you saying it hadn't been?
OTCQB Listing
The Company has been verified to trade on OTCQB®, the venture marketplace for entrepreneurial and development stage
companies operated by OTC Markets Group (OTCQX: OTCM) and began trading Oct. 7, 2014. Euro Pacific Capital, Inc. is a
qualified Principal American Liaison (“PAL”) and has submitted a Letter of Introduction for Graphene 3D in accordance with
the standards for trading on OTCQB.
What we need folks, is a MONORAIL!
Monorail! Monorail! Monorail! Monorail!
A lot of haters and lovers for the stock. My thoughts are they simply are too early for industry adoption. The industry is still in its infancy and developing out, trying to do things themselves. Plus, there are so many variables that effect a build and how builds integrate with industry 4.0.
Fact is, DDD and others simply need quality assurance. Some I believe are trying to build it themselves. SGLB has a huge amount of Important patents, so will be hard. Plus, if third party assurance ensures there's no conflict of interest. Say, if a plane went down and if you are Boeing, do you want to validate your own parts. Quite risky.
This is what I know.
Additive manufacturing will never grow into large scale industrial manufacturing without closed loop in process quality assurance. The post destructive processing alone doesn't make it viable. OEM's like DDD need to invest there or purchase the system upgrade from somebody else, and offer it. The only company in that game is Sigma Labs, with IPQA.
Others are trying to develop, but SGLB has a lead. The closest is maybe GE, who are more than 5 years behind. But they are doing it via accoustics. Just doesn't compare to what SGLB has.
Anyway, I digress. Customers are not rushing in and buying up like the hype suggestd because it's still not fast enough as an end-to-end setup.
Yeah, Protolabs was the only success. Sold out of that though back in 2018.
Tell him we know his plan is to spin some BS because he's ran out of money and needs to pump this up.
Just another lifestyle company running to pay his salary. Anyone buying this are fools.
LMFAO. Still loving your investment?
Worst trade ever.
Couldn't have said it better.
I was looking forward to a fresh face looking at DDD and potentially getting a lens posted here that I was not across or came to on my own.
DDD has been a disappointing growth story to date.
Based on what?
You're a self confessed gambler, so I'm not expecting much research... If any.
Hope in the market is a gamblers play.
Agreed, investors positive on SGLB should understand the tricks some play. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/analyst/030102.asp
Those long, please ignore the noise. Constantly reassess your SGLB investment based on your own DD.
Lie? Oh really. Please inform us what was a lie. And future projections cannot be flagged. Because you know, it's a projection.
It does float, that's a good thing in this context. I suppose you're meant to reference something sinking, to make your point valid. So i guess your point is still mute.
The red sea has so much salt per parts that a cannonball will float. Therefore your point is mute.
Well we all know you have no idea. #lomikometals. Wonder how much you are losing pumping dead stocks.
Wasn't even a pump as well. Doing 'a little more, a little faster' doesn't exactly shout ROI. Bring on closed loop.
Too right it is. But you and I are alone it seems. We are the minority. But it IS the minority who get smart and get rich.
Posted to Dodeedee, about a post we made a while ago, which he interjected too and now keeps going on about it.
Please go back and read my post to Outlook. You then replied to me taking SGLB off track. I've never said SGLB and GE had a marriage. Do you have another agenda there?
My point is that anything developed when they were talking is still a very valid product development. It just doesn't go away because GE wanted to undercut SGLB.