Joshua 1:9 Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the LORD your God will be with you whereve
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Guido the only beef I have with this is, Mnuchin did say he expects the GSE's to continue paying
but you need to remember the context.
Mnuchin had already in Dec 2016 stated their intentions of getting them out of government control.
One week after he was sworn in, we suffered a terrible loss on 2-21-17 in the Perry lawsuit at the DC court of appeals.
It was a win for Treasury, a suit that now had his name on it instead of Jack Lew.
The share price fell sharply.
DOJ and Treasury had been fighting it long before he got there, but it now carried his name
At the time Timothy Howard said this court loss could push everything back months.
He was in the hot seat before congress, at the time he said it.
What did you want him to say? Maybe he should have taken a different approach.
Also a couple of years later Otting as acting director of FHFA ,once again stated the administrations intentions
in a meeting at FHFA (he was ratted out probably by Sandra) and was met with all kinds of blowback.
No sense of arguing about this, on what should be a day of celebration.
Donotunderstand says:
"Put me in the camp that fears a dilution due to LP for common and maybe also JPS
Put me in the camp that does NOT want that and does not so ADVOCATE
Put me in the camp that wonders if JPS have a get of jail card that is strong and valid
And in this context ---- put me in the camp that worries about THIS FLOOD ---- a ton more than I worry about the Warrants --- AND IN THE CAMP THAT IF SOMEHOW IT CAME TO TRADING 4B NEW SHARES FOR DEATH WIPE OUT OF LP AND WE GET PAID ---- AS A MEMBER"
Reply from the camp:
We have accepted you to join the camp with the biggest tent.
You are now a member of the DJT camp.
Welcome aboard partner
Fannie's comeback like...
Shrimp and grits. Lots of history. 😎
Sounds great! I love Charleston.
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/default-source/forms-and-documents---clerks-office/rules/federalrulesofappellateprocedure
FED. R. APP. P. WITH 5TH CIR. R. & IOPs
4-1
FRAP 4. APPEAL AS OF RIGHT — WHEN TAKEN
(a) Appeal in a Civil Case.
(1) Time for Filing a Notice of Appeal.
(A) In a civil case, except as provided in Rules 4(a)(1)(B), 4(a)(4), and 4(c), the
notice of appeal required by Rule 3 must be filed with the district clerk within
30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from.
(B) The notice of appeal may be filed by any party within 60 days after entry of the
judgment or order appealed from if one of the parties is:
(i) the United States;
(ii) a United States agency;
(iii) a United States officer or employee sued in an official capacity; or
(iv) a current or former United States officer or employee sued in an individual
capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with duties
performed on the United States’ behalf – including all instances in which
the United States represents that person when the judgment or order is
entered or files the appeal for that person.
(C) An appeal from an order granting or denying an application for a writ of error
coram nobis is an appeal in a civil case for purposes of Rule 4(a).
(2) Filing Before Entry of Judgment. A notice of appeal filed after the court
announces a decision or order — but before the entry of the judgment or order — is
treated as filed on the date of and after the entry.
(3) Multiple Appeals. If one party timely files a notice of appeal, any other party may
file a notice of appeal within 14 days after the date when the first notice was filed,
or within the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(a), whichever period ends
later.
(4) Effect of a Motion on a Notice of Appeal.
(A) If a party files in the district court any of the following motions under the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure — and does so within the time allowed by those rules
— the time to file an appeal runs for all parties from the entry of the order
disposing of the last such remaining motion:
FED. R. APP. P. WITH 5TH CIR. R. & IOPs
4-2
(i) for judgment under Rule 50(b);
(ii) to amend or make additional factual findings under Rule 52(b), whether or
not granting the motion would alter the judgment;
(iii) for attorney’s fees under Rule 54 if the district court extends the time to
appeal under Rule 58;
(iv) to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59;
(v) for a new trial under Rule 59; or
(vi) for relief under Rule 60 if the motion is filed within the time allowed for
filing a motion under Rule 59.
(B) (i) If a party files a notice of appeal after the court announces or enters a
judgment — but before it disposes of any motion listed in Rule 4(a)(4)(A) —
the notice becomes effective to appeal a judgment or order, in whole or in part,
when the order disposing of the last such remaining motion is entered.
(ii) A party intending to challenge an order disposing of any motion listed in
Rule 4(a)(4)(A), or a judgment’s alteration or amendment upon such a
motion, must file a notice of appeal, or an amended notice of appeal — in
compliance with Rule 3(c) — within the time prescribed by this Rule
measured from the entry of the order disposing of the last such remaining
motion.
(iii) No additional fee is required to file an amended notice.
(5) Motion for Extension of Time.
(A) The district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if:
(i) a party so moves no later than 30 days after the time prescribed by this Rule
4(a) expires; and
(ii) regardless of whether its motion is filed before or during the 30 days after
the time prescribed by this Rule 4(a) expires, that party shows excusable
neglect or good cause.
(B) A motion filed before the expiration of the time prescribed in Rule 4(a)(1) or
(3) may be ex parte unless the court requires otherwise. If the motion is filed
after the expiration of the prescribed time, notice must be given to the other
parties in accordance with local rules.
FED. R. APP. P. WITH 5TH CIR. R. & IOPs
4-3
(C) No extension under this Rule 4(a)(5) may exceed 30 days after the prescribed
time or 14 days after the date when the order granting the motion is entered,
whichever is later.
(6) Reopening the Time to File an Appeal. The district court may reopen the time to
file an appeal for a period of 14 days after the date when its order to reopen is entered,
but only if all the following conditions are satisfied:
(A) the court finds that the moving party did not receive notice under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 77(d) of the entry of the judgment or order sought to be
appealed within 21 days after entry;
(B) the motion is filed within 180 days after the judgment or order is entered or
within 14 days after the moving party receives notice under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 77(d) of the entry, whichever is earlier; and
(C) the court finds that no party would be prejudiced.
That's what I was getting ready to ask you about. I've seen you post about Collins before, and this is one that I'm very interested in.
Maybe Familymang didn't include Collins because nothing has been scheduled yet. Also, maybe the plaintiffs are holding off to file En Banc could possibly be waiting on Lamberth to certify the 8-0 decision.
Maybe Navycmdr could email the lawyers and see whats going on.
I agree with you, but they have yes men installed at the top of
both Fannie and Freddie. They'll do as told, I believe.
It don't matter that much it's peanuts anyway.
When we are released, we should fire the BOD and elect a new
BOD and if any of the CEO's can't be trusted fire them too.
More importantly we get the 8-0 win finalized, and now can send filings to other courts.
This is Fannie sneaking up on the 80's
Deputy U.S. Marshall to probe GSE conservatorship.
From the news wire: A Deputy U.S. Marshall has decided to launch an investigation into the 15 year conservatorship of Fannie and Freddie. This brief statement was released on Thursday by Deputy Festus Haggen. " Well we was sitting in the Longbranch having a drank, and Doc was reading from a newspaper that 2 companies were a bein held hostage. So I asked Matthew (Marshall Dillon) rekin we orta take a look into that? And he said yeah.
Captain, I'm giving it all she's got. We're going to work double shifts tonight sir. Tomorrow she'll be running smooth as silk. Scottie
Ludlow couldn't stop it. He would have received the same blowback as Joseph Otting.
Article title- Democrats demand details of Trump plan to release mortgage giants from federal control
https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fannie-freddie-20190125-story.html
I believe common is the way to go here.
A big domino has fallen today!!
Over a year ago I was planning to try to bring down my FNMA average of $1.69 per share.
I found out FNMA was not included in this, so instead I decided to just buy FMCC.
Today I'm around 50/50.
FNMA still $1.69
FMCC .49
The US Treasury robbed the US taxpayer
In 2008 after the financial crisis Fannie and Freddie found themselves owing the taxpayer just over 191 Billion dollars plus 10% interest.
Fannie and Freddie repaid 301 Billion dollars to the taxpayer.
The US treasury didn't apply it to the debt to the taxpayer.
They used that 301 Billion for other stuff.
The US Treasury stole that money from the taxpayer.
And to this point have stolen the company from the shareholders.
As you like to say... FNMAT was at $2.09 on Feb 9th. Today it closed 60 pennies less than that per share.
There is no reason for you to be excited.
I'll take two, what the heck.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gMQP1Iw5tCU
You bought FMCC I assume because it was a little cheaper than FNMA at the time. FNMAT was the cheapest .......like usual.
I do admire a thrifty person. Do you coupon too?
Green this week...
He did post on Facebook Fannie Packers. The SilverEagle profile pic is the same one he used on Facebook. I won't tell you his name.
On here he goes by tutt1126. I figured that out a long time ago, because he was posting the same things on Facebook that he was posting here.
Good to see you Rick!
They are delicious. The closest store to me is in Spartanburg, SC, 25 miles away.
If I'm anywhere nearby I go get one. You can eat on it for days.
My dogs love them too.
They only needed 4 votes to grant cert. Of coarse the three dems were for it (CFPB). Also probably Roberts...
Just a guess, but I believe the other 5 Justices would be staunchly against CFPB.
Jordan fades back.... Swish!.... And that's the game!
I can remember 4 Judges who have made some pretty nice quotes
Judge Brown
Judge Sweeney
Judge Willett
Judge Thapar
EDIT Judge Jones makes 5
Who are your three?
JOoa0ky.......Where you at JOoa0kie!!!
It sure was. I think the person doing it couldn't do it anymore. They haven't been able to find anyone to do it yet.
I miss seeing those: Peter Chapman writes...
I don't know about the little, tiny shell GB has to his ear. But the Navycmdr shell, would convert all that calcium carbonate into a fortune, far more than he has.
That is a beautiful shell. I don't know price value, but I'd say worth thousands. Defenately one of a kind.
More like a broken record.
Noel was also the Solicitor General, and number three man at the DOJ under the Trump administration.
She's taking on water now. Better grab a can of Flex seal.
The Collins case is being appealed back to the 5th circuit. Will it go back to a three judge panel or straight to en banc?
Absolutely, The 5th is made up of a group of individuals, that in the majority rule based on the rule of law.
Everyone knew when Ellison took over, what the likely outcome would be. Now it sits squarely in front of them. They have proven in the past that they will not be swayed and will do their job.
Please sticky!!!
With the Bhatti case being dismissed today. It is basically at the same
point as the Collins case, although Collins has been all the way to SCOTUS.
I would wait a couple of weeks then appeal back to the 8th circuit. By that time
the 5th would have time to accept Collins, so maybe the 8th will follow them and
accept Bhatti.
I really feel good about Collins, because the 5th has been the most favorable to us.
Not sure about Bhatti and the 8th but remain hopeful.
I also feel good about SCOTUS taking the case from the COFC (Court of Federal Claims)
Other courts have said in the past that COFC was the place we should have been all along.
I am not a lawyer
Judge Schiltz is proving once again, he's "skeered" to go against Uncle Suggy.
Thanks Vancmike. Send one to Matt Talibi if you have Twitter. I'm suspended and can only read Twitter
Matt has got a ton of new followers recently.