Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Difference in investment strategy.
I chose to listen to bigger liar than you seem to be.
I should’ve invested in SCY and followed your advice. Right?
https://money.tmx.com/advanced-chart/NB?chartSymbol=SCY
Give your head a shake before you pull it out of your azz.
As I stated in my other post as long as it doesn’t interrupt anything.
I don’t care what they do as an aside to improve our content or process but there’s been enough delay.
Mark Smith said EXIM will welcome RailVEYOR, because they are proven technology, so I assume there may be a problem if we all of a sudden start using something that is not proven. Unless it won’t affect the project as it stands.
I’m not dissing that technology.
And thanks for posting that information. Good DD
No because it is not proven technology. (EXIM)
***********
At least not until a later date when we are up and running, or if Novamera can use the technology on our mine with no interruption to our intended mining process.
JMO
3 contradictions attacking one bush whisperer.
If they get one more guy, it should be evenly matched.
Because the squeeze is on and it’s a new week and month.
I imagine lots of volume but going nowhere absolutely. But the breakout has to happen very soon.
Let’s just hope it’s not lower lol
6 month OHLC
https://money.tmx.com/advanced-chart/NB?chartSymbol=NB%3AUS
314,000 shares traded and down 11 cents. Interesting.
I see next week being fun times
LoL. Right.
I can hear the telephone calls now, “now here’s what we’re going to do tomorrow starting from before the opening bell to after it closes”
“If we follow that agenda we should be able to snafu a whole bunch of shares”
The Gang of 8 meets here every day to say good morning.
Shelf offerings
https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/:~:text=Three%20common%20types%20of%20shelf,to%20sell%20in%20the%20future.
https://theluxuryplaybook.com/shelf-offerings-a-strategic-approach-for-investors-and-corporate-professionals/#:~:text=optimal%20market%20circumstances.-,Types%20of%20Shelf%20Offerings%20and%20Regulatory%20Requirements%3A,or%20a%20combination%20of%20both.
Please explain the parts of the shelf registration completely so it’s understandable to a dummy like me, and also why this news release says “including common stock” while the previous news release a couple of weeks ago said it was a “mixed” registration and they use the word “warrants” etc.
To me, Common Stocks are obvious for a shelf registration but maybe I’m wrong but using it for warrants is not obvious to me.
Sorry to sound like I’m a dummy. LoL.
Maybe I should take a shelf registration course for dummies
If you have dealt with shelf registrations before on some bases could you explain that as well?
Yes it matters to me, because the previous one said Mixed Shelf and this NR does not say Mixed.
Makes it sound like we have 2 different $200 million Shelf registrations.
That is why I am asking.
I’m loving this early trading so far, being the bid and ask are tight, and volume is high so far with only a few minutes in.
Even though the ask is a couple of pennies below yesterday’s close, somebody seems to be buying at the ask with big numbers.
With this recent news release for a $200 million shelf offering, does this mean we have two times $200 million shelf offerings?
Since we just had a News release a month ago of shelf registration, only the description was different.
Of course it can be used for different scenarios including institutions wanting in, but when I was reading online about shelf offerings the main gist of what I got out of it was a financial institution operate the shelf and usually has a plan to implement it when the specified price target time comes.
Shrug. Anything goes
My understanding of a shelf registration is that it can go out onto the open market at certain intervals with high volume at share price values to be determined by the company and the underwriter in charge of handling the transactions. I don’t think NioCorp itself will be worrying about when they come off the shelf.
More than likely a financial institution like JP Morgan
NioCorp Announces $200 Million Shelf Registration Statement
CENTENNIAL, Colo. June 27, 2024— NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NASDAQ: NB) (“NioCorp” or the “Company”), is pleased to announce that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has made effective a $200 million shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (the “Shelf Registration Statement”).
The Shelf Registration Statement will allow the Company the flexibility from time to time to offer and sell up to $200 million of securities, including common stock, on a registered basis in the U.S. The specific securities and terms of each such future offering of securities, if any, along with the intended use of any net proceeds therefrom, would be described in detail under a separate prospectus supplement at the time of any such offering.
Mark A. Smith, NioCorp’s CEO and Executive Chairman, said: “The Shelf Registration Statement provides us with added flexibility so that NioCorp can access capital markets on a timely and efficient basis.”
These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the Shelf Registration Statement becomes effective. Any offering of the securities covered by the Registration Statement will be made solely by means of a prospectus and an accompanying prospectus supplement relating to that offering. A copy of the prospectus included in the Shelf Registration Statement may be obtained on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any offer for sale, or solicitation of an offer to buy, any of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.
Yes that fine print .
The heavier volume on previous days was my clue but I figure yesterday was the first green day like bernice. Oh well.
Better to be, the day late PutzMueler, than the late PutzMueler
JMO
I guess you didn’t read the fine print. Lol
God Bless the Nasdaq. And the ridiculous institutions who are not giving us the Liquidity Mark said we would have.
Oooops but they will only jump in on news which would have come without the Nasdaq if several weeks (two years ago) wasn’t a con.
We had liquidity on the TSX with 300 million shares to trade if only the news came when it was said to be coming.
LAST PRICE
1.6500*
Bid / Lots
1.3200/ 1
Ask / Lots
2.3200/ 1
Feeling sorry for yourself? eom
You told me once you only change your nickname when your character dies off.
**********
How does DOA die off?
Asking for a friend, You don't know her!
Speak for yourself clown, not the board,eom
That Depends. Reversals don’t need news.
Not quite complete but close. eom
5 seconds after the close
LAST PRICE
1.6500*
Bid / Lots
1.6100/ 2
Ask / Lots
27.0000/ 300
Wasn’t that AO who put an outrageous selling price a while back? LoL
House and Garden
https://www.houseandgarden.co.uk/
********
It’s a magazine.
And her garden is full of bushes FYI
But I also agree with her, the volume tells me there will be a last push to accumulate at this price.
But then again nobody can truly say this isn’t the most manipulated stock they know of. And I could be full of it.
But what better way to accumulate than to push it into the red until the last minute.??
Many have been asking how much money is needed.
Going back to Superalloys in 2015
Is quite informative. Read all to get an idea.
Thanks Monocle, for the superalloys post.
**************
1) As we reported last week in our Consolidated Interim Financial Statements for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015, and in our associated Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), substantial progress continues to be made with respect to completing our Feasibility Study (FS). We continue to apply the results of our extensive metallurgical testing program in order to refine our process and move forward as expeditiously as possible with a feasibility study-level plant and mine design. We are committed to ensuring that the FS meets our very rigorous standards for excellence, and we currently estimate that work on the FS can be completed within four to six months following the successful raising of the capital needed to complete the FS and meet ongoing project and operational activities needs.
2) Regarding the capital we need to progress through the FS stage, our current estimate is that approximately CAD$10-$15 million will be required. Let me put this number into some perspective. It is commonly accepted that projects in the general CAPEX range of our project require between 3-5% of total CAPEX to move the project from early scoping through the FS stage. A recent independent study and survey of such projects, done by the IPA Institute, confirms this finding. In our case, that range would equate to about $30 - $50 million to make it through the FS stage. To date, we have spent approximately CAD$26M on the project. Thus, our estimate of CAD$10-$15M in additional capital needed puts this project in line with the norm.
3) Further to the point above, as was noted in our recently filed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements, we showed approximately CAD$6.5 million in payables as of Sept. 30, 2015. The bulk of that spending was for work to advance the FS, and is included in the CAD$26M figure noted above. Thus, a significant percentage of the CAD$10-$15 million that we currently are working to raise will go toward paying for FS work that already has been done.
4) As some posters have noted previously, the NioCorp team has advanced this project on a remarkably fast timeframe relative to similar projects. If you do a bit of research, you will discover that many junior mining developments can take years to get to the point where NioCorp has advanced in only 18 months or so. In fact, the analysis by the IPA Institute referenced above found that, on average, large natural resource and chemical development projects in our CAPEX range take about two years just to move from the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) stage to the FS stage. The Niocorp team is moving this project along on a much more condensed timeline.
5) While I am admittedly a bit biased in this regard, I give a large hat tip to the NioCorp team not only for moving expeditiously on this project but also for tackling a remarkable breadth of very difficult work over the past 18 months. When our FS effort kicked off in May 2014, the only information available was assay data from some historic drillholes. Since that time, not only have they defined and expanded the Resource, but they completed detailed investigations in a number of areas where little or no information had been generated previously, including the following: mineral processing and associated metallurgical testing; hydrometallurgical testing; pyrometallurgical testing; analysis of the geotechnical properties of the rock and soil in the area; surface and groundwater system characteristics; dynamics of the local climate, resources, infrastructure and physiography; economics of the Nb, Ti, and Sc markets; and many other data sets -- all as more particularly detailed in NioCorp’s October 16, 2015 Preliminary Economic Assessment and available for review on SEDAR.
Completing a bankable FS is a large and highly complex undertaking that requires a relatively large team of highly experienced experts from a variety of disciplines. While our team has successfully navigated this process before, as have the external consultants with whom we have been working, it may not be readily apparent to many why these efforts can consume such capital and can take many months to complete. To shed further light on this process, I thought folks might be interested in seeing a detailing of the generally accepted set of minimum requirements for engineering studies required for a new mine. You can see that here. This information is not proprietary and is generally available in the public domain.
I’d say ask Jim but . . . eom
I would imagine they could sell whatever they want, but they just can’t convert. Or they can convert but no lower price than the floor price.
Speaking of coincidences, you must be telepathic.
Two days ago your post asked why hasn’t NioCorp been in touch with the governor of Nebraska and then the next day Jim tells PC he was meeting with the governors team.
PC’s post
He responded quickly just now and said he and Scott are in Nebraska today and met with the Governor's team, and also had meetings in Omaha and elsewhere.
Compensation committee’s
Mark Smith has single-handedly destroyed my NioCorp holdings by falsely glorifying forward looking statements to keep investors wearing rainbow coloured glasses and by giving my shares to to the new SPAC board members who had a SPAC, that WERE NOT looking for a critical mineral mine, but were looking for a totally different investment strategy in a retail market environment.
And he is confused why everyone but the founders baled. ????
Give the man a raise.
https://www.onboardmeetings.com/blog/compensation-committee/#:~:text=A%20compensation%20committee%20is%20a,while%20creating%20competitive%20retention%20strategies.
I know, and I asked to have-it-taken-down.
My reason, Too Harsh (not)
But the shares I lost to the billionaires, are being sold off to the detriment of me and every other investor who stuck it out because of knowingly falsified forward looking statements. JMO
Sucks to be an insider,
Suck it up!
lol, Thanks
And thanks for being here all these years, to comfort me, just like that.
🦨
***************
The stock is doing exactly what I said it was going to do with THE SPAC.
With all ofl those warrants out everybody is going to sell their shares and be risk free and drive our share price down into the dirt.
Presto
And it’s probably our newest board of directors and TH destroying our share price
and MaxZ and his Comrades also
Can’t forget them.
Nothing is shut down now but we are going DOWN DOWN DOWN
Why do you think that is?
Who do you think is to blame?
We have niobium scandium titanium and rare earth elements and nobody cares.
And nobody cares that Mark Smith is destroying shareholder value every time he opens his mouth.
But without him there would be no EXIM or Stellantis.
Our latest board members on the board of directors are billionaires
Knock knock.
How does it feel to be invested in the stock for 12 years and have it returned to the same price you purchased it at 12 years ago?
What is a positive developement that will turn our share price around?
I can’t believe that everybody is watching the value of their portfolios tumbling into the ground And still Mark Smith has them wrapped around his finger.
Surprise me, instead of contacting them to find out if they used to chat on the message board ask him what the fuck are they doing.
Now I’ll go back to my hardwood forest
I’ve got product to manufacture, and I’m invested in the perfect mining stock to allow me to produce the best hardwood.
Lucky me to have that market wrapped up.
If you were on the compensation committee would you take notice of the falling share price? And try a figure out why?
Or would you just give yourself a raise?
I wonder how many people actually sent messages to NioCorp wanting answers as to why the share price keeps falling but they are full of optimism?
Take a look at the share price down $.10 in one day yesterday was the same thing and at that rate how long before we get to zero? That would be about the middle of July. So maybe that’s why we don’t have to worry about them paying in August lol
And nobody is asking mgt WTF
You being a Moderator could find Marks Nickname on here. I think I know what it is but I can’t be certain.
Maybe my Pal landmark who brought me into this torturous room can remember Marks handle.
I bet Prop Joe could.
I thought Rare Earth Elements were the key to both Stellantis and EXIM?
***********
Nobody said Mark and Jim were still posting on this board. This is what I said and I was the first to mention it, in my reply to CDH, so I’m assuming you misread me.
Even Mark and Jim had handles back then. But Mark rarely made a showing and Jim a bit more than that.