Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Please, do tell all his verifiable lies... And, nice to see you back nyt. I was wondering...
To understand the potential here, look into the past...
Post from 2019- Separate issue. The judge(federal Judge) threw the infringement case out of court. Unfortunately a long appeal process must now begin there. The denied request was regarding Apple's efforts at shelving or cancelling the patents in question(essentially at the patent office with their judges). So that it where it is a bit compelling- Why would Apple put out any effort to have patents cancelled if they were not infringing? Apple's own expert testified at the Patent trial(PTAB) that they had been using the technology prior to VPLM's development of them. The Ptab looked at the evidence and ruled in favour of VPLM.
Hmm...CEO's is long gone! No private messages calling me out...One word, 'Vindication'.
I agree somewhat with your thought about it smelling bad here. I still think there is a decent long term 'potential' for the price to increase after a few court decisions in the companies favour. That is a 'smell' I can live with.
Do you recall where you saw this? I was under the impression there were no further appeal avenues at the PTAB for Apple.
Can you imagine if word leaked on here about talks with Dr.Gil back then We would have heard about SEC investigations, etc. Now, its ok to say that someone overheard conversations back then. Talk about BS!
Are additional lawsuits starting soon? Lets find one and test it in another jurisdiction please.
It seems the very same people who now claim to know the offer was presented prior to the Koh decision are the same ones who would have been highly skeptical of any such talks then. And...now with great applause, the depiction of Mr. Malak dropping his gums about Dr. Gil discussions does not require any proof.
I think Mr. Gil is a actual person with the ability to communicate Gastric. Why would he be quiet now when all he has to do is refute the offer the company has released?
You really believe Mr. Malak would rather take his chance making money on a share selling scheme when he can pocket that type of coin? C'mon! Think about what you are saying. I wonder why Dr. Gil has not stepped forward to deny or clarify his position, don't you?
Mr Malak had the chance to take a significant payout and leave, which he did not.
Are you stating that Emil has a warrant for his arrest?
Do you think they will be able to get Judge Koh to do that for them? It would sure be a lot of effort coming from a company who claims they are not infringing on the Patent.
Separate issue. The judge(federal Judge) threw the infringement case out of court. Unfortunately a long appeal process must now begin there. The denied request was regarding Apple's efforts at shelving or cancelling the patents in question(essentially at the patent office with their judges). So that it where it is a bit compelling- Why would Apple put out any effort to have patents cancelled if they were not infringing? Apple's own expert testified at the Patent trial(PTAB) that they had been using the technology prior to VPLM's development of them. The Ptab looked at the evidence and ruled in favour of VPLM.
Apple made the request for rehearing, they were denied.
Gastric, I hope the Ptab answered some of your fears today.
Agreed, many of those shares are restricted and have not been transferred from certificates to shareholder accounts to date. They were also purchased above the current market price.
Thank you Gastric for stating the obvious.
Bicell
You might see the low you are hoping for. Probably not today or for the next while. The company has not issued a PR release on the most recent ruling yet. Maybe that will take some wind out of the 'pump and dump' talk, that would surely be posted posted.
It was suggested throughout last year by a number of posters on here, that 'discussion's' were likely happening. I do believe the record would show(archived posts) that a number of other posters who believe this offer was given prior to the Koh's decision are the same ones who called BS to the mere suggestion any discussions occurred. Enough said about that.
I believe the press release allude's to the offer for Mr.Malak's shares being discussed and turned down at a directors meeting after the decision. I agree, it would be nice to know more details on the actual date it was received, but, if it did happen after the ruling, one might expect another offering sometime after Koh provides the details of her decision to the company. I understand it is due sometime next week.
Gastric - do not be too quick to 'write off' the patents just yet. The court decision may inevitability result as you wish them to be, however, there is still an appeal option which may delay your celebration. You do agree with that possibilty don't you? Or, is that option only available to companies you support? And again another if...would you concede the patents are not 'killed' once the court decision is appealed?
I hope mythbusters is accurate
Judge Koh decision will take some time; unfortunately but true. In the meantime dilution is an opportunity to add. My crystal ball says mid May. As for buyout, the numbers offered are way too low to be considered right now. Again, just a guess! No SEC needed Gastric or Egold!
What specific point(s) Gastric? The blank sections maybe.
Indtead of taking that as an insult I will accept where it is coming from and let it slide. I challenge you to offer one shred of evidence that 815 does not stand a chance. I suggest you avoid Apple's expert, he might as well testified in support of the Patents.
What do you know about the 815 Patent? Have you read any of the IPR testimony? Did you know Apple admitted to using RBR in another court case?
Thanks Egold for posting the link.
I am sure DB would say it is necessary.
Who specifically are you talking about? Board members? Vinnie who runs the pool hall? Who else Egold?
Thanks for posting what you know about True Longs Gastric. I do not want to shock you but your statement is not entirely accurate. I suppose that does not matter to you.
This shareholder understands dilution is part of the cost of paying for the IPR result, continued Patent applications and legal costs associated with litigation.
I agree, VPLM is not a scam. Oh, missed your point SW. Do you think Mr.Malak is scamming on purpose or delusional?
Thank you for finally admitting VPLM has potential Straightword. Or, are you suggestiong only idiots would invest?
I do not want to curb your optimism Rebel. I do not think the company is looking for the amount you are hoping for. Good luck to you.
Bicell.
Sorry, you missed the question. How do they Pay to defend when companies refuse to negotiate and then file an IPR?
How do they pay for an IPR defence?
Its an appeal Gastric. The decision on the Patents went against Apple. They only were able to appeal the ex parti component. I guess you probably new all that. Why all the hub-bub then?
Gastric, are you suggesting Mr.Malak would put all of it in a suitcase and run?
Everything here is MY OPINION! I am making NO buy or sell recommendations here! DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE! You should have read this before you elected to buy shares.
What is the point in explaining the simple math behind dilution if you have already 'written off' the patents Plow? The math is fairly simple to understand, if one accepts they have even half the value that the claims suggest they do.
Are you attempting to use dilution as the antecedent to a patent that did not sell because it has no value? If so, please do elaborate.