Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Rationale for supporting Leronlimab...get to know it and (until proved otherwise) it's the right thing to do
(IMO)
Thank Goodness even the wealthiest >>> are still mortal.
And LOL >> even THEY can't take
"all the greedily accumulated wealth"
with them.
And if
the end isn't the end
there's also the consideration of potential
"ultimate accountability."
Wow
Heavy thought
Thus >> why pick on a puny little stock issue that could potentially be
HELPING
numerous people (either independently or accompanying other regimens) and those it doesn't help, so far, have exhibited minor short-term effects, if any (unless anybody has newer data - please share).
So it doesn't have the
Grocery list
of ill-effects and sometimes even dastardly stuff (IMO)
Accompanying other medications
See
>> ADs run on TV's, the negative stuff they read off, or display on the screen, while (possible samples) the girl is hauling in a ship’s sail, ladies running down the wooden ramp into the water, folks loading help packages, etc >> distractors (IMO)
Now I accept I could be deluded, but I know some folks - that might really benefit from Leronlimab and just can't get it.
If Leronlimab >> truly << helps deal with "chronic inflammatory situations" known and unknown, I'm exceedingly interested!
And if "chronic inflammation" is a key factor in disease progression...Hmmmmm.
I don't especially "enjoy" pain and discomfort - so (as previously stated) I'm personally interested.
***
Bottom line
You (and your loved-ones, friends, family, etc.) can support >>
Folks having another, relatively harmless, but potentially helpful medication added to the Doctor's repertoire
or just go with the stuff they have now...
Like my late best friend.
IMO
IMO means “In My Opinion.”
Sorry, no free-rides, definitely do your own research!
Leronlimab appears to "hold the key" to control of a valuable portal. At the same time appears to modulate some immunological function(s) in a 're-balancing" manner (This is my take on things- do your own research) and doesn't appear to have any significant long term side-effects.
And can also be used in concert with several other drugs.
And reputedly, can cross the blood-brain barrier -
***
I want leronlimab available NOW! and not JUST for the FAT CATS (like so-far), and connected "politicos,"
But for ALL of us.
As always - my opinion - please do your own "home-work."
And PRAY Leronlimab is available when it's the only thing that might stand between you and torment.
Greetings, from, yes, a proponent for (based on the information) Leronlimab.
Now "information" could be total "garbage" but saving the life of the former President of the Philippines, was Out-of-OUR-Hands! and along with other accounts, has kept me here.
And if this >> Lerolimab >> does moderate the CCR5 "pathway," moderate inflammatory processes, as well as cross the Blood-brain barrier
with MINIMAL NEGATIVE EFFECTS/REACTIONS
Wow!
........even YOU have to have some ambivalence.
Because your "clock is ticking" like mine and there's the potential to "enhance" the number of >>TICKS!
bRAVO - LERONLIMAB !!
Now this is based on what I've read/heard/discovered BUT YOU must perform your OWN "due diligence!"
So consider ALL, IMO!
***
Alas, Leronlimab is "out of the Covid Competition" as the VACs battle it out.
Another victim of the vacs wars -
americanmilitarynews.com/2024/05/covid-vaccine-causing-very-rare-and-dangerous-side-effect-pulled-worldwide/?mc_cid=66c7590758&mc_eid=1fbc7be438
In the meantime - how many folks now have to deal with a "new" serious problem thanks to this vaccine's side effects?
So my wife and I got both shots and a "booster" and I'm wondering what "other prizes are coming our way?
In retrospect, we both had significant "health changes" directly following the vaccinations.
"They'd never approve something that might 'mess us up', right?" Only later on did we begin to "relate" the timing of the vaccination and the resulting occurrences.
But nobody needs a vaccination if physicians have a potent treatment at their beck and call? Leronlimab.
But Leronlimab would "torpedo" this most excellent solution (think - lotsamoney for BP and potentially cyclical too [as the virus becomes a yearly event])
So we all (those "jabbed") await the eventual outcomes from those "JABations!"
"Oh golly, I'm so excited - what did I win?"
...And the deaths just keep on coming....and when will the numbers catch the eye of the DOJ?
You'd think >> Over a million dead. and how many could have been saved if certain "strategies" hadn't gone into play?
Like the organized obstruction of Leronlimab.
IMO
And a separate thought...a lot of "little fish" (usually the big fish slink away) will be caught and dealt with?
Lots!
LOL
(over a million 'slaughtered' and more given life-changing "alterations." Yeah, a lotta heads will "roll" (but not always the 'right' heads).
Again IMO
Seriously, the (as per your link) Japanese rebuttal of MRNA drugs from the US and results are alarming, and I believe some of the Scandinavian Countries are doing likewise?
Meanwhile we're being encouraged to get jabbed?
Is there anybody keeping track in the US...and what kinds of results are we seeing?
And in the reference to "turbo-cancers" via the Japanese information ...
Seeing supportive evidence in the US ?
And will Leronlimab ameliorate such?
Questions that deserve a answer that will answer to mankind - when reviewed in the future.
So you've "gotten the mRNA jab."
You might want to check out my former post #232305
(remember - my opinion)
And maybe you're lucky
OR
In reconsideration
You remember happenings shortly afterward but never considered a possible correlation.
between jab and whatever happened...
Going back " (My Take) "the presentation" suggests the mRNA seems to ineffectuate the immune system(s)...or does it only degrade it/them?
Either way ....
But I digress
Anyway, it would be GREAT if this was a "back to normal all gone" thing, but >>>It's -now-in- you"
Remember those nano-delivery particles employed...
Yeah, a lot of unknowns,
But society will reap what it has sown
Eeeeeek!
But fore-warned, which gives time to... your choice - it could all be BS.
And strictly my OPINION...not gospel
So do YOUR OWN RESEARCH!, please!
Monroe, Your second point:
". Japan says Sayonara: We need to do some trials in Japan! https://www.bitchute.com/video/9kRkv6T1NyCs/"
Caught my attention.
Loaded the site, watched and listened.
(There's always the concern of validity, but...)
The first 34 seconds says it all.
So went "hunting" - who is Masanori Fukushima?
Seems he IS a big deal in Japan
and
Dr. Fukushima doesn't "mince words!"
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1313524522796668
( Part of the overview)
"Dr. Masanori Fukushima, Professor Emeritus at Kyoto University, warns about vaccine harms to the Japanese Ministry of Health:
"The people who have the disease right now are not the ones who haven't been vaccinated, but the ones who have been vaccina…"
Monroe >>> Seems this is real and has some serious implications
Including a good reason Leronlimab has been thwarted thus.
But your item #1 - suggests hope.
And for Many (including my wife and I) - it may be our best last chance.
So it appears if you've "had the jabs," the game is "on."
We NEED Leronlimab as "another arrow in our quiver."
especially since it (supposedly) can cross the BBB.
All my opinion But check out the findings of Dr. Masanori Fukushima
And if you had the mRNA...hmmmm.
Yo Dudes
it appears
Leronlimab MIGHT
BUT
It DEPENDS on the situation!
Wanna-take-a-chance?
Right now - IT'S NOT EVEN AN OPTION! eEEEEEEEK!
Could be me...I want it okayed!
IMO
Golly Gee! This has been an experience. How not to run an effective purveyance of world-wide health!
What should take precedence? Profits or results
Want to guess which's winning?
Here at Leronlimab-world, we've watched, waited, winced, and been wailed, BUT We're not waiting!
If you're here and want to enhance the survival of yourself, your loved ones, friends, and future family...
You might want to "reconsider your position."
Turn off the TV/media/cell phone and truly consider the unique point we're at as People-Kind.
So many things are coming together simultaneously
Climate debacle
Over-population
A burgeoning "older population" and generally lower birth rates to support the older pop.
Declining resources
As our refuse and abuse change our lands, ever-warming oceans and environment into...
And - now gov't is accepting the presence of WTH (decided to go with _ What-To-Heck')s flying around, so far only watching us...When does the watching stop?
Maybe it's time to come TOGETHER and address these situations?
Or
lose yourself in your cell-phone
While cowering under the bed or a "bomb-proof school desk"
>>> a pleasantly stupid solution ...
IMO
Up to YOU
Locked away in various places the gentle humming of serious ultra-loooooow temp. Frig units.
Dwelling within >> numerous innocuously coded "containers"
"lab samples - property of -, contact dr. blahblahblah at 12342342341" or...
And - bundled toward the back ... they wait.
Where?
Almost assuredly in Brazil and the Philippines, but in some U.S. research labs as well as "samples" that went elsewhere
And...
You and I DON'T have access...
But stuff's not gonna' last forever...so
Reel the "BIG ONES in, while the stuff's still potent (or close to?)
***
Oh this isn't happening? You mean grand Aunt Ester and her fortune..., or the shah of WhattheHeck, etc. aren't getting "little bonuses?"
But But But But
You and me
The-way-it-goes:..Better enjoy the ride >> re: my late, best friend - there were only certain treatments allowed...none include Leronlimab. Some things work, some sort-of work, and then there's the others.
But learn a NEW ACRONYM - SOC = Standard of care (which sets limits to what is recommended, allowed - for YOU and ME).
At the same time wonder how Roger Stone (and others) got some for his ailing wife and was (evidently) quite open about it and the results.
And even today...it's probably for sale If you have SERIOUS cash and connections. The right person could liberate a package from one of those ULT freezers.
***
Like I said - it's NOT a cure-all, BUT it appears to have myriad known and potential applications (and as an adjuvant, even more).
AND
It COULD be available to ALL OF US…NOW.
And it should be!
IMO
And I'm not knocking the medical establishment, but I'm more concerned about extreme influence of the pharmaceutical industry for a few reasons: No 1# you could be our country's MOST VALUABLE RESOURCE.
Who doesn't want a long, more healthful life...all over the world?
And if you accept this premise - It's obviously time to "reconfigure" this industry in a more insightful manner.
A conversation for another day - but a cogent one!
Considering the source, genetics or environment would be the more likely cause of aberrations (re: the twins) rather than Leronlimab.
IMO
Considering the source, genetics or environment would be the more likely cause of aberrations rather than Leronlimab.
IMO
Whoa.... stopped to take a peak and WOW!
Looks like we're "knee-deep in the AYCE* club!"
They can cast aspersions
But Leronlimab's MOA (mechanism of action) and lack of "nasty " (so far) side-effects
Makes it (IMO) >>> "Golden"
And ...
First - BP KNOWS >> of Leronlimab's existence/potential mega-billion money maker [in their hands]/BUT potential SUBSTANTIAL threat to their drug lines if allowed to exist.
And a round of applause for the AYCE club spending their timmmmmmmmmmmmme here!
(Muffled applause dwindles out)
(and guess who supports the "AYCE-club presence" DUH!)
But sooner or later
There's "gonna be a 'leak in the dike" and the brotherhood/sisterhood of Big Pharma is going to 'fracture viciously as different entities spring to secure the profitable rights/licenses to Leronlimab's numerous applications both as a primary agent and as an adjuvant ( greatly multiplying potential applications).
Like tossing bloody meat into the piranha pool, LOL.
And...how far away is the moment?
the Juicy,pink meat
splashes in?
6mo? a year? 18mos? (the brotherhood of pharma is only annual report deeeeeeep.)
Some repugnant lawsuits and poor earnings could initiate a need for
Solidifying future income - the "new-big-hitter" on the drug-lineup.
>>...and then the fun begins.
Except
Very unfortunately,
the "AYCE club" will be
"pounding the pavement."
(Funny thought - many of them might be significant holders of shares - they're here all day, get to see some convincing info, and certainly track issue better than I can...
Hmmmm, maybe they're walking away with big smiles.
IRONY
IMO
*AYCE = acronym for All You Can Eat.
It's all about Leronlimab >> the drug and it's demonstrated and potential applications. Also it's minimal reputed side-effects.
Sorry - NOT a miracle drug "that will make the deaf to walk and the blind to hear again!"
(No flimflam!)
Suspiciously, LERONLIMAB might even be BETTER than we know >> otherwise <<< why would there be soooo much pressure against it?
(Good Question >>> Why are...)
Why are so many "grown-up (maybe) people" here daily to "nay-say" a penny-stock?
Duh, if it's worthless, you walk away...or... are your days so "worthless" as to spend them here?"
UNLESS this is ...perhaps...more than meets the eye...
Please - this is strictly my opinion >>>Please do YOUR OWN research./due diligence!
In some cases Leronlimab (or Leronmybud LL) will "carry the ball across the goal," (Especially where CCR5 is involved) but more frequently, it would be a valuable adjuvant. And the, so far, minimal negative side-effects... give it some interesting advantages.
And
Makes >> LL >>> A THREAT <<< to competing drugs carrying "heavy side-effect disadvantages."
So spin us a tale on ...HOW >>>Roger Stone get some LL for his wife with (reputedly) good results?
And it seems some other "biggies" got some.
But now >>> LL could gradually, become the Newest Drug. A drug that seems to support health by helping to counter chronic inflammation. But LL's not a magic bullet.
A lot of factors apply - like what are you're eating, breathing, sharing, and on and on, etc.
But Leronlimab, Leronmybud, is something I want available.
My Opinion totally!!
***
And, sorry big-bully Pharma. We could have been working together, but events have a path of their own,
Imagine
Leronlimab
Could be
Popping up
Leronmybud
And they have their own
"on-line Docs"
to do the scripts ;)
Always entirely my opinion - do your own research
Me skeptical?
And what IS happening with the "waste Leroonlimab?"
The "game is afoot," (an allusion to 'Sherlock Holmes').
Sure, they're going to just "flush >>> the ultimate new cure >> down the drain or the collective toilets in S. Korea?
Realllllly?
(And even if it's not a proven fact...makes a delicious rumor...suggesting the drug might suddenly "appear from afar.")
And the product and formula are totally gone or beyond analysis and replication? Right!!!!!
And Suddenly...
"Hello there"
It's your 'new friend'
Leronmybud!
Yeah, it's down there, to the left of bagged fortune cookies under, yeah, the counter full of "lucky bamboo." So, cash, card, or Dillo?
And big pharma is caught "stupidly standing" as the wonder drug becomes readily available from other sources.
***
I suspect >>>it's available right now...
But not for us.
***
All my opinion
Would you take a truckload of "hope Diamonds" and dump them in the deepest ocean...(without a net cleverly concealed)?
Hmmmm?
The pen-ultimate "Ha, ha?"
Our big pharma, after battering poor old CytoDyne (My opinion)" will be lost in the dust...
...And how many lives lost and families trashed? Will the real truth ever come to light? Anybody here for a while sees the constant "interference" CytoDyn contends with on the contentious path to approval...while - how many more needlessly suffer/die.
Will the architects of this "delay" ever be be brought to justice? Probably not in this world...but they may have an "interesting time" if there (think Easter) is a "beyond!"
IMO
Re: litigation against Nader and Kazempour/amarex. They are not equivalencies! They should be tried separately (IMO).
Yeah, Nader (as I've mentioned before) tried to keep this company viable then, toward the end, went "wild west" - to get what he could, while he could as CytoDyn began to founder. ...So somewhere between a million to maybe ten million? I don't know, but his family was (probably) "going down with this ship," and they rescued leronlimab from the trashbin - and I'm glad they did.
Which is PEANUTS COMPARED WITH THE DAMAGE DONE BY KAZEMPPUR AND AMAREX!
They were "laced onto this company like a skate!" Part of every move CytoDyn made.
Every move
Every move
Every step from design through execution to results to reporting such (LOL)
And thoroughly screwed us every step of the way. Was this what they were SUPPOSED to do? Who proposed this "marriage of CytoDyn and Amarex?" two companies led by ethnic Iranians - a match made in heaven...or hell?
In any case,,,
Pourhassan -< 10 million
Kazempour/Amarex > How many millions lost OR MORE IMPORTANTLY >> HOW MANY BILLIONS NOT MADE?
These are NOT EQUIVALENCIES separate and treat them as such!
In My Opinion!!
Thank YOU!
I'm largely distracted "elsewhere" (and at my advanced age...not hard to figure where) but try to follow the progress of leronlimab, when time permits.
Hadn't seen this elsewhere and am disappointed that I'm not receiving notice of such announcements!
So, I appreciate your message sharing the text of CytoDyn's announcement to shareholders!
With appreciation,
Learning53
Thank you ;)
As mentioned "cogitate"
www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/worlds-50-largest-pharmaceutical-companies/
Or (suggestion) go "meta."
(Regrettably, such a powerful concept "purloined")
the compulsion to drop some bread-crumbs is intense... but like intermittent fasting - one must look at, savor at a distance but move on.
And Leronlimab might be a fine exemplar of a different "conceptualization"...there's today's breadcrumb (succumbed to temptation, LOL)
IMO
***
Time, time, TIME!!!!! Is of the essence! the "nimble, multiple fingers" of the BP fraternity frantically burning the midnight oil to replicate a patentable "similar" to Leronlimab. CytoDyn has already demonstrated (enough) and we're not dealing with "lame brains." If they weren't as concerned, we wouldn't experience all the extraordinary counter-measures impeding Leronlimab's acceptance. I'm questioning the standard wisdom of calmly following the myriad steps to "prove" leronlimab effective by FDA standards...to eke out an eventual (and YOU don't expect further roadblocks?) approval.
A process dedicated to incinerating time we don't have!
I am NOT dissing Dr. J, but suggest an alternate strategy:
>benefitting by" throwing a juicy piece of raw meat to a wolf."
Pick out a tempting "indication," limit the damage by enlisting Sidley Austin to legally confine/define the usage/grant, and offer it at a pittance to its actual value. Right now the BP fraternity have obviously banded together to "stonewall" Leronlimab's progress.
But...there's probably a member of the BP crowd facing a faltering drug line-up and less than delicious balance sheet, which might be willing to "break the chain," with sufficient motivation!
Which is the weakest link...?
Here's the map: www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/worlds-50-largest-pharmaceutical-companies/
***
By the way - the graphic suggests another provocative idea. "Cogitate"
***
Throw the designated target a juicy (but limited) indication and let them revel in their unexpected profits after they gain almost immediate acceptance with their buddies at the FDA... resulting in a Leronlimab approval further creating an avenue for off-label usages.
To wit..Envious BP members, noticing, might be clamoring for another "toss of the red meat," but this time (having gained their attention) at more equitable terms to CytoDyn.
In other words >> use BP as our initial mechanism for approval...and save some really "juicy chunks" for the folks - "longs" here.
If we "diddle about" they'll move on without us, so let's use the greed of BP to "Break the blockade!"
***
For a long time we've been the chicken running into a wall...perhaps its time to consider "using" BP to our own ends, by joyously opening the cage to "use us."
***
Let's fracture the bond that binds, as others envy a a billion dollar addition to a competitor's bottom line while they stood there, arms linked, and statuesque >>> "they let the prize be swiped from under their nose by a "brother company."
Use their greed against them.
Time for Dr. J to "have some fun."
IMO
IMO and LOL
Since the Subject is Leronlimab
Is the inconspicuous worthy of my limited time?
Obvious
But >>thankyoufor << refining the construct.
Unfortunately, do not have the dialogs immediately at hand, but...
This is, indeed, a pivotal point, but Nader was being fed a line by (I think) Dhodi, that the work was almost completed (though, turns out, it was far from being in any form to submit)
NP, in his Podcasts(?) often referred to the great work done by the folks at Amarex (sort of like "good old boys" - wasn't Kazem a fellow Iranian?), I believe they had Nader completely "snowed." I sincerely believe Nader was not complicit, but unable to interpret the results on his own, he trusted the Amarex folks that it was very close to completion and to "send it in." Instead of dotting some i's and crossing some t's it was a disaster. It was corporately suicidal to submit this......"SUPPOSEDLY almost completed " report.
Nader may have "bought the farm,"
BUT
AMAREX owns this!
There's further data worth reviewing. I'm not absolving NP of all woes, but there's bigger fish to net here. And unless constrained - has wheels...
In my opinion - based on my reading, though not positive the liason's name was Dhodi - you' have to look back on earlier podcasts, but Nader appeared to have great faith that the folks at Amarex knew what they were doing and did it well....Surprise! Guess Not!
All in my opinion and based on my evaluation and memory of readings from that time
Funny thing - the influence of a (??????) CRO is pivotal. The CRO has a unique "intimacy" with planning, designing goals/levels, screenings, the trial as well as its administration, and collections, statistics, evaluation, reporting, etc. So CytoDyn is laid bare to a CRO...and if it did its job properly - Leronlimab may have scored numerous approvals. Amarex did its part, retarding Leronlimab's progress.
But it'll be awhile...time...that's the key.
Leronlimab is threatening now, but given time...BP will "diddle" the formula sufficiently to simulate some of the key effects/results.* Then creating competing patents, BP will overpower the markets with their massive promotional budgets.
Time.
*To me - all the hoopla sounded good, but figures can be diddled and conclusions biased (Note Dr. Fauci's assessment of Remdesivir), but
For me
The real trial - was one that couldn't reasonably be "diddled."
A doctor in the Philippines, (Dr. Richard "Randy" Nicolas - hope I got that right), who must have been researching "possibilities" acquired some for a locally famous religious leader ( as reported on Philippines media). Afterward the Covid stricken former president of the Philippines, after all else failed, recovered after receiving Leronlimab. But then, with the Chinese contesting Philippines territorial waters (and being out-gunned), Manilla decided it needed Bro-America and with it came the baggage. So ultimately, it seems only the rich (reputedly Philippines Airlines CEO - type) folks paid for it. But it wasn't on the public agenda.
Other relevant evidence, to me, are some personal accounts from folks on this board, and anecdotal records from doctors utilizing Leronlimab successfully with numerous patients (some published) are quite encouraging.
While probably the raw data is hopefully accurate, sometimes the results suggest the basic trial designs were flawed. Were these designed to fail? I guess Austin Sidley will figure that out...
If Leronlimab has only mild adverse effects, is anti viral, mitigates chronic inflammation, crosses the blood-brain barrier and modulates inflammatory responses there as well...
Bingo >>I want a periodic tune-up! Also I'm not crazy what might enter via the CCR5" portal...some nasties sneak in but - (yes, only supposedly) >> Leronlimab limits access and tends to thwart various negatives.
Yes, I'll do a few sessions - one a week for maybe a month - think medicare will pay? Probably save a lot of $$$$ for them in the long run!!!
My opinion only
Trying to remember the correct trial, but surprisingly folks in the "target group" had far fewer "negative outcomes" in parameters not officially being trialed.
Possible interpretation: While we're assessing Leronlimab's effect upon one area/process/outcome...the stuff goes throughout the whole body and may adjust chronic inflammation to some degree, in a positive manner." Or they spent the test time at a closely monitored "health resort." <<< admittedly ludicrous.
>>Also THIS IS MY OPINION - NOT ADVICE!!! Do your own homework. We're all different so what might be good for me could make your left arm fall off!
Yeah. I accept NO RESPONSIBILTY for your decisions!
Pourhassan/Kazempour (IMO) this linkage is a travesty! Who or what generated this "bundling?" Convenience? Or an attempt to mitigate Kazempour/Amarex's exposure to massive judgements in its derailmment of Leronlimab. Was Kazempore's sacrificial "patsy-dom" to save BP from the spectre of Leronlimab? Because it did!
***
Nader Pourhassan PhD., (NP) Was a newbie to America - the Land where a man could make something of himself (or something along those lines). A newbie who (I believe earned their degree in Mechanical engineering?) yet used the family resources to purchase, guide and drive Leronlimab into the great American success story - NOT.
The guy was headstrong, committed, creative, and communicative, but ran into a wall! And, to me, it appears he went (especially toward the end of his reign) a bit "wild west" (possibly to save/recoup) in his attempts to limit his own misfortunes, as "the writing on the wall," Read boldly - "NO WAY IN HELL FOR YOU TO SUCCEED!"...or to put it nicely, suggested he WOULD NOT BRING LERONLIMAB TO MARKET! He's already paid a price - look at his pictures - this ride has cost and will cost him financially.
..
I appreciate his sacrifice and give him credit FOR REALLY TRYING TO GET LERONLIMAB TO MARKET >> HERE, AND IN THE PHILIPPINES, BRAZIL... He probably drove BP a bit crazy and imagine they had to pull some "interesting strings" to stave off his valiant attempts outside of the US!
AND - While he doesn't get the middle cross - perhaps one to either side is merited.
To put it simply:
Leronlimab is a drug I want AVAILABLE! NOW!
And not from "the Ebenezer Scrooge bean-counters of BP!" I want it from CytoDyn, from those that stood by and supported this drug to save lives without the tragic potential side effects of many drugs on the market! Strangely, NP almost scored, but now he will pay for his daring.
***
Kazempour and Amarex were a key deterrent to the acceptance of Leronlimab (Pouhassan's baby). Like a lamphrey, it sucked the blood out of CytoDyn, befouling the process and was a key operator in stanching Leronlimab's progress and did it from within. As CRO (Contract Research Organization), it was party to every move by CytoDyn and managed to trash the company's progress, screw up the trials and results, exhaust it's funds, and give it garbage in return. While CytoDyn is "bashed" from without, a cancer called Amarex was making sure Leronlimab went nowhere from within!
Meanwhile, over a million died from Covid, and how many more from other "indications" that appear to be positively manipulated by Leronlimab? Of course the full picture is unavailable due to the magnificent efforts of Kazempour and Amarex to befuddle Leronlimab's results.
***
Nader Pourhassan, Ph D. I salute your valiant efforts! I give you extreme credit for trying against extraordinary odds, to bring Leronlimab to market. But BP outmaneuvered you/us from without and from within...not your fault. I guess the "American Dream." is just that (in the current scene) >> just a dream.
I hope you survive the upcoming inquisition.
Suggestion: Get your attorney to separate you from Kazempour/Amarex the folks that brought you/us down! (My opinion) they're using YOU to "blur judgement." Dude, you were trying to do something GOOD and damn near did! Wishing you well.
Kazempour/Amarex perfidy deserve a different level of response or is "the fix" already in?
Go Sidley Austin! Make Nader's dream come true.
IN MY OPINION!
And as Always - strictly my opinion
Tmac20, your out-of-hand dismissal, was indeed disappointing. You do not inhabit my copious "ignore" list, due to a display of occasional cogency.
So - if faced with Misiu 143's situation...(considering your immersion here)...
I wonder which course YOU'd "steer" ?
"To Leronlimab or not to leronlimab" ?
(Hopefully, you're never faced with such a dire "situation.")
Strictly my opinion, as always
...And no answer required - course of action reveals all.
Good night Little Jazzy, sweet dreams, and by the time your really need it, perhaps Leronimab might be approved for your use
Though you fought it,
all,
the way,
You LOST!
Lucky you.
Don't forget your blankey...LOL
Delicious - So Jazzy's essentially mirthful and of little, too no consequence.
Thank you.
Agree >> lack of credulity, seconded.
***
Portentous timing...
The Arrival of the (If I may be so bold) supposedly "white-knight" of scam blasting. Or is that a "cover?"
We've endured so many obstacles, you might >>> possibly <<< be the latest.
But...
Finally, we have a leader who "knows" Leronlimab and is steering a course, some Pharma entities might find threatening to "drug line-ups."
Further, a serious cash settlement might re- ignite CytoDyn/Leronlimab's progress...and to some>> that's "VERY NAUGHTY."
And behold
"Poof" a flash of light
and
Janice arrives.
(To me the BIG question is >> Are you looking for some outrageous scam or creating barriers to benefit BP?")
So
Please investigate!
Peek under every rock and log, but don't forget to look "without" (outside). You'll eventually discover >> this isn't some crazy scam to defraud investors of their hard-earned cash. But Leronlimab is a drug with usages (with minimal reported side-effects) that should be "brought to the fore!"
In fact, you might discover the "real workings of the beast." Big Pharma works for Big Pharma - its all about wealth first, and somewhere the public good comes in... waaay... farther down the list.
For that reason, Leronlimab has been embattled every step of the way.
If I'm partially accurate >>you and I are (To be polite) older folk. The days of youth are (regrettably) in the rear view mirror. At this point in our lives, our bodies are not the "well;oiled machines" of our thirties. We are prone to some dysregulation and points of chronic inflammation. Beside Leronlimab's modulation of the CCR5 receptor, its ability to modulate some key immunological processes, suggests its ability to help deal with inflammatory "situations." And it can "cross" the blood-brain Barrrier. Wow.
There's some serous reasons that Leronlimab is "scary." to BP >> But (no this is not a magic potion), it won't cure everything, but (from those utilizing it) appears to have minimal and/or only short term side effects, but amazingly useful.
While loved ones slip into decline, it's frustrating (a mild word) when leronlimab, the drug, with the potential to halt or reverse that descent, is at hand, but inaccessible.*
And perhaps Jazzy might look significantly smarter in motley, LOL.
If interested in "the joke" (as this post was just "termed" by poster Janice Shell)? djjazzyjeff (post 228985) on January 11th, 2024 at 6:57 PM
"Jazzy" is "further explaining his monetary reward structure in response to dOlphintOm (post 228981)
***
In my estimation - Jazzy brings little to this table, generally preferring to pick up the lead from others as Jazzy further rehashes, well rehashed conversations.
Strangely - Jazzy isn't known for jocularity and hasn't shown a significant understanding re: Leronlimab's facets...i.e. >> MOA/indications/function/minor reactions/trials/no-sever-reactions/potential as a adjuvant/results/etc.
Jazzy ...a messenger of mirth? ...Really
***
Thank you for sharing >>> your <<< evaluation.
IMO
Janice >>> DJjazzyjeff post 228985 -whadduhyah say? ...It appears one of this board's "luminaries" posted a glimpse into their activities and remuneration for such (which probably what many would term "bashing").
Is this a lie (suggesting the veracity of the poster is at best questionable) or a tacit admission of employment (directly or indirectly) to undermine CYDY?
Janice >> your "ruling?"
IMO.
So "an esteemed challenger" presents its views - but BEHOLD it's only a "garbage cannon" gush.
More of a character attack than sharing any iota of discussion re: Leronlimab.
Wants to engage on "trivia>"
This is a Life/death situation.
And we ALL will live/die at a particular moment
THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS
Leronlimab may prevent some deaths (depending upon their source),
But we all go and HOW is a decent concern.
My best friend of over fifty years expired recently. But as a best friend - he left me some
"interesting hints"
And being older than him..."thank you!!!"
Sincerely
I seek to have some control over my exit...and will.
He had the "benefit of some of our latest cancer drugs and (his opinion) went through hell.
I choose not to be a "lab rat."
***
-ccl
Since, cutting to the quick, Leronlimab has the power to modulate the CCR5/CCL5 receptor process AND help to modulate certain key immunological processes is great. Unfortunately, it is a "magic" in certain ( while important) limited realms. Still if INFLAMMATION is a key concern in most physical deterioration, then Leronlimab has a significant role.
It will help, but it does (In my opinion) NOT impart immortality.
But WE are INFINITELY better with Leronlimab than without
IMO
Been assessing a few more posts and see some, thus far, non-critical responses to "the loyal (? $?) Leronlimab? opposition."
So: Kindly read a significant change to what I wrote, to wit.
"...JS's posts SOLELY "targeting" proponents..."
should be changed to :
" ...JS's posts PRIMARILY "targeting" proponents..."
IN THE MEANTIME
A bit unclear, but the aforementioned CEO - appears to refer to Nader.
"Carry on,"
IMO
Monroe, You're just TOO precious! Taking your valuable time to swat gnats.
But I relish the information you, misiu143, others "bring to the table."
Forget Cytodyn - it's all about Leronlimab.
I
WANT
IT
AVAILABLE!
Admittedly, its not a "magic potion," but it has utility (due to its MOA) on a number of currently NASTY - to-untreatable "situations."
So, I'm still here with only a tiny investment (retired teacher - didn't earn the big bucks), but it's a good place to be
(IMO)
But having fun listening to the "crunch" of these cockroaches under your (?) thick-soled sandals.
Rock on!
Bulls-eye (or cow's-eye)!! >>> Identification >>> JS's posts SOLELY "targeting" proponents of Leronlimab
While ignoring the ludicrous and repetitious diatribes of those opposing the progress of Leronlimab and verbal barrages aimed at Leronlimab's supporters.
Therefore >> Neutrality - doubtful (and ..that's a shame. I held some hope.)
Kudos - Polarity Delineated!
***
On the plus side...People spending time here
(even Leronlimab's harshest critics)
if reading carefully and evaluating the information exchanged,
will be exposed to data that may
>>>
Help them save their own lives, and the lives of those they love.*
And to that end - KUDOS TO THOSE POSTERS WHO SHARE RELEVANT INFORMATION ON THIS SITE!!!!!
*It appears to have already happened a few times.
IMO :)
FWIW according to Janice >> you don't exist.
Yo "Home Team"
This person may have "stumbled into here"
With an
Open
Mind.
What a novelty.
I haven't put Janice on "ignore" yet.
And to Janice - We have some REALLY GOOD PEOPLE HERE!
(and you'll soon discern the "ignores", LOL
To Janice, You may have noticed our "welcoming committee" wasn't here to greet you.
And you've already discerned this is a fairly partisan board. Perhaps you've entered a situation unencountered?
While it may seem (the "HOME TEAM" ...Yay Leronlimab) are deluded paranoids, it's a learned behavior. And unlike orcs, unicorns, and other imaginary "thingees" >>> "bashers" do exist and make a (Paltry?) living in "mom's basement" (interesting mental picture). I saved (somewhere) the post of one bragging about the pay structure…I have most on ignore, to focus on more meaningful posts.
But at the same time you'll get glimmers of reality re: marionette agencies (the FDA, CDC, NIH are struggling with the massive financial influence ot those they seek to "regulate"). And then, just as Dr Jay (many regard as a serious “WHITE HAT! God guy) you arrive at Lerolimab’s door.
Must mean JTF and some of our other “basher regulars” are not living up to expectations, and just as Leronlimab is finally “turning the corner,” they’re sending in the “A-TEAM!”
And BING0 >>> BEHOLD Janice Shell and
Leronlimab - sort of a "klutzy - nowhere" name, but having extraordinary potential as it modulates immune factors and moulates access to a key entry point...CCR5.
(No claims to being a bio-chemist, but I believe this is accurate, and if I'm not Misiu 143, will point me in the right direction. (Yeah, she studies this stuff and has had "up-close-and-personal experience)).
And you’ve already “locked horns” with Monroe… But
Like I mentioned…you may be a “different” newbie (other than a replacement basher or worse).
Youre in a “good place.”
You’re a bit younger than I am. When you have the “ear to the ground” some information goes through here that is contrary to the “Blather” AND THAT IS IMPORTANT. I have altered my/and family responses due to the information exchange this board offers…yes you have to “wade through a lot of garbage, but this board has ,in the past, probably saved several, and has made a serious difference in my life. And given the chance, Leronlimab due to its MOA (Mechanism of Action) will provide a serious new tool to health care…if…allowed. Right now it poses a serious threat to a number or current and pending product lineups in big Pharma. One of Leronlimab’s biggest threats is it’s lack of significant side effects.
So take it…and even if it doesn’t work for you, it doesn’t “trash other organs/structures.
Anyway….this is subject to my incomplete understanding(s).
Welcome.
IMO
Janice Shell, welcome.
Volunteering your time...especially during Covid Craziness where medical staff were going down too...
Thank YOU!
Can't say >>I did that.
..And our insipient BP decided to "mess with Mother Nature." re: the Dr. Martin presentations to the EU parliament. Our vaccines can't hope to compete with the virus' viral permutations. Meanwhile, the vaccines appear to possibly "have the potential to create serious problems." Perhaps these problems have been addressed, but ...
In any case - Mother Nature might wring out a real blockbuster on one of these "go-rounds" and I'm surely hoping leronlimab is available by that time!
Shouldn't mess with Mother Nature!
All - In My Humble Opinion
???hmmm...Hey any of you critics >>>volunteer?
Well, I CAN"T claim "moral superiority"
I've company... Nuff said