Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That’s what sucks about this stock.
Announcing a settlement could easily mean a 20x return overnight.
But this stock doesn’t look good in the short term. And it doesn’t look like there will be any settlement announcement in the short term. It’s just damn risky to sell cause you don’t want to miss out on 20x returns overnight, and it seems likely to get there in the long run if you just hold anyway. And maybe an announcement could come soon.
FML
He emailed Phelps, and that was the response. (I believe)
I will certainly bet on an AMZN split. Picking up some calls today.
I think AAPL and TSLA are splitting, not for normal reasons, but because they know the market will crash after the election, and a stock split will soften the blow when the market does crash.
If I’m correct about my reasoning, then AMZN will almost definitely do the same, I would imagine.
Did you email Phelps? Get a response?
Yea it will be interesting to see if Tesla still has a dominating lead in 5 years. Right now, nobody can compete. In the future, the gap should close, I agree. That is one of the reasons why I think they’re extremely overvalued. Of course, their earnings numbers correspond to a much lower valuation.
There is a very important argument, though, for why Tesla will hold its #1 spot for a very long time, and that’s due to their lead in data. No other company comes close to the data that Tesla has recorded (22.5 billion miles so far). And yes, that data is extremely valuable and it will keep Tesla in the lead for a while (not forever).
Def possible.
But I think TSLA won’t crash until the market crashes. And I personally believe the market crash is coming after the election, not before. Trump won’t let it crash before.
You’re looking at meaningless statistics.
Who cares what percent of the overall car market they have? They are ruling the EV market, and the EV market as a whole is growing rapidly each year.
As long as the EV market continues to grow, Tesla will be in good shape. And with prices of batteries coming down, the EV market will definitely continue to grow. Without a doubt.
Tesla also has a huge data advantage over all of their competition which will likely keep them #1 for a long time.
Only problem I see with the company is they are way overvalued. And Musk is a POS of a person.
Still, strong company IMO, and the things you are claiming show how uneducated you are about TSLA.
Their battery costs are about to go down substantially. Profitability will not be a concern for them in the future.
I don’t own shares here, but you clearly have no idea what you’re talking about IMO.
That’s quite a bold claim.
What does WDC have to do with NLST?
I would imagine that they need to find a way to get him to sell. I guess they can’t force him, but maybe they can work out a deal.
But if they did work out a deal, I guess he wouldn’t be selling on the open market.
No idea.
I wonder if Iliad Research is being forced to sell his 45m shares into the open market? Anybody have any idea?
I’m wondering that since the annual report said that Finra didn’t approve the R/S because of Iliad / John Fife.
Someone is definitely selling a lot of shares, and the O/S has been stuck at 457m shares for a long time now, so I don’t see how it can be dilution.
Oh, you’re saying WDC has down guidance? Who cares? What’s your point?
Are you going to post a link for down guidance? If not, then post something that states where you’re getting your information from.
Otherwise I doubt it’s true.
Depends on if the new company will be able to uplist or not IMO.
And also, “this is the worst I’ve ever seen”...then you haven’t seen a single share selling scam, because they are much much worse. There are many companies that have done 3 or 4 or more reverse splits in only 5 years.
Look at RNVA, TOPS, DRYS, DCTH. All share selling scams. Insane dilution, multiple reverse splits (you can check split history).
IMUN’s dilution is nothing at all compared to those share selling scams (because IMUN is not a share selling scam IMO). Those companies stock price have gone from $10m+ (or worse) per share to .0001 per share when all the R/S’s have been factored in.
IMUN’s O/S went from 455m to 457m in over 12 months (which is basically nothing). And IMUN still has never had a reverse split. Those share selling scams will go from 15m O/S to 6b O/S in one year, then do their 4th R/S in 5 years, and then do it all over again the next year. While IMUN didn’t even add 1% to their O/S in the past 12 months.
They will certainly need 750m shares post R/S.
They have I think 14m in debt. (I didn’t recheck the 10-k before writing that so I could be off). If the plan is to fully convert all debt to equity and have a new company with a new ticker that is debt free after the R/S, then I’m sure they will need close to the 750m authorized to fully convert all debt to equity.
They’re capping him at 3%. Can’t even give him 5%.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14289180&guid=_tFFUWRpjOp7ryh
Kevin.Phelps@immunetherapeutics.com
It didn’t even happen yet.
He’s basically saying “if this bullish thing that could potentially happen, does indeed happen, then the stock may look bullish”
Before the pandemic hit, when I used to play a lot of live poker, we would laugh at people who had poker conversations in that manner - “fantasy poker” players.
“If the 3 clubs came on the turn, I would’ve beat you for so much”.
“Yea, but the K of diamonds was coming on the river, and I would’ve stacked you.”
Just saw 2m on the Bid for a second too. Gone now. I don’t have access to the L2 now, away from my computer.
2m on the Ask @.025 a minute ago, now it’s gone. Honestly, if someone wants to sell that many, they should know to break it up into smaller blocks. But it’s gone now, so who knows what they’re doing.
I just wish I knew who is scooping them up.
Anybody on this board buy yesterday?
I haven’t added for maybe 3 months or more, and most likely will never add again.
So you can’t actually identify what misinformation you were referring to?
And by the way, this stock is making lower highs and lower lows. That’s not a good thing.
People talk trash on literally every single board, means nothing. I used to talk trash on this board, and look what happened - the stock has gone down.
You have nothing to back up that claim. Just like you ignored my last question, because you have no answer.
But I’d certainly be interested in hearing you back up your claim with a link, so go ahead.
“Misinformation on Regulatory, and MM here.”
What misinformation are you referring to exactly?
This is the link I used to figure over 1/2 million...
https://www.fda.gov/industry/prescription-drug-user-fee-amendments/standard-costs-thousands-dollars-components-process-review-human-drug-applications
My point is that anyone claiming “smoke and mirrors” or shell company is making an illogical claim.
If Cytocom spent over 1/2 million on an INDA, then yes, I’m sure they issued new shares. And I’m sure those shares went to insiders. No smoke and mirrors. Not a shell.
I disagree with your statements regarding shell and smoke and mirrors.
The O/S increased only 2 million shares from 455m to 457m in something like a 15-18 month period. And Cytocom just spent over half a million dollars on an INDA - this is a cost that CANNOT be put in common shareholders as it’s Cytocom’s cost. Because they’re private, they can’t just sell shares to put the cost on common shareholders. That is money spent by the company with the sole purpose of getting drug approval. No chance the purpose was to sell shares. Hence, your claim makes no sense. But you say smoke and mirrors? So tell me how the O/S only increased 2m shares in something like 1.5 years? Shell? After they just spent over 1/2 million on an INDA? That makes no sense.
Your claim was 20m shares @.31. That’s a very specific claim with specific numbers. If you can’t link where THOSE EXACT NUMBERS came from, then you just made it up and what you said was false.
So I’ll ask again - do you have a link that states anything with these numbers?
How do you know that there’s a good chance they meet this week to start negotiations?
I don’t have PM so can’t respond to your question via PM. But the answer to your question is No (luckily No - because I was thinking about it). Perhaps some day the answer will be Yes.
Skip’s will mail you the LDN I mean, not the prescription.
IMUN actually did have over 100k revenue in 2018 in Africa.
And maybe like 16k total revenue in the few years before that, although it’s not clear which country that revenue came from.
They had no revenue in 2019 and have no revenue in 2020 so far.
It’s generic. Even though there are patented rights for different uses of the drug.