Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh, I see. Yea, it’s clear that they are downplaying everything IMO, so I wouldn’t expect them to pump it up until they can’t hide it any longer. So I would never expect them to release internal results earlier than required.
If they begin clinical trials, it has to be on clinicaltrials.gov (private or not makes no difference in this case)...so there may be some truth to what you’re saying, but the public will still know if they’ve begun trials.
$2.27m round of funding on July 20th.
https://tracxn.com/d/companies/cytocom.com
Must be getting paid IMO.
All I said was the stock was overvalued at 1000 P/E and he called me dumb and stupid and 5 other bad names. 7 attacks in 7 messages in 2 days, and Admin doesn’t throw this guy in the jailhouse and teach him how to act appropriately? He’s gonna keep breaking the rules if you don’t show him that there are any consequences. Unreal.
“How I roll” is I speak the truth.
This stock is the most overvalued stock in the world in terms of $ amount, and it is also the most overvalued stock in the world in terms of % if you only look at companies with market caps over $50B (I think).
Not bashing. Just speaking the truth.
If you reread my post from yesterday, I said it’s possible that a 100 P/E ratio could be fair for TSLA. And that’s a very very high number. I think 100 could be fair, partially because of the future potential in energy.
If you think 1000 P/E is fair (less now), that is irrational thinking.
I never assigned it a value of zero. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Irrational = holding on to an overvalued stock after the CEO announces a $5b share offering.
What did I say that was irrational?
They don’t have anything proprietary.
For electric cars, however, they have a huge data advantage (22 billion miles?) which will keep them in the lead for at least 5 years from now.
But they don’t have any competitive advantage in energy. And no profits in that industry as of yet. Correct me if I’m wrong. So I don’t see how you can add a huge number to their valuation from the energy sector, at least not at this point in time.
Earnings only thing that matters. If you think revenues matter, you are incorrect.
Funny how you call me dumb for something that you are wrong about.
I’m blocking you. I can’t waste any more time explaining things to irrational posters.
You can’t fix irrational.
I reached my 15 post maximum yesterday actually.
I don’t know the answer to your question. Neither do you.
I didn’t call the million mile battery a pipe dream. Don’t put words in my mouth to falsely win an argument, thanks.
I am in full agreement that TSLA is the leader in the electric car industry.
As far as energy, they deserve something for future earnings, but as of now, they have not even come close to taking the lead in that industry.
I think TSLA is a great company. Just extremely overvalued.
If you are trying to prove a point, THE BURDEN IS ON YOU to provide links and even quotes from your links that prove your points. You haven't done that, because there is nothing out there that proves your point. JUST IRRATIONAL GIBBERISH coming from an irrational poster IMO.
Here you go, here's some reading for you that is RATIONAL.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/012815/how-does-short-selling-help-market-and-investors.asp
Instead of answering my questions, you direct me to somewhere that doesn't answer my question. Because you don't have any answer, you just keep releasing irrational gibberish.
It doesn't matter because TSLA earnings in the energy sector are NEGATIVE and they have not established themself as the leader in any industry except electric cars.
If you want to add 100's of billions to their valuation because of the possibility of leading the energy sector in the future, well, you are just irrationally speculating IMO.
I don't think you understand the importance of shorting if you think someone is evil for opening a short position, and why it is needed to maintain fair markets (even though our markets are clearly still not fair).
You are just repeating Musks words obviously, without anything to back it up, just like a true cultist would do.
But I'll entertain your argument (illogical argument), and I'll ask you to clarify...
What exactly is evil about betting that a stock goes down (as opposed to betting that it goes up)? Rational answers only please.
No, I don't consider just car sales. If I considered only car sales, I wouldn't give it a P/E ratio higher than 15.
I was EXTREMELY EXTREMLY generous giving it a P/E ratio of 100, which is by the way extremely ridiculous for a P/E ratio. But with the future potential of the company , MAYBE MAYBE MAYBE 100 P/E MIGHT be fair, at best.
15 P/E ratio puts TSLA at a $6B company. I was extremely generous giving it a $40B valuation.
I have no position.
Funny thing is you insult me RATHER than simply disputing my facts that I've stated. EXACTLY like Trump does. That's cause you have no rational response, obviously.
Can't win the argument in a rational manner? No problem, just insult the guy, just like a Trumpster would do.
Keep buying stocks with 1000 P/E ratio, see how far it takes you.
You call me stupid, but you think 1000 P/E ratio is fair?
I won’t even stoop to your level to insult you back. I’ll just laugh at how naive you are.
And they also had to pay 7500 less employees.
30 P/E ratio would give a valuation of $12B.
But I do believe Tesla is a clear leader in their industry, so I think while they still have plenty of room to grow, a 100 P/E ratio MIGHT be fair. Maybe.
That’s a $40B company.
It ran up on a short squeeze. Could still go higher, but will eventually crash hard when the market crashes (probably after elections).
Haha, I need to do math?
Q2 earning were 100m.
That is on pace for $400m earning annually.
If you think TSLA’s valuation is justified, you think that a 1000 P/E ratio is a fair valuation?
And I need to do math?
If TSLA was $100k per share, you still wouldn’t sell IMO.
I’d ask you if you can justify the current valuation, but I already know that you cannot.
Why did you ignore my last question? That was not a friendly thing to do (as opposed to what you're doing now which is friendly).
$IMUN
Or maybe he was with the company at the end of 2019, and not now, I don’t know.
They just published that amendment a few days ago, so he should still be there I would guess.
You could always email Phelps and ask him. He seems to be pretty good about responding it seems.
He's still there in the 10-k/A that was just released, on page 58/59...
It’s a short squeeze. The company is not worth $400b.
They had $100m profit last quarter.
Both of you were so friendly to us with your "GM IMUN", but then both of you just ignore the question when I ask "When is the R/S going to be?"....that's pretty unfriendly. You could've at least responded with a "I have no idea".
Why were you so friendly before, but now you don't want to help anybody by answering any questions? Weird.
When is the R/S going to be?
Yea I imagine Lodonal is no more, and Lotrexon is the new trademark name. Not sure if it’s the exact same formulation or not.
You don’t want to say when the R/S is going to be?